Literature DB >> 30318415

Gamma Synchronization between V1 and V4 Improves Behavioral Performance.

Gustavo Rohenkohl1, Conrado Arturo Bosman2, Pascal Fries3.   

Abstract

Behavior is often driven by visual stimuli, relying on feedforward communication from lower to higher visual areas. Effective communication depends on enhanced interareal coherence, but it remains unclear whether this coherence occurs at an optimal phase relation that actually improves stimulus transmission to behavioral report. We recorded local field potentials from V1 and V4 of macaques performing an attention task during which they reported changes in the attended stimulus. V1-V4 gamma synchronization immediately preceding the stimulus change partly predicted subsequent reaction times (RTs). RTs slowed systematically as trial-by-trial interareal gamma phase relations deviated from the phase relation at which V1 and V4 synchronized on average. V1-V4 gamma phase relations accounted for RT differences of 13-31 ms. Effects were specific to the attended stimulus and not explained by local power or phase. Thus, interareal gamma synchronization occurs at the optimal phase relation for transmission of sensory inputs to motor responses.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attention; coherence; communication; effective connectivity; gamma band; oscillation; phase relation; reaction time; rhythm; visual cortex

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30318415      PMCID: PMC6250574          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.09.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuron        ISSN: 0896-6273            Impact factor:   17.173


  68 in total

1.  Modulation of oscillatory neuronal synchronization by selective visual attention.

Authors:  P Fries; J H Reynolds; A E Rorie; R Desimone
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-02-23       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Bivariate line-fitting methods for allometry.

Authors:  David I Warton; Ian J Wright; Daniel S Falster; Mark Westoby
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2006-03-30

3.  Monkey area MT latencies to speed changes depend on attention and correlate with behavioral reaction times.

Authors:  F Orlando Galashan; Hanna C Saßen; Andreas K Kreiter; Detlef Wegener
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  How to detect the Granger-causal flow direction in the presence of additive noise?

Authors:  Martin Vinck; Lisanne Huurdeman; Conrado A Bosman; Pascal Fries; Francesco P Battaglia; Cyriel M A Pennartz; Paul H Tiesinga
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  A normalization model suggests that attention changes the weighting of inputs between visual areas.

Authors:  Douglas A Ruff; Marlene R Cohen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Attention and the detection of signals.

Authors:  M I Posner; C R Snyder; B J Davidson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-06

7.  Content-specific fronto-parietal synchronization during visual working memory.

Authors:  R F Salazar; N M Dotson; S L Bressler; C M Gray
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Shifts of Gamma Phase across Primary Visual Cortical Sites Reflect Dynamic Stimulus-Modulated Information Transfer.

Authors:  Michel Besserve; Scott C Lowe; Nikos K Logothetis; Bernhard Schölkopf; Stefano Panzeri
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Contrast gain control and horizontal interactions in V1: a DCM study.

Authors:  D A Pinotsis; N Brunet; A Bastos; C A Bosman; V Litvak; P Fries; K J Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-02-02       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Visual cortical gamma-band activity during free viewing of natural images.

Authors:  Nicolas Brunet; Conrado A Bosman; Mark Roberts; Robert Oostenveld; Thilo Womelsdorf; Peter De Weerd; Pascal Fries
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  27 in total

1.  Layer 3 Dynamically Coordinates Columnar Activity According to Spatial Context.

Authors:  Gijs Plomp; Ivan Larderet; Matilde Fiorini; Laura Busse
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Surface color and predictability determine contextual modulation of V1 firing and gamma oscillations.

Authors:  Alina Peter; Cem Uran; Pascal Fries; Martin Vinck; Johanna Klon-Lipok; Rasmus Roese; Sylvia van Stijn; William Barnes; Jarrod R Dowdall; Wolf Singer
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Visual Stimulus Content in V4 Is Conveyed by Gamma-Rhythmic Information Packages.

Authors:  Dmitriy Lisitsyn; Iris Grothe; Andreas K Kreiter; Udo A Ernst
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Sub-second dynamics of theta-gamma coupling in hippocampal CA1.

Authors:  Lu Zhang; John Lee; Christopher Rozell; Annabelle C Singer
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Decoding Adaptive Visuomotor Behavior Mediated by Non-linear Phase Coupling in Macaque Area MT.

Authors:  Mohammad Bagher Khamechian; Mohammad Reza Daliri
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Oscillation-Based Connectivity Architecture Is Dominated by an Intrinsic Spatial Organization, Not Cognitive State or Frequency.

Authors:  Parham Mostame; Sepideh Sadaghiani
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Decision Signals in the Local Field Potentials of Early and Mid-Level Macaque Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Aravind Krishna; Seiji Tanabe; Adam Kohn
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Spike Timing in the Attention Network Predicts Behavioral Outcome Prior to Target Selection.

Authors:  Ian C Fiebelkorn; Sabine Kastner
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Mechanisms of Network Interactions for Flexible Cortico-Basal Ganglia-Mediated Action Control.

Authors:  Petra Fischer
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2021-06-11

10.  Cortical gamma-band resonance preferentially transmits coherent input.

Authors:  Christopher Murphy Lewis; Jianguang Ni; Thomas Wunderle; Patrick Jendritza; Andreea Lazar; Ilka Diester; Pascal Fries
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 9.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.