Literature DB >> 30316199

Information or education interventions for adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients and their carers.

Sharon R Lewis1, Michael W Pritchard, Oliver J Schofield-Robinson, David Jw Evans, Phil Alderson, Andrew F Smith.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: During intensive care unit (ICU) admission, patients and their carers experience physical and psychological stressors that may result in psychological conditions including anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Improving communication between healthcare professionals, patients, and their carers may alleviate these disorders. Communication may include information or educational interventions, in different formats, aiming to improve knowledge of the prognosis, treatment, or anticipated challenges after ICU discharge.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of information or education interventions for improving outcomes in adult ICU patients and their carers. SEARCH
METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO from database inception to 10 April 2017. We searched clinical trials registries and grey literature, and handsearched reference lists of included studies and related reviews. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), and planned to include quasi-RCTs, comparing information or education interventions presented to participants versus no information or education interventions, or comparing information or education interventions as part of a complex intervention versus a complex intervention without information or education. We included participants who were adult ICU patients, or their carers; these included relatives and non-relatives, including significant representatives of patients. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion, extracted data, assessed risk of bias, and applied GRADE criteria to assess certainty of the evidence. MAIN
RESULTS: We included eight RCTs with 1157 patient participants and 943 carer participants. We found no quasi-RCTs. We identified seven studies that await classification, and three ongoing studies.Three studies designed an intervention targeted at patients, four at carers, and one at both patients and carers. Studies included varied information: standardised or tailored, presented once or several times, and that included verbal or written information, audio recordings, multimedia information, and interactive information packs. Five studies reported robust methods of randomisation and allocation concealment. We noted high attrition rates in five studies. It was not feasible to blind participants, and we rated all studies as at high risk of performance bias, and at unclear risk of detection bias because most outcomes required self reporting.We attempted to pool data statistically, however this was not always possible due to high levels of heterogeneity. We calculated mean differences (MDs) using data reported from individual study authors where possible, and narratively synthesised the results. We reported the following two comparisons.Information or education intervention versus no information or education intervention (4 studies)For patient anxiety, we did not pool data from three studies (332 participants) owing to unexplained substantial statistical heterogeneity and possible clinical or methodological differences between studies. One study reported less anxiety when an intervention was used (MD -3.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) -3.38 to -3.02), and two studies reported little or no difference between groups (MD -0.40, 95% CI -4.75 to 3.95; MD -1.00, 95% CI -2.94 to 0.94). Similarly, for patient depression, we did not pool data from two studies (160 patient participants). These studies reported less depression when an information or education intervention was used (MD -2.90, 95% CI -4.00 to -1.80; MD -1.27, 95% CI -1.47 to -1.07). However, it is uncertain whether information or education interventions reduce patient anxiety or depression due to very low-certainty evidence.It is uncertain whether information or education interventions improve health-related quality of life due to very low-certainty evidence from one study reporting little or no difference between intervention groups (MD -1.30, 95% CI -4.99 to 2.39; 143 patient participants). No study reported adverse effects, knowledge acquisition, PTSD severity, or patient or carer satisfaction.We used the GRADE approach and downgraded certainty of the evidence owing to study limitations, inconsistencies between results, and limited data from few small studies.Information or education intervention as part of a complex intervention versus a complex intervention without information or education (4 studies)One study (three comparison groups; 38 participants) reported little or no difference between groups in patient anxiety (tailored information pack versus control: MD 0.09, 95% CI -3.29 to 3.47; standardised general ICU information versus control: MD -0.25, 95% CI -4.34 to 3.84), and little or no difference in patient depression (tailored information pack versus control: MD -1.26, 95% CI -4.48 to 1.96; standardised general ICU information versus control: MD -1.47, 95% CI -6.37 to 3.43). It is uncertain whether information or education interventions as part of a complex intervention reduce patient anxiety and depression due to very low-certainty evidence.One study (175 carer participants) reported fewer carer participants with poor comprehension among those given information (risk ratio 0.28, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.53), but again this finding is uncertain due to very low-certainty evidence.Two studies (487 carer participants) reported little or no difference in carer satisfaction; it is uncertain whether information or education interventions as part of a complex intervention increase carer satisfaction due to very low-certainty evidence. Adverse effects were reported in only one study: one participant withdrew because of deterioration in mental health on completion of anxiety and depression questionnaires, but the study authors did not report whether this participant was from the intervention or comparison group.We downgraded certainty of the evidence owing to study limitations, and limited data from few small studies.No studies reported severity of PTSD, or health-related quality of life. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: We are uncertain of the effects of information or education interventions given to adult ICU patients and their carers, as the evidence in all cases was of very low certainty, and our confidence in the evidence was limited. Ongoing studies may contribute more data and introduce more certainty when incorporated into future updates of the review.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30316199      PMCID: PMC6517066          DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012471.pub2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  58 in total

