Literature DB >> 30320130

Increased prevalence of expiratory flow limitation during exercise in children with bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

Christopher A O'Dea1,2,3, Karla Logie3,4,5, Andrew Maiorana2,6, Andrew C Wilson1,2,3,4, J Jane Pillow7,8, Georgia L Banton3, Shannon J Simpson2,3,4,9, Graham L Hall2,3,4,9.   

Abstract

Evidence regarding the prevalence of expiratory flow limitation (EFL) during exercise and the ventilatory response to exercise in children born preterm is limited. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of EFL as well as contributing factors to EFL and the ventilatory response to exercise in preterm children with and without bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Preterm children (≤32 weeks gestational age) aged 9-12 years with (n=64) and without (n=42) BPD and term controls (n=43), performed an incremental treadmill exercise test with exercise tidal flow-volume loops. More preterm children with BPD (53%) had EFL compared with preterm children without BPD (26%) or term controls (28%) (p<0.05). The presence of EFL was independently associated with decreased forced expiratory volume in 1 s/forced vital capacity z-score and lower gestational age (p<0.05). There was no difference in peak oxygen uptake between preterm children with BPD and term controls (48.0 versus 48.4 mL·kg-1·min-1; p=0.063); however, children with BPD had a lower tidal volume at peak exercise (mean difference -27 mL·kg-1, 95% CI -49- -5; p<0.05). Children born preterm without BPD had ventilatory responses to exercise similar to term controls. Expiratory flow limitation is more prevalent in children born preterm with BPD and is associated with airway obstruction and a lower gestational age.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30320130      PMCID: PMC6174284          DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00048-2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ERJ Open Res        ISSN: 2312-0541


Introduction

Preterm birth (<37 weeks gestational age) constitutes ∼11% of live births worldwide [1]. Children born preterm, and in particular those born very preterm (<32 weeks gestational age), are born with an immature respiratory system characterised by few to no alveoli, insufficient surfactant production and gas exchange, and are at increased risk of developing bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) [2]. Advances in neonatal care, including the widespread introduction of exogenous surfactant and more gentle forms of mechanical ventilation, have increased survival of children born at lower gestational age and birth weight [3]. Contemporary neonatal lung disease, termed “new BPD”, is characterised by peripheral lung abnormalities, failed alveolarisation and abnormal pulmonary vascularisation [3], which contribute to long-term respiratory sequelae including airway obstruction [4-6], impaired gas transfer [7], gas trapping [7, 8] and increased respiratory morbidity [5, 6, 9] throughout childhood. The exercise capacity of children born preterm during the surfactant era is unclear; with some [8, 10–12], but not all [13-15], studies reporting reduced peak exercise capacity. In addition, a limited number of studies report an altered ventilatory response to exercise, including reduced tidal volume (VT) and increased respiratory frequency [10, 12, 16, 17]. However, the mechanisms underlying altered ventilatory responses to exercise in children with BPD remain unknown. One factor potentially contributing to altered ventilatory responses during exercise may be expiratory flow limitation (EFL). EFL is associated with an impaired ventilatory response to exercise in asthma, cystic fibrosis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [18-21]. The single study describing EFL after preterm birth reports an increased prevalence of EFL in children born at <29 weeks gestational age [12]. However, this study did not assess the impact of EFL on exercise capacity or explore risk factors associated with the presence of EFL and thus the broader consequence of their finding is unclear. We aimed to investigate the ventilatory response to a maximal exercise test in school aged children born very preterm with and without a neonatal diagnosis of BPD. We also aimed to determine the prevalence of EFL and assess any contribution from neonatal exposures on the prevalence of EFL in these children. We hypothesised that children with a neonatal diagnosis of BPD would exhibit an altered ventilatory response to maximal exercise characterised by EFL and dynamic hyperinflation. Further, we hypothesised that the magnitude of the altered ventilatory response would be related to the severity of neonatal lung disease.

Methods

Full methodological details are provided in the online supplementary material.

