Literature DB >> 18835130

Automatic bone age assessment based on intelligent algorithms and comparison with TW3 method.

Jian Liu1, Jing Qi, Zhao Liu, Qin Ning, Xiaoping Luo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: New algorithms are proposed to improve the validity, accuracy and practicality of automatic bone age assessment (ABAA).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The concept of object-based region of interest (ROI) was proposed. Thirteen RUS (including radius, ulna and short finger bones) ROIs and seven carpal ROIs were appointed respectively according to Tanner-Whitehouse (TW3) method. Five features including size, morphologic features and fusional/adjacent stage of each ROI were extracted based on particle swarm optimization (PSO) and input into ANN classifiers. ANNs were built upon feed-forward multilayer networks and trained with back-propagation algorithm rules to process RUS and carpal features respectively. About 1046 digital left hand-wrist radiographs were randomly utilized half for training ANNs and the rest for ABAA after manual reading by TW3 method.
RESULTS: BA comparison between observers indicated that the S.D. of RUS BA was larger than that of carpal BA (S.D.=4.40, 2.42 respectively), but interestingly, both CVs were 4.0, and both concordance rates were very high (95.5% and 94.2%), and both differences between observers were not significant (both P>0.05). We found by comparison between results of ABAA and manual readings that RUS BA had larger S.D.s than carpal BA between two methods, but the CVs were very similar in the case of carpal BA<9 years and RUS BA>or=9 years (CV=3.0, 3.1 respectively), apart from a comparatively larger CV for RUS BA<9 years (CV=3.5). Both parts of ABAA system, RUS and carpal, had very high concordance rates (97%, 93.8% and 96.5%) and no significant difference compared with manual method (all P>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: PSO method made image segmentation and feature extraction more valid and accurate, and the ANN models were sophisticated in processing image information. ABAA system based on intelligent algorithms had been successfully applied to all cases from 0 to 18 years of bone age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18835130     DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2008.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph        ISSN: 0895-6111            Impact factor:   4.790


  13 in total

1.  A fuzzy-based growth model with principle component analysis selection for carpal bone-age assessment.

Authors:  Chi-Wen Hsieh; Tzu-Chiang Liu; Tai-Lang Jong; Chui-Mei Tiu
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Bone age assessment in young children using automatic carpal bone feature extraction and support vector regression.

Authors:  Krit Somkantha; Nipon Theera-Umpon; Sansanee Auephanwiriyakul
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Accurate Age Determination for Adolescents Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Hand and Wrist with an Artificial Neural Network-Based Approach.

Authors:  Fuk Hay Tang; Jasmine L C Chan; Bill K L Chan
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  A Deep Automated Skeletal Bone Age Assessment Model with Heterogeneous Features Learning.

Authors:  Chao Tong; Baoyu Liang; Jun Li; Zhigao Zheng
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 5.  How Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Is Assisting Us to Extract Meaning from Data on Bone Mechanics?

Authors:  Saeed Mouloodi; Hadi Rahmanpanah; Colin Martin; Soheil Gohari; Helen M S Davies
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

6.  A semi-automated method for bone age assessment using cervical vertebral maturation.

Authors:  Roberto S Baptista; Camila L Quaglio; Laila M E H Mourad; Anderson D Hummel; Cesar Augusto C Caetano; Cristina Lúcia F Ortolani; Ivan T Pisa
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  An artifacts removal post-processing for epiphyseal region-of-interest (EROI) localization in automated bone age assessment (BAA).

Authors:  Hum Yan Chai; Lai Khin Wee; Tan Tian Swee; Sh-Hussain Salleh; Lim Yee Chea
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 2.819

8.  Automated bone age assessment: motivation, taxonomies, and challenges.

Authors:  Marjan Mansourvar; Maizatul Akmar Ismail; Tutut Herawan; Ram Gopal Raj; Sameem Abdul Kareem; Fariza Hanum Nasaruddin
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 2.238

9.  Artificial intelligence system can achieve comparable results to experts for bone age assessment of Chinese children with abnormal growth and development.

Authors:  Fengdan Wang; Xiao Gu; Shi Chen; Yongliang Liu; Qing Shen; Hui Pan; Lei Shi; Zhengyu Jin
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  An Automated System for Skeletal Maturity Assessment by Extreme Learning Machines.

Authors:  Marjan Mansourvar; Shahaboddin Shamshirband; Ram Gopal Raj; Roshan Gunalan; Iman Mazinani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.