Literature DB >> 19656753

Contributors to surgical in-patient satisfaction--development and reliability of a targeted instrument.

C S K Cheung1, W F Bower, S C B Kwok, C A van Hasselt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Patient satisfaction is an important indicator of healthcare system performance. High patient satisfaction is associated with greater trust in caregivers, improved compliance with treatment recommendations and a better quality of life (QOL). There are few validated instruments to measure surgical patients satisfaction. The aim of this study was to develop a culturally-specific patient satisfaction instrument, for use as an outcome measure in evaluating surgical services.
DESIGN: Patient focus groups were convened to explore dimensions of the peri operative hospital experience. Forums uncovered pertinent domains of interest and identified terminology understood by patients. A preliminary set of items reflecting patient satisfaction was developed. Test-retest reliability of a new surgical patient satisfaction instrument was assessed in 42 subjects at hospital discharge.
RESULTS: Domains that emerged included; admission processes and hospital environment, information provision, nursing care, doctor and nurse interaction, and ancillary staff services. Staff attitudes and human qualities were highly valued, as was prompt attention to requests for assistance. Clarity or quality of medical information did not appear to influence in-patient satisfaction. A new measure of surgical patient satisfaction, Hong Kong Index of Inpatient Happiness (HK2Happ), was developed from focus group consultation. Test-retest generated an Intra Class Correlation of 0.868-0.935, indicating a highly stable tool.
CONCLUSION: The initial version of HK2Happ was reliable in assessing surgical patient satisfaction. The measure is now undergoing validity testing across different surgical patient populations for generalization and generation of a short form of discriminant items.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19656753     DOI: 10.1016/s1015-9584(09)60385-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian J Surg        ISSN: 1015-9584            Impact factor:   2.767


  5 in total

1.  A systematic review of the validity and reliability of patient-reported experience measures.

Authors:  Claudia Bull; Joshua Byrnes; Ruvini Hettiarachchi; Martin Downes
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Satisfaction with surgeon care as measured by the Surgery-CAHPS survey is not related to NSQIP outcomes.

Authors:  Ryan K Schmocker; Linda M Cherney Stafford; Emily R Winslow
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  Understanding the determinants of patient satisfaction with surgical care using the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems surgical care survey (S-CAHPS).

Authors:  Ryan K Schmocker; Linda M Cherney Stafford; Alexander B Siy; Glen E Leverson; Emily R Winslow
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Development and validation of the Chinese surgical inpatient satisfaction and comfort questionnaire.

Authors:  Bolin Liu; Shujuan Liu; Tao Zheng; Yuan Wang; Baohua Cao; Zhiling Wang; Lijun Yu; Na Zhang; Binfang Zhao; Dan Lu; Lei Chen; Tao Ma; Yuexia Zhong; Shiming He
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Patient satisfaction with the perioperative surgical services and associated factors at a University Referral and Teaching Hospital, 2014: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Endale Gebreegziabher Gebremedhn; Girmay Fitiwi Lemma
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2017-07-05
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.