Literature DB >> 30315735

Blood sampling guidelines with focus on patient safety and identification - a review.

Michael Cornes1, Mercedes Ibarz2, Helene Ivanov3, Kjell Grankvist4.   

Abstract

It has been well documented over recent years that the preanalytical phase is a leading contributor to errors in the total testing process (TTP). There has however been great progress made in recent years due to the exponential growth of working groups specialising in the field. Patient safety is clearly at the forefront of any healthcare system and any reduction in errors at any stage will improve patient safety. Venous blood collection is a key step in the TTP, and here we review the key errors that occur in venous phlebotomy process and summarise the evidence around their significance to patient safety. Recent studies have identified that patient identification and tube labelling are the steps that carry the highest risk with regard to patient safety. Other studies have shown that in 16.1% of cases, patient identification is incorrectly performed and that 56% of patient identification errors are due to poor labelling practice. We recommend that patient identification must be done using open questions and ideally three separate pieces of information. Labelling of the tube or linking the identity of the patient to the tube label electronically must be done in the presence of the patient whether it is before or after sampling. Combined this will minimise any chance of patient misidentification.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blood sampling; patient identification; patient safety; phlebotomy; tube labelling

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30315735     DOI: 10.1515/dx-2018-0042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagnosis (Berl)        ISSN: 2194-802X


  2 in total

1.  The results of a close follow-up of trainees to gain a good blood collection practice.

Authors:  Güzin Aykal; Hatice Esen; Ayşenur Yeğin; Cemile Öz
Journal:  J Med Biochem       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Form for planning and elaborating high fidelity simulation scenarios: A validation study.

Authors:  Regina Mayumi Utiyama Kaneko; Inês Monteiro; Maria Helena Baena de Moraes Lopes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 3.752

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.