1.  Stress and immunity in humans: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  T B Herbert; S Cohen
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.312

2.  Stress-reducing effect of physician's tape-recorded support on cardiac surgical patients in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  S L Hwang; Y Chang; W J Ko; M B Lee
Journal:  J Formos Med Assoc       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Alessandro Liberati; Douglas G Altman; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Cynthia Mulrow; Peter C Gøtzsche; John P A Ioannidis; Mike Clarke; P J Devereaux; Jos Kleijnen; David Moher
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 11.069

4.  Qualitative analysis of patients' intensive care experience during mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Kefang Wang; Bing Zhang; Chunyan Li; Chen Wang
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.036

5.  Preparing families of intensive care patients for withdrawal of life support: a pilot study.

Authors:  Karin T Kirchhoff; Jenna Palzkill; Jennifer Kowalkowski; Anne Mork; Elfa Gretarsdottir
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.228

6.  Early education and counselling of patients with acute coronary syndrome. A pilot study for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Lukas Weibel; Paola Massarotto; Hannele Hediger; Romy Mahrer-Imhof
Journal:  Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 3.908

7.  Information or education interventions for adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients and their carers.

Authors:  Sharon R Lewis; Michael W Pritchard; Oliver J Schofield-Robinson; David Jw Evans; Phil Alderson; Andrew F Smith
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-10-13

8.  Preoperative information for ICU patients to reduce anxiety during and after the ICU-stay: protocol of a randomized controlled trial [NCT00151554].

Authors:  Almuth Berg; Steffen Fleischer; Michael Koller; Thomas R Neubert
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2006-03-08

9.  Language differences as a barrier to quality and safety in health care: the Joint Commission perspective.

Authors:  Paul M Schyve
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Patient and family satisfaction levels in the intensive care unit after elective cardiac surgery: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a preoperative patient education intervention.

Authors:  Veronica Ka Wai Lai; Anna Lee; Patricia Leung; Chun Hung Chiu; Ka Man Ho; Charles David Gomersall; Malcolm John Underwood; Gavin Matthew Joynt
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  5 in total

1.  Information or education interventions for adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients and their carers.

Authors:  Sharon R Lewis; Michael W Pritchard; Oliver J Schofield-Robinson; David Jw Evans; Phil Alderson; Andrew F Smith
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-10-13

2.  Effect of intensive care unit-specific virtual reality (ICU-VR) to improve psychological well-being and quality of life in COVID-19 ICU survivors: a study protocol for a multicentre, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Johan H Vlake; Jasper Van Bommel; Evert-Jan Wils; Tim I M Korevaar; Merel E Hellemons; Anna F C Schut; Joost A M Labout; Lois L H Schreuder; Diederik Gommers; Michel E Van Genderen
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 2.279

3.  Experience of discomfort and its self-management strategies in ICU patients.

Authors:  Pouran Tavakoli; Mohammad Ali Cheraghi; Simin Jahani; Marziyeh Asadizaker
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2022-01-31

4.  Development of the support needs after ICU (SNAC) questionnaire.

Authors:  Brenda O'Neill; Mark Linden; Pam Ramsay; Alia Darweish Medniuk; Joanne Outtrim; Judy King; Bronagh Blackwood
Journal:  Nurs Crit Care       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 2.897

5.  An Individualized Recovery Task Checklist Which Served as an Educational Instrument in a Critically Ill and Intubated COVID-19 Patient.

Authors:  Ashley Stantz; Joel Emilio; Sumera Ahmad; Ognjen Gajic; Gregory Garrison; Christopher Boswell; Misk Al Zahidy
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.