Literature DB >> 30319809

Crystal structure of meso-3,3'-(1,4-phenyl-ene)bis-(2-phenyl-2,3,5,6-tetra-hydro-4H-1,3-thia-zin-4-one).

Hemant P Yennawar1, Quentin J Moyer2, Lee J Silverberg2.   

Abstract

The crystal structure of the title compound - meso-C26H24N2O2S2 with two stereocenters - has half the mol-ecule in the asymmetric unit with the other half generated by a crystallographic center of inversion. The thia-zine ring is in a conformation that is between half-chair and envelope [θ = 52.51 (17)°]. The phenyl ring on the 2-carbon atom of the thia-zine ring is pseudo-axial. The central phenyl ring of the mol-ecule is close to orthogonal to the phenyl rings on either side with an angle of 76.85 (11)° between those planes. In the crystal, pairwise, weak C-H⋯O hydrogen bonds between the central phenyl ring and the oxygen atoms of neighboring mol-ecules result in continuous strips propagating along the a-axis direction. Hydro-phobic inter-actions of the C-H⋯π type are also observed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C—H⋯O and C—H⋯π inter­actions; bis-thia­zinone; crystal structure; meso structure

Year:  2018        PMID: 30319809      PMCID: PMC6176446          DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018013397

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Chemical context

Bis-heterocyclic compounds are of inter­est because of their potential biological activity (Shaker, 2012 ▸). The phenyl­ene bridged bis-thia­zolidinone 3,3′-(1,4-phenyl­ene)bis­(2-phenyl-l,3-thia­zolidin-4-one) has been reported by multiple groups over several decades (Martani, 1956 ▸; El-Shafei et al., 1984 ▸; Shaker, 1999 ▸; Kumar et al., 2013 ▸; Pang et al., 2016 ▸; Xing et al., 2016 ▸), but the analogous bis-2,3,5,6-tetra­hydro-4H-1,3-thia­zin-4-one has not. There is a report of 3,3′-(1,4-phenyl­ene)bis­(2-(4-methyl­phen­yl)-2,3,5,6-tetra­hydro-4H-1,3-thia­zin-4-one), but the data supporting the assigned structure are questionable (Aljamali, 2013 ▸). There do not appear to be any other reports of a 3,3′-(1,4-phenyl­ene)bis­(2-ar­yl-2,3,5,6-tetra­hydro-4H-1,3-thia­zin-4-one). In previous work, we have reported the synthesis and crystal structures of several mono-heterocyclic 2,3-diaryl-2,3,5,6-tetra­hydro-4H-1,3-thia­zin-4-ones (Yennawar & Silverberg, 2014 ▸, 2015 ▸; Yennawar et al., 2018 ▸). Herein we report the synthesis and crystal structure of meso-3,3′-(1,4-phenyl­ene)bis­(2-phenyl-2,3,5,6-tetra­hydro-4H-1,3-thia­zin-4-one), (I). There are two stereocenters in the mol­ecule, at the 2-C position of each heterocycle, but the only stereoisomer isolated was the meso structure, i.e. the stereocenters have opposite configurations.

Structural commentary

Compound (I) is highly symmetric with two chiral centers and its meso stereochemistry allows it to straddle the center of inversion in the P21/c space-group (Fig. 1 ▸). The thia­zine rings adopt a configuration midway between half-chair and envelope [θ = 52.51 (17)°], with the sulfur atoms in each forming the back or the flap. On each thia­zine ring, the phenyl group on the 2-carbon atom is pseudo-axial. The dihedral angle between the planes of the two substituent phenyl rings is 76.85 (11)°. The structure described above shows some similarities and some differences when compared with that of 2,3-diphenyl-2,3,5,6-tetra­hydro-4H-1,3-thia­zin-4-one, (II) (Yennawar & Silverberg, 2014 ▸). In (II), the thia­zine ring has an envelope conformation [θ = 54.54 (17)°] and the orientation of the phenyl ring on the 3-nitro­gen atom about the N—C bond differs by about 90° from the structure of (I), as can be seen in superposition image (Fig. 2 ▸).
Figure 1

The mol­ecular structure of (I) with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level. The asymmetric unit contains half the mol­ecule (unique atoms shown with labels); the unlabeled atoms are generated by the symmetry operation (2 − x, 1 − y, −z).

Figure 2

Overlay image of the title mol­ecule (a few atoms labeled) with 2,3-diphenyl-2,3,5,6-tetra­hydro-4H-1,3-thia­zin-4-one (Yennawar & Silverberg, 2014 ▸) showing differences in the central ring orientation in the two structures.

