Literature DB >> 30316867

Predicting puberty in partial androgen insensitivity syndrome: Use of clinical and functional androgen receptor indices.

Ngee Lek1, Rieko Tadokoro-Cuccaro2, Jonathan B Whitchurch3, Bismoy Mazumder3, Harriet Miles2, Philippa Prentice2, Trevor Bunch2, Karolina Zielińska2, Veronika Metzler4, Nigel P Mongan4, David M Heery3, Ieuan A Hughes5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: PAIS exhibits a complex spectrum of phenotypes and pubertal outcomes. The paucity of reliable prognostic indicators can confound management decisions including sex-of-rearing. We assessed whether external masculinisation score (EMS) at birth or functional assays correlates with pubertal outcome in PAIS patients and whether the EMS is helpful in sex assignment.
METHODS: We collected pubertal outcome data for 27 male-assigned PAIS patients, all with confirmed androgen receptor (AR) mutations, including two previously uncharacterized variants (I899F; Y916C). Patients were grouped as follows; EMS at birth <5 and ≥ 5 (EMS in normal males is 12; median EMS in PAIS is 4·7) and pubertal outcomes compared.
FINDINGS: Only 6/9 patients (67%) with EMS <5 underwent spontaneous onset of puberty, versus all 18 patients with EMS ≥5 (p = .03). Only 1/6 patients (17%) with EMS <5 developed adult genitalia reaching Tanner stage 4 or 5, versus 11/13 (85%) with EMS ≥5 (p = 0·01). There was no significant difference between the two groups of patients in being prescribed androgen replacement, who reached adult testicular volume ≥ 15 ml, pubic hair Tanner stage 4 or 5, above average adult height, had gynaecomastia, and mastectomy. No correlation was observed between EMS and in vitro AR function.
INTERPRETATION: In PAIS with AR mutation, birth EMS is a simple predictor of spontaneous pubertal onset and satisfactory adult genitalia. This provides useful information when discussing the likely options for management at puberty. FUND: European Commission Framework 7 Programme, NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, BBSRC DTP.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Androgen insensitivity; Androgen receptor; External masculinisation score; Gynaecomastia; Mutation; Puberty outcome; Reporter assays; Sex assignment; in silico modelling

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30316867      PMCID: PMC6197786          DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.09.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EBioMedicine        ISSN: 2352-3964            Impact factor:   8.143


Evidence before this study

There are limited data on pubertal outcome in patients with partial androgen insensitivity syndrome (PAIS) assigned male at birth. We searched PubMed using the search term “(‘androgen insensitivity’ AND (partial NOT complete)) AND (‘long term’ OR ‘follow up’ OR pubert* OR outcome)” (last searched in June 2018). After review, we could only identify two relevant articles [1,2]. One study reported pubertal outcome in 14 PAIS patients, all of whom had an external masculinisation score (EMS) of 5 or more, thus excluding information on the more severely undermasculinised infants at birth [1]. A more recent study reported pubertal outcome in a larger group of 29 males with a proven AR mutation and a range of EMS at birth [2]. A specific feature of this study was the universal finding of pubertal gynaecomastia.

Added value of this study

The paucity of outcome data at puberty makes it difficult to predict what will happen at puberty in boys with PAIS particularly when there is severe undermasculinisation of the external genitalia at birth. This study analysed prospectively collected data on EMS at birth and function of AR mutations in 27 PAIS patients to determine whether useful predictors of puberty outcome could be identified. The cohort included two patients with AR mutations (I899F and Y916C) for which functional studies had not previously been undertaken. All 18 patients who had EMS ≥5 at birth had spontaneous onset of puberty, whereas three of nine patients whose EMS <5 at birth failed to start puberty spontaneously. In contrast to the clinical findings, there was no clear predictor of puberty outcome from the functional analysis of AR variants.

Implications of all the available evidence

Our study indicates that in PAIS patients with a confirmed AR mutation, the EMS at birth is a simple predictor of spontaneous pubertal onset and adult genital development. Consistent with recent reports of gynaecomastia prevalence in PAIS [1,2], the majority of patients in this study developed the problem at puberty and irrespective of their EMS at birth. Consideration should be given to selectively starting an anti-estrogen or aromatase inhibitor in early puberty. Functional analysis of AR mutations in vitro provided detailed information to explain the PAIS phenotype but was not as predictive as clinical findings for puberty outcome. However, these assays together with in silico modelling of AR structure may prove beneficial in guiding optimal treatment in those patients requiring high dose androgen treatment. Alt-text: Unlabelled Box

