Literature DB >> 30320037

Does Exposure to Static Magnetic Fields Generated by Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scanners Raise Safety Problems for Personnel?

A Ghadimi-Moghadam1,2, S M J Mortazavi2,3, A Hosseini-Moghadam4, M Haghani2, S Taeb2, M A Hosseini2, N Rastegariyan5, F Arian6, L Sanipour6, S Aghajari6, S A R Mortazavi2, A Soofi2, M R Dizavandi7.   

Abstract

MRI workers are occupationally exposed to static and time-varying gradient magnetic fields. While the 24-hour time-averaged exposure to static magnetic fields is about a few mT, the maximum static field strength can be as high as 500 mT during patient setup. Over the past several years, our laboratory has performed extensive experiments on the health effects of exposure of animal models and humans to different sources of electromagnetic fields such as cellular phones, mobile base stations, mobile phone jammers, laptop computers, radars, dentistry cavitrons and MRI. This study is to investigate the adverse health effects in MRI workers and also to assess the effect of exposure of MRI workers to static magnetic fields on their cognitive functions. In the first phase of this study a questionnaire was designed to collect information from 120 MRI personnel. The collection of data about the adverse health effects was based on self-reporting by the participants. In the second phase, 47 volunteer university students were asked to continuously move around a 1.5 T MRI scanner. Visual reaction time and working memory tests were performed on all participants before and after the experiment. Forward digit span and backward digit span were used for assessing the working memory. Furthermore, participants were asked to report the symptoms they had experienced during the movement. The first phase of our study showed increased frequencies of adverse health effects in MRI workers. In this study the rates of self-reported symptoms such as a headache, sleep problems, myalgia, palpitation, fatigue, concentration problems, attention problems, nervousness and backpain were possibly affected by static magnetic field. Furthermore we found that reaction time and working memory could be influenced by the movements of the body around a MRI scanner. It can be concluded that movement through a high magnetic field can also lead to some adverse cognitive effects in MRI staff.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive Functions; Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs) ; Health Effects ; MRI ; Static Magnetic Fields (SMF)

Year:  2018        PMID: 30320037      PMCID: PMC6169123     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng        ISSN: 2251-7200


Introduction

The interactions of static magnetic fields (SMFs) with the body are at molecular, cellular, tissue and organ level. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is a widely used important diagnostic imaging method. Although MRI has been known as a safe diagnostic imaging procedure, adverse health effects such as a headache, vertigo, nausea, concentration problems, metallic taste, balance problems, bone health and seeing light flashes have been reported by MRI staff [1-4]. The number of MRI scanners worldwide is estimated to be 20,000-25,000 and as usually about 5 personnel from different disciplines (MRI technologists, nurses, anesthetists, technicians, engineers, cleaners, etc.) are involved in each MRI scanner [5,6], it is estimated that about 100,000 workers are being exposed to substantial electromagnetic fields generated by MRI scanners [7]. MRI workers are occupationally exposed to static and time-varying gradient magnetic fields. While the 24-hour time-averaged exposure to static magnetic fields is about a few mT, the maximum static field strength can be as high as 500 mT during patient set up [8]. It is worth mentioning that MRI workers are exposed to a static magnetic field during the whole working hours. As the static magnetic field of an MRI scanner is always on, MRI personnel moving around the scanner will be exposed to time-varying extremely low frequency magnetic fields which induce electric fields and currents in their bodies. Furthermore, MRI personnel are occupationally exposed to radiofrequency radiation and the switched gradient fields used for image encoding only during patients’ examinations. Over the past several years, our laboratory at the Ionizing and Non-ionizing Radiation Protection Research Center (INIRPRC) has performed extensive experiments on the health effects of exposure of animal models and humans to different sources of electromagnetic fields such as cellular phones [9-16], mobile base stations [17], mobile phone jammers [18], laptop computers [19], radars [10], dentistry cavitrons [20] and MRI [21,22]. The first goal of this study was to investigate the adverse health effects in MRI workers. The second goal of this study was to assess the effect of exposure of MRI workers to static magnetic fields on cognitive functions.

Materials and Methods

Questionnaire Study

A questionnaire was designed to collect information from MRI personnel from seven teaching hospitals affiliated to Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. The collection of data about the adverse health effects was based on self-reporting by the participants (120 personnel including technologists and nurses).

Cognitive Functions

In this part of the study, 47 volunteer university students (18 males and 29 females) were asked to continuously move around a 1.5 T MRI scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany) for 15 minutes. Visual reaction time and working memory tests were performed on all participants before and after the experiment. Forward digit span and backward digit span were used to measure the working memory. Furthermore, participants were asked to report the symptoms they had experienced during the movement.

Results

A. MRI Workers

A statistically significant difference was found between the frequency of individuals who reported getting headaches in MRI workers and the control group (P=0.037). Moreover, a statistically significant difference was found between the frequency of individuals who reported sleep problems in MRI workers and the control group (P<0.001). Furthermore, frequencies of myalgia, palpitations, fatigue, concentration problems, attention problems, nervousness and backpain significantly affected MRI personnel compared to the control group.

