Literature DB >> 30319561

Molecular Epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: Association of Molecular Factors With the Source of Infection.

Dafne Pérez-Montarelo1, Esther Viedma1, Nieves Larrosa2, Carmen Gómez-González3, Enrique Ruiz de Gopegui4, Irene Muñoz-Gallego1, Rafael San Juan1, Nuria Fernández-Hidalgo2, Benito Almirante2, Fernando Chaves1.   

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) is associated with high morbidity and mortality, which varies depending on the source of infection. Nevertheless, the global molecular epidemiology of SAB and its possible association with specific virulence factors remains unclear. Using DNA microarrays, a total of 833 S. aureus strains (785 SAB and 48 colonizing strains) collected in Spain over a period of 15 years (2002-2017) were characterized to determine clonal complex (CC), agr type and repertoire of resistance and virulence genes in order to provide an epidemiological overview of CCs causing bloodstream infection, and to analyze possible associations between virulence genes and the most common sources of bacteremia. The results were also analyzed by acquisition (healthcare-associated [HA] and community-acquired [CA]), methicillin-resistant (MRSA) and methicillin-susceptible (MSSA) strains, and patient age (adults vs. children). Our results revealed high clonal diversity among SAB strains with up to 28 different CCs. The most prevalent CCs were CC5 (30.8%), CC30 (20.3%), CC45 (8.3%), CC8 (8.4%), CC15 (7.5%), and CC22 (5.9%), which together accounted for 80% of all cases. A higher proportion of CC5 was found among HA strains than CA strains (35.6 vs. 20.2%, p < 0.001). CC5 was associated with methicillin resistance (14.7 vs. 79.4%, p < 0.001), whereas CC30, CC45, and CC15 were correlated with MSSA strains (p < 0.001). Pathogen-related molecular markers significantly associated with a specific source of bacteremia included the presence of sea, undisrupted hlb and isaB genes with catheter-related bacteremia; sed, splE, and fib genes with endocarditis; undisrupted hlb with skin and soft tissue infections; and finally, CC5, msrA resistance gene and hla gene with osteoarticular source. Our study suggests an association between S. aureus genotype and place of acquisition, methicillin resistance and sources of bloodstream infection, and provides a valuable starting point for further research insights into intrinsic pathogenic mechanisms involved in the development of SAB.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia; bacteremia source; clonal complex; molecular epidemiology; virulence factors

Year:  2018        PMID: 30319561      PMCID: PMC6167439          DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Microbiol        ISSN: 1664-302X            Impact factor:   5.640


Introduction

Staphylococcus aureus is an opportunistic pathogen that can potentially cause a wide range of infections. It is a leading cause of bacteremia and represents a significant global health problem (Weiner et al., 2016). S. aureus bacteremia (SAB) is often associated with severe metastatic infections, such as infective endocarditis, septic arthritis and osteomyelitis and complications, such as sepsis and septic shock, which lead to adverse outcomes that are challenging to manage (Shorr et al., 2006; Wyllie, 2006). The incidence of SAB is difficult to determine and there are major geographical differences that reflect discrepancies in health care systems and infection control practices. In developed countries, the estimated incidence 80–190 cases per 100,000 inhabitants per year (Laupland, 2013; Le Moing et al., 2015). Despite the improvements in SAB management, including greater understanding of this infection and mandatory surveillance implemented in several countries over recent decades, SAB still causes significant morbidity and mortality, with an associated early mortality that appears to have plateaued at approximately 20–30% (van Hal et al., 2012). Certainly, little is known about global SAB epidemiology in terms of the circulating clones causing SAB in different patient subgroups, such as adults and children, or those most commonly found in the community or hospital settings. Because it is becoming progressively more difficult to differentiate between healthcare-associated and community-acquired infections due to changes in the complexity of present health care systems, it is important to identify the specific clones that are traditionally associated with the community but may be entering hospitals and replacing common nosocomial clones, and vice versa. Moreover, it would be especially interesting to study clonality taking into account that bacterial phenotype and genotype have been shown to have a possible influence on infection outcome, since different clones can adopt different strategies to overcome host responses and cause severe pathology (Recker et al., 2017). The overall mortality rate from SAB varies depending on the primary focus of infection (the highest rates occur in patients with infective endocarditis and pulmonary infections, and the lowest in patients with catheter-related infections) and on the complications deriving from SAB. This association makes it necessary to regard SAB not as a single entity, but as a heterogeneous group of infections that can evolve differently and therefore require source-specific management (van Hal et al., 2012). However, the characteristics of the most common clones causing SAB according to source of infection remain unknown. Furthermore, determining the role of particular genetic backgrounds (clonality and virulence) in bloodstream infections caused by S. aureus has become a real challenge due to the diversity, redundancy and host specificity of the virulence factors. The aim of the present study was to explore the molecular characteristics of S. aureus strains causing bacteremia in order to provide an epidemiological overview of the circulating clones causing bloodstream infection and to analyze the possible association between virulence and the most common sources of bacteremia.

Materials and methods

Data collection

A total of 785 strains causing bacteremia with different source and 48 colonization strains collected over a period of 15 years (2002–2017) were analyzed. These strains were obtained from different sources in hospitals geographically distant from each other spread across the territory of Spain (Table 1). Specifically, these strains were identified in 10 different collections: six were single-center studies developed at the Hospital 12 de Octubre in Madrid, and the remaining four corresponded to multi-center studies developed at various Spanish hospitals (Muñoz-Gallego et al., 2017; San-Juan et al., 2017; Fernández-Hidalgo et al., 2018). The main focus and objective of the studies for which these strains were collected was source of staphylococcal bacteremia, mainly endocarditis (N = 214), catheter-related bacteremia (CRB) (N = 212), skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI) (N = 66), and bone and joint infections (N = 100). Eight of these collections corresponded to SAB infections in adults, and two in children (< 15 years of age). The percentage of MRSA strains included in each collection varied. The studies were approved by the ethics committee of the University Hospital 12 de Octubre (Madrid, Spain). It was not considered necessary to obtain written informed consent because the participants were anonymized (IRH-ANT-2013-01).
Table 1

Description of the bacteremia-producing strain collections included in the study.

SourcePeriodParticipating citiesParticipating hospitals*Number of strainsAge populationMRSA (%)CommentaryReferences
Endocarditis2013–2016Malaga, Seville, Madrid, Barcelona, Santander, Bilbao15210Adults19.0Prospective studyFernández-Hidalgo et al., 2018
Catheter2011–2014Madrid, Barcelona, Seville580Adults0.0Prospective study including only MSSA strainsSan-Juan et al., 2016
Various sourcesa2002–2010Madrid1111Children3.6Retrospective studies
Various sourcesb2009–2010Madrid, Barcelona, Palma de Mallorca, A Coruña591Children12.1Prospective study
Various sourcesb2006–2010Madrid145Adults and children51.1Retrospective study including recurrent bacteremia. Children n = 3
Various sourcesd2010–2011Madrid1111Adults24.3Retrospective studyViedma et al., 2014
Various sourcese2012–2014Madrid159Adults100.0Retrospective study including only MRSA strains
Bone and joint infections2005–2015Madrid149Adults71, 4Retrospective studyMuñoz-Gallego et al., 2017
Bone and joint infections2016Madrid729Adults20, 7Prospective study
Colonization2012Madrid148Adults5.8Prospective study of colonization strains from healthy carriersLópez-aguilera et al., 2013

Catheter-related, congenital, skin and soft tissue infections, osteoarticular, unknown.