Supra­molecular features

A very weak C—H⋯O hydrogen bond between the central phenyl ring and the oxygen atom of the neighboring mol­ecule is detailed in Table 1 ▸. In the extended structure, these hydrogen bonds result in parallel and reciprocal pairs of inter­actions, which further give rise to a pair of continuous tape formations down the a-axis direction (Fig. 3 ▸), defined by the lines (x, ½, 0) and (x, 0, ½). In addition, a C—H⋯π inter­action [C⋯π-ring = 3.457 (3) Å] between the carbon atom of the thia­zine ring and the 2-phenyl ring is observed.
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
C13—H13⋯O1i 0.932.723.401 (3)131

Symmetry code: (i) .

Figure 3

Packing diagram for (I) showing continuous tape formations linked by weak C—H⋯O inter­actions (dashed lines) propagating along the [100] direction.

Database survey

The crystal structure of the mono-heterocycle 2,3-diphenyl-2,3,5,6-tetra­hydro-4H-1,3-thia­zin-4-one (Yennawar & Silverberg, 2014 ▸) was the closest crystal structure found. Similarity and substructure searches on SciFinder, repeated 9/25/18, only found one phenylene-bridged bis-(1,3-thiazin-4-one) compound, which almost certainly was incorrectly identified (Aljamali, 2013 ▸). No crystal structures of this or phenylene-bridged bis-(1,3-thiazolidin-4-one) compounds were found either.

Synthesis and crystallization

-3,3′-(1,4-Phenyl­ene)bis­(2-phenyl-2,3,5,6-tetra­hydro-4 -1,3-thia­zin-4-one): A two-necked 25-ml round-bottom flask was oven-dried, cooled under N2, and charged with a stir bar, N,N′-(1,4-phenyl­ene)bis­(1-phenyl­methanimine) (0.8531 g, 3 mmol) and 3-mercaptopropionic acid (0.6368 g, 6 mmol). 2-Methyl­tetra­hydro­furan (2.3 ml) was added and the solution was stirred. Pyridine (1.95 ml, 24 mmol) and finally, 2,4,6-tri­propyl-1,3,5,2,4,6-trioxatri­phospho­rinane-2,4,6-trioxide (T3P) in 2-methyl­tetra­hydro­furan (50 weight %; 7.3 ml, 12 mmol) were added. The reaction was stirred at room temperature and followed by TLC (80% ethyl acetate/hexa­nes). The mixture was poured into a separatory funnel with di­chloro­methane and distilled water. The layers were separated and the aqueous layer was then extracted twice with di­chloro­methane. The organics were combined and washed with saturated sodium bicarbonate and then saturated sodium chloride. The organic was dried over sodium sulfate and concentrated under vacuum to give crude product. The crude was recrystallized from CH2Cl2/acetone solution to give white powder. Yield: 0.3108 g 1st crop, 0.0318 g 2nd crop (12% total), m.p. 523 K (decomp.). Crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction studies were grown by slow evaporation from CH2Cl2/acetone.

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2 ▸. H atoms were positioned geometerically (C—H = 0.93–0.98 Å) and refined as riding with U iso(H) = 1.2U eq(C).
Table 2

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC26H24N2O2S2
M r 460.59
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K)298
a, b, c (Å)7.080 (2), 13.017 (4), 12.093 (3)
β (°)98.289 (6)
V3)1102.9 (5)
Z 2
Radiation typeMo Kα
μ (mm−1)0.27
Crystal size (mm)0.15 × 0.06 × 0.05
 
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker SMART CCD area detector
Absorption correctionMulti-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 20014)
T min, T max 0.857, 0.9
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections7575, 2757, 2055
R int 0.023
(sin θ/λ)max−1)0.668
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.056, 0.149, 1.02
No. of reflections2757
No. of parameters145
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)0.29, −0.21

Computer programs: SMART and SAINT (Bruker, 2001 ▸), SHELXS and SHELXL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸) and OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009 ▸).

