Literature DB >> 30320459

Ergonomic interventions for preventing musculoskeletal disorders in dental care practitioners.

Priti Mulimani1, Victor Cw Hoe, Melanie J Hayes, Jose Joy Idiculla, Adinegara Bl Abas, Laxminarayan Karanth.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dentistry is a profession with a high prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSD) among practitioners, with symptoms often starting as early in the career as the student phase. Ergonomic interventions in physical, cognitive, and organisational domains have been suggested to prevent their occurrence, but evidence of their effects remains unclear.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of ergonomic interventions for the prevention of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among dental care practitioners. SEARCH
METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO ProQuest, NIOSHTIC, NIOSHTIC-2, HSELINE, CISDOC (OSH-UPDATE), ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal to August 2018, without language or date restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs, and cluster RCTs, in which participants were adults, aged 18 and older, who were engaged in the practice of dentistry. At least 75% of them had to be free from musculoskeletal pain at baseline. We only included studies that measured at least one of our primary outcomes; i.e. physician diagnosed WMSD, self-reported pain, or work functioning. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three authors independently screened and selected 20 potentially eligible references from 946 relevant references identified from the search results. Based on the full-text screening, we included two studies, excluded 16 studies, and two are awaiting classification. Four review authors independently extracted data, and two authors assessed the risk of bias. We calculated the mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for continuous outcomes and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals for dichotomous outcomes. We assessed the quality of the evidence for each outcome using the GRADE approach. MAIN
RESULTS: We included two RCTs (212 participants), one of which was a cluster-randomised trial. Adjusting for the design effect from clustering, reduced the total sample size to 210. Both studies were carried out in dental clinics and assessed ergonomic interventions in the physical domain, one by evaluating a multi-faceted ergonomic intervention, which consisted of imparting knowledge and training about ergonomics, work station modification, training and surveying ergonomics at the work station, and a regular exercise program; the other by studying the effectiveness of two different types of instrument used for scaling in preventing WMSDs. We were unable to combine the results from the two studies because of the diversity of interventions and outcomes.Physical ergonomic interventions. Based on one study, there is very low-quality evidence that a multi-faceted intervention has no clear effect on dentists' risk of WMSD in the thighs (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.42; 102 participants), or feet (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.41; 102 participants) when compared to no intervention over a six-month period. Based on one study, there is low-quality evidence of no clear difference in elbow pain (MD -0.14, 95% CI -0.39 to 0.11; 110 participants), or shoulder pain (MD -0.32, 95% CI -0.75 to 0.11; 110 participants) in participants who used light weight curettes with wider handles or heavier curettes with narrow handles for scaling over a 16-week period.Cognitive ergonomic interventions. We found no studies evaluating the effectiveness of cognitive ergonomic interventions.Organisational ergonomic interventions. We found no studies evaluating the effectiveness of organisational ergonomic interventions. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: There is very low-quality evidence from one study showing that a multi-faceted intervention has no clear effect on dentists' risk of WMSD in the thighs or feet when compared to no intervention over a six-month period. This was a poorly conducted study with several shortcomings and errors in statistical analysis of data. There is low-quality evidence from one study showing no clear difference in elbow pain or shoulder pain in participants using light weight, wider handled curettes or heavier and narrow handled curettes for scaling over a 16-week period.We did not find any studies evaluating the effectiveness of cognitive ergonomic interventions or organisational ergonomic interventions.Our ability to draw definitive conclusions is restricted by the paucity of suitable studies available to us, and the high risk of bias of the studies that are available. This review highlights the need for well-designed, conducted, and reported RCTs, with long-term follow-up that assess prevention strategies for WMSDs among dental care practitioners.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30320459      PMCID: PMC6516890          DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011261.pub2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  59 in total

1.  Cluster trials in implementation research: estimation of intracluster correlation coefficients and sample size.

Authors:  M K Campbell; J Mollison; J M Grimshaw
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 2.  Mechanisms leading to musculoskeletal disorders in dentistry.