B. Volunteer Students

The mean age of participants was 22.23 ± 1.99 years (ranged 20-32 years). As shown in Figure 1, the means of pre and post exposure reaction times were 635 ± 82 and 684 ± 126 msec, respectively (P=0.034). Furthermore, reverse digit span was found to be lower after exposure compared to that of pre-exposure (p>0.040). However, forward digit span, was not affected by exposure to static magnetic fields.
Figure1

The means (±SD) of pre and post exposure reaction times

The means (±SD) of pre and post exposure reaction times

Discussion

In a general view, our results showed increased frequencies of adverse health effects in MRI workers. In our study the rates of self-reported symptoms such as headache, sleep problems, myalgia, palpitations, fatigue, concentration problems, attention problems, nervousness and backaches were possibly affected by exposure to static magnetic field. Altogether these findings are in line with this well documented point that movement in a static magnetic field, depending on the basic factors such as magnetic flux density, the speed of movement and the magnitude of induced currents in the tissues, may result in physiologically significant sensory perception disorders such as vertigo, nausea, the perception of flickering light in the visual field, and a metallic taste in the mouth due to the changes of the magnetic flux penetrating the body [23,24]. These findings are in line with several studies which reported temporary and dose-correlated vertigo and nausea in workers and patients exposed to static magnetic fields. Further studies are needed to explore these bioeffects as well as their magnitudes and possible mechanisms. Our findings are generally in line with reports submitted by Schaap et al. who performed an observational study on 361 employees of 14 clinical and research MRI facilities in the Netherlands. After analysing 633 diaries, they reported that in spite of the variations in their exposure categories, symptoms were reported during 16-39% of the MRI work shifts. Schaap et al. observed a positive association between the magnetic field strength of each scanner and reported symptoms (mainly vertigo and metallic taste) in staff working with closed-bore MRI scanners of 1.5 Tesla and higher [3]. These researchers suggested an exposure-response association between exposure to strong SMFs and transient health symptoms on the same day of exposure. Altogether, these data suggest that in healthy individuals, reaction time and working memory can be influenced by the movements of the body around a MRI scanner. It can be hypothesized that the electric currents induced in the body during movements in the magnetic field may cause these cognitive effects. The increased reaction time observed in our study is in line with the findings of Bongers et al. who found a link between occupational exposure to SMFs of MRI scanners and an increased risk of accidents which caused injuries[25].
  20 in total

1.  Exposure, health complaints and cognitive performance among employees of an MRI scanners manufacturing department.

Authors:  Frank de Vocht; Hinkelien van Drooge; Hans Engels; Hans Kromhout
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Prevalence of subjective poor health symptoms associated with exposure to electromagnetic fields among university students.

Authors:  S M J Mortazavi; J Ahmadi; M Shariati
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.010

3.  Occupational exposure to static and time-varying gradient magnetic fields in MR units.

Authors:  Jill K Bradley; Matilda Nyekiova; David L Price; Lindsay D'jon Lopez; Therese Crawley
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Human short-term exposure to electromagnetic fields emitted by mobile phones decreases computer-assisted visual reaction time.

Authors:  S M J Mortazavi; M S Rouintan; S Taeb; N Dehghan; A A Ghaffarpanah; Z Sadeghi; F Ghafouri
Journal:  Acta Neurol Belg       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 2.396

5.  [Are there any adverse effects of static magnetic field from magnetic resonance imaging devices on bone health of workers?].

Authors:  Harun R R Güngör; Nusret Ok; Semih Akkaya; Nuray Akkaya
Journal:  Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi       Date:  2014

6.  Mercury release from dental amalgam restorations after magnetic resonance imaging and following mobile phone use.

Authors:  S M J Mortazavi; E Daiee; A Yazdi; K Khiabani; A Kavousi; R Vazirinejad; B Behnejad; M Ghasemi; M Balali Mood
Journal:  Pak J Biol Sci       Date:  2008-04-15

7.  Increased Radioresistance to Lethal Doses of Gamma Rays in Mice and Rats after Exposure to Microwave Radiation Emitted by a GSM Mobile Phone Simulator.

Authors:  Smj Mortazavi; Ma Mosleh-Shirazi; Ar Tavassoli; M Taheri; Ar Mehdizadeh; Sas Namazi; A Jamali; R Ghalandari; S Bonyadi; M Haghani; M Shafie
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 2.658

8.  Guidelines on limits of exposure to static magnetic fields. International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection.

Authors: 
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 1.316

9.  Occupational exposure of healthcare and research staff to static magnetic stray fields from 1.5-7 Tesla MRI scanners is associated with reporting of transient symptoms.

Authors:  Kristel Schaap; Yvette Christopher-de Vries; Catherine K Mason; Frank de Vocht; Lützen Portengen; Hans Kromhout
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 4.402

10.  High-field MRI and mercury release from dental amalgam fillings.

Authors:  S M J Mortazavi; M Neghab; S M H Anoosheh; N Bahaeddini; G Mortazavi; P Neghab; A Rajaeifard
Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2014-04
View more
  1 in total

1.  Health effects related to exposure of static magnetic fields and acoustic noise-comparison between MR and CT radiographers.

Authors:  Anton Glans; Jonna Wilén; Lenita Lindgren; Isabella M Björkman-Burtscher; Boel Hansson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 5.315

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.