Introduction

Androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS) is the most common cause of undermasculinisation in XY males with a disorder of sex development (DSD) when characterised by a phenotype consistent with androgen resistance [[3], [4], [5]]. The complete form (CAIS) is characterised by a female phenotype, while the partial form (PAIS) is expressed as a variable male phenotype. This includes hypospadias, micropenis, bifid scrotum and undescended testes at birth, or in later life, gynaecomastia and infertility as a result of oligospermia or azoospermia in a male with otherwise normal genitalia. CAIS is invariably caused by a mutation in the androgen receptor (AR) gene, whereas a pathogenic AR mutation is found in only 22% of patients with a PAIS-like phenotype [6]. Consequently, it is important to exclude other conditions which can present with a similar XY DSD phenotype when undertaking studies in PAIS. Demonstrating an AR mutation which was confirmed to be pathogenic as a cause of the PAIS phenotype was a requirement for inclusion of cases for this present study and knowledge of AR mutation status is important to guide management of PAIS in the longer term [2]. Sex assignment at birth for an infant with DSD is a central component of management undertaken jointly by health professionals and the family. In PAIS characterised by severe undermasculinisation, a key question raised is whether masculinisation is likely to occur at puberty. Data on such outcomes are limited [1,2]. Consistent findings appear to be a variable degree of spontaneous masculinisation at puberty, the need for androgen supplements to induce puberty in nearly half the cases, and the frequent occurrence of gynaecomastia. There is a trend in recent decades towards male sex-of-rearing for all causes of XY DSD, including PAIS infants who are severely undermasculinised [7]. This poses a challenge of formulating predictive factors which inform puberty and subsequent development in early adulthood in males. We hypothesised that the degree of masculinisation at birth as assessed by a validated external masculinisation score (EMS) [8] and functional analysis of the cognate mutant AR would be clinically informative. Thus, clinical follow-up data and the results of in vitro functional studies for 19 unique AR mutations within the study cohort were analysed, including two previously uncharacterised AR mutants (I899F and Y916C) for which preliminary structure/function analysis is presented.

Patients and methods

Patients

The Cambridge DSD Database contains detailed information on each case based on a questionnaire completed by the referring clinician at the time of notification. Using this resource, 27 PAIS patients were identified with known AR mutations characterised functionally who were assigned male and were of pubertal or post-pubertal age at the last known clinical assessment.

Clinical data

Information on the external genitalia at birth was verified and further information on the status of pubertal development was obtained via a second questionnaire distributed to their current clinician following written informed consent from the patient and/or parents. The questionnaire was completed opportunistically during a routine clinic visit. The pubertal data were collected in binary format (yes/no): spontaneous onset of puberty; whether androgen replacement was given; testicular volume ≥ 15 ml (as assessed using Prader Orchidometer); Tanner stage 4 or 5 for pubic hair and genitalia (penile length was not measured consistently, with ‘satisfactory penile development’ often recorded); final adult height standard deviation score (SDS) ≥ 0 (i.e. taller than the average adult male in the UK using 1990 UK population reference); presence of gynaecomastia and whether mastectomy was performed. Data on testosterone and gonadotrophin concentrations were available in only 10 subjects, thereby an insufficient number for analysis in this study. The degree of virilisation at birth was quantified by the EMS [8]. The composite EMS ranges from a minimum of 0 (indicating complete lack of masculinisation) to a maximum of 12 (normal masculinisation). The median EMS among all PAIS patients raised male in the Cambridge DSD Database (n = 41) is 4·7. The 27 patients in this study cohort were sub-divided into 2 groups based on an EMS at birth <5 (below median) and ≥ 5 (at or above median). The clinical data collated at puberty and beyond were compared between the two groups and analysed using Fisher's exact test for categorical variables as being the appropriate test for the relatively small sample size; statistical significance was taken to be p < 0·05.

PAIS-associated AR mutations

Genomic DNA was isolated from peripheral leukocytes or genital skin fibroblasts using standard techniques. The coding exons and exon/intron boundaries of the AR gene were analysed by direct sequencing. Amino acid numbering for the human AR (1—920) is based on NM_000044.2 (NCBI). A total of 19 unique AR mutations were identified in the study cohort, which were assessed for their impact on AR-dependent reporter activation. Two previously uncharacterised variants were also assessed for dimerization and coactivator binding in yeast two-hybrid assays [9].

Mammalian expression plasmids

Wild-type (WT) human AR cDNA expression vector pSVAR0 was used to generate AR mutant expression vectors by QuikChange Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Agilent Technologies) [10]. All AR constructs were verified by sequencing. The luciferase reporter construct pGRE2-TATA-Luc has been described previously [11]. Renilla luciferase constructs pGL4-TK and phRG-TK (Promega) or pCH110 (β-galactosidase) were used as transfection controls.

Transient transfection and reporter assays

For AR transactivation studies, COS-1 or HeLa cells were seeded into 12-well tissue culture plates in Dulbecco's modified essential medium (DMEM) containing 2 mM glutamine and 10% charcoal-stripped serum. Cells were transfected with 250 ng pGRE2-TATA-Luc, 25 ng pSVAR0 and a control reporter 25 ng phRG-TK (Renilla Luciferase) or pCH110 (β-galactosidase) as indicated using standard transfection procedures. After 16 h incubation the cells were exposed to fresh medium containing 0–10 nmol dihydrotestosterone (DHT; Sigma) or the synthetic androgen mibolerone (Steraloids Inc) for a further 24 h. The cells were then lysed in 500 μl passive lysis buffer (Promega) and the ratio of firefly to renilla was determined using Nanolight technology Alternatively, Dual-light System (Applied Biosystems) was used to measure Luciferase and β-galactosidase activities. Reporter assays were quantified using a Microplate Luminometer LB 960 (Berthold).