Catheter-related, skin and soft tissue infections, osteoarticular, unknown.

Catheter-related, skin and soft tissue infections, osteoarticular, endocarditis, urinary tract infection, respiratory, unknown.

Participant Hospitals: University Hospital 12 de Octubre, University Hospital de La Princesa, University Hospital Puerta del Hierro, University Hospital La Paz (Comunidad de Madrid); University Hospital A Coruña (Galicia); University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla (Cantabria); University Hospital Son Espases (Islas Baleares); University Hospital Cruces (País Vasco); University Hospital Vall d‘Hebron, Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Hospital de la Santa Creu y Sant Pau, Hospital de San Pedro, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Hospital de Barcelona, Hospital Parc Tauli (Cataluña); Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Macarena, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria (Andalucía).

Description of the bacteremia-producing strain collections included in the study. Catheter-related, congenital, skin and soft tissue infections, osteoarticular, unknown. Catheter-related, skin and soft tissue infections, osteoarticular, unknown. Catheter-related, skin and soft tissue infections, osteoarticular, endocarditis, urinary tract infection, respiratory, unknown. Participant Hospitals: University Hospital 12 de Octubre, University Hospital de La Princesa, University Hospital Puerta del Hierro, University Hospital La Paz (Comunidad de Madrid); University Hospital A Coruña (Galicia); University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla (Cantabria); University Hospital Son Espases (Islas Baleares); University Hospital Cruces (País Vasco); University Hospital Vall d‘Hebron, Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Hospital de la Santa Creu y Sant Pau, Hospital de San Pedro, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Hospital de Barcelona, Hospital Parc Tauli (Cataluña); Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Macarena, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria (Andalucía). Cases were classified according to acquisition: healthcare-associated (HA) or community-acquired (CA). HA included both nosocomial cases with a positive blood culture obtained from patients who had been hospitalized for 48 h or longer (Garner et al., 1988) and healthcare-associated cases following Friedman et al.'s criteria (Friedman et al., 2002). CA cases were those with a positive blood culture obtained at the time of hospital admission or within 48 h after hospital admission. Methicillin resistance was defined on the basis of results of microdilution techniques, cefoxitin susceptibility testing and/or the presence of the mecA gene.

Molecular studies

Blood cultures were processed with an automated blood culture system (BACTEC 9240, Becton Dickinson Microbiological System, USA). Automatic microdilution techniques were used for identification and susceptibility testing of isolates. Bacterial DNA was extracted using commercial extraction kits (Qiagen, Germany) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. DNA microarrays (Alere, Germany; Monecke et al., 2008) covering 334 target sequences and approximately 187 different genes that included species-specific markers, antimicrobial resistance genes, exotoxins, genes encoding microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules (MCSCRAMMs), capsule genes, clonal complexes (CC) and agr group typing markers were run on the whole collection of strains. Those cases with ambiguous array results were considered as missing values for further analysis. Only genes found with a frequency of between 5 and 95% in the whole collection were considered for statistical analysis.

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables were compared using the chi-squared or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. Significance levels of DNA microarray results were corrected using the Bonferroni correction for multiple tests. Pairwise comparisons of the main CCs, agr types and virulence genes were performed with source of bacteremia. Potential associations were investigated by univariate and multivariate logistic regression, in which CCs, agr types and virulence factors were considered as independent dichotomous variables, and source of bacteremia as the dependent variable. For multivariate analysis, variables with a p-value <0.1 in the univariate analysis were included in a backward stepwise algorithm. All statistical tests were two-tailed and a p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Analyses were performed using the SPSS statistical package, version 21.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).

Results

A total of 785 S. aureus strains causing bacteremia and 48 S. aureus colonizing strains were characterized in this study with the DNA microarray. Of a total of 187 genes included in the array, 67 genes were excluded from further analysis. Twenty one genes because they were found in almost all of the strains (>95%): sarA(99.5%), saeS(98.4%), vraS(99.7%), lukF(96.7%), hl(97.5%), hld(99.3%), sspA(99.8%), sspB(100%), sspP(99.8%), icaA(99.6%), icaC(98.4%), icaD(99.5%), clfA(99.6%), clfB(99.4%), ebpS(99.4%), eno(99.5%), fnbA(98.1%), map(97.6%), sdrC(99.3%) and isdA(99.6%); and 47 genes because they were absent from almost all of the strains (< 5%): ermA(4.7%), ermB(0.3%), lnuA(0.7%), mefA(0%), vatA(0%), vatB(0%), vgaA(2.6%), vgaB(0%), aacA-aphD(3.9%), dfrS1(2.5%), fusB(0%), fusC(0.8%), tetK(2.2%), tetM(2.1%), cat(0.8%), cfr(0.1%), fexA(0.2%), qacA(0.2%), qacC(2.2%), vanA(0%), vanB(0%), vanZ(0%), seb(3.6%), see(0%), seh(4.6%), sej(3.6%), sek(3.4%), seq(3.1%), ser(3.4%), pvl(1.8%), etA(2.5%), etB(0.8%), etD(3.1%), edinA(0.6%), edinB(3.3%), edinC(0.7%), ACME cluster(0.5%), arcA-SCC(0.2%), arcB-SCC(0.1%), arc-SCC(0.1%), arcD-SCC(3.6%), cap1(0.7%), and bap(0.1%). Nine additional genes were discarded due to an unacceptable number of missing values (>30%): mecC(55%), mecR(56.2%), merA(53.3%), merB(39.5%), fosBplasmid(62.8%), lukM(52.8%), lukY(51.3%), setC-selX(52.3%), setB3(51.5%), setB2(51.7%), setB1(52.6%), fnbB(51.3%), and sdrD(51.6%). The main CCs detected in this study were: CC5 (30.8%), CC30 (20.3%), CC45 (8.3%), CC8 (8.4%), CC15 (7.5%) and CC22 (5.9%). In addition, up to 22 minor CCs were also detected: CC398 (2.4%), CC121 (2.4%), CC25 (2.2%), CC9 (1.7%), CC97 (1.6%), CC6 (1.3%), CC1 (1.1%), CC7 (1.1%), CC188 (1.0%), CC101, CC10, CC49, CC59, CC509, CC20, CC12, CC75, CC96, CC395, CC522, CC707 and CC1021 (<1%; Table 2). agrII type was the most common (41.7%), followed by agrI (33.7%) and agrIII (22.2%).
Table 2

Distribution of S. aureus clonal complexes according to place of acquisition, methicillin resistance and age of population.