Authors:  Bethany Valachi; Keith Valachi
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.634

3.  A system for predicting and preventing work-related musculoskeletal disorders among dentists.

Authors:  Bhornsawan Thanathornwong; Siriwan Suebnukarn; Yupin Songpaisan; Kan Ouivirach
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 1.763

4.  Examining the effect of the Flextend Orthotic Device on grip strength: a pilot study.

Authors:  Debra M James; Bonnie G Branson; Melanie Simmer-Beck; Kimberly K Bray
Journal:  Work       Date:  2010

5.  The relationship between working conditions and sick leave in Swedish dental hygienists.

Authors:  V Petrén; K Petzäll; H Preber; J Bergström
Journal:  Int J Dent Hyg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.477

Review 6.  A systematic review of musculoskeletal disorders among dental professionals.

Authors:  Mj Hayes; D Cockrell; D R Smith
Journal:  Int J Dent Hyg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.477

7.  Effects of prismatic glasses including optometric correction on head and neck kinematics, perceived exertion and comfort during dental work in the oral cavity--a randomised controlled intervention.

Authors:  A Lindegård; M Gustafsson; G-Å Hansson
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.661

8.  A laboratory study to determine the effects of universal and rotating ultrasonic inserts on wrist movement and scaling time efficiency of dental hygienists.

Authors:  C C Hawn; S L Tolle; M Darby; M Walker
Journal:  Int J Dent Hyg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.477

9.  The dentist's operating posture - ergonomic aspects.

Authors:  C Pîrvu; I Pătraşcu; D Pîrvu; C Ionescu
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2014-06-25

Review 10.  Ergonomics in dentistry.

Authors:  Anshul Gupta; Manohar Bhat; Tahir Mohammed; Nikita Bansal; Gaurav Gupta
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2014-04-26
View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Effects of Workplace-Based Intervention for Shoulder Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sol Patricia Beltran Picón; Gabriel de Amorim Batista; Ana Carolina Rodarti Pitangui; Rodrigo Cappato de Araújo
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2020-10-02

2.  A standardized protocol for the comprehensive assessment of dental hygiene work.

Authors:  Shawn C Roll; Mark E Hardison; Jane L Forrest; Nikki L Colclazier; Joyce Y Sumi; Nancy A Baker
Journal:  Work       Date:  2021

3.  The effectiveness of ergonomic interventions in material handling operations.

Authors:  Steven J Wurzelbacher; Michael P Lampl; Stephen J Bertke; Chih-Yu Tseng
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 3.661

4.  Ergonomic interventions for preventing musculoskeletal disorders in dental care practitioners.

Authors:  Priti Mulimani; Victor Cw Hoe; Melanie J Hayes; Jose Joy Idiculla; Adinegara Bl Abas; Laxminarayan Karanth
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-10-15

5.  Ergonomic risk exposure and work ability among young dental professionals in China: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Sihao Lin; Zhenyi Wu; Wenjuan Tang; Guoxi Xu; Xianzhe Zeng
Journal:  J Occup Health       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.708

Review 6.  Prevention of Musculoskeletal Diseases and Pain among Dental Professionals through Ergonomic Interventions: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Janna Lietz; Nazan Ulusoy; Albert Nienhaus
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Vibration Exposure and Transmissibility on Dentist's Anatomy: A Study of Micro Motors and Air-Turbines.

Authors:  Harish Kumar Banga; Pankaj Goel; Raman Kumar; Vikas Kumar; Parveen Kalra; Sehijpal Singh; Sunpreet Singh; Chander Prakash; Catalin Pruncu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Prevalence of Musculoskeletal Diseases of the Upper Extremity Among Dental Professionals in Germany.

Authors:  Carolin Rickert; Ulrike Fels; Georg Gosheger; Tobias Kalisch; Dennis Liem; Sebastian Klingebiel; Kristian Nikolaus Schneider; Dominik Schorn
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2021-09-11

9.  Ergonomic interventions for preventing work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb and neck among office workers.

Authors:  Victor Cw Hoe; Donna M Urquhart; Helen L Kelsall; Eva N Zamri; Malcolm R Sim
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-10-23

10.  Musculoskeletal Disorders among Italian Dentists and Dental Hygienists.

Authors:  Maria Giovanna Gandolfi; Fausto Zamparini; Andrea Spinelli; Alessandro Risi; Carlo Prati
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.