Yeast two-hybrid assays

Yeast two-hybrid interaction studies were performed as described previously using the S. cerevisiae L40 reporter strain transformed with expression vectors for LexA-SRC1 NID 431–761 (nuclear receptor interaction domain) in combination with VP16-AR LBD (627–920) [9]. VP16-AR LBD mutants I899F and Y916C were generated by site-directed PCR mutagenesis, and constructs were validated by sequencing. For AR-LBD dimerization assays, LexA-AR-LBD was co-transformed with VP16-AR expression plasmids. Construct expression levels were determined by western blotting using antibodies specific for the LexA (06–719; Millipore) and VP16 (sc-7546; Santa Cruz) epitopes. Co-transformants were purified and grown in selective medium in the presence of 1 μM Mibolerone or vehicle. Reporter β-galactosidase activities are presented as the mean of three independent clones with error bars to indicate standard deviations.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the local research ethics committee (09/H0308/158), and institutional approval was obtained from the Research and Development Committee at the Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.

Role of the funding source

The funders had no role in study design, collection, analysis or interpretation of the data, writing the report, or the decision to submit the report for publication.

Results

EMS at birth and age of last clinical assessment

Table 1A, Table 1B shows EMS at birth and pubertal status at the last assessment for each of the 27 study participants in relation to their AR mutation type. The age range at last assessment was 14–44 years. Two of the participants (2-E and 2-O) were aged 14 years and both had entered puberty spontaneously but were not contactable at the time of the analysis. The remaining 25 participants had either recently completed puberty or were in young adulthood.
Table 1A

Clinical pubertal data for the 9 patients with PAIS Group 1 (EMS at birth <5).

Study participant1-A1-B1-C1-D1-E1-F1-G1-H1-I
AR mutationR630WS704GF755 LR841CR841CI899F #R856HA897EA897E
Codon change2247C > T2469 A > G2624C > G2880C > T2880C > T3057 A > T3016 G > A3049C > A3049C > A



Clinical features at birth
EMS at birth (0−12)321141333
Scrotal fusion (0; 3)000000000
Microphallus (0; 3)000000000
Urethral meatus (0; 1; 2; 3)000010000
Right gonad (0; 0.5; 1.0; 1.5)1.510.50.51.50.51.51.51.5
Left gonad (0; 0.5; 1.0; 1.5)1.510.50.51.50.51.51.51.5



Last known clinical features
Age (years) at the last assessment263118381816211518
Spontaneous onset of pubertyYesNoNoYesNoYesYesYesYes
Androgen replacement givenYesYesYesNoYesNoYesNoNo
Adult testes ≥ 15 mlNoNoYesYesYesNoYes
Adult pubic hair PH4-PH5YesNoYesNoYesYesYesYesYes
Adult genitalia G4-G5NoYesNoNoNoNo
Adult height SDS > 0NoNoYesNoYesYesNoYesYes
Presence of gynaecomastiaYesYesYesYesYesYesYesNoNo
Mastectomy doneYesYesYesYesYesYesNoNoNo
Table 1B

Clinical pubertal data for the 18 patients with PAIS Group 2 (EMS at birth ≥ 5).

Study participant2-A2-B2-C2-D2-E2-F2-G2-H2-I2-J2-K2-L2-M2-N2-O2-P2-Q2-R
AR mutationI665TF674CD691EF755SY764CR841CR841CR841HI870MI870MA871VM625 LY916C #A597TA871VL713F &L713F &L713F &
Codon change2353 T > C2380 T > G2432C > A2623 T > C2650 A > G2880C > T2880C > T2881 G > A2969 T > G2969 T > G2971C > T2232 A > T3106 A > G2148 G > A2971C > T2496C > T2496C > T2496C > T



Clinical features at birth
EMS at birth (0–12)665885956610756688.59
scrotal fusion (0; 3)300330300030000033
microphallus (0; 3)030033303333033300
urethral meatus (0; 1; 2; 3)002211120011200333
right gonad (0; 0.5; 1.0; 1.5)1.51.51.51.50.50.511.51.51.51.51.51.51.51.5111.5
left gonad (0; 0.5; 1.0; 1.5)1.51.51.51.50.50.511.51.51.51.51.51.51.51.511.51.5



Last known clinical features
Age (years) at the last assessment181831171417272018184421301614191716
Spontaneous onset of pubertyYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Androgen replacement givenYesYesYesNoYesNoNoYesNoYesYesYes
Adult testes ≥ 15 mlYesYesYesNoYesNoYesYesYesYesNoYesYesNoNo
Adult pubic hair PH4-PH5YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Adult genitalia G4-G5YesYesNoYesNoYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Adult height SDS > 0YesNoYesNoYesYesNoYesNoYesYesYes
Presence of gynaecomastiaYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Mastectomy doneYesYesYesYesYesNoNoYesYesYes

In this cohort of 27 patients with PAIS, a total of 19 different mutations in the AR were found.

All the mutations except I899F and Y916C (the ones marked with #) have accompanying data from functional studies for comparison with the clinical pubertal data.

Three siblings with AR mutation L713F (the ones marked with &) were included in the study by Lucas-Herald et al. See reference 2.