Place of acquisition*Methicillin resistanceAge (adult)
CC**HA N = 551 n (%)CA N = 255 n (%)P-valueMSSA N = 627 n (%)MRSA N = 206 n (%)P-valueAdult N = 628 n (%)Children N = 205 n (%)P-value
5193 (35.6)50 (20.2)<0.00190 (14.7)162 (79.4)<0.001213 (34.2)39 (20.0)<0.001
838 (7.0)21 (8.5)0.47442 (6.9)20 (9.8)0.17945 (7.2)17 (8.7)0.501
1540 (7.4)21 (8.5)0.59861 (10.0)0 (0.0)<0.00143 (6.9)18 (9.2)0.293
2235 (6.5)11 (4.4)0.24939 (6.4)9 (4.4)0.29139 (6.3)9 (4.6)0.379
30101 (18.6)58 (23.4)0.126165 (26.9)1 (0.5)<0.001113 (18.2)53 (27.2)0.008
4542 (7.7)23 (9.3)0.47365 (10.6)4 (2.0)<0.00150 (8.0)19 (9.7)0.462

27 strains did not have place of acquisition data available.

Only the major clones are shown. Other clones detected in this study were: CC1(1.1%), CC6(1.3%), CC7(1.1%), CC9(1.7%), CC10(0.6%), CC12(0.2%), CC20(0.4%), CC25(2.2%), CC49(0.6%), CC59(0.6%), CC75(0.1%), CC96(0.1%), CC97(1.6%), CC101(0.7%), CC121(2.4%), CC188(1.0%), CC395(0.1%), CC398(2.4%), CC509(0.5%), CC522(0.1%), CC707(0.1%) and CC1021(0.1%).

Statistically significant results are highlighted in bold.

CC, clonal complex; HA, healthcare-associated; CA, community-associated; MSSA, methicillin-susceptible S. aureus; MRSA, methicillin-resistant S. aureus.

Distribution of S. aureus clonal complexes according to place of acquisition, methicillin resistance and age of population. 27 strains did not have place of acquisition data available. Only the major clones are shown. Other clones detected in this study were: CC1(1.1%), CC6(1.3%), CC7(1.1%), CC9(1.7%), CC10(0.6%), CC12(0.2%), CC20(0.4%), CC25(2.2%), CC49(0.6%), CC59(0.6%), CC75(0.1%), CC96(0.1%), CC97(1.6%), CC101(0.7%), CC121(2.4%), CC188(1.0%), CC395(0.1%), CC398(2.4%), CC509(0.5%), CC522(0.1%), CC707(0.1%) and CC1021(0.1%). Statistically significant results are highlighted in bold. CC, clonal complex; HA, healthcare-associated; CA, community-associated; MSSA, methicillin-susceptible S. aureus; MRSA, methicillin-resistant S. aureus.

Distribution of S. aureus strains by CC and agr type according to acquisition, methicillin resistance and age of population

Healthcare-associated vs. community-acquired

In our collection, there was a higher proportion of HA strains (68.4%) compared to CA strains, which accounted for 31.6%. Healthcare-associated strains were assigned to 26 different CCs, with CC5 (35.6%) being the most common, followed by CC30 (18.6%). The CC diversity was slightly lower among CA strains, which were assigned to 23 CCs, with CC30 (23.4%) and CC5 (20.2%) being the ones most commonly found (Table 2). Although most clones circulated in the healthcare and community settings, a higher proportion of CC5 was found among HA than among CA strains (35.6 vs. 20.2%, p < 0.001; Table 2). The distribution of agr types is presented in Table 3. Note that while agrI was the main agr type among CA strains (31.0% vs. 39.2%, p: 0.030), agrII was associated with HA acquisition, (46.6 vs. 31.8%, p < 0.001).
Table 3

Distribution of agr types according to place of acquisition, methicillin resistance and age of population.

Place of acquisition*Methicillin resistanceAdult age
agr type**HA N = 551 n (%)CA N = 255 n (%)P-valueMSSA N = 627 n (%)MRSA N = 206 n (%)P-valueAdult N = 628 n (%)Children N = 205 n (%)P-value
agrI169 (31.0)96 (39.2)0.030238 (38.6)37 (18.4)<0.001206 (33.3)69 (34.7)0.728
agrII254 (46.6)78 (31.8)<0.001179 (29.1)162 (80.6)<0.001276 (44.7)65 (32.7)<0.001
agrIII113 (20.7)61 (24.9)0.225179 (29.1)2 (1.0)<0.001123 (19.9)58 (29.1)0.008
agrIV9 (1.7)10 (4.1)0.07020 (3.2)0 (0.0)0.00613 (2.1)7 (3.5)0.390

27 strains did not have data for place of acquisition available.

In the whole collection there were 16 non-typable agr strains.

Statistically significant results are highlighted in bold.

HA, healthcare-associated; CA, community-associated; MSSA, methicillin-susceptible S. aureus; MRSA, methicillin-resistant S. aureus.

Distribution of agr types according to place of acquisition, methicillin resistance and age of population. 27 strains did not have data for place of acquisition available. In the whole collection there were 16 non-typable agr strains. Statistically significant results are highlighted in bold. HA, healthcare-associated; CA, community-associated; MSSA, methicillin-susceptible S. aureus; MRSA, methicillin-resistant S. aureus.

Methicillin resistance

Methicillin resistance was observed in 24.7% of the strains. Eleven different CCs were detected in this group, with CC5 being the main clone (79.4%). By contrast, among the MSSA strains, all the CCs detected in our collection were represented (N = 28) and showed a higher clonal diversity than MRSA strains. The major clones detected among MSSA strains were CC30 (26.5%), CC5 (14.5%), CC45 (10.5%) and CC15 (10.0%). A comparison of the two groups revealed that only CC5 was associated with methicillin resistance (14.7 vs. 79.4%, p < 0.001), whereas CC30, CC45 and CC15 were correlated with MSSA strains (p < 0.001; Table 2). With respect to agr type, agrII type was observed to be significantly associated with MRSA strains (29.1 vs. 80.6%, p < 0.001), whereas, agrI was associated with MSSA strains (38.6 vs. 18.4%, p < 0.001; Table 3).

Adult vs. child population

While 28 CCs detected in this study were represented among strains isolated from adults, lower CC diversity was detected in children, with only 19 CCs identified. A comparison of clonality in the adult and children populations revealed that while CC5 was associated with strains from adults (34.2 vs. 20.0%, p < 0.001), CC30 was significantly related to strains from the child population (18.2 vs. 27.2%, p < 0.008; Table 2). The distribution of agr types by patient age is shown in Table 3. This analysis showed a significant association between agrII and strains from adults (44.7 vs. 32.7%, p < 0.001), while agrIII was associated with the child population (19.9 vs. 29.1%, p < 0.008).

