Literature DB >> 30318422

Noninvasive Cardiac Output Monitoring in Cardiothoracic Surgery Patients: Available Methods and Future Directions.

Bernd Saugel1, Maurizio Cecconi2, Ludhmila Abrahao Hajjar3.   

Abstract

The monitoring and optimization of cardiac output (CO) are central components of perioperative hemodynamic management in patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery. Until recently, echocardiography and invasive indicator dilution methods have been the mainstays of CO monitoring in these patients. However, completely noninvasive methods to estimate CO have become available during recent years. In this review, the physical measurement principles, limitations, and measurement performance of the different techniques for continuous noninvasive CO estimation in the setting of cardiothoracic surgery are described. Methods to estimate CO in a completely noninvasive manner include noninvasive pulse wave analysis (using a finger cuff method or automated radial artery applanation tonometry), thoracic electrical bioimpedance and bioreactance, pulse wave transit time, and partial carbon dioxide rebreathing. All these technologies have been evaluated in cardiothoracic surgery patients, but the validation studies describing the measurement performance in comparison with invasive reference methods have shown inconsistent and, in part, contradictory results. In addition, all technologies have major limitations with regard to the applicability during routine clinical care in the operating room or the intensive care unit. Therefore, the methods for noninvasive CO estimation described in this review still require technological improvements with regard to measurement performance and clinical applicability before they can be recommended for routine perioperative hemodynamic management of cardiothoracic surgery patients outside of studies.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bioimpedance; bioreactance; cardiac surgery; partial carbon dioxide rebreathing; pulse wave analysis; pulse wave transit time

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30318422     DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2018.06.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth        ISSN: 1053-0770            Impact factor:   2.628


  5 in total

1.  Cardiovascular dynamics during peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal achalasia: a prospective observational study using non-invasive finger cuff-derived pulse wave analysis.

Authors:  Bernd Saugel; Christina Vokuhl; Hans O Pinnschmidt; Thomas Rösch; Martin Petzoldt; Benjamin Löser
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 2.  Accuracy of non-invasive and minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring: where do we stand?

Authors:  Issa Pour-Ghaz; Theodore Manolukas; Nathalie Foray; Joel Raja; Aranyak Rawal; Uzoma N Ibebuogu; Rami N Khouzam
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

3.  Wireless, non-invasive, wearable device for continuous remote monitoring of hemodynamic parameters in a swine model of controlled hemorrhagic shock.

Authors:  Dean Nachman; Keren Constantini; Gal Poris; Linn Wagnert-Avraham; S David Gertz; Romi Littman; Eli Kabakov; Arik Eisenkraft; Yftach Gepner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Comparing Cardiac Output Measurements Using a Wearable, Wireless, Noninvasive Photoplethysmography-Based Device to Pulse Contour Cardiac Output in the General ICU: A Brief Report.

Authors:  Ayana Dvir; Nir Goldstein; Avigal Rapoport; Ronen Gingy Balmor; Dean Nachman; Roei Merin; Meir Fons; Arik Ben Ishay; Arik Eisenkraft
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2022-02-01

Review 5.  Blood Pressure Sensors: Materials, Fabrication Methods, Performance Evaluations and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Ahmed Al-Qatatsheh; Yosry Morsi; Ali Zavabeti; Ali Zolfagharian; Nisa Salim; Abbas Z Kouzani; Bobak Mosadegh; Saleh Gharaie
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 3.576

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.