Clinical pubertal data for the 9 patients with PAIS Group 1 (EMS at birth <5). Clinical pubertal data for the 18 patients with PAIS Group 2 (EMS at birth ≥ 5). In this cohort of 27 patients with PAIS, a total of 19 different mutations in the AR were found. All the mutations except I899F and Y916C (the ones marked with #) have accompanying data from functional studies for comparison with the clinical pubertal data. Three siblings with AR mutation L713F (the ones marked with &) were included in the study by Lucas-Herald et al. See reference 2.

EMS and AR mutation type

Fig. 1 illustrates the distribution of mutations in the AR gene in this PAIS cohort. All were missense mutations and located in the DNA-binding (DBD) or ligand-binding (LBD) domains. There was no association between EMS at birth and the nature of the missense mutation. Indeed, some participants harbouring identical mutations displayed a widely variable EMS. For example, four participants (1-D, 1-E, 2-F and 2-G) with the same AR mutation (R841C) had an EMS of 1, 4, 5, and 9, respectively (see Table 1A, Table 1B).
Fig. 1

Scheme of androgen receptor gene. Androgen receptor mutations and patients' EMS at birth (in parentheses) were illustrated. Upper; Group 1 (EMS < 5) and below; Group 2 (EMS ≥5). Mutations I899F and Y916C (marked with #) were characterised in Fig. 3.

Scheme of androgen receptor gene. Androgen receptor mutations and patients' EMS at birth (in parentheses) were illustrated. Upper; Group 1 (EMS < 5) and below; Group 2 (EMS ≥5). Mutations I899F and Y916C (marked with #) were characterised in Fig. 3.
Fig. 3

A: Reporter assays using extracts of transiently transfected HeLa cells showing dose-dependent activation of an androgen-responsive luciferase reporter gene by wild-type (WT) or variant AR proteins in response to mibolerone. B: Yeast two-hybrid assays to assess cofactor binding by AR proteins. Shown is reporter activity due to interaction of AAD-AR LBD WT, I899F or Y916C constructs with the nuclear receptor interaction domain (NID) of steroid receptor coactivator 1 protein (DBD-SRC1 NID) in the presence of vehicle or mibolerone (1 μM) as indicated. C: Dose response curve in yeast two-hybrid assay comparing interaction of AAD-AR LBD WT and I899F proteins with DBD-SRC1 NID. D: Yeast two-hybrid assay assessing homo-dimerization capabilities of AR LBD WT or AR-LBD I899F constructs. The data shown represent the mean of triplicates and the error bars indicate standard deviations. *** = p < .001 by 2-way ANOVA.

EMS and pubertal outcome

Table 2 shows a quantitative summary of the study cohort (where data were available). For comparison of pubertal outcomes, the participants were sub-divided according to the EMS: Group 1, EMS <5 at birth (n = 9) and Group 2, EMS ≥5 at birth (n = 18). This cohort of 27 PAIS patients had a higher median (interquartile range) EMS of 6·0 (3·0 to 7·5), compared to an EMS of 4·8 (3·0 to 6·0) recorded in a previously published cohort of 36 male-assigned PAIS patients [6] and a median EMS of 4·7 in all 41 male-assigned PAIS patients recorded in the Cambridge DSD Database. In this study, there was no statistically significant difference between Groups 1 and 2 for age at last assessment. There was a trend towards less data on pubertal outcome in Group 2, and particularly on whether mastectomy had occurred (p = 0·03). Overall differences in data availability between the two groups did not reach statistical significance.
Table 2

Results of statistical analyses on the clinical pubertal data for the 27 patients with PAIS in the study cohort.

Study cohort [median (IQR)]Group 1 (EMS at birth < 5), n = 9Group 2 (EMS at birth ≥ 5), n = 18p-value (Group 1 + Group 2), n = 27
EMS at birth (0–12)3.0 (1.0 to 3.0)6.0 (6.0 to 8.0)<0.0016.0 (3.0 to 7.5)
Age (years) at last assessment18.0 (18.0 to 26.0)18.0 (17.0 to 20.8)0.5318.0 (17.0 to 23.5)
Group 1 (EMS at birth < 5), n = 9Group 2 (EMS at birth ≥ 5), n = 18(Group 1 + Group 2), n = 27
Pubertal outcomes [binary]YesNoTotal data, n [%] ^YesNoTotal data, n [%] ^p-value ⁎⁎Total available data, n [%] ^
Spontaneous onset of puberty639[100]18018[100]0.0327[100]
Androgen replacement given549[100]8412[67]0.6721[78]
Adult Testes ≥ 15 ml437[78]10515[83]1.0022[81]
Adult Pubic Hair PH4-PH5729[100]12012[67]0.1721[78]
Adult Genitalia G4-G5156[67]11213[72]0.0119[70]
Adult Height SDS > 0549[100]8412[67]0.6721[78]
Presence of gynaecomastia729[100]14014[78]0.1423[79]
Mastectomy done639[100]8210[56]0.6319[70]

Statistical analyses

There was no statistically significant difference in the age at last clinical assessment between patients in the two groups.

All the 18 patients with EMS at birth ≥ 5 (Group 2) had spontaneous onset of pubertal development, compared to 6 of 9 patients with EMS at birth <5 (Group 1).

Only 1 of 6 patients with EMS at birth <5 (Group 1) attained Genitalia Tanner Stage G4 or G5 in adulthood, compared to 11 of 13 patients with EMS at birth ≥ 5 (Group 2).