Clonal complex diversity, agr type and virulence genes among S. aureus strains from different sources of bacteremia

The main objective was to explore the distribution of CCs and virulence genes according to source of bacteremia. A collection of S. aureus strains from healthy carriers was also added to the analysis in order to evaluate potential differences between colonizing and bacteremic strains. Remarkably, CC5 and agrII predominated in SAB from osteoarticular infections (Tables 4A,B). When we focused on antibiotic resistance genes, significant differences were identified in strains from different sources of infection for the mecA, msrA, aadD, aphA3, and sat genes (Tables 4A,B). Our results seemed to indicate a higher proportion of these resistance genes among osteoarticular infections compared with other bacteremia sources. In general, significant differences for source of bacteremia and colonization were also detected in virulence genes, such as sea, sed, hla, undisrupted hlb, splE, cna, fib, and isaB among others.
Table 4A

Frequency of clonal complexes, agr type, resistance and virulence genes according to different sources of infection.

VariableColonization (N = 48) n (%)CRB (N = 212) n (%)Endocarditis (N = 214) n (%)SSTI (N = 66) n (%)Osteoarticular (N = 100) n (%)P-valuea
CC*
59 (19.1)65 (31.3)47 (22.0)19 (29.7)51 (51.5)<0.001
82 (4.3)14 (6.7)22 (10.3)5 (7.8)3 (3.0)0.236
153 (6.4)15 (7.2)20(9.3)10 (15.6)4 (4.0)0.192
222 (4.3)15 (7.2)16 (7.5)1 (1.6)7 (7.1)0.435
3011 (23.4)44 (21.2)41 (19.2)11 (17.2)11 (11.1)0.263
454 (8.5)19 (9.1)19 (8.9)3 (4.7)6 (6.1)0.736
agr TYPES
agrI17 (36.2)72 (34.1)81 (38.6)18 (28.1)28 (28.3)0.342
agrII14 (29.8)90 (42.7)77 (36.7)31 (48.4)55 (55.6)0.008
agrIII12(25.5)47 (22.3)46 (21.9)14 (21.9)12 (12.1)0.184
agrIV4 (8.5)2 (0.9)6 (2.9)1 (1.6)4 (4.0)0.087
ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE GENES
mecA3 (6.3)54 (25.5)39 (18.2)16 (24.2)44 (44.0)<0.001
blaZ43 (89.6)179 (85.2)181 (84.6)57 (86.4)90 (90.9)0.530
blaI43 (89.6)177 (85.1)191 (91.0)57 (86.4)91 (91.0)0.341
blaR42 (87.5)175 (83.3)177 (84.3)58 (87.9)88 (88.9)0.653
erm(C)2 (4.2)12 (9.1)7 (3.3)9 (13.6)10 (10.0)0.018
msr(A)1 (2.1)29 (13.7)22 (10.3)11 (16.7)34 (34.0)<0.001
mphC1 (2.1)22 (18.0)21 (10.0)8 (17.8)32 (33.3)<0.001
aadD0 (0.0)29 (13.7)20 (9.3)13 (19.7)32 (32.6)<0.001
aphA31 (2.1)26 (12.3)12 (5.6)13 (19.7)26 (26.3)<0.001
sat1 (2.1)23 (11.0)10 (4.7)12 (18.5)26 (26.0)<0.001
mupR0 (0.0)10 (5.4)10 (4.7)3 (4.5)8 (8.0)0.154
fosB34 (70.8)159 (75.7)153 (72.2)55 (84.6)75 (75.0)0.295
VIRULENCE GENES
tst111 (22.9)34 (16.1)43 (20.4)9 (13.6)11 (11.0)0.181
sea18 (37.5)65 (31.4)46 (21.5)20 (30.8)15 (15.2)0.003
sec2 (4.2)18 (8.5)11 (5.1)3 (4.5)4 (4.0)0.432
sed10 (20.8)8 (4.1)23 (11.4)0 (0.0)6 (6.6)<0.001
seg34 (70.8)158 (75.6)153 (74.3)45 (68.2)81 (81.0)0.391
sei34 (70.8)134 (72.8)147 (68.7)44 (67.7)80 (81.6)0.151
sel2 (4.2)17 (8.1)11 (5.1)3 (4.5)4 (4.0)0.533
selm36 (75.0)136 (73.9)154 (72.6)45 (68.2)84 (84.0)0.137
seln34 (70.8)139 (75.5)149 (70.3)45 (68.2)81 (81.0)0.223
selo27 (56.3)125 (700.6)144 (68.9)42 (64.6)79 (79.0)0.058
egc35 (72.9)168 (79.2)165 (77.8)45 (68.2)83 (83.0)0.215
selu34 (70.8)164 (77.7)150 (70.4)45 (68.2)83 (83.0)0.067
lukS44 (91.7)183 (87.6)178 (86.4)63 (98.4)88 (93.6)0.011
hlgA47 (97.9)196 (94.2)204 (95.8)61 (93.8)97 (98.0)0.448
lukD24 (50.0)126 (59.4)120 (56.1)45 (68.2)66 (66.0)0.152
lukE23 (47.9)117 (55.7)111 (52.9)39 (60.0)67 (67.0)0.110
lukX41 (85.4)190 (93.1)191 (90.5)63 (95.5)92 (92.9)0.325
hla40 (83.3)187 (88.6)187 (93.5)64 (97.0)97 (97.0)0.006
un-disr hlbα9 (18.8)87 (41.0)54 (26.6)8 (12.1)15 (15.2)<0.001
sak39 (81.3)136 (74.3)166 (79.8)53 (80.3)77 (77.0)0.669
chp33 (68.8)147 (71.7)148 (75.1)5 (75.8)70 (70.7)0.814
scn43 (89.6)181 (85.8)179 (86.1)60 (90.9)81 (81.8)0.497
aur44 (91.7)123 (95.3)199 (95.2)63 (95.5)91 (91.9)0.686
splA24 (50.0)126 (59.4)119 (56.4)45 (68.2)68 (68.7)0.084
splB24 (50.0)122 (57.5)120 (56.3)46 (69.7)69 (69.0)0.044
splE20 (41.7)89 (42.6)103 (48.1)33 (50.0)25 (25.0)0.001
CAPSULE-ASSOCIATED GENES
cap 521 (43.8)118 (55.7)109 (50.9)38 (57.6)68 (68.0)0.026
cap 828 (58.3)96 (45.3)105 (49.3)28 (42.4)32 (32.0)0.016
MSCRAMM GENES
bbp45 (93.8)183 (86.3)192 (89.7)57 (86.4)93 (93.0)0.273
cna26 (54.2)79 (38.2)100 (48.5)20 (30.8)32 (32.7)0.006
ebh45 (93.8)194 (91.9)190 (89.2)64 (97.0)90 (90.0)0.257
fib28 (58.3)132 (62.3)126 (59.2)51 (77.3)71 (71.0)0.030
sasG23 47.9127 (59.9)130 (60.7)41 (63.1)70 (70.0)0.130
vwb44 (91.7)197 (92.9)212 (99.1)63 (96.9)99 (99.0)0.002
isaB48 (100.0)185 (88.5)111 (62.7)66 (100)74 (76.3)<0.001

Multiple comparison.

