Literature DB >> 30317386

Predicting the need for surgical intervention in patients with spondylodiscitis: the Brighton Spondylodiscitis Score (BSDS).

Nageswary Appalanaidu1, Roozbeh Shafafy1, Christopher Gee1, Kit Brogan1, Shuaib Karmani1, Giuseppe Morassi1, Sherief Elsayed2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Spondylodiscitis represents a condition with significant heterogeneity. A significant proportion of patients are managed without surgical intervention, but there remains a group where surgery is mandated. The aim of our study was to create a scoring system to guide clinicians as to which patients with spondylodiscitis may require surgery.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients presenting to our institution with a diagnosis of spondylodiscitis between 2005 and 2014 was performed. Data for 35 variables, characterised as potential risk factors for requiring surgical treatment of spondylodiscitis, were collected. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the predictability of each. A prediction model was constructed, and the model was externally validated using a second series of patients from 2014 to 2015 meeting the same standards as the first population. The predicted odds were calculated for every patient in the data set. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were created, and the area under curve (AUC) was determined.
RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were identified. Surgery was deemed necessary in 21 patients. Six predictors: distant site infection, medical comorbidities, the immunocompromised patient, MRI findings, anatomical location and neurology, were found to be the most consistent risk factors for surgical intervention. An internally validated scoring system with an AUC of 0.83 and an Akaike information criterion (AIC) of 115.2 was developed. External validation using a further 20 patients showed an AUC of 0.71 at 95% confidence interval of 0.50-0.88.
CONCLUSIONS: A new scoring system has been developed which can help guide clinicians as to when surgical intervention may be required. Further prospective analyses are required to validate this proposed scoring system. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Predict; Spondylodiscitis; Treatment

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30317386     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-018-5775-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  28 in total

1.  Vertebral osteomyelitis in Göteborg, Sweden: a retrospective study of patients during 1990-95.

Authors:  M Beronius; B Bergman; R Andersson
Journal:  Scand J Infect Dis       Date:  2001

Review 2.  Clinical practice. Vertebral osteomyelitis.

Authors:  Werner Zimmerli
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Long-term results of ventro-dorsal versus ventral instrumentation fusion in the treatment of spondylitis.

Authors:  O Linhardt; J Matussek; H J Refior; A Krödel
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-05-17       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Spondylodiscitis: update on diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Theodore Gouliouris; Sani H Aliyu; Nicholas M Brown
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.790

5.  Simultaneous versus sequential one-stage combined anterior and posterior spinal surgery for spinal infections (outcomes and complications).

Authors:  Cagatay Ozturk; Ufuk Aydinli; Recep Vural; Ali Sehirlioglu; Muren Mutlu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-05-31       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Spondylodiscitis in patients under haemodyalisis.

Authors:  Ana Maria Cervan; Juan de Dios Colmenero; Alfonso Del Arco; Francisco Villanueva; Enrique Guerado
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 7.  Pyogenic spondylodiscitis: an overview.

Authors:  G S Skaf; N T Domloj; M G Fehlings; C H Bouclaous; A S Sabbagh; Z A Kanafani; S S Kanj
Journal:  J Infect Public Health       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 3.718

8.  Current diagnosis and treatment of spondylodiscitis.

Authors:  Rolf Sobottke; Harald Seifert; Gerd Fätkenheuer; Matthias Schmidt; Axel Gossmann; Peer Eysel
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 5.594

9.  Anterior debridement and fusion followed by posterior pedicle screw fixation in pyogenic spondylodiscitis: autologous iliac bone strut versus cage.

Authors:  Yong Hun Pee; Jong Dae Park; Young-Geun Choi; Sang-Ho Lee
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2008-05

Review 10.  Pyogenic spondylitis.

Authors:  W Y Cheung; Keith D K Luk
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 3.075

View more
  4 in total

1.  An inter- and intra-rater agreement assessment of a novel classification of pyogenic spinal infections.

Authors:  Gaston Camino-Willhuber; Byron Delgado; Nelson Astur; Alfredo Guiroy; Marcelo Valacco; Luigi Aurelio Nasto; Luca Piccone; Giovanni Barbanti-Brodano; Antonio Leone; Valerio Cipolloni; Enrico Pola; Julio Urrutia
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Vertebral Osteomyelitis: A Mortality Analysis Comparing Surgical and Conservative Management.

Authors:  Spogmai Zadran; Peter Heide Pedersen; Søren Eiskjær
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2019-07-10

Review 3.  Diagnostic and interventional management of infective spine diseases.

Authors:  Pierpaolo Palumbo; Federico Bruno; Francesco Arrigoni; Marcello Zappia; Anna Maria Ierardi; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Luigi Zugaro; Marina Carotti; Ernesto Di Cesare; Alessandra Splendiani; Luca Brunese; Carlo Masciocchi; Antonio Barile
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2020-07-13

4.  Influence of microbiological diagnosis on the clinical course of spondylodiscitis.

Authors:  Martin Stangenberg; Klaus Christian Mende; Malte Mohme; Theresa Krätzig; Lennart Viezens; Anna Both; Holger Rohde; Marc Dreimann
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 3.553

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.