Participants

Children were recruited to the study if they were aged 9–12 years and either born preterm (≤32 weeks completed gestational age) or were healthy term-born children as previously described [6]. Preterm children were classified as having BPD if they required at least 28 days of supplemental oxygen before 36 weeks postmenstrual age as per international guidelines [22]. Written informed consent from parents and assent from the child were obtained prior to study enrolment. Ethics approval was obtained from the Princess Margaret Hospital for Children (Perth, Australia) Human Ethics Committee (approval 1760EP).

Pulmonary function testing

Spirometry and lung volume measurements by multiple breath nitrogen washout (Sensormedics Encore 21–1A; Sensormedics, Yorba Linda, CA, USA) were performed in accordance with international guidelines [23, 24], and are reported as predicted z-scores [25, 26].

Peak exercise test

Participants performed an incremental treadmill exercise test (Marquette; Sensormedics, Yorba Linda, CA, USA) in accordance with a modified Balke protocol [27, 28] The testing was performed at ambient conditions within a laboratory and all results are reports at BTPS (body temperature, ambient pressure, saturated with water vapour). Briefly, baseline observations were obtained over 5 min. Subsequently, children ran at a comfortable pace on a gradient of 0% for 2 min after which the gradient was increased to 4% and then by 2% increments every 2 min until volitional exhaustion. A peak exercise test was defined as peak heart rate >90% predicted and physical signs of peak performance (sweating, flushed face and inability to maintain running speed). Peak metabolic (oxygen uptake (V′O), carbon dioxide production) and ventilatory data (VT and breathing frequency) were recorded continuously using breath-by-breath analysis (SensorMedics 229 Metabolic Cart; SensorMedics). Breathing reserve was calculated as maximum minute ventilation − maximum voluntary ventilation (MVV), expressed as a percentage of MVV; MVV was calculated as forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) × 40 [29].

Tidal flow–volume loops

Tidal flow–volume loops were assessed as reported previously [30] and adapted by our group [31]. Briefly, 3–5 tidal breaths during exercise were recorded followed by a maximal inspiratory capacity (IC) manoeuvre to total lung capacity (TLC) which was recorded at the end of each exercise stage. Placement of the tidal flow–volume loop relative TLC was determined from the IC manoeuvre at the end of each exercise stage. Tidal flow–volume loops were set within the maximal flow–volume loop obtained during baseline spirometry based on IC. TLC was assumed to remain constant throughout the exercise. Dynamic flow limitation was determined if 5% or more of the tidal flow–volume loop tracked or exceeded the maximum flow–volume loop obtained prior to exercise (figure 1).
FIGURE 1

Demonstration of the assessment of expiratory flow limitation (EFL). a) A subject with no EFL; b) a subject with EFL >5%.

Demonstration of the assessment of expiratory flow limitation (EFL). a) A subject with no EFL; b) a subject with EFL >5%.

Breathing strategy during exercise

End expiratory and inspiratory lung volume (EELV and EILV, respectively) were assessed at each stage as a measure of dynamic functional residual capacity (FRC) [31, 32] and expressed as a change from baseline (e.g. ΔEELV) and as a percentage of TLC (e.g. EELV%TLC). Full details are described in the online supplementary material.

Neonatal data and exercise symptoms

Neonatal variables including gestational age, days of supplemental oxygen and ventilatory support (mechanical ventilation and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)) were extracted from medical records and a prospectively maintained neonatal database. Parentally reported exercise symptoms within the preceding 3 months were recorded using a respiratory symptom questionnaire [33]. Children were classified as having current exercise-induced symptoms if parents reported cough, wheeze or shortness of breath on exertion, or symptoms that limited their child's physical activity within the preceding 3 months.

Statistical analysis

Data are reported as mean±sd for normally distributed data and median (interquartile range) for non-normally distributed data. Differences between groups were assessed by Mann–Whitney U-test or Kruskal–Wallis, as appropriate. Bonferroni correction was applied to account for possible type 1 errors due to multiple testing. Chi-squared analysis was used for differences in proportions between groups. This study was powered to detect a 25% difference in EFL to 80% power at a 0.05 significance level. The relationships between neonatal factors, lung function and EFL were initially assessed using univariate regressions with EFL as a binary (yes/no) outcome. Factors with a significant univariate association (p<0.05) with the presence of EFL were included in subsequent stepwise binary logistic regressions. Multi-collinearities between the neonatal predictors were identified and adjusted for by using residuals of independent regressions of the collinear variables. For example, the independent impact of mechanical ventilation on EFL was determined from the residual of the regression between gestational age and mechanical ventilation. The effect of lung development (gestational age and birth weight z-score), neonatal lung disease (days of supplemental oxygen, days of mechanical ventilation and days on CPAP), age, sex, height, weight and lung function (FEV1, forced vital capacity (FVC), TLC, residual volume and FRC z-scores) at the time of the exercise test were included in the logistic regression. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Version 22.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