^ Data availability:

In this cohort of 27 patients with PAIS, information on evidence of spermatogenesis was available in six patients (22%).

There was fewer availability of pubertal outcome data in Group 2 (EMS ≥ 5) for whether mastectomy was done (Fisher's exact test; p = .03).

There was a trend towards fewer availability of pubertal outcome data in Group 2 (EMS ≥ 5) for whether androgen replacement was given,

Whether Pubic Hair Tanner Stage PH4 or PH5 in adulthood was attained, and whether Height SDS >0 in adulthood was attained (Fisher's exact test; all p = .07).

Differences in data availability between the two groups for the other pubertal outcomes did not reach statistical significance (Fisher's exact test; all p > .10).

Mann-Whitney U test was used to test for differences in EMS at birth and age at last clinical assessment of puberty between patients in the two groups.

Fisher's exact test was used to test for differences in pubertal outcome (binary) parameters between patients in the two groups.

Results of statistical analyses on the clinical pubertal data for the 27 patients with PAIS in the study cohort. Statistical analyses There was no statistically significant difference in the age at last clinical assessment between patients in the two groups. All the 18 patients with EMS at birth ≥ 5 (Group 2) had spontaneous onset of pubertal development, compared to 6 of 9 patients with EMS at birth <5 (Group 1). Only 1 of 6 patients with EMS at birth <5 (Group 1) attained Genitalia Tanner Stage G4 or G5 in adulthood, compared to 11 of 13 patients with EMS at birth ≥ 5 (Group 2). ^ Data availability: In this cohort of 27 patients with PAIS, information on evidence of spermatogenesis was available in six patients (22%). There was fewer availability of pubertal outcome data in Group 2 (EMS ≥ 5) for whether mastectomy was done (Fisher's exact test; p = .03). There was a trend towards fewer availability of pubertal outcome data in Group 2 (EMS ≥ 5) for whether androgen replacement was given, Whether Pubic Hair Tanner Stage PH4 or PH5 in adulthood was attained, and whether Height SDS >0 in adulthood was attained (Fisher's exact test; all p = .07). Differences in data availability between the two groups for the other pubertal outcomes did not reach statistical significance (Fisher's exact test; all p > .10). Mann-Whitney U test was used to test for differences in EMS at birth and age at last clinical assessment of puberty between patients in the two groups. Fisher's exact test was used to test for differences in pubertal outcome (binary) parameters between patients in the two groups.

Spontaneous onset of puberty

24 of the total cohort of 27 participants (89%) entered puberty spontaneously, based primarily on evidence of an increase in testicular volume. There was a statistically significant difference in spontaneous versus non-spontaneous pubertal onset according to the EMS: 6/9 participants (67%) with EMS < 5 had spontaneous onset of puberty, compared to all 18 participants with EMS ≥5 (p = 0·03).

Tanner stage 4 or 5 in adult genitalia

Data on this outcome parameter were available in 19/27 participants (70%). Only 1/6 participants (17%) with EMS <5 had adult genitalia reaching Tanner stage 4 or 5, compared to 11/13 participants (85%) with EMS ≥5 (p = 0·01). For all the other pubertal outcomes, there was no statistically significant difference between Groups 1 and 2 for androgen replacement (n = 21; p = 0·67), achieving adult testicular volume ≥ 15 ml (n = 22; p = 1·00), pubic hair Tanner stage 4 or 5 (n = 21; p = 0·17), above average adult male height (n = 21; p = 0·67), development of gynaecomastia (n = 23; p = 0·14), or mastectomy surgery (n = 19; p = 0·63). Importantly, among the participants in whom data were available (n = 23), 21 (91%) developed gynaecomastia irrespective of the EMS at birth or the type of AR mutation. Two siblings (1-H and 1-I) with AR mutation A897E showed no gynaecomastia with EMS at birth of 3 in both.

EMS and functional analysis of AR mutants

PAIS–associated mutations in AR may potentially impact on different AR functions including expression of the AR gene, stability of the mRNA or AR protein, or protein functions such as DNA or ligand binding, dimerization and cofactor binding, nuclear localisation, and transcriptional activity. As AR transcriptional activity is a readout for most of these functions, we assessed androgen-dependent reporter gene activation by wild-type and mutant AR proteins in well-established reporter assays using transiently transfected cells. Fig. 2 depicts reporter gene activation by wild-type and mutant AR proteins in response to increasing DHT/mibolerone concentrations. Transcriptional activity of mutant ARs was significantly impaired except for R630W, A597T (Fig. 2A), and for A897E (Fig. 2B). Although these three mutant ARs show a normal transcriptional response, the associated EMS in the cognate participants were reduced to 3 (1-A, 1-H and 1-I) and 6 (2-N). Furthermore, the phenotype at birth as defined by the EMS was extremely variable (including the four participants with the R841C mutation) and did not correlate with the results of in vitro transcriptional activation studies. The poor correlation between the specific pathologic mutation in the AR sequence and the clinical presentation at birth suggests other factors impact on phenotype.
Fig. 2

A: Reporter assays using extracts of transiently transfected COS-1 cells showing dose-dependent activation of an androgen-responsive luciferase reporter gene by wild-type (WT) or variant AR proteins in response to dihydrotestosterone (DHT). B: Reporter assay for A897E was performed separately using COS-1 cells and mibolerone (Mib).