Unknown bacteremia source (169, 20.3%) and other bacteremia sources including respiratory, abdominal and urinary tract infections (24, 2.9%) were not included in this analysis.

Ambiguous results from DNA arrays were considered as missing values for further analysis. Variables with an unacceptable proportion of missing values (>30%) were excluded from analysis.

Only the major clones are shown.

P-values are calculated for each gene with a two-tailed chi-squared or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. The Bonferroni correction was applied (significant p-value < 0.001). Statistically significant results are highlighted in bold.

CRB, catheter-related bacteremia; CC, clonal complex;

undisrupted hlb; MSCRAMM, microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules.

Table 4B

Pairwise comparison of clonal complexes, agr types and virulence genes according to source of infection.

VariableColonization N = 48CRB N = 212Endocarditis N = 214SSTI N = 66Osteoarticular N = 100
YESNOP-valueaYESNOP-valueaYESNOP-valueaYESNOP-valueaYESNOP-valuea
CC*
59 (19.1)190 (31.2)0.11765 (31.3)134 (29.9)0.79847 (22.0)152 (34.4)0.00219 (29.7)180 (30.4)1.00051 (51.5)148 (26.6)< 0.001
82 (4.3)46 (7.6)0.58414 (6.7)34 (7.6)0.81722 (10.3)26 (5.9)0.0625 (7.8)43 (7.3)1.0003 (3.0)45 (8.1)0.092
153 (6.4)44 (93.6)0.78815 (7.2)193 (92.8)0.62120 (9.3)194 (32.2)0.56810 (15.6)54 (84.4)0.0434 (4.0)95 (96.0)0.114
222 (4.3)45 (95.7)0.76015 (7.2)193 (92.8)0.68516 (7.5)198 (32.2)0.5411 (1.6)63 (98.4)0.1107 (7.1)92 (92.9)0.943
3011 (23.4)110 (18.1)0.47544 (21.2)77 (17.2)0.26741 (19.2)80 (18.1)0.82511 (17.2)110 (18.6)0.91811 (11.1)110 (19.7)0.057
454 (8.5)43 (91.5)1.00019 (9.1)189 (90.9)0.67419 (8.9)195 (91.1)0.7893 (4.7)61 (95.3)0.3466 (6.1)93 (93.9)0.513
agr TYPES
agrI17 (36.2)30 (63.8)0.93472 (34.1)39 (65.9)0.94281 (38.6)129 (61.4)0.16218 (28.1)46 (71.9)0.31728 (28.3)71 (71.7)0.190
agrII14 (29.8)263 (43.3)0.09890 (42.7)187 (42.2)0.98277 (36.7)200 (45.0)0.05231 (48.4)246 (41.7)0.36655 (55.6)222 (40.0)0.006
agrIII12 (25.5)35 (74.5)0.48347 (22.3)164 (77.7)0.49846 (21.9)164 (78.1)0.60814 (21.9)50 (78.9)0.90012 (12.1)87 (87.9)0.035
agrIV4 (8.5)13 (2.1)0.0282 (0.9)15 (3.4)0.0716 (2.8)11 (2.5)0.9831 (1.6)16 (2.7)1.0004 (4.0)13 (2.3)0.307
ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE GENES
mecA3 (6.3)162 (26.3)0.00154 (25.5)111 (24.6)0.87539 (18.2)126 (28.0)0.00916 (24.2)149 (24.9)1.00044 (44.0)121 (21.5)< 0.001
erm (C)2 (4.2)39 (7.3)0.56412 (9.1)29 (6.4)0.3917 (3.3)34 (9.2)0.0119 (13.6)32 (6.2)0.04910 (10.0)31 (6.4)0.289
msr (A)1 (2.1)102 (16.6)0.00329 (13.7)74 (16.4)0.44422 (10.3)81 (18.1)0.01311 (16.7)92 (15.4)0.93434 (34.0)69 (12.3)< 0.001
mphC1 (2.1)86 (17.9)0.00222 (18.0)65 (16.0)0.68921 (10.0)66 (20.6)0.0028 (17.8)79 (16.3)0.96732 (33.3)55 (12.7)< 0.001
aadD0 (0.0)101 (16.4)0.00129 (13.7)72 (16.0)0.51720 (9.3)81 (18.0)0.00513 (19.7)88 (14.7)0.37732 (32.6)69 (12.3)< 0.001
aphA31 (2.1)81 (13.2)0.02126 (12.3)56 (12.4)1.00012 (5.6)70 (15.6)< 0.00113 (19.7)69 (11.6)0.08926 (26.3)56 (9.9)< 0.001
sat1 (2.1)76 (12.4)0.03323 (11.0)54 (12.0)0.81010 (4.7)67 (15.1)< 0.00112 (18.5)65 (10.9)0.11226 (26.0)51 (9.1)< 0.001
VIRULENCE GENES
sea18 (37.5)155 (25.5)0.09865 (31.4)108 (24.0)0.05746 (21.5)127 (28.7)0.06320 (30.8)153 (25.8)0.47915 (15.2)158 (28.3)0.009
sed10 (20.8)39 (6.7)0.0018 (4.1)41 (9.6)0.02723 (11.4)26 (6.1)0.0310 (0.0)49 (8.7)0.0066 (6.6)43 (8.0)0.793
selo27 (56.3)408 (71.0)0.049125 (70.6)310 (69.5)0.860144 (68.9)291 (70.3)0.79142 (64.6)393 (70.4)0.41079 (79.0)356 (68.1)0.039
selu34 (70.8)460 (74.9)0.650164 (77.7)330 (73.2)0.246150 (70.4)344 (76.6)0.10645 (68.2)449 (75.3)0.26483 (83.0)411 (73.1)0.049
lukS44 (91.7)532 (89.1)0.808183 (87.6)393 (90.1)0.392178 (86.4)398 (90.7)0.13663 (98.4)513 (88.3)0.00988 (93.6)488 (88.6)0.199
hla40 (83.3)559 (93.0)0.032187 (88.6)412 (94.1)0.023187 (93.5)412 (91.8)0.54364 (97.0)535 (91.8)0.21897 (97.0)502 (91.4)0.086
un-disr hlbα9 (18.8)168 (27.8)0.23487 (41.0)90 (20.5)< 0.00154 (26.6)123 (27.4)0.9088 (12.1)169 (28.8)0.00615 (15.2)162 (29.3)0.005
splA24 (50.0)374 (61.1)0.173126 (59.4)272 (60.7)0.819119 (56.4)279 (62.1)0.18745 (68.2)353 (59.4)0.21368 (68.7)330 (58.8)0.082
splB24 (50.0)372 (60.5)0.203122 (57.5)274 (60.8)0.484120 (56.3)276 (61.3)0.25446 (69.7)350 (58.6)0.10869 (69.0)327 (58.1)0.052
splE20 (41.7)262 (42.7)1.00089 (42.6)193 (42.7)1.000103 (48.1)179 (40.0)0.06033 (50.0)249 (41.8)0.25525 (25.0)257 (45.8)< 0.001
CAPSULE-ASSOCIATED GENES
cap 828 (58.3)272 (44.2)0.08296 (45.3)204 (45.2)1.000105 (49.3)195 (43.3)0.17528 (42.4)272 (45.6)0.72232 (32.0)268 (47.6)0.005
MSCRAMM GENES
cna26 (54.2)241 (40.2)0.08179 (38.2)188 (42.6)0.321100 (48.5)167 (37.8)0.01220 (30.8)247 (42.4)0.09532 (32.7)235 (42.7)0.079
fib28 (58.3)396 (64.4)0.493132 (62.3)292 (64.7)0.593126 (59.2)298 (66.2)0.09251 (77.3)373 (62.5)0.02571 (71.0)353 (62.7)0.139
vwb44 (91.7)592 (96.3)0.124197 (92.9)439 (97.3)0.013212 (99.1)424 (94.4)0.00363 (96.9)573 (95.8)1.00099 (99.0)537 (95.4)0.104
isaB48 (100)458 (80.1)0.001185 (88.5)321 (78.1)0.002111 (62.7)395 (89.2)< 0.00166 (100)440 (79.4)< 0.00174 (76.3)432 (82.6)0.183