221 (126 male) children were enrolled in the study including 99 with BPD, 64 without BPD and 58 healthy term-born controls. This cohort is representative of the broader preterm population in Perth during the same birth period, with no differences in neonatal characteristics of the recruited cohort, as reported by our group previously [6]. A valid maximal exercise test (n=171) was completed by 68 preterm children with BPD, 55 preterm children without BPD and 48 healthy term controls. Exercise tests (n=50) were determined invalid if there was a leak in the mask during testing (n=13), equipment malfunction (n=12), early termination of exercise (n=6), physical inability to perform exercise testing (n=13), poor baseline lung function (exercise testing deemed clinically inappropriate) (n=3) or consent not given (n=3). Of the 171 children completing a valid exercise test, 149 children successfully performed the flow–volume loop manoeuvres required for assessment of EFL (64 preterm children with BPD, 42 preterm children without BPD and 43 healthy term controls) and this population will form the basis of all analyses herein (figure 2). Table 1 shows the demographic details of the subjects who successfully completed the exercise test with matched flow–volume loops measurements.
FIGURE 2

Flow diagram of enrolment for the study. BPD: bronchopulmonary dysplasia; non-BPD: preterm children without BPD.

TABLE 1

Neonatal and demographic details of the study population

BPDNon-BPDTerm controls
Subjects n644243
Male (%)42 (66%)#,¶32 (76%)#18 (42%)
Gestational age (PMA) weeks26.0 (25–27.5)30 (29.1–31.0)
Birth weight g843 (709–993)1420 (1238–1615)
Birth weight z-score−0.15±0.82−0.12±0.82
Mechanical ventilation days15.3 (4.4–32.8)0.0 (0.0–1.0)
CPAP days14.5 (6.6–24.0)0.7 (0.0–3.6)
Supplemental oxygen days86.5 (57.5–98.0)1 (0.0–3.0)
Recent exercise symptoms+29 (46%)15 (38%)
Doctor diagnosed asthma ever23 (36%)17 (44%)
Current asthma medication4 (6%)10 (26%)
Age at test years10.8±0.610.9±0.610.6±0.6
Height at test cm141 (136–146)142 (138–148)145.5 (138–153)
Weight at test kg32.4 (28.5–37.6)36.5 (30.5–41.3)34.7 (30.0–42.2)

Data are presented as mean±sd, median (interquartile range) or n (%), unless otherwise stated. Note the term controls did not have any neonatal intervention or respiratory symptoms. Not all children completed every question in the symptom questionnaire. BPD: bronchopulmonary dysplasia; non-BPD: preterm children without BPD; PMA: postmenstrual age; CPAP: continuous positive airway pressure. #: p<0.05 compared with healthy term controls; ¶: p<0.05 compared with non-BPD; +: exercise symptoms included parentally reported wheeze, cough and shortness of breath during exertion.

