Literature DB >> 30323393

Comparing Teaching Methods on Skin Disorders Using Standardized Patients Dressed in Moulage vs Paper Cases.

Emily K Flores1, Rick Hess1.   

Abstract

Objective. To determine whether using standardized patients dressed in moulage improves pharmacy students' ability to assess skin disorders compared to using picture-based paper cases. To determine pharmacy student preferences when learning assessment of skin disorders through these two educational methods. Methods. Faculty members investigated student assessments of drug-induced skin disorders and contact dermatitis by using picture-based paper cases compared with using standardized patients dressed in moulage in a patient assessment course. Faculty members measured student knowledge via multiple-choice questions before laboratory, immediately after laboratory, and during a final examination 3 weeks later. Student preferences were measured immediately after laboratory via survey instrument in this randomized, non-blinded, crossover design educational study. Results. No significant differences in knowledge scores related to skin disorders were found after laboratory or 3 weeks later when comparing the two educational methods. However, survey results suggested student preferences for using standardized patients dressed in moulage for drug-induced skin disorders. No significant differences were found for contact dermatitis cases. Conclusion. Using standardized patients dressed in moulage did not improve pharmacy students' ability to assess skin disorders compared to using picture-based paper cases. Pharmacy students preferred standardized patients dressed in moulage only when learning assessment of drug-induced skin disorders.

Entities:  

Keywords:  moulage; pharmacy student; skin disorders; standardized patients

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30323393      PMCID: PMC6181170          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe6636

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  18 in total

1.  Recognition of melanoma: a dermatologic clinical competency in medical student education.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Goulart; Stephen Dusza; Amanda Pillsbury; Rainier P Soriano; Allan C Halpern; Ashfaq A Marghoob
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 11.527

2.  Using moulage to enhance educational instruction.

Authors:  Marilyn Smith-Stoner
Journal:  Nurse Educ       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.082

3.  Center for the Advancement of Pharmacy Education 2013 educational outcomes.

Authors:  Melissa S Medina; Cecilia M Plaza; Cindy D Stowe; Evan T Robinson; Gary DeLander; Diane E Beck; Russell B Melchert; Robert B Supernaw; Victoria F Roche; Brenda L Gleason; Mark N Strong; Amanda Bain; Gerald E Meyer; Betty J Dong; Jeffrey Rochon; Patty Johnston
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Teaching patient assessment skills to doctor of pharmacy students: the TOPAS study.

Authors:  Jeffery W Spray; Sarah A Parnapy
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  Recognizing biothreat diseases: realistic training using standardized patients and patient simulators.

Authors:  Ronald M Atlas; Richard D Clover; Ruth Carrico; Gina Wesley; Michelle Thompson; W Paul McKinney
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2005-11

6.  Assessing students' ability to detect melanomas using standardized patients and moulage.

Authors:  Claudia Hernandez; Robin Mermelstein; June K Robinson; Rachel Yudkowsky
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 11.527

Review 7.  Practice skill development through the use of human patient simulation.

Authors:  Kathryn A Crea
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 2.047

8.  The impact of a standardized patient program on student learning of communication skills.

Authors:  Nathaniel M Rickles; Phuong Tieu; Lindsay Myers; Suzanne Galal; Valerie Chung
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 2.047

9.  Melanoma simulation model: promoting opportunistic screening and patient counseling.

Authors:  Namita Jain; Mark J Anderson; Pooja Patel; Hanz Blatt; Lauren Davis; Jennifer Bierman; William McGaghie; James B Brucker; Mary Martini; June K Robinson
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 10.282

10.  Pharmacy students' preferences for various types of simulated patients.

Authors:  Casey Gallimore; Angela K George; Michael C Brown
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 2.047

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.