| Literature DB >> 30319521 |
Christopher Melinosky1,2, Shiming Yang1,3, Peter Hu1,3, HsiaoChi Li3, Catriona H T Miller4, Imad Khan1,2, Colin Mackenzie1,3, Wan-Tsu Chang1,5, Gunjan Parikh1,2, Deborah Stein1,6, Neeraj Badjatia1,2.
Abstract
Background: In the acute resuscitation period after traumatic brain injury (TBI), one of the goals is to identify those at risk for secondary neurological decline (ND), represented by a constellation of clinical signs that can be identified as objective events related to secondary brain injury and independently impact outcome. We investigated whether continuous vital sign variability and waveform analysis of the electrocardiogram (ECG) or photoplethysmogram (PPG) within the first hour of resuscitation may enhance the ability to predict ND in the initial 48 hours after traumatic brain injury (TBI).Entities:
Keywords: heart rate variability; machine learning; photoplethysmogram; predictive model; traumatic brain injury
Year: 2018 PMID: 30319521 PMCID: PMC6167472 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00761
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
Figure 1Waveform feature analysis for ECG and PPG. (A) An exemplary ECG segment with identified P,Q,R,S,T peaks. Five items from the segment are used for ECG feature calculation. Item 1 is the NN interval. Items 2 and 4 are Q to R rising time and R to S falling time. Items 3 and 5 are Q to R rising amplitude and R to S falling amplitude. (B) An exemplary PPG segment with identified peaks and valleys (1st panel).The first derivative of PPG signal (2nd panel). The second derivative of PPG signal (3rd panel). The first and second derivatives of the PPG waveform were used to identify the diastolic notch indicated by segment 6.
Characteristics of models to predict neurological worsening.
| Model 1 | Age, sex, first vital sign data recorded (HR, RR, SBP, DBP) |
| Model 2 | Age, sex, first vital sign data recorded (HR, RR, SBP, DBP), and initial GCS recorded |
| Model 3 | Age, sex, first vital sign data recorded (HR, RR, SBP, DBP), initial GCS, and Marshall score |
| Model 4 | ECG heart rate variability and waveform feature analysis for the first 15 min |
| Model 5 | PPG variability and waveform feature analysis for the first 15 min |
| Model 6 | ECG heart rate variability and waveform feature analysis for the first 60 min |
| Model 7 | PPG variability and waveform feature analysis for the first 60 min |
| Model 8 | Model 2 + Model 4 |
| Model 9 | Model 2 + Model 5 |
Figure 2Flow diagram of study cohort.
Baseline characteristics of study cohort.
| Age | 41 (25, 54) | 48 (26, 74) | 0.19 |
| Men | 112 (71) | 25 (76) | 0.61 |
| RACE | 0.64 | ||
| White | 103(65) | 23 (70) | |
| Black | 40 (25) | 10 (30) | |
| Other | 15 (10) | – | |
| Injury severity score | 5 (5, 14) | 25 (16,29) | <0.001 |
| GCS score | 15 (15, 15) | 7 (3, 14) | <0.001 |
| Marshall score | 1 (1, 1) | 2 (1, 3) | <0.001 |
| MAP(mmHg) | 107 (98,118) | 108 (102, 118) | <0.001 |
| Heart Rate (bpm) | 97 (82,106) | 88 (75, 103) | 0.39 |
| Resp. Rate (bpm) | 20 (17, 23) | 18 (12, 24) | 0.08 |
| 99 (98, 100) | 100 (97, 100) | 0.45 | |
| Mechanism of injury | 0.21 | ||
| Blunt | 147 (93) | 28 (85) | |
| Penetrating | 11 (7) | 5 (15) | |
All continuous data shown at median (25th%ile, 75%thile). Categorical data shown as n(%). P-values obtained from Chi-Square test and Mann-Whitney U test for categorical and continuous data respectively.
Predictive models of neurological decline.
| Model 1 | 0.69 | 0.59 | 0.80 | 0.35 | 0.90 |
| Model 2 | 0.86 | 0.77 | 0.94 | 0.67 | 0.94 |
| Model 3 | 0.90 | 0.84 | 0.97 | 0.61 | 0.97 |
| Model 4 | 0.84 | 0.76 | 0.93 | 0.53 | 0.94 |
| Model 5 | 0.87 | 0.80 | 0.93 | 0.47 | 0.95 |
| Model 6 | 0.89 | 0.83 | 0.96 | 0.57 | 0.96 |
| Model 7 | 0.83 | 0.74 | 0.91 | 0.47 | 0.94 |
| Model 8 | 0.92 | 0.87 | 0.97 | 0.76 | 0.97 |
| Model 9 | 0.92 | 0.86 | 0.98 | 0.68 | 0.98 |
AUROC, Area Under the Curve for Receiver Operator Curve.
PPV, positive predictive value.
NPV, negative predictive value.