Literature DB >> 30320622

Instruments to evaluate complexity in end-of-life care.

Maria Luisa Martin-Rosello1,2, Maria Reyes Sanz-Amores3, Maria Rosa Salvador-Comino4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The growing number of patients with terminal and chronic conditions and co-morbidities constitutes a challenge for any healthcare system, to provide effective and efficient patient-centred care at the end of life. Resources are limited, and complexity is rising within patients' situations and healthcare professionals interventions. This review presents the state of art of the role of complexity in specialist palliative care provision. RECENT
FINDINGS: Although studies related to complexity in palliative care are still limited, interesting reviews on complexity frameworks in co-morbidity conditions and palliative care are growing more present in current literature. They identify multidimensional issues, resource utilisation, and the relationship between them as fundamental aspects of complexity constructs, helping to define and understand complexity, and to therefore design validated tools to support healthcare professionals identifying the most complex patients, such as Hui's criteria, PALCOM, INTERMED, and IDC-Pal which is presented in this review.
SUMMARY: There is an urgent need to guarantee quality and equity of care for all the patients eligible for palliative care, from those who need a palliative care approach to those needing specialist intensive palliative care. Implementing complexity theory into practice is paramount. In this review, complexity science, complexity frameworks, as well as tools evaluating complexity in palliative care are described.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30320622     DOI: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Support Palliat Care        ISSN: 1751-4258            Impact factor:   2.302


  4 in total

1.  A systematic review of classifications systems to determine complexity of patient care needs in palliative care.

Authors:  Matthew Grant; Everlien de Graaf; Saskia Teunissen
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 4.762

2.  Assessing Face Validity of the HexCom Model for Capturing Complexity in Clinical Practice: A Delphi Study.

Authors:  Xavier Busquet-Duran; Eva Maria Jiménez-Zafra; Magda Tura-Poma; Olga Bosch-de la Rosa; Anna Moragas-Roca; Susana Martin-Moreno; Emilio Martínez-Losada; Silvia Crespo-Ramírez; Lola Lestón-Lado; Núria Salamero-Tura; Joana Llobera-Estrany; Núria Oriol-Peregrina; Eduard Moreno-Gabriel; Josep Maria Manresa-Domínguez; Pere Torán-Monserrat
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-04

3.  Tools to help healthcare professionals recognize palliative care needs in patients with advanced heart failure: A systematic review.

Authors:  Stephanie Mc Ament; Inge Me Couwenberg; Josiane Jj Boyne; Jos Kleijnen; Henri Ejh Stoffers; Marieke Hj van den Beuken; Yvonne Engels; Louise Bellersen; Daisy Ja Janssen
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 4.762

4.  A New Approach to the Identification of Palliative Care Needs and Advanced Chronic Patients among Nursing Home Residents.

Authors:  Ana A Esteban-Burgos; María José Lozano-Terrón; Daniel Puente-Fernandez; César Hueso-Montoro; Rafael Montoya-Juárez; María P García-Caro
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.