Only the major clones are shown.

SAB, Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia; CRB, catheter-related bacteremia; CC, clonal complex;

undisrupted hlb; MSCRAMM, microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules.

P-values are calculated for each gene with a two-tailed chi-squared or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. The Bonferroni correction was applied (significant p-value < 0.001).

Frequency of clonal complexes, agr type, resistance and virulence genes according to different sources of infection. Multiple comparison. Unknown bacteremia source (169, 20.3%) and other bacteremia sources including respiratory, abdominal and urinary tract infections (24, 2.9%) were not included in this analysis. Ambiguous results from DNA arrays were considered as missing values for further analysis. Variables with an unacceptable proportion of missing values (>30%) were excluded from analysis. Only the major clones are shown. P-values are calculated for each gene with a two-tailed chi-squared or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. The Bonferroni correction was applied (significant p-value < 0.001). Statistically significant results are highlighted in bold. CRB, catheter-related bacteremia; CC, clonal complex; undisrupted hlb; MSCRAMM, microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules. Pairwise comparison of clonal complexes, agr types and virulence genes according to source of infection. Only the major clones are shown. SAB, Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia; CRB, catheter-related bacteremia; CC, clonal complex; undisrupted hlb; MSCRAMM, microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules. P-values are calculated for each gene with a two-tailed chi-squared or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. The Bonferroni correction was applied (significant p-value < 0.001). A comparison of colonizing vs. SAB strains revealed that the sed gene was most frequently found in colonizing strains (20.8 vs. 6.7%, p < 0.001; Table 4B). This gene also had greater representation among endocarditis strains (11.4 vs. 6.1%, p: 0.031). In addition, the undisrupted hlb gene mostly presented in CRB strains (41.0 vs. 20.5%, p < 0.001; Table 4B). The presence of MSCRAMM genes, such as cna, fib, vwb and isaB also varied significantly according to source of SAB. While cna and vwb genes had greater representation among strains from an endocarditis source (48.5 vs. 37.8%, p: 0.012 and 99.1 vs. 94.4%, p: 0.003, respectively), there was significant detection of fib genes (77.3 vs. 62.5%, p: 0.025) in SSTI sources. Finally, the isaB gene was more commonly found among CRB strains (88.5 vs. 78.1%, p: 0.002) and in the SSTI bacteremia group (100 vs. 79.4%, p < 0.001; Table 4B). Various regression models were performed in order to measure the role of pathogen-related molecular markers (CC, agr type and virulence genes) adjusted for different sources of bacteremia and colonization (Table 5). All adjusted models in multivariate analysis showed that these variables were the presence of agrIV type and sed gene for colonizing strains; the presence of sea, undisrupted hlb and isaB genes for CRB; sed, splE and fib genes for an endocarditis source; undisrupted hlb for the SSTI group; and finally, CC5, msrA resistance gene and hla gene with respect to bacteremia from an osteoarticular source (Table 5).
Table 5

Multivariate analysis according to different sources of SAB and colonization.

ColonizationCRBEndocarditisSSTIOsteoarticular
VariableaOR (95% CI)P-valueaOR (95% CI)P-valueaOR (95% CI)P-valueaOR (95% CI)P-valueaOR (95% CI)P-value
CC52.05 (1.18–3.64)0.011
agrIV4.11 (1.24–13.66)0.021
mecA0.18 (0.05–0.060)0.005
erm(C)
msr(A)2.55 (1.37–4.75)0.003
aadD
sat0.41 (0.19–0.87)0.021
sea2.06(1.34–3.15)0.0010.57 (0.34–0.96)0.0350.39(0.21–0.72)0.003
sed5.22 (1.21–12.35)< 0.0010.24(0.09–0.64)0.0042.79 (1.33–5.85)0.007
selu
lukS
hla0.33 (0.14–0.78)0.0120.42 (0.22–0.79)0.00810.01 (1.34–76.01)0.025
un–disr hlbα3.72 (2.42–5.71)< 0.0012.5 (1.15–5.46)0.0290.30 (0.16–0.56)< 0.001
splE1.56 (1.01–2.43)0.046
cap 8
cna
fib3.42 (1.63–6.44)0.001
vwb0.35 (0.15–0.80)0.013
isaB2.62 (1.50–4.59)0.0010.05 (0.02–0.10)< 0.001

Various multivariate models were explored that included different numbers of variables according to the number of events by bacteremia source.

–: variables included in the initial model of multivariate analysis then discarded in a backward stepwise process. Only variables consistently retained in exploratory models are shown.

CRB, catheter-related bacteremia; aOR, adjusted Odds Ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence intervals;

undisrupted hlb.

Multivariate analysis according to different sources of SAB and colonization. Various multivariate models were explored that included different numbers of variables according to the number of events by bacteremia source. –: variables included in the initial model of multivariate analysis then discarded in a backward stepwise process. Only variables consistently retained in exploratory models are shown. CRB, catheter-related bacteremia; aOR, adjusted Odds Ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence intervals; undisrupted hlb.