Flow diagram of enrolment for the study. BPD: bronchopulmonary dysplasia; non-BPD: preterm children without BPD. Neonatal and demographic details of the study population Data are presented as mean±sd, median (interquartile range) or n (%), unless otherwise stated. Note the term controls did not have any neonatal intervention or respiratory symptoms. Not all children completed every question in the symptom questionnaire. BPD: bronchopulmonary dysplasia; non-BPD: preterm children without BPD; PMA: postmenstrual age; CPAP: continuous positive airway pressure. #: p<0.05 compared with healthy term controls; ¶: p<0.05 compared with non-BPD; +: exercise symptoms included parentally reported wheeze, cough and shortness of breath during exertion. Children without a valid exercise test and matched flow–volume loop measurements had a lower FEV1 z-score (−0.78 versus −0.30) and had a higher prevalence of parentally reported exercise symptoms (65% versus 39%) (table E1). Children who performed acceptable exercise flow–volume loops had similar exercise outcomes as those who could not, although they had a lower peak VT (0.88 L versus 1.03 L) (table E1). Table 2 shows the spirometry, lung volume and maximal exercise test results for the participants that performed a successful exercise test and flow–volume loop measurements. Preterm children with a neonatal diagnosis of BPD had a lower absolute V′O peak; however, V′O peak was not reduced when expressed relative to bodyweight (table 2). Children with BPD had a lower VT (mean difference= −27 mL·kg−1; (95% CI −49– −5); p<0.001) at peak exercise compared with the healthy term-born controls. Similarly, children with BPD had an increased respiratory rate (7 breaths·min−1 (95% CI 2–12); p<0.001), but minute ventilation and VT at peak exercise were not different from preterm children without BPD. Preterm children without BPD demonstrated no differences at peak exercise compared with term born controls (table 2).
TABLE 2

Lung function and exercise variables for children who completed a successful maximal exercise test

BPDNon-BPDTerm controls
Subjects n644243
FEV1 z-score−0.83 (−1.57– −0.17)#,¶0.09 (−0.91–0.37)0.04 (−0.57–0.61)
FVC z-score−0.09 (−0.65–0.87)#0.37 (−0.25–0.97)0.24 (−0.65–0.86)
FEV1/FVC z-score−1.35 (−2.59– −0.80)#−0.87 (−1.52– −0.41)#−0.42 (−1.06–0.48)
TLC z-score−0.28 (−0.92–0.53)0.25 (−0.50–0.78)−0.12 (−1.06–0.48)
FRC z-score0.29 (−0.64–0.87)0.71 (−0.19–1.91)#−0.07 (−0.68–0.36)
RV z-score−0.21 (−1.05–0.30)0.01 (−0.85–0.77)−0.33 (−1.16–0.71)
VO2 peak L·min−11.53 (1.40–1.76)#,¶1.78 (1.49–1.95)1.69 (1.45–2.17)
VO2 peak mL·kg−1·min−147.7 (42.8–53.2)46.1 (42.5–51.7)48.1 (45.5–52.4)
VO2 at AT mL·kg−1·min−126.6 (13.9–47.2)31.0 (15.8–38.8)34.7 (13.6–45.3)
Peak RQ1.01 (0.98–1.02)#1.03 (1.01–1.06)1.04 (1.02–1.06)
Peak heart rate beats·min−1196 (187–205)195 (185–202)200 (195–206)
Peak VT mL·kg−124 (21–27)27 (23–30)28 (24–31)
Peak fR breaths·min−164 (54–72)54 (49–63)58 (54–68)
Peak VE L·min−1·kg−11.53 (1.36–1.72)1.40 (1.30–1.68)1.55 (1.42–1.81)
Breathing reserve %34.0 (28.2–35.8)37.2 (27.0–38.3)34.4 (30.0–37.1)
EFL n (%)34 (53%)#,¶11 (26%)12 (28%)
EFL%VT27.5 (0.0–60.0)#,¶0.0 (0.0–26.5)0.0 (0.0–25.0)
ΔIC mL25 (−83–193)110 (−78–225)25 (−90–203)
ΔEELV mL−30 (−145–200)−50 (−180–170)−15 (−175–137)
ΔEILV mL397 (146–557)371 (238–648)368 (157–723)
EELV %TLC rest32.0 (27.5–37.4)32.1 (28.0–35.1)30.1 (25.8–34.9)
EELV %TLC peak31.8 (28.4–35.9)31.9 (27.6–36.6)29.9 (27.0–33.7)

Data are presented as median (interquartile range), unless otherwise stated. BPD: bronchopulmonary dysplasia; non-BPD: preterm children without BPD; FEV1: forced expiratory volume in 1 s; FVC: forced vital capacity; TLC: total lung capacity; FRC: functional residual capacity; RV: residual volume; V′O: oxygen uptake; AT: anaerobic threshold; RQ: respiratory quotient; VT: tidal volume; fR: respiratory frequency; V′E: minute ventilation; EFL%VT: percentage of tidal volume assessed as meeting or exceeding the maximum flow–volume loop; IC: inspiratory capacity; EELV: end expiratory lung volume; EILV: end inspiratory lung volume. #: p<0.05 compared with healthy term controls; ¶: p<0.05 compared with non-BPD.