A: Reporter assays using extracts of transiently transfected COS-1 cells showing dose-dependent activation of an androgen-responsive luciferase reporter gene by wild-type (WT) or variant AR proteins in response to dihydrotestosterone (DHT). B: Reporter assay for A897E was performed separately using COS-1 cells and mibolerone (Mib).

Mutant AR activity and spontaneous onset of puberty

The activity of 17 different mutant ARs as based on transactivation assays in vitro was analysed in relation to whether puberty occurred spontaneously or not. The data are summarised in Fig. 2 and Table 1A, Table 1B. Increasing concentrations of DHT or mibolerone were used in the assay and the transcriptional response of a reporter gene was compared with the wild-type AR. There was no consistent relationship between the degree of transcriptional AR deficit and puberty outcome. Mutants R841H and F674C in participants 2-H and 2-B, respectively, had low transcriptional activity relative to wild-type AR and yet in both cases, puberty occurred spontaneously. In contrast, mutant S704G identified in participant 1-B was similarly transcriptionally inactive and in this instance, puberty did not occur spontaneously and response to androgen treatment was not satisfactory. Nevertheless, although AR transcriptional activity in reporter assays was invariably reduced in most of the cohort, only three boys did not enter puberty spontaneously. Mutant R841C characterised by low transcriptional activity was identified in four separate participants of whom three entered puberty spontaneously and one did not. The widespread inconsistency between this phenotypic marker and the results of AR function assessed in vitro indicates that the AR functional assays employed here may not be a reliable predictor of pubertal outcome.

Structure and function analysis of I899F and Y916C AR variants

Two AR mutations were identified during our molecular investigation of this cohort of patients with PAIS who were raised male, namely I899F (identified in participant 1-G, Group 1) and Y916C (identified in participant 2-M, Group 2) where the variants were previously uncharacterised. A preliminary analysis of structure and function was undertaken as part of this study. A: Reporter assays using extracts of transiently transfected HeLa cells showing dose-dependent activation of an androgen-responsive luciferase reporter gene by wild-type (WT) or variant AR proteins in response to mibolerone. B: Yeast two-hybrid assays to assess cofactor binding by AR proteins. Shown is reporter activity due to interaction of AAD-AR LBD WT, I899F or Y916C constructs with the nuclear receptor interaction domain (NID) of steroid receptor coactivator 1 protein (DBD-SRC1 NID) in the presence of vehicle or mibolerone (1 μM) as indicated. C: Dose response curve in yeast two-hybrid assay comparing interaction of AAD-AR LBD WT and I899F proteins with DBD-SRC1 NID. D: Yeast two-hybrid assay assessing homo-dimerization capabilities of AR LBD WT or AR-LBD I899F constructs. The data shown represent the mean of triplicates and the error bars indicate standard deviations. *** = p < .001 by 2-way ANOVA. Examination of the crystal structures of agonist-bound AR LBD monomers (PDB: 3L3X, 4OEY) or the AR LBD homodimer (PDB: 5JJM) in complex with cofactor peptides revealed that the I899 sidechain forms part of the cofactor binding site whereas the Y916 side chain lies exposed on an outer surface of the AR LBD, distant from ligand binding, dimerisation or cofactor binding sites (Supplementary Figs. S1 and S2). Consistent with this, both AR mutants (I899F and Y916C) displayed reduced ability to activate the reporter, compared to wild-type AR, especially at the low concentration (0·1 nM) of exogenous androgen tested (Fig. 3A). This effect on activity was more pronounced with AR mutant I899F. To assess whether these mutations impact on the function of the AR LBD, we performed yeast two-hybrid studies as described previously [12]. As shown in Fig. 3B, wild-type AR LBD showed a strong ligand–dependent interaction with the nuclear receptor interaction domain (NID) of the Steroid Receptor coactivator (SRC1), a known cofactor for AR containing three LXXLL motifs. This interaction was significantly compromised by the I899F substitution (Fig. 3B and C) consistent with the proximity of the residue to the surface required for both cofactor binding and N/C domain interactions (Supplementary Fig. S2). In contrast the I899F mutation had no significant impact on the ability of the AR LBD to form homodimers in these assays in response to ligand (Fig. 3D), indicating that other major LBD functions were not affected. Western blots confirmed similar expression levels of the wild-type and mutant AR and SRC1 two-hybrid proteins (Supplementary Fig. S3),

