Purpose: The community-based participatory research approach has been identified as a great asset in reducing health disparities through the integration of community members in all phases of the research process. It is essential to provide skills to community members to achieve successful research partnerships. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of the community-based participatory research training curriculum for community members. Methods: Using mixed-methods, noncomparative design, eight workshops were developed and tested. Workshops covered topics such as community-based participatory research principles, health disparities, ethics in community-based participatory research, and fundamentals of research methodology. A total of 25 community leaders were trained. Pre-/post-test knowledge (unpaired t-test), retention rate, workshop satisfaction, and cognitive debriefing sessions were used to assess knowledge gained and acceptability and feasibility of the curriculum. Results: A retention rate of 100% and an average satisfaction of 92.68% were obtained. Preliminary effectiveness results indicate that there was an overall significant change in participant's knowledge before and after the curriculum (p<0.001). In the cognitive debriefing, participants were satisfied with the organization and structure and found the curriculum feasible. Furthermore, participants identified the skills acquired to aid in being more effective in their communities and work with academic researchers. The following changes were recommended: workshops' order, time, practical activities, and level of language. Discussion: Findings from this study suggest that the curriculum was acceptable and feasible to community leaders and that it might provide skills to actively incorporate community members in research activities. A large randomized clinical trial (RCT) study to evaluate curriculum effectiveness is recommended.
RCT Entities:
Purpose: The community-based participatory research approach has been identified as a great asset in reducing health disparities through the integration of community members in all phases of the research process. It is essential to provide skills to community members to achieve successful research partnerships. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of the community-based participatory research training curriculum for community members. Methods: Using mixed-methods, noncomparative design, eight workshops were developed and tested. Workshops covered topics such as community-based participatory research principles, health disparities, ethics in community-based participatory research, and fundamentals of research methodology. A total of 25 community leaders were trained. Pre-/post-test knowledge (unpaired t-test), retention rate, workshop satisfaction, and cognitive debriefing sessions were used to assess knowledge gained and acceptability and feasibility of the curriculum. Results: A retention rate of 100% and an average satisfaction of 92.68% were obtained. Preliminary effectiveness results indicate that there was an overall significant change in participant's knowledge before and after the curriculum (p<0.001). In the cognitive debriefing, participants were satisfied with the organization and structure and found the curriculum feasible. Furthermore, participants identified the skills acquired to aid in being more effective in their communities and work with academic researchers. The following changes were recommended: workshops' order, time, practical activities, and level of language. Discussion: Findings from this study suggest that the curriculum was acceptable and feasible to community leaders and that it might provide skills to actively incorporate community members in research activities. A large randomized clinical trial (RCT) study to evaluate curriculum effectiveness is recommended.
Entities:
Keywords:
CBPR curriculum; community capacity building; community empowerment
Authors: Jacquelyn V Coats; Jewel D Stafford; Vetta Sanders Thompson; Bethany Johnson Javois; Melody S Goodman Journal: J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics Date: 2014-12-10 Impact factor: 1.742
Authors: Karen Hacker; Shalini A Tendulkar; Catlin Rideout; Nazmim Bhuiya; Chau Trinh-Shevrin; Clara P Savage; Milagro Grullon; Hal Strelnick; Carolyn Leung; Ann DiGirolamo Journal: Prog Community Health Partnersh Date: 2012
Authors: Martha Abshire; Victor D Dinglas; Maan Isabella A Cajita; Michelle N Eakin; Dale M Needham; Cheryl Dennison Himmelfarb Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2017-02-20 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Anna M Hood; Staja Q Booker; Calia A Morais; Burel R Goodin; Janelle E Letzen; Lisa C Campbell; Ericka N Merriwether; Edwin N Aroke; Claudia M Campbell; Vani A Mathur; Mary R Janevic Journal: J Pain Date: 2022-02-26 Impact factor: 5.383
Authors: Monica Webb Hooper; Charlene Mitchell; Vanessa J Marshall; Chesley Cheatham; Kristina Austin; Kimberly Sanders; Smitha Krishnamurthi; Lena L Grafton Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-09-06 Impact factor: 3.390