Discussion

The present study describes and gives a global epidemiological overview of the molecular epidemiology of a large collection of S. aureus strains focused on bloodstream infections in Spain over a 15-years period. In this scenario, our study provides important findings regarding the distribution of clonality and virulence genes and their association with specific sources of SAB. Our results revealed high clonal diversity among SAB strains, although the most prevalent CCs were CC5, CC30, CC45, CC8, CC15, and CC22, which together represented 80% of all cases. Additionally, substantial differences were found between strains causing MRSA and MSSA bacteremia, which indicated that MSSA strains were much more genetically diverse than their MRSA counterparts, which is consistent with studies developed in Europe (Aamot et al., 2012; Grundmann et al., 2014) and the USA (Miko et al., 2013; Park et al., 2017). The most common clone among MSSA strains was CC30, followed by CC45 and CC15, whereas among MRSA strains, there was a significant representation of CC5 in more than 75% of strains. Similar results have been reported in Latin America (Arias et al., 2017) and Germany (Schaumburg et al., 2012), where the CC5-MRSA clone was the most prevalent in the setting of bloodstream infections. Furthermore, in our collection, CC5 was found to be significantly associated with HA acquisition and the adult population, a finding which lends support to the interest aimed at investigating the pathogenic and molecular characteristics of CC5 and those factors that enhance its spread. Several studies have suggested that while the agrI type is the most common one among clinical isolates (van Leeuwen et al., 2000; Moore and Lindsay, 2001), others (Sakoulas et al., 2003) have determined that more than half of clinical MRSA bloodstream isolates belong to agr group II. In our collection, agrII was also associated with MRSA, which may explain the higher percentage of agrII found in the nosocomial setting and among adults, in whom the prevalence of MRSA was higher. By contrast, agrI was related to MSSA strains and CA acquisition. Interestingly, a statistically significant association was also found between agrII and agrIII and adult and child populations, respectively. These associations are probably due to the correlation between agr type and CC, since CC5 (agrII) was the majority clone among adults and CC30 (agrIII) among children. To date, different studies have explored the association between bacterial genotype, especially S. aureus virulence genes, and various clinical syndromes (Gillet et al., 2002; Jarraud et al., 2002; Peacock et al., 2002). This study focuses specifically on bacteremia. Our collection included S. aureus strains from the most common primary clinical sources of infection: CRB, SSTI, osteoarticular infection and endocarditis, as well as nasal carriage strains. We found no major differences between colonizing and bacteremia-producing strains of S. aureus, which supports the fact that most strains of S. aureus are capable of causing bacteremia. Nevertheless, and in accordance with other studies (Fowler et al., 2007; Giulieri et al., 2016), we identified specific clonal backgrounds and various molecular markers that have been associated with bloodstream infections and certain sources of bacteremia in particular. In this regard, our findings showed that CC5 in addition to hla and msrA genes were more frequently present in strains causing osteoarticular bacteremia. The association of the hla gene, present in most S. aureus strains, with different types of infection has already been reported (Stulik et al., 2014; Sharma-Kuinkel et al., 2015). Further studies are needed to elucidate the role of this important virulence factor in the pathogenesis of bacteremia. With respect to the adhesin genes (MSCRAMMs), which play an essential role in the pathogenesis of intravascular, osteoarticular and device-associated S. aureus infections (Foster et al., 2014), our study revealed an association between the fib and isaB genes and endocarditis and CRB sources, respectively. Other adhesins like clfA/B, fnbA/B, and cna and their linkage with bacteremia, endocarditis and CRB, have also been reported (Giulieri et al., 2016; San-Juan et al., 2017). Another finding of note in this study was the presence of the undisrupted β-hemolysin (undisrupted hlb) which was significantly related to sources, such as CRB and SSTI. Different studies have demonstrated its contribution to SSTI (Hedström and Malmqvist, 1982; Lebughe et al., 2017) and biofilm-related infections (Salgado-Pabón et al., 2014). Although β-toxin is encoded in S. aureus, most strains are reported not to secrete β-toxin because the bacteriophage (ϕSa3) inserts into the hlb gene (Winkler et al., 1965; Coleman et al., 1991), inactivating it in the majority of S. aureus strains recovered from humans. Moreover, the ϕSa3 bacteriophage encodes the immune evasion cluster (IEC) sak-chip-scn (Coleman et al., 1989; de Haas et al., 2004). Coinciding with other studies (Pantucek et al., 2004; Van Wamel et al., 2006), these genes were relatively abundant in our collection, ranging between 73% (sak) and 87% (scn). Interestingly, the absence of the intact hlb gene (or which amounts to the same thing, the presence of hlb truncated by the IEC-carrying ϕSa3 phage) was significantly associated with an osteoarticular source. This intriguing association should be investigated further since other studies have reported the association between these phage-integrated genes and less severe staphylococcal infections (Jin et al., 2003). This study presents several limitations that should be mentioned. First, the heterogeneity and non-continuity of the SAB collection (geographical origin, time points and hosts) precluded us from adjusting for these variables in multivariate analysis. Moreover, the proportion of colonization strains was small in comparison with the number of SAB strains. The results therefore should be interpreted with caution. At the same time, our study includes a large number of S. aureus strains causing bacteremia, with relevant information on place of acquisition, methicillin resistance and source of infection. Second, the lack of clinical data regarding the outcome of the bacteremic episodes makes it impossible to make inferences about the prognostic importance of the molecular factors. Other studies evaluating associations between bacterial genotype and virulence have led to conflicting results (Day et al., 2001, 2002; Feil et al., 2003; Melles et al., 2004), due in part to the heterogeneous nature of the S. aureus infections included, as well as the absence of a large, well-characterized collection of isolates. Third, our study methodology was based on DNA microarrays, which should be noted in the case of the hla gene. Despite the fact that hla is present in virtually all S. aureus strains, some studies, such as Sharma-kuinkel et al. (JCM) have reported up to 12 different variants of hla. In our study, the hla gene was detected in 92.2% of strains. We think that the low frequency of this gene observed in our collection may have been due to the DNA microarray technology, which may underestimate the presence of certain minority hla variants due to lack of sensitivity. Whole genome sequencing may be a more effective genotypic characterization approach for detecting different genetic variants that may not be detected by hybridization procedures, although previous studies have shown good agreement between the genotypic results obtained using a DNA array-based methodology and those using high-throughput sequencing (Strauß et al., 2016). Finally, we did not perform gene expression studies, which would be key to determining whether a particular gene or set of genes was responsible for the specific pathogenic behavior observed in SAB from particular clinical sources. Nevertheless, our findings offer a valuable starting point for further research insights into intrinsic pathogenic mechanisms involved in the development of SAB. In conclusion, the current study suggests a potential association between S. aureus genotype and acquisition, methicillin resistance and bloodstream infection sources. The results of this study reinforce the view that SAB continues to represent a major clinical challenge. Thus, a better understanding of S. aureus epidemiology and pathogenesis is crucial to the detection of prognostic biomarkers as well as to the development of potential therapeutic targets aimed at improving patient outcomes.

Author contributions

DP-M, EV, and FC conceived and designed the experiments. EV, CG-G, ERG, NL, NF-H, RS, and IM-G collected the isolates. Funding was obtained by FC and BA. Experiments were performed by EV, CG-G, and IM-G. The data were analyzed by EV and DP-M. EV and DP-M prepared the manuscript draft. All authors agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work. EV, DP-M, and FC contributed in giving final approval of the version to be published. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  48 in total

Review 1.  Adhesion, invasion and evasion: the many functions of the surface proteins of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Timothy J Foster; Joan A Geoghegan; Vannakambadi K Ganesh; Magnus Höök
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 60.633

2.  Mortality after Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia in two hospitals in Oxfordshire, 1997-2003: cohort study.

