Literature DB >> 30315376

Free Will, Determinism, and Intuitive Judgments About the Heritability of Behavior.

Emily A Willoughby1, Alan C Love2, Matt McGue3, William G Iacono3, Jack Quigley3, James J Lee3.   

Abstract

The fact that genes and environment contribute differentially to variation in human behaviors, traits and attitudes is central to the field of behavior genetics. Perceptions about these differential contributions may affect ideas about human agency. We surveyed two independent samples (N = 301 and N = 740) to assess beliefs about free will, determinism, political orientation, and the relative contribution of genes and environment to 21 human traits. We find that lay estimates of genetic influence on these traits cluster into four distinct groups, which differentially predict beliefs about human agency, political orientation, and religiosity. Despite apparent ideological associations with these beliefs, the correspondence between mean lay estimates and published heritability estimates for the surveyed traits is large (r = .77). Belief in genetic determinism emerges as a modest predictor of accuracy in these lay estimates. Additionally, educated mothers with multiple children emerge as particularly accurate in their estimates of the genetic contribution to these traits.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Determinism; Environment; Free will; Genetics; Heritability; Human agency

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30315376     DOI: 10.1007/s10519-018-9931-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Genet        ISSN: 0001-8244            Impact factor:   2.805


  5 in total

1.  Can we get human nature right?

Authors:  Iris Berent
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Asymmetric genetic attributions for one's own prosocial versus antisocial behavior.

Authors:  Matthew S Lebowitz; Kathryn Tabb; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  J Soc Psychol       Date:  2022-03-31

3.  Minnesota Center for Twin and Family Research.

Authors:  Sylia Wilson; Kevin Haroian; William G Iacono; Robert F Krueger; James J Lee; Monica Luciana; Stephen M Malone; Matt McGue; Glenn I Roisman; Scott Vrieze
Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 1.587

Review 4.  Potential use of clinical polygenic risk scores in psychiatry - ethical implications and communicating high polygenic risk.

Authors:  A C Palk; S Dalvie; J de Vries; A R Martin; D J Stein
Journal:  Philos Ethics Humanit Med       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 2.464

Review 5.  Bench Research Informed by GWAS Results.

Authors:  Nikolay V Kondratyev; Margarita V Alfimova; Arkadiy K Golov; Vera E Golimbet
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 6.600

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.