Lung function and exercise variables for children who completed a successful maximal exercise test Data are presented as median (interquartile range), unless otherwise stated. BPD: bronchopulmonary dysplasia; non-BPD: preterm children without BPD; FEV1: forced expiratory volume in 1 s; FVC: forced vital capacity; TLC: total lung capacity; FRC: functional residual capacity; RV: residual volume; V′O: oxygen uptake; AT: anaerobic threshold; RQ: respiratory quotient; VT: tidal volume; fR: respiratory frequency; V′E: minute ventilation; EFL%VT: percentage of tidal volume assessed as meeting or exceeding the maximum flow–volume loop; IC: inspiratory capacity; EELV: end expiratory lung volume; EILV: end inspiratory lung volume. #: p<0.05 compared with healthy term controls; ¶: p<0.05 compared with non-BPD. Similarly, static lung volumes (TLC, FRC and residual volume) at rest and the change in EILV or EELV during exercise (expressed as either an absolute change or as a percentage of TLC), did not differ between preterm children with or without BPD and term-born controls (table 2). Children with BPD had a significantly lower FEV1 z-score compared with healthy controls (−0.98 (95% CI −1.5– −0.46); p<0.001) and non-BPD preterm children (−0.70 (95% CI −1.23– −0.17); p=0.005). The FEV1/FVC z-score of preterm children with (−1.06 (95% CI −1.61– −0.51); p<0.001) and without BPD (−0.71 (95% CI −1.31– −0.12); p=0.012) was lower compared with term-born controls.

Tidal flow–volume loop assessment

Approximately half of the children with BPD (53%) exhibited EFL during maximal exercise testing, which was significantly more prevalent than in the non-BPD and healthy term control groups (Chi-squared analysis p<0.01) (figure 3). The prevalence of EFL was not significantly different between the healthy term controls and the preterm children without BPD (26% and 28%, respectively).
FIGURE 3

Prevalence of expiratory flow limitation (EFL). BPD: bronchopulmonary dysplasia; non-BPD: preterm children without BPD. *: p<0.05.

Prevalence of expiratory flow limitation (EFL). BPD: bronchopulmonary dysplasia; non-BPD: preterm children without BPD. *: p<0.05. Differences in neonatal, spirometry and maximal exercise test outcomes in preterm children with and without EFL are presented in table 3. Preterm children with EFL had a significantly longer duration of supplemental oxygen and mechanical ventilation as well as a significantly worse baseline FEV1 and FEV1/FVC z-score compared with preterm children without EFL. VT, breathing frequency and breathing strategy at peak exercise and parentally reported frequency of symptoms during exercise were not significantly different between preterm children with EFL and those that did not experience EFL during exercise. Days of supplemental oxygen, FEV1 z-score and FEV1/FVC z-score were significantly associated with the presence of EFL on univariate analysis (table E2). FEV1/FVC z-score and days of supplemental oxygen after accounting for gestational age were subsequently included in the multivariate analysis; gestational age was also included to assess the impact of lung development. The impact of each of these in the multivariate model can be seen in table E3. Binary logistic regression analysis showed that a reduced FEV1/FVC z-score and lower gestational age were independent predictors of EFL developing during a maximal exercise test (table 4).
TABLE 3

Differences between preterm participants with and without expiratory flow limitation (EFL)

