Literature DB >> 30324428

Accurate Age Determination for Adolescents Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Hand and Wrist with an Artificial Neural Network-Based Approach.

Fuk Hay Tang1,2, Jasmine L C Chan3, Bill K L Chan3.   

Abstract

This study proposes an accurate method in assessing chronological age of the adolescents using a machine learning approach using MRI images. We also examined the value of MRI with Tanner-Whitehouse 3 (TW3) method in assessing skeletal maturity. Seventy-nine 12-17-year-old healthy Hong Kong Chinese adolescents were recruited. The left hand and wrist region were scanned by a dedicated skeletal MRI scanner. T1-weighted three-dimensional coronal view images for the left hand and wrist region were acquired. Independent maturity indicators such as subject body height, body weight, bone marrow composition intensity quantified by MRI, and TW3 skeletal age were included for artificial neural network (ANN) analysis. Our results indicated that the skeletal age was generally underestimated using TW3 method, and significant difference (p < 0.05) was noted for skeletal age with chronological age for female category and at later stage of adolescence (15 to 17 years old) in both genders. In our proposed machine learning approach, ages determined by ANN method agreed well with chronological age (p > 0.05).The machine learning approach using ANN method was about 10-fold more accurate than the TW3 method using MRI alone. It offers a more objective and accurate solution for prospective chronological maturity assessment for adolescents.

Keywords:  Artificial neural networks; Chronological age; Machine learning; Magnetic resonance imaging; Skeletal maturity

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30324428      PMCID: PMC6456634          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-018-0135-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  19 in total

1.  Age determination by magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist in adolescent male football players.

Authors:  Jiri Dvorak; John George; Astrid Junge; Juerg Hodler
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2006-10-04       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  TW2 and TW3 bone ages: time to change?

Authors:  M Lynn Ahmed; Justin T Warner
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  Training feedforward networks with the Marquardt algorithm.

Authors:  M T Hagan; M B Menhaj
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Netw       Date:  1994

4.  Automatic bone age assessment based on intelligent algorithms and comparison with TW3 method.

Authors:  Jian Liu; Jing Qi; Zhao Liu; Qin Ning; Xiaoping Luo
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 4.790

5.  MRI of the wrist is not recommended for age determination in female football players of U-16/U-17 competitions.

Authors:  P M Tscholl; A Junge; J Dvorak; V Zubler
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 4.221

6.  Computerized Bone Age Estimation Using Deep Learning Based Program: Evaluation of the Accuracy and Efficiency.

Authors:  Jeong Rye Kim; Woo Hyun Shim; Hee Mang Yoon; Sang Hyup Hong; Jin Seong Lee; Young Ah Cho; Sangki Kim
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Correlation between dental maturation and chronological age in patients with cerebral palsy, mental retardation, and Down syndrome.

Authors:  P Diz; J Limeres; A F P Salgado; I Tomás; L F Delgado; E Vázquez; J F Feijoo
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  2010-11-30

8.  Secular changes in height, weight and body mass index in Hong Kong Children.

Authors:  Hung-Kwan So; Edmund A S Nelson; Albert M Li; Eric M C Wong; Joseph T F Lau; Georgia S Guldan; Kwok-Hang Mak; Youfa Wang; Tai-Fai Fok; Rita Y T Sung
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2008-09-21       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 9.  Bone age assessment methods: a critical review.

Authors:  Arsalan Manzoor Mughal; Nuzhat Hassan; Anwar Ahmed
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.088

10.  Comparison of TW2 and TW3 skeletal age differences in a Brazilian population.

Authors:  Ana Isabel Ortega; Francisco Haiter-Neto; Gláucia Maria Bovi Ambrosano; Frab Norberto Bóscolo; Solange Maria Almeida; Marcia Spinelli Casanova
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.698

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  How Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Is Assisting Us to Extract Meaning from Data on Bone Mechanics?

Authors:  Saeed Mouloodi; Hadi Rahmanpanah; Colin Martin; Soheil Gohari; Helen M S Davies
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

2.  Intelligent Bone Age Assessment: An Automated System to Detect a Bone Growth Problem Using Convolutional Neural Networks with Attention Mechanism.

Authors:  Mohd Asyraf Zulkifley; Nur Ayuni Mohamed; Siti Raihanah Abdani; Nor Azwan Mohamed Kamari; Asraf Mohamed Moubark; Ahmad Asrul Ibrahim
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-24

3.  A Novel Shorthand Approach to Knee Bone Age Using MRI: A Validation and Reliability Study.

Authors:  Blake C Meza; Scott M LaValva; Julien T Aoyama; Christopher J DeFrancesco; Brendan M Striano; James L Carey; Jie C Nguyen; Theodore J Ganley
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-08-11

4.  Salivary IGF-1 and Alkaline Phosphatase-Based Modeling for Skeletal Maturity Prediction in Orthodontic Patients.

Authors:  Asma Sookhakian; Maryam Zahed; Hamidreza Pakshir; Shabnam Ajami
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 5.  Current and emerging artificial intelligence applications for pediatric musculoskeletal radiology.

Authors:  Amaka C Offiah
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2021-07-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.