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018013397/hb7772sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018013397/hb7772Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018013397/hb7772Isup3.mol CCDC reference: 1868690 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C26H24N2O2S2F(000) = 484
Mr = 460.59Dx = 1.387 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 7.080 (2) ÅCell parameters from 1747 reflections
b = 13.017 (4) Åθ = 2.3–26.2°
c = 12.093 (3) ŵ = 0.27 mm1
β = 98.289 (6)°T = 298 K
V = 1102.9 (5) Å3Block, colorless
Z = 20.15 × 0.06 × 0.05 mm
Bruker SMART CCD area detector diffractometer2757 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube2055 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.023
phi and ω scansθmax = 28.4°, θmin = 2.3°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 20014)h = −9→9
Tmin = 0.857, Tmax = 0.9k = −16→17
7575 measured reflectionsl = −16→12
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.056Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.149H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.02w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0717P)2 + 0.4464P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2757 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
145 parametersΔρmax = 0.29 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.21 e Å3
Experimental. The data collection nominally covered a full sphere of reciprocal space by a combination of 4 sets of ω scans each set at different φ and/or 2θ angles and each scan (10 s exposure) covering -0.300° degrees in ω. The crystal to detector distance was 5.82 cm. SADABS V2.05 (BRUKER, 2001) was used for absorption correction. R(int) was 0.0303 before and 0.0175 after correction. The Ratio of minimum to maximum transmission is 0.8572. The λ/2 correction factor is 0.0015.
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.9688 (3)0.29893 (15)0.21227 (18)0.0388 (5)
H11.05850.28520.15940.047*
C20.6918 (3)0.41602 (17)0.20879 (17)0.0392 (5)
C30.5997 (4)0.3422 (2)0.2815 (2)0.0588 (7)
H3A0.59230.37760.35140.071*
H3B0.46940.33220.24570.071*
C40.6802 (4)0.2374 (2)0.3114 (2)0.0601 (7)
H4A0.57600.19060.31870.072*
H4B0.76080.24100.38330.072*
C51.0882 (3)0.31690 (16)0.32526 (18)0.0387 (5)
C61.1926 (3)0.2367 (2)0.3796 (2)0.0523 (6)
H61.18550.17140.34800.063*
C71.3066 (3)0.2534 (3)0.4800 (2)0.0654 (8)
H71.37650.19930.51560.078*
C81.3185 (4)0.3491 (3)0.5283 (2)0.0739 (9)
H81.39500.35970.59650.089*
C91.2166 (4)0.4288 (3)0.4751 (2)0.0675 (8)
H91.22480.49390.50690.081*
C101.1016 (3)0.4123 (2)0.37427 (19)0.0502 (6)
H101.03210.46680.33900.060*
C110.9278 (3)0.44770 (14)0.08461 (15)0.0317 (4)
C121.1198 (3)0.47343 (16)0.09557 (16)0.0350 (4)
H121.20070.45560.16020.042*
C130.8087 (3)0.47470 (15)−0.01124 (16)0.0347 (4)
H130.67980.4579−0.01910.042*
N10.8566 (2)0.38859 (13)0.16985 (14)0.0355 (4)
O10.6121 (2)0.49719 (13)0.18357 (15)0.0539 (4)
S10.81637 (9)0.18725 (5)0.21024 (6)0.0574 (2)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0399 (10)0.0339 (11)0.0440 (11)0.0052 (8)0.0106 (8)0.0067 (9)
C20.0346 (9)0.0437 (12)0.0396 (11)0.0021 (9)0.0059 (8)0.0043 (9)
C30.0560 (14)0.0589 (16)0.0668 (16)0.0056 (12)0.0269 (12)0.0170 (13)