With EFLWithout EFL
Subjects n4561
BPD34 (76%)*30 (49%)
Male28 (62%)43 (70%)
Gestation PMA weeks27.0 (25.0–29.2)28.6 (25.3–30.2)
Mechanical ventilation days5.0 (1.3–30.1)2.0 (0.0–13.5)
CPAP days6.5 (1.0–24.9)5.6 (0.6–15.7)
Supplemental oxygen days74.0 (28.0–94.5)*22.0 (1.0–83.5)
FEV1 z-score−1.31±0.96*−0.12±0.83
FVC z-score−0.40 (−0.57–0.78)0.22 (−0.51–1.13)
FEV1/FVC z score−1.85±0.89*−0.71±0.83
VO2 peak L·min−11.54 (1.40–1.78)1.63 (1.42–1.86)
VO2 peak mL·kg·min−149.6 (43.2–52.3)47.5 (42.4–52.3)
Peak RQ1.03 (1.01–1.05)1.01 (0.99–1.02)
Maximum heart rate beats·min−1197 (187–207)195 (186–202)
VT L·kg−125 (22–28)25 (22–28)
fR breaths·min−162 (53–70)60 (52–69)
Maximum VE L·min−1·kg−11.55 (1.36–1.74)1.43 (1.30–1.67)
Breathing reserve %31.1 (26.4–35.6)35.5 (29.3–38.5)
Exercise symptoms21 (48%)23 (40%)
Docter diagnosed asthma ever23 (52%)*17 (29%)
Current asthma medication4 (9%)10 (17%)*

Data are presented as mean±sd, median (interquartile range) or n (%), unless otherwise stated. Not all children completed every question in the symptom questionnaire. BPD: bronchopulmonary dysplasia; PMA: postmenstrual age; CPAP: continuous positive airway pressure; FEV1: forced expiratory volume in 1 s; FVC: forced vital capacity; V′O: oxygen uptake; RQ: respiratory quotient; VT: tidal volume; fR: respiratory frequency; V′E: minute ventilation. *: p<0.05.

TABLE 4

Binary logistic regression for neonatal and spirometry variables, for presence of expiratory flow limitation

VariableOdds ratio (95% CI)p-valueR2
FEV1/FVC z-score0.184 (0.084–0.401)*<0.0010.477
Gestational age (PMA)0.799 (0.640–0.997)*0.047
Supplemental oxygen days1.22 (0.674–2.200)0.514

FEV1: forced expiratory volume in 1 s; FVC: forced vital capacity; PMA: postmenstrual age. *: p<0.05.

Differences between preterm participants with and without expiratory flow limitation (EFL) Data are presented as mean±sd, median (interquartile range) or n (%), unless otherwise stated. Not all children completed every question in the symptom questionnaire. BPD: bronchopulmonary dysplasia; PMA: postmenstrual age; CPAP: continuous positive airway pressure; FEV1: forced expiratory volume in 1 s; FVC: forced vital capacity; V′O: oxygen uptake; RQ: respiratory quotient; VT: tidal volume; fR: respiratory frequency; V′E: minute ventilation. *: p<0.05. Binary logistic regression for neonatal and spirometry variables, for presence of expiratory flow limitation FEV1: forced expiratory volume in 1 s; FVC: forced vital capacity; PMA: postmenstrual age. *: p<0.05.