Discussion

We report the largest cohort of PAIS patients to date whose puberty has been systematically characterised and quantitatively analysed in relation to the nature of their AR mutation. All 18 patients with median-or-higher EMS at birth achieved spontaneous onset of puberty, whereas three of the nine patients with lower-than-median EMS needed androgen treatment to induce puberty. This confirms the utility of assessing the degree of virilisation at birth to predict likely spontaneous pubertal development. The finding has practical importance in assisting health professionals and families when discussing the likely options for management at puberty, particularly in light of the recent trend for male assignment in PAIS [7]. Indicators of final pubertal progression were also informative. There was failure to reach Tanner stage 4 or 5 in more of the PAIS patients with low EMS. There were no significant differences between the two groups of PAIS patients with high or low EMS in terms of adult testicular volume, Tanner staging of pubic hair, adult height and incidence of gynaecomastia. Sperm analysis had been undertaken in 5 patients all of whom had oligo/azoospermia (1-A, 1-D, 2-C, 2-G, 2-L). A further patient was reported to have two children but no additional details were available (2-K). Overall, the results of this study suggest that the higher the EMS is at birth the more likely that puberty will occur spontaneously with satisfactory genital development. A previous study from Denmark reported gynaecomastia in 13 of 14 PAIS patients in their cohort [1]. The study group was unusual since eight patients had a normal EMS at birth and first presented in puberty with gynaecomastia as a sign of PAIS. The authors estimated that their small cohort accounted for 74% of PAIS patients in Denmark, suggesting the more severely undermasculinised patients presenting at birth were not included. A larger study of boys with PAIS through the International Disorders of Sex Development Registry reported universal development of gynaecomastia at puberty [2]. This also seemed to be the case in our study apart from two siblings who showed no gynaecomastia. Both had an EMS of 3 at birth and entered puberty spontaneously. That pubertal gynaecomastia is generally common in PAIS raises the possibility of prevention with the use of anti-estrogens and aromatase inhibitors to avoid surgical reduction mammoplasty [13]. A specific aspect of the current study was inclusion of patients in whom not only was the diagnosis confirmed by sequencing the AR gene, but the pathogenicity of the mutation was also assessed. The results show that all mutations located in the AR LBD displayed reduced transcriptional activity as measured in a reporter gene activation assay. However, this in vitro profile was not sufficiently specific in relation to clinical parameters such as the EMS and whether puberty started spontaneously. Two mutations, A597T and R630W, were located outside the LBD and both demonstrated wild-type activity in vitro. A597T occurs in the DNA-binding domain and was originally reported in two families with Reifenstein syndrome, a previously used eponymous term to describe the severe form of PAIS [14]. Subsequent studies showed this mutation disrupts AR dimerization and hence DNA binding [14,15]. The R630 residue lies at the DBD-hinge domain boundary and its role is poorly understood. A mutation in this residue (R629Q using the former numbering system) was identified in a prostate cancer patient with hormone refractory/androgen independent disease and was revealed to enhance AR transcriptional activation [16]. This suggests that the substitution of arginine by glutamine, an amino acid of similar volume, promotes AR function whereas the presence of a bulkier aromatic tryptophan side chain cannot be accommodated and thereby disrupts androgen signalling. A combination of reporter assays, yeast two-hybrid assays and in silico modelling was used for functional characterisation of Y916C and I899F, two novel AR mutations identified during the course of this study. The results show that I899F compromises the recruitment of the coactivator, SRC1 and consequently is likely to impair AR-regulated transcription [17]. Structural data for the LBD in complex with LXXLL or FXXLF motifs support this conclusion. I899 makes important stabilising contacts with the first conserved leucine or phenylalanine in these motifs that would be sterically disrupted by a phenylalanine side chain, consistent with the yeast two-hybrid data (Figs. 3B-3D). The Y916 residue does not participate in the cofactor binding site, nor at the recently characterised AR dimerization interface [18]. However, it may be involved in interactions with other proteins due to its exposed location on the AR LBD surface in both the monomeric and dimeric structures (Supplementary Fig. S1). A previous study has shown that Y916 is phosphorylated by Src kinase and that this event is important for recruitment of AR to chromatin [19]. Disruption of such function is unlikely to be detected in a reporter gene assay. Future studies should address the developmental regulation of AR phosphorylation as its physiological significance may have relevance to the timing of pubertal onset and subsequent progression [20]. Since the phenotype associated with PAIS is so variable and pleiotropic in its causation, it is generally accepted that a diagnosis of PAIS should be confirmed by identifying a mutation in the AR gene [3]. Furthermore, additional studies of the mutant receptor are needed, particularly when the mutation is novel. While the additional use of yeast two-hybrid assays provides mechanistic insights into the nature of the functional defect in AR signalling, it is evident that the use of in vitro assays of androgen action used in this study is not sufficiently informative to predict how puberty will develop in PAIS associated with a particular AR mutation. This may be due to variable responses according to different promoters used in reporter gene assays under the conditions employed [21,22]. The complexity of nuclear receptor coregulator dynamics is now well established, where the activity of the receptor itself is influenced by the DNA elements bound, together with coregulator expression and recruitment. Current in vitro methods are likely to be sensitive enough only to detect the most extreme of functional defects. There are also examples of mosaic expression of AR mutations in PAIS which can explain variable phenotypes [[23], [24], [25]]. The question of mosaicism was not systematically examined in this study. It is likely to be infrequent as in most cases, genital skin fibroblast lines had been established for androgen binding assays and furthermore, many of the cases were familial. The strength of the present study is a relatively large cohort of patients with PAIS demonstrating a range of EMS values which reliably indicated the likelihood of spontaneous onset of puberty. The outcome parameters of puberty were generally complete, apart from systematic evidence of spermatogenesis. Furthermore, the clinical dataset was coupled with detailed information about the AR mutation identified in each patient, including the use of in silico modelling. The propensity for infants with PAIS now to be more likely assigned male at birth requires a management policy that addresses the clinical challenges which may be faced at puberty and beyond. The majority of patients with PAIS assigned male appear to enter puberty spontaneously. Thereafter, androgen supplementation may be required for which it may be possible to utilise data on AR structure and function as a guide for the type and dose of androgen preparation.

