Literature DB >> 30315036

Chronic kidney disease in type 2 diabetes: Does an abnormal urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio need to be retested?

Divya Garg1, Christopher Naugler2, Vishal Bhella3, Fahmida Yeasmin4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the positive predictive value (PPV) of a single random abnormal urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) compared with repeat test results in patients with type 2 diabetes to diagnose chronic kidney disease (CKD).
DESIGN: Retrospective, longitudinal secondary data analysis using Calgary Laboratory Services data.
SETTING: Calgary, Alta. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged 21 and older with a new diagnosis of diabetes in the study period from January 2008 to December 2015 and with a first abnormal urine ACR followed by another ACR test completed within 120 days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The PPV of an abnormal urine ACR (2 to 20 mg/mmol) to diagnose CKD was calculated. A test result was considered a true positive if a subsequent positive test result (≥ 2 mg/mmol) was identified within 120 days of the first positive test result and a false positive if 2 subsequent negative test results were identified within the same time period. The relationship between the first and second urine ACR values to assess the probability of the second urine ACR being abnormal (≥ 2 mg/mmol) based on the values of the first abnormal urine ACR was also explored.
RESULTS: The PPV of the first abnormal urine ACR between 2 and 20 mg/mmol to diagnose CKD was calculated at 96.80% (95% CI 95.37% to 98.21%). Additionally, there was increased predictive probability of the second urine ACR being abnormal at higher values of the first urine ACR (2 to 20 mg/mmol). The data were further analyzed to exclude test results with a new or changed prescription of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker medications around the time of the first urine ACR test to focus results on screening and not treatment response. With these exclusions, the PPV for first urine ACR between 2 and 20 mg/mmol to diagnose CKD was calculated as 96.23% (95% CI 94.13% to 98.32%).
CONCLUSION: The first random abnormal urine ACR has a good PPV for the diagnosis of CKD in patients with type 2 diabetes, so multiple random urine ACR tests might not be necessary to diagnose patients with type 2 diabetes as having persistent microalbuminuria and CKD. A simpler diagnostic model for diagnosing renal disease might improve patient compliance, efficiency of testing, and implementation of health interventions. Reduced testing would also be expected to result in reduced cost from a health care expenditure perspective. Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30315036      PMCID: PMC6184958     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  14 in total

1.  Add to cart?

Authors:  Ilona Hale
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Vascular protection in people with diabetes.

Authors:  James A Stone; David Fitchett; Steven Grover; Richard Lewanczuk; Peter Lin
Journal:  Can J Diabetes       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 4.190

3.  Chronic kidney disease in diabetes.

Authors:  Philip McFarlane; Richard E Gilbert; Lori MacCallum; Peter Senior
Journal:  Can J Diabetes       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 4.190

4.  Association of estimated glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in general population cohorts: a collaborative meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kunihiro Matsushita; Marije van der Velde; Brad C Astor; Mark Woodward; Andrew S Levey; Paul E de Jong; Josef Coresh; Ron T Gansevoort
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Day-to-day variability in spot urine albumin-creatinine ratio.

Authors:  Chetana N Naresh; Andrew Hayen; Alexander Weening; Jonathan C Craig; Steven J Chadban
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 8.860

6.  Evolution of incipient nephropathy in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  K V Lemley; I Abdullah; B D Myers; T W Meyer; K Blouch; W E Smith; P H Bennett; R G Nelson
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 10.612

Review 7.  Screening for microalbuminuria to prevent nephropathy in patients with diabetes: a systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  D C Scheid; L H McCarthy; F H Lawler; R M Hamm; K E Reilly
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 0.493

8.  Type 2 diabetes in family practice. Room for improvement.

Authors:  Stewart B Harris; Moira Stewart; Judith Belle Brown; Stephen Wetmore; Catherine Faulds; Susan Webster-Bogaert; Sheila Porter
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.275

9.  Are triplicate urine samples necessary to assess albuminuria?

Authors:  Abbas Deeb; Philippe Zaoui; Salima Le Penven; David Tartry; Pierre Lantelme; Michel Ducher; Jean-Pierre Fauvel
Journal:  Nephron Clin Pract       Date:  2013-04-12

Review 10.  Associations of kidney disease measures with mortality and end-stage renal disease in individuals with and without diabetes: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Caroline S Fox; Kunihiro Matsushita; Mark Woodward; Henk J G Bilo; John Chalmers; Hiddo J Lambers Heerspink; Brian J Lee; Robert M Perkins; Peter Rossing; Toshimi Sairenchi; Marcello Tonelli; Joseph A Vassalotti; Kazumasa Yamagishi; Josef Coresh; Paul E de Jong; Chi-Pang Wen; Robert G Nelson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  What methods are being used to create an evidence base on the use of laboratory tests to monitor long-term conditions in primary care? A scoping review.

Authors:  Martha M C Elwenspoek; Lauren J Scott; Katharine Alsop; Rita Patel; Jessica C Watson; Ed Mann; Penny Whiting
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2020-11-28       Impact factor: 2.267

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.