Discussion

We investigated the impact of very preterm birth on the ventilatory response to exercise in school-aged children and determined the factors associated with presence of EFL in these children. We report that children with BPD have an altered breathing pattern during exercise, which is characterised by rapid, shallow breathing. Furthermore, we show that half of children born very preterm with BPD exhibit EFL during a maximal exercise test. We found that the presence of EFL was independently predicted by poorer lung function and a lower gestational age. This study shows that preterm children with a neonatal classification of BPD have reduced minute ventilation due to a markedly decreased VT with an increased breathing frequency at peak exercise. These observations are consistent with a rapid and shallow breathing pattern and are in keeping with previous exercise studies in children born preterm [10, 12, 16, 17]. We hypothesised that this rapid and shallow breathing pattern would be associated with an increased prevalence of EFL. However, the absence of significant differences in VT, minute ventilation and breathing frequency between those with and without EFL during exercise suggests that EFL is not contributing to the altered breathing response to exercise. Our study confirms that EFL is highly prevalent in children with BPD [12]. Our observations of the prevalence of EFL in preterm children with (53%) and without (26%) BPD are similar to the prevalence reported by MacLean et al. [12] (47% and 33% in children with and without BPD, respectively). Our study adds to the current literature in that we report this prevalence over a wider gestational age (up to 32 weeks gestational age compared with <29 weeks gestational age). Our data suggests that flow limitation during exercise is not limited to those children surviving extreme preterm birth. Selection of appropriate predicted values for lung function and exercise testing in a paediatric population is hampered by the lack of large normative datasets. We have previously confirmed that the Global Lung Function Initiative reference equations are valid for an Australian population [34]. While we cannot confirm that the predicted values for lung volumes are valid in our population, our inclusion of healthy term controls increases our ability to interpret our data and it is unlikely that the differences between groups reported here are associated with differences in group demographics. The presence of EFL in adults with obstructive lung disease is often linked to an increase in operating lung volumes (EELV and EILV) and dynamic hyperinflation during exercise [18, 21]. However, the preterm children who developed EFL during this study (with reduced FEV1/FVC; table 4), did not show dynamic hyperinflation or changes in operating lung volumes. Preterm children with EFL were more likely to have had a doctor diagnosis of asthma in the past compared with those without; however, they were less likely to be currently using asthma medication. While the current use of asthma medication may blunt the ventilatory response to exercise, all children were assessed without the use of a short-acting bronchodilator medication prior to exercise. Given the lack of dynamic hyperinflation during exercise this suggests that current asthma may not be significantly contributing to the presence of EFL during peak exercise. We hypothesise the role of prematurity per se, rather than severity of neonatal lung disease or recent symptoms is the primary cause of EFL in children born very preterm. This is confirmed in the multivariate analysis demonstrating that the prevalence of EFL was significantly associated with lower gestational age and not markers of the severity of BPD, such as supplemental oxygen use (table 4). In support of our hypothesis, Rideau Batista Novais et al. [17] identified that very low birth weight children had a rapid breathing pattern during exercise and reduced inspiratory muscle strength, suggesting that an increased inspiratory resistive load may lead to the early onset of inspiratory muscle fatigue. Inspiratory muscle load, inspiratory muscle fatigue and/or impaired contractile function of the respiratory muscles may result in the inability of preterm children to increase their operating lung volumes during maximal exercise rather than hyperinflation and hence to a higher prevalence of EFL. Furthermore, the damage associated with injurious tidal volumes during mechanical ventilation and altered peripheral lung development affects the mechanical properties of the lung [3]. Reduced pulmonary compliance increases elastic load on breathing. Increased load (work of breathing) that exceeds the ability of the respiratory muscles to generate sufficient force to increase the operating lung volumes when higher flows are required may result in EFL. In addition, the higher elastic work of increasing the lung volumes may not be tolerated in children born prematurely, preventing the maintenance of a higher operating lung volume. We reported a similar mechanism in obese children with an increased load on the chest wall and diaphragm resulting in a similar response to exercise to that seen in the preterm population, i.e. increased prevalence of EFL without any change in operating lung volumes [31]. Alternatively, the increased prevalence of EFL could be secondary to reduced lung and/or airway size. Children [30, 35] and women [36, 37] have increased EFL compared with adult males; both groups have a lower FEV1 and FEV1/FVC compared to adult males due to smaller lung volumes and airway size, a factor associated with increased prevalence and severity of EFL [36, 37]. However, as the preterm children with EFL did not exhibit differences in measured static lung volumes (FVC, TLC, FRC and residual volume; table 3 and table E2), it is unlikely that the EFL observed in this study is associated with inherent differences in lung size. Lung volumes in this study were assessed using multiple breath washout and it is known that this technique can underestimate actual FRC in the presence of significant airway obstruction leading to trapped gas. It is therefore feasible that our assessments of FRC (and hence TLC) may be underestimated, exploration of this mechanism using whole body plethysmography to measure static lung volumes may be of value. However, given that there were no changes in measures of dynamic lung volume (i.e. IC during exercise) we do not feel that this is a significant limitation to our study. The repeatability of EFL in the paediatric population has not been well described and is difficult to assess due to the need to repeat the exercise test. However, the measurement of EFL is dependent upon accurate measurement of IC and as we did not see any changes in the measurement of IC in this study we are confident this measurement is valid. Children with BPD had an increased prevalence of EFL in the presence of a normal response to exercise and no differences in exercise symptoms; therefore, the clinical implications of this increased EFL are unclear. While we report no differences in exercise symptoms in children with EFL, we were unable to record rated perceived exertion scores or symptom scores at peak exercise as many children were unable to provide a clear answer. As such, we are unable to identify if there are differences in symptoms in children with EFL at peak exercise. We suggest that children born preterm may maintain normal physical activity by moderating their ventilatory response or work in shorter exercise bouts before EFL becomes clinically significant. Further investigation into the mechanisms driving EFL and the functional effects of EFL are necessary to fully identify its impact on exercise of different modes, intensities and durations, and the long-term impact of EFL as these children continue to grow.