Contributors

NL, RTC, PP, HM, and IAH designed the study, collected, analysed, and interpreted the data and wrote the report. TB, KZ, and JW performed reporter assays. DMH designed the Y2H experiments, analysed data and co-wrote the manuscript. JW and BM generated Y2H constructs and performed Y2H reporter assays, and western blots. NPM, VM analysed data and edited the manuscript.

Declaration of interests

We declare no competing interests.
  25 in total

1.  Variable expressivity and mutation databases: The androgen receptor gene mutations database.

Authors:  B Gottlieb; L K Beitel; M A Trifiro
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.878

2.  Significance of the CAG repeat length in the androgen receptor gene (AR) for the transactivation function of an M780I mutant AR.

Authors:  I Knoke; A Allera; P Wieacker
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Clinical and molecular spectrum of somatic mosaicism in androgen insensitivity syndrome.

Authors:  P M Holterhus; J Wiebel; G H Sinnecker; H T Brüggenwirth; W G Sippell; A O Brinkmann; K Kruse; O Hiort
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.756

4.  Human reporter gene assays: transcriptional activity of the androgen receptor is modulated by the cellular environment and promoter context.

Authors:  Stephanie Simon; Stefan O Mueller
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 4.221

5.  Point mutation in the DNA binding domain of the androgen receptor in two families with Reifenstein syndrome.

Authors:  H Klocker; F Kaspar; J Eberle; S Uberreiter; C Radmayr; G Bartsch
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  The role of a clinical score in the assessment of ambiguous genitalia.

Authors:  S F Ahmed; O Khwaja; I A Hughes
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Regulation of androgen receptor activity by tyrosine phosphorylation.

Authors:  Zhiyong Guo; Bojie Dai; Tianyun Jiang; Kexin Xu; Yingqiu Xie; Oekyung Kim; Issa Nesheiwat; Xiangtian Kong; Jonathan Melamed; Venkatesh D Handratta; Vincent C O Njar; Angela M H Brodie; Li-Rong Yu; Timothy D Veenstra; Hegang Chen; Yun Qiu
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 31.743

8.  Dynamics of coregulator-induced conformational perturbations in androgen receptor ligand binding domain.

Authors:  Mikhail N Zakharov; Biju K Pillai; Shalender Bhasin; Jagadish Ulloor; Andrei Y Istomin; Chao Guo; Adam Godzik; Raj Kumar; Ravi Jasuja
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2011-05-14       Impact factor: 4.102

9.  Male patients with partial androgen insensitivity syndrome: a longitudinal follow-up of growth, reproductive hormones and the development of gynaecomastia.

Authors:  Philip Hellmann; Peter Christiansen; Trine Holm Johannsen; Katharina M Main; Morten Duno; Anders Juul
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 3.791

10.  The hinge region regulates DNA binding, nuclear translocation, and transactivation of the androgen receptor.

Authors:  Annemie Haelens; Tamzin Tanner; Sarah Denayer; Leen Callewaert; Frank Claessens
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  6 in total

1.  Pubertal induction and transition to adult sex hormone replacement in patients with congenital pituitary or gonadal reproductive hormone deficiency: an Endo-ERN clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  A Nordenström; S F Ahmed; E van den Akker; J Blair; M Bonomi; C Brachet; L H A Broersen; H L Claahsen-van der Grinten; A B Dessens; A Gawlik; C H Gravholt; A Juul; C Krausz; T Raivio; A Smyth; P Touraine; D Vitali; O M Dekkers
Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 6.558

2.  Growth Curves of Chinese Children with Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome: A Multicenter Registry Study.

Authors:  Xiu Zhao; Zhe Su; Shaoke Chen; Xiumin Wang; Yu Yang; Linqi Chen; Li Liang; Geli Liu; Yi Wang; Yanning Song; Lijun Fan; Xiaoya Ren; Chunxiu Gong
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-05-10

3.  Two Compact Cas9 Ortholog-Based Cytosine Base Editors Expand the DNA Targeting Scope and Applications In Vitro and In Vivo.

Authors:  Susu Wu; Liping Li; Min Li; Shiyu Sun; Yuting Zhao; Xiaowen Xue; Feiyu Chen; Jingli Zhong; Junfan Guo; Qianhui Qu; Xiongjun Wang; Zhen Liu; Yunbo Qiao
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-03-01

4.  The challenges of androgen insensitivity syndrome.

Authors:  Bratu Ovidiu; Dragos R Marcu; Dan L D Mischianu; Catalina Poiana; Camelia C Diaconu; Simona G Bungau; Delia M Tit; Alin Cumpanas; Roxana Bohiltea
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 3.707

5.  Long-term Healthcare of People with Disorders of Sex Development: Predictors of Pubertal Outcomes of Partial Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome - Authors' Reply.

Authors:  Ngee Lek; Rieko Tadokoro-Cuccaro; Ieuan Hughes
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 8.143

6.  Long-term healthcare of people with disorders of sex development: Predictors of pubertal outcomes of partial androgen insensitivity syndrome.

Authors:  Maki Fukami
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 8.143

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.