C40.0485 (13)0.0575 (16)0.0759 (17)−0.0081 (11)0.0139 (12)0.0209 (13)
C50.0313 (9)0.0442 (12)0.0422 (11)0.0011 (8)0.0103 (8)0.0112 (9)
C60.0422 (11)0.0492 (14)0.0660 (15)0.0022 (10)0.0095 (11)0.0201 (12)
C70.0426 (12)0.085 (2)0.0676 (17)0.0072 (13)0.0034 (12)0.0370 (16)
C80.0538 (15)0.116 (3)0.0478 (15)−0.0035 (16)−0.0057 (12)0.0142 (16)
C90.0668 (17)0.081 (2)0.0535 (15)0.0025 (15)0.0042 (13)−0.0116 (14)
C100.0485 (12)0.0545 (15)0.0468 (12)0.0104 (11)0.0039 (10)0.0014 (11)
C110.0334 (9)0.0291 (10)0.0329 (9)0.0018 (7)0.0064 (7)0.0013 (7)
C120.0323 (9)0.0405 (11)0.0310 (9)0.0029 (8)−0.0002 (7)0.0019 (8)
C130.0294 (8)0.0371 (11)0.0371 (10)−0.0014 (7)0.0031 (7)−0.0012 (8)
N10.0342 (8)0.0359 (9)0.0373 (8)0.0054 (7)0.0085 (6)0.0083 (7)
O10.0471 (8)0.0525 (10)0.0655 (10)0.0173 (7)0.0191 (8)0.0169 (8)
S10.0605 (4)0.0356 (3)0.0744 (5)−0.0044 (3)0.0041 (3)0.0002 (3)
C1—H10.9800C6—C71.375 (4)
C1—C51.518 (3)C7—H70.9300
C1—N11.462 (2)C7—C81.373 (5)
C1—S11.809 (2)C8—H80.9300
C2—C31.512 (3)C8—C91.370 (4)
C2—N11.367 (3)C9—H90.9300
C2—O11.216 (3)C9—C101.382 (3)
C3—H3A0.9700C10—H100.9300
C3—H3B0.9700C11—C121.388 (3)
C3—C41.502 (4)C11—C131.377 (3)
C4—H4A0.9700C11—N11.435 (2)
C4—H4B0.9700C12—H120.9300
C4—S11.787 (3)C12—C13i1.379 (3)
C5—C61.389 (3)C13—C12i1.379 (3)
C5—C101.374 (3)C13—H130.9300
C6—H60.9300
C5—C1—H1106.6C7—C6—H6119.9
C5—C1—S1112.95 (14)C6—C7—H7119.6
N1—C1—H1106.6C8—C7—C6120.8 (2)
N1—C1—C5113.37 (17)C8—C7—H7119.6
N1—C1—S1110.10 (13)C7—C8—H8120.3
S1—C1—H1106.6C9—C8—C7119.4 (3)
N1—C2—C3119.70 (19)C9—C8—H8120.3
O1—C2—C3118.33 (19)C8—C9—H9120.0
O1—C2—N1121.92 (19)C8—C9—C10120.1 (3)
C2—C3—H3A106.7C10—C9—H9120.0
C2—C3—H3B106.7C5—C10—C9121.0 (2)
H3A—C3—H3B106.6C5—C10—H10119.5
C4—C3—C2122.4 (2)C9—C10—H10119.5
C4—C3—H3A106.7C12—C11—N1120.09 (16)
C4—C3—H3B106.7C13—C11—C12119.42 (17)
C3—C4—H4A109.0C13—C11—N1120.40 (17)
C3—C4—H4B109.0C11—C12—H12119.8
C3—C4—S1113.01 (18)C13i—C12—C11120.44 (17)
H4A—C4—H4B107.8C13i—C12—H12119.8
S1—C4—H4A109.0C11—C13—C12i120.14 (17)
S1—C4—H4B109.0C11—C13—H13119.9
C6—C5—C1120.0 (2)C12i—C13—H13119.9
C10—C5—C1121.50 (18)C2—N1—C1122.35 (17)
C10—C5—C6118.5 (2)C2—N1—C11120.86 (16)
C5—C6—H6119.9C11—N1—C1116.80 (15)
C7—C6—C5120.2 (3)C4—S1—C194.42 (11)
C1—C5—C6—C7177.6 (2)C12—C11—N1—C2134.4 (2)
C1—C5—C10—C9−177.4 (2)C13—C11—C12—C13i−0.2 (3)
C2—C3—C4—S1−26.3 (3)C13—C11—N1—C1131.14 (19)
C3—C2—N1—C1−11.9 (3)C13—C11—N1—C2−49.0 (3)
C3—C2—N1—C11168.2 (2)N1—C1—C5—C6175.76 (18)
C3—C4—S1—C153.0 (2)N1—C1—C5—C10−6.6 (3)
C5—C1—N1—C2−77.3 (2)N1—C1—S1—C4−64.88 (16)
C5—C1—N1—C11102.54 (19)N1—C2—C3—C4−1.4 (4)
C5—C1—S1—C462.97 (17)N1—C11—C12—C13i176.39 (18)
C5—C6—C7—C80.3 (4)N1—C11—C13—C12i−176.38 (18)
C6—C5—C10—C90.2 (3)O1—C2—C3—C4176.1 (3)
C6—C7—C8—C9−0.5 (4)O1—C2—N1—C1170.7 (2)
C7—C8—C9—C100.6 (4)O1—C2—N1—C11−9.2 (3)
C8—C9—C10—C5−0.5 (4)S1—C1—C5—C649.6 (2)
C10—C5—C6—C7−0.1 (3)S1—C1—C5—C10−132.72 (19)
C12—C11—C13—C12i0.2 (3)S1—C1—N1—C250.3 (2)
C12—C11—N1—C1−45.4 (2)S1—C1—N1—C11−129.85 (15)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C13—H13···O1ii0.932.723.401 (3)131
  2 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  2,3-Diphenyl-2,3,5,6-tetra-hydro-4H-1,3-thia-zin-4-one.

Authors:  Hemant P Yennawar; Lee J Silverberg
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2014-01-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.