Authors:  David H Wyllie; Derrick W Crook; Tim E A Peto
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-06-23

3.  Association between Staphylococcus aureus strains carrying gene for Panton-Valentine leukocidin and highly lethal necrotising pneumonia in young immunocompetent patients.

Authors:  Yves Gillet; Bertrand Issartel; Philippe Vanhems; Jean-Christophe Fournet; Gerard Lina; Michèle Bes; François Vandenesch; Yves Piémont; Nicole Brousse; Daniel Floret; Jerome Etienne
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-03-02       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  The innate immune modulators staphylococcal complement inhibitor and chemotaxis inhibitory protein of Staphylococcus aureus are located on beta-hemolysin-converting bacteriophages.

Authors:  Willem J B van Wamel; Suzan H M Rooijakkers; Maartje Ruyken; Kok P M van Kessel; Jos A G van Strijp
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Assignment of Staphylococcus aureus isolates to clonal complexes based on microarray analysis and pattern recognition.

Authors:  Stefan Monecke; Peter Slickers; Ralf Ehricht
Journal:  FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol       Date:  2008-05-27

6.  Detecting Staphylococcus aureus Virulence and Resistance Genes: a Comparison of Whole-Genome Sequencing and DNA Microarray Technology.

Authors:  Lena Strauß; Ulla Ruffing; Salim Abdulla; Abraham Alabi; Ruslan Akulenko; Marcelino Garrine; Anja Germann; Martin Peter Grobusch; Volkhard Helms; Mathias Herrmann; Theckla Kazimoto; Winfried Kern; Inácio Mandomando; Georg Peters; Frieder Schaumburg; Lutz von Müller; Alexander Mellmann
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Staphylococcus aureus β-toxin production is common in strains with the β-toxin gene inactivated by bacteriophage.

Authors:  Wilmara Salgado-Pabón; Alfa Herrera; Bao G Vu; Christopher S Stach; Joseph A Merriman; Adam R Spaulding; Patrick M Schlievert
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 5.226

8.  Insertional inactivation of the Staphylococcus aureus beta-toxin by bacteriophage phi 13 occurs by site- and orientation-specific integration of the phi 13 genome.

Authors:  D Coleman; J Knights; R Russell; D Shanley; T H Birkbeck; G Dougan; I Charles
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 3.501

9.  Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infection and Endocarditis--A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Vincent Le Moing; François Alla; Thanh Doco-Lecompte; François Delahaye; Lionel Piroth; Catherine Chirouze; Pierre Tattevin; Jean-Philippe Lavigne; Marie-Line Erpelding; Bruno Hoen; François Vandenesch; Xavier Duval
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Chemotaxis inhibitory protein of Staphylococcus aureus, a bacterial antiinflammatory agent.

Authors:  Carla J C de Haas; Karin Ellen Veldkamp; Andreas Peschel; Floor Weerkamp; Willem J B Van Wamel; Erik C J M Heezius; Miriam J J G Poppelier; Kok P M Van Kessel; Jos A G van Strijp
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  15 in total

1.  Relationship between mortality and molecular epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.

Authors:  Masaru Shimizu; Toshihito Mihara; Junya Ohara; Keita Inoue; Mao Kinoshita; Teiji Sawa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Genotypic and Phenotypic Characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus Prosthetic Joint Infections: Insight on the Pathogenesis and Prognosis of a Multicenter Prospective Cohort.

Authors:  Irene Muñoz-Gallego; Esther Viedma; Jaime Esteban; Mikel Mancheño-Losa; Joaquín García-Cañete; Antonio Blanco-García; Alicia Rico; Adelaida García-Perea; Patricia Ruiz Garbajosa; Rosa Escudero-Sánchez; Mar Sánchez Somolinos; Mercedes Marín Arriaza; Juan Romanyk; José María Barbero; Ana Arribi Vilela; Fernando González Romo; Conchita Pérez-Jorge; David M Arana; Alfonso Monereo; Diego Domingo; José Cordero; Mª Isabel Sánchez Romero; Miguel Ángel García Viejo; Jaime Lora-Tamayo; Fernando Chaves
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 3.835

3.  Characterisation of antibiotic resistance, virulence, clonality and mortality in MRSA and MSSA bloodstream infections at a tertiary-level hospital in Hungary: a 6-year retrospective study.

Authors:  Andrea Horváth; Orsolya Dobay; Judit Sahin-Tóth; Emese Juhász; Júlia Pongrácz; Miklós Iván; Enikő Fazakas; Katalin Kristóf
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 3.944

4.  Different Types of Coagulase Are Associated With 28-Day Mortality in Patients With Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections.

Authors:  Matthias Karer; Manuel Kussmann; Franz Ratzinger; Markus Obermueller; Veronika Reischer; Heidemarie Winkler; Richard Kriz; Heinz Burgmann; Bernd Jilma; Heimo Lagler
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 5.293

5.  Clinical and molecular epidemiology of invasive Staphylococcus aureus infection in Utah children; continued dominance of MSSA over MRSA.

Authors:  Hillary Crandall; Aurélie Kapusta; Jarrett Killpack; Carly Heyrend; Kody Nilsson; Mandy Dickey; Judy A Daly; Krow Ampofo; Andrew T Pavia; Matthew A Mulvey; Mark Yandell; Kristina G Hulten; Anne J Blaschke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Variable Release of Lipoteichoic Acid From Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Isolates Relates to Distinct Clinical Phenotypes, Strain Background, and Antibiotic Exposure.

Authors:  Marquerita Algorri; Peter Jorth; Annie Wong-Beringer
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Molecular Characterization of Equine Staphylococcus aureus Isolates Exhibiting Reduced Oxacillin Susceptibility.

Authors:  Anissa D Scholtzek; Dennis Hanke; Birgit Walther; Inga Eichhorn; Sabita D Stöckle; Katja-Sophia Klein; Heidrun Gehlen; Antina Lübke-Becker; Stefan Schwarz; Andrea T Feßler
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 4.546

8.  Molecular characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical strains from the endotracheal tubes of patients with nosocomial pneumonia.

Authors:  Roberto Cabrera; Laia Fernández-Barat; Anna Motos; Rubén López-Aladid; Nil Vázquez; Mauro Panigada; Francisco Álvarez-Lerma; Yuly López; Laura Muñoz; Pedro Castro; Jordi Vila; Antoni Torres
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 4.887

9.  Presence of egc-positive major clones ST 45, 30 and 22 among methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible oral Staphylococcus aureus strains.

Authors:  Ewa Kwapisz; Katarzyna Garbacz; Maja Kosecka-Strojek; Justyna Schubert; Jacek Bania; Jacek Międzobrodzki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Virulence Factor Genes and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus Strains Isolated from Blood and Chronic Wounds.

Authors:  Anna Budzyńska; Krzysztof Skowron; Agnieszka Kaczmarek; Magdalena Wietlicka-Piszcz; Eugenia Gospodarek-Komkowska
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 4.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.