Literature DB >> 33557220

Assessing Face Validity of the HexCom Model for Capturing Complexity in Clinical Practice: A Delphi Study.

Xavier Busquet-Duran1,2,3, Eva Maria Jiménez-Zafra1, Magda Tura-Poma1, Olga Bosch-de la Rosa4, Anna Moragas-Roca1, Susana Martin-Moreno1, Emilio Martínez-Losada1, Silvia Crespo-Ramírez4, Lola Lestón-Lado1, Núria Salamero-Tura1, Joana Llobera-Estrany1, Núria Oriol-Peregrina5,6, Eduard Moreno-Gabriel2,7, Josep Maria Manresa-Domínguez2,7,8, Pere Torán-Monserrat2,7.   

Abstract

Capturing complexity is both a conceptual and a practical challenge in palliative care. The HexCom model has proved to be an instrument with strong reliability and to be valid for describing the needs and strengths of patients in home care. In order to explore whether it is also perceived to be helpful in enhancing coordinated and patient-centred care at a practical level, a methodological study was carried out to assess the face validity of the model. In particular, a Delphi method involving a group of 14 experts representing the full spectrum of healthcare professionals involved in palliative care was carried out. The results show that there is a high level of agreement, with a content validity index-item greater than 0.92 both with regard to the complexity model and the HexCom-Red, HexCom-Basic, and the HexCom-Clin instruments, and higher than 0.85 regarding the HexCom-Figure and the HexCom-Patient instruments. This consensus confirms that the HexCom model and the different instruments that are derived from it are valued as useful tools for a broad range of healthcare professional in coordinately capturing complexity in healthcare practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Delphi technique; complexity; coordinated care; home care services; methodological study; needs assessment; palliative care

Year:  2021        PMID: 33557220      PMCID: PMC7913893          DOI: 10.3390/healthcare9020165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)        ISSN: 2227-9032


  42 in total

Review 1.  [How is an instrument for measuring health to be validated?].

Authors:  A Carvajal; C Centeno; R Watson; M Martínez; A Sanz Rubiales
Journal:  An Sist Sanit Navar       Date:  2011 Jan-Apr       Impact factor: 0.829

Review 2.  Referral criteria for outpatient specialty palliative cancer care: an international consensus.

Authors:  David Hui; Masanori Mori; Sharon M Watanabe; Augusto Caraceni; Florian Strasser; Tiina Saarto; Nathan Cherny; Paul Glare; Stein Kaasa; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  Improving outcomes for people with progressive cancer: interrupted time series trial of a needs assessment intervention.

Authors:  Amy Waller; Afaf Girgis; Claire Johnson; Christophe Lecathelinais; David Sibbritt; Dion Forstner; Winston Liauw; David C Currow
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 3.612

4.  Facilitating needs-based support and palliative care for people with chronic heart failure: preliminary evidence for the acceptability, inter-rater reliability, and validity of a needs assessment tool.

Authors:  Amy Waller; Afaf Girgis; Patricia M Davidson; Phillip J Newton; Christophe Lecathelinais; Peter S Macdonald; Christopher S Hayward; David C Currow
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 3.612

5.  [The challenge of clinical complexity in the 21st century: Could frailty indexes be the answer?]

Authors:  Jordi Amblàs-Novellas; Joan Espaulella-Panicot; Marco Inzitari; Lourdes Rexach; Benito Fontecha; Roman Romero-Ortuno
Journal:  Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol       Date:  2016-08-17

6.  Palliative Care Problem Severity Score: Reliability and acceptability in a national study.

Authors:  Malcolm Masso; Samuel Frederic Allingham; Claire Elizabeth Johnson; Tanya Pidgeon; Patsy Yates; David Currow; Kathy Eagar
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 4.762

7.  The relation between self-efficacy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and caregiver burden.

Authors:  Semiha Kar; Neriman Zengin
Journal:  Scand J Caring Sci       Date:  2019-10-27

Review 8.  Funding models in palliative care: Lessons from international experience.

Authors:  E Iris Groeneveld; J Brian Cassel; Claudia Bausewein; Ágnes Csikós; Malgorzata Krajnik; Karen Ryan; Dagny Faksvåg Haugen; Steffen Eychmueller; Heike Gudat Keller; Simon Allan; Jeroen Hasselaar; Teresa García-Baquero Merino; Kate Swetenham; Kym Piper; Carl Johan Fürst; Fliss Em Murtagh
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 4.762

9.  Priorities for global research into children's palliative care: results of an International Delphi Study.

Authors:  Julia Downing; Caprice Knapp; Mary Ann Muckaden; Susan Fowler-Kerry; Joan Marston
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 3.234

10.  How many people will need palliative care in 2040? Past trends, future projections and implications for services.

Authors:  S N Etkind; A E Bone; B Gomes; N Lovell; C J Evans; I J Higginson; F E M Murtagh
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 8.775

View more
  2 in total

1.  Gender and Observed Complexity in Palliative Home Care: A Prospective Multicentre Study Using the HexCom Model.

Authors:  Xavier Busquet-Duran; Eduard Moreno-Gabriel; Eva Maria Jiménez-Zafra; Magda Tura-Poma; Olga Bosch-DelaRosa; Anna Moragas-Roca; Susana Martin-Moreno; Emilio Martínez-Losada; Silvia Crespo-Ramírez; Lola Lestón-Lado; Núria Salamero-Tura; Joana Llobera-Estrany; Ariadna Salvago-Leiracha; Ana Isabel López-García; Josep María Manresa-Domínguez; Teresa Morandi-Garde; Eda Sara Persentili-Viure; Pere Torán-Monserrat
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Intra-rater reliability and feasibility of the HexCom advanced disease complexity assessment model.

Authors:  Xavier Busquet-Duran; Manel Esteban-Perez; Josep Maria Manresa-Domínguez; Susana Martin Moreno; Lola Leston-Lado; Pere Torán-Monserrat
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 2.206

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.