| Literature DB >> 26176603 |
Franck Amyot1,2, David B Arciniegas3,4, Michael P Brazaitis5, Kenneth C Curley6, Ramon Diaz-Arrastia2, Amir Gandjbakhche1, Peter Herscovitch7, Sidney R Hinds8, Geoffrey T Manley9, Anthony Pacifico10, Alexander Razumovsky11, Jason Riley12,13, Wanda Salzer10, Robert Shih14, James G Smirniotopoulos15, Derek Stocker14.
Abstract
The incidence of traumatic brain injury (TBI) in the United States was 3.5 million cases in 2009, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. It is a contributing factor in 30.5% of injury-related deaths among civilians. Additionally, since 2000, more than 260,000 service members were diagnosed with TBI, with the vast majority classified as mild or concussive (76%). The objective assessment of TBI via imaging is a critical research gap, both in the military and civilian communities. In 2011, the Department of Defense (DoD) prepared a congressional report summarizing the effectiveness of seven neuroimaging modalities (computed tomography [CT], magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], transcranial Doppler [TCD], positron emission tomography, single photon emission computed tomography, electrophysiologic techniques [magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography], and functional near-infrared spectroscopy) to assess the spectrum of TBI from concussion to coma. For this report, neuroimaging experts identified the most relevant peer-reviewed publications and assessed the quality of the literature for each of these imaging technique in the clinical and research settings. Although CT, MRI, and TCD were determined to be the most useful modalities in the clinical setting, no single imaging modality proved sufficient for all patients due to the heterogeneity of TBI. All imaging modalities reviewed demonstrated the potential to emerge as part of future clinical care. This paper describes and updates the results of the DoD report and also expands on the use of angiography in patients with TBI.Entities:
Keywords: electrophysiology; imaging; spectroscopy; tomography; ultrasound
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26176603 PMCID: PMC4651019 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2013.3306
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neurotrauma ISSN: 0897-7151 Impact factor: 5.269