Conclusion

We investigated the impact of EFL on aerobic capacity and the ventilatory response to a maximal exercise test in children born preterm with and without a neonatal diagnosis of BPD. We show that children born preterm have a higher prevalence of EFL than term-born controls, and that this was not associated with an altered ventilatory response to exercise. The prevalence of EFL in children born before 32 weeks gestation was associated with a lower gestational age and reduced lung function. Please note: supplementary material is not edited by the Editorial Office, and is uploaded as it has been supplied by the author. Online data supplement 00048-2018_Supplement
  36 in total

Review 1.  Emerging concepts in the evaluation of ventilatory limitation during exercise: the exercise tidal flow-volume loop.

Authors:  B D Johnson; I M Weisman; R J Zeballos; K C Beck
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Relation of lung volumes to height in healthy persons between the ages of 5 and 38 years.

Authors:  C D COOK; J F HAMANN
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1961-11       Impact factor: 4.406

3.  Respiratory outcome in school-aged, very-low-birth-weight children in the surfactant era.

Authors:  P Korhonen; J Laitinen; E Hyödynmaa; O Tammela
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.299

4.  Determinants of expiratory flow limitation in healthy women during exercise.

Authors:  Paolo B Dominelli; Jordan A Guenette; Sabrina S Wilkie; Glen E Foster; A William Sheel
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 5.411

5.  Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in school-aged children who had chronic lung disease in infancy.

Authors:  Suchita Joshi; Thomas Powell; William J Watkins; Mark Drayton; E Mark Williams; Sailesh Kotecha
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 4.406

6.  The EPICure study: maximal exercise and physical activity in school children born extremely preterm.

Authors:  Liam Welsh; Jane Kirkby; Sooky Lum; Dolf Odendaal; Neil Marlow; Graham Derrick; Janet Stocks
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 9.139

7.  Dynamic hyperinflation during bronchoconstriction in asthma: implications for symptom perception.

Authors:  M Diane Lougheed; Thomas Fisher; Denis E O'Donnell
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Motor coordination difficulties and physical fitness of extremely-low-birthweight children.

Authors:  Yvonne R Burns; Marcella Danks; Michael J O'Callaghan; Peter H Gray; David Cooper; Leith Poulsen; Pauline Watter
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 5.449

9.  Respiratory health in pre-school and school age children following extremely preterm birth.

Authors:  E M Hennessy; M A Bracewell; N Wood; D Wolke; Kate Costeloe; A Gibson; N Marlow
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 10.  The clinical importance of dynamic lung hyperinflation in COPD.

Authors:  Denis E O'Donnell; Pierantonio Laveneziana
Journal:  COPD       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.409

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

Authors:  Bernard Thébaud; Kara N Goss; Matthew Laughon; Jeffrey A Whitsett; Steven H Abman; Robin H Steinhorn; Judy L Aschner; Peter G Davis; Sharon A McGrath-Morrow; Roger F Soll; Alan H Jobe
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 52.329

2.  Lung abnormalities do not influence aerobic capacity in school children born preterm.

Authors:  Christopher A O'Dea; Karla Logie; Andrew C Wilson; J Jane Pillow; Conor Murray; Georgia Banton; Shannon J Simpson; Graham L Hall; Andrew Maiorana
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 3.  Lung growth and pulmonary function after prematurity and bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

Authors:  Laura Moschino; Luca Bonadies; Eugenio Baraldi
Journal:  Pediatr Pulmonol       Date:  2021-03-26
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.