Literature DB >> 30315410

Clinical and morphological comparisons of idiopathic macular holes between stage 3 and stage 4.

Yanping Yu1,2, Xida Liang1,2, Zengyi Wang1,2, Jing Wang1,2, Wu Liu3,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare clinical and morphological differences in idiopathic macular holes (IMHs) between stage 3 and stage 4.
METHODS: In this retrospective cross-sectional observational study, patients with stage 3 and stage 4 IMHs based on Gass's classification in 1988 were enrolled. Horizontally and vertically, optical coherence tomography (OCT)-based parameters including minimum linear diameter (MLD), basal diameter (BD), and macular hole height (H) were measured; fluid cuff (FC), diameter hole index (DHI), macular hole index (MHI), traction hole index (THI), and hole form factor (HFF) were calculated. Afterwards, stage 3 IMHs smaller than 400 μm were excluded according to Gass's classification in 1995. Clinical features, such as age, duration of symptoms, and baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and OCT parameters were compared respectively between two stages based on both classifications.
RESULTS: Given classification of 1988, stage 3 IMHs had significantly shorter duration of symptoms (P = 0.020) and smaller horizontal BD (P = 0.041). Horizontally and vertically, MLD (P = 0.001, 0.004 respectively), DHI (P = 0.032, 0.021 respectively), and HFF (P = 0.032, 0.017 respectively) were significantly smaller and THI (P = 0.011, 0.020 respectively) was significantly larger in stage 3 holes. Clinical features like age and baseline BCVA showed no significant differences. When staged by classification of 1995, IMHs of the two stages shared similar features.
CONCLUSIONS: Stage 3 IMHs, instead of owning shorter duration of symptoms and smaller diameters, share similar clinical and morphological features with stage 4 IMHs according to Gass's classification in 1995, which excludes IMHs smaller than 400 μm from stage 3 compared to his 1988 version.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Idiopathic macular hole; Morphology; Optical coherence tomography; Stage

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30315410     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-018-4158-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  23 in total

Review 1.  Idiopathic full thickness macular hole: natural history and pathogenesis.

Authors:  E Ezra
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Macular hole size as a prognostic factor in macular hole surgery.

Authors:  S Ullrich; C Haritoglou; C Gass; M Schaumberger; M W Ulbig; A Kampik
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  A comparison of several methods of macular hole measurement using optical coherence tomography, and their value in predicting anatomical and visual outcomes.

Authors:  Laura Wakely; Rubina Rahman; John Stephenson
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Equivalent tamponade by room air as compared with SF(6) after macular hole surgery.

Authors:  Yuhei Hasegawa; Yasuaki Hata; Yasutaka Mochizuki; Ryoichi Arita; Shuhei Kawahara; Takeshi Kita; Yoshihiro Noda; Tatsuro Ishibashi
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-06-21       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Recovery of photoreceptor layer on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography after vitreous surgery combined with air tamponade in chronic idiopathic macular hole.

Authors:  Feng He; Fangtian Dong; Weihong Yu; Rongping Dai
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.300

6.  Idiopathic senile macular hole. Its early stages and pathogenesis.

Authors:  J D Gass
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1988-05

7.  Incidence of idiopathic full-thickness macular holes in fellow eyes. A 5-year prospective natural history study.

Authors:  E Ezra; J A Wells; R H Gray; F M Kinsella; G M Orr; J Grego; G B Arden; Z J Gregor
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Surgical management of macular holes: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

Authors:  W E Benson; K C Cruickshanks; D S Fong; G A Williams; M A Bloome; D A Frambach; A E Kreiger; R P Murphy
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 9.  Predicting visual outcome following surgery for idiopathic macular holes.

Authors:  Sentaro Kusuhara; Akira Negi
Journal:  Ophthalmologica       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 3.250

10.  Prevalence of full-thickness macular holes in urban and rural adult Chinese: the Beijing Eye Study.

Authors:  Shuang Wang; Liang Xu; Jost B Jonas
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.258

View more
  6 in total

1.  Observation of macular hole associated with retinoschisis in patients with high myopia.

Authors:  Ke Zhang; Xiaohan Yang; Zengyi Wang; Yanping Yu; Yajie Yu; Lingzi Liu; Biying Qi; Xijin Wu; Wu Liu
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 3.535

Review 2.  Literature Review of Surgical Treatment in Idiopathic Full-Thickness Macular Hole.

Authors:  Mantapond Ittarat; Thanapong Somkijrungroj; Sunee Chansangpetch; Pear Pongsachareonnont
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-07-30

3.  Functional evaluation with microperimetry in large idiopathic macular holes treated by a free internal limiting membrane flap tamponade technique.

Authors:  Peirong Huang; Hong Wang; Fenge Chen; Jieqiong Chen; Yifan Hu; Junran Sun; Jingyang Feng; Hong Zhu
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 2.209

Review 4.  Pathogenesis and Management of Macular Hole: Review of Current Advances.

Authors:  Guzel Bikbova; Toshiyuki Oshitari; Takayuki Baba; Shuichi Yamamoto; Keisuke Mori
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 1.909

5.  Intraoperative Observation of a Macular Holes Using Optical Coherence Tomography.

Authors:  Koichi Nishitsuka; Katsuhiro Nishi; Hiroyuki Namba; Yutaka Kaneko; Hidetoshi Yamashita
Journal:  Clin Optom (Auckl)       Date:  2021-04-14

6.  Modified internal limiting membrane flap technique for large chronic macular hole: Two case reports.

Authors:  Keran Li; Yunfan Zhou; Weihua Yang; Qin Jiang; Xiangzhong Xu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 1.889

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.