Christopher A VanFosson1, Terry L Jones2, Linda H Yoder3. 1. United States Army Institute of Surgical Research, 3698 Chambers Road, San Antonio, TX 78234, United States. Electronic address: christopher.a.vanfosson.mil@mail.mil. 2. Virginia Commonwealth University School of Nursing, 1100 East Leigh Street, Richmond, VA 23298, United States. Electronic address: tjones69@vcu.edu. 3. The University of Texas at Austin School of Nursing, 1710 Red River St., Austin, TX 78712, United States. Electronic address: lyoder@mail.nur.utexas.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe the monthly variation in the prevalence and patterns of unfinished nursing care and to determine the relationships between the system of nursing care and unfinished nursing care at the US Army Burn Center. METHODS: This was a repeated measures, descriptive study. For one week per month for six months, all nurses providing direct patient care on two inpatient burn units (intensive care and progressive care) were asked to complete an anonymous paper survey, which contained the Perceived Implicit Rationing of Nursing Care instrument, to estimate the prevalence of unfinished nursing care on their unit. Unit administrative data also were collected from the unit nursing leaders each month. Descriptive statistics and multilevel modeling were used in the analysis. RESULTS: Most (80.5%) eligible nurses participated at least once; 46.6% participated three or more times. A high proportion (85.7-100%) of nurses left at least one element of care unfinished; the mean number of activities left unfinished over each 7 shift period per nurse was 16.2. Only nursing care hours provided by float staff significantly predicted nurse estimates of unfinished nursing care, β=.008, SE=.001, p<.05. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of unfinished nursing care at the US Army Burn Center was high and generally consistent with other studies of unfinished nursing care in non-burn settings. The inability to meet the demand for nursing care, as evidenced by the presence of unfinished nursing care, may be the result of a limited surge capacity. Implications for research, policy, and practice were discussed. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the monthly variation in the prevalence and patterns of unfinished nursing care and to determine the relationships between the system of nursing care and unfinished nursing care at the US Army Burn Center. METHODS: This was a repeated measures, descriptive study. For one week per month for six months, all nurses providing direct patient care on two inpatient burn units (intensive care and progressive care) were asked to complete an anonymous paper survey, which contained the Perceived Implicit Rationing of Nursing Care instrument, to estimate the prevalence of unfinished nursing care on their unit. Unit administrative data also were collected from the unit nursing leaders each month. Descriptive statistics and multilevel modeling were used in the analysis. RESULTS: Most (80.5%) eligible nurses participated at least once; 46.6% participated three or more times. A high proportion (85.7-100%) of nurses left at least one element of care unfinished; the mean number of activities left unfinished over each 7 shift period per nurse was 16.2. Only nursing care hours provided by float staff significantly predicted nurse estimates of unfinished nursing care, β=.008, SE=.001, p<.05. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of unfinished nursing care at the US Army Burn Center was high and generally consistent with other studies of unfinished nursing care in non-burn settings. The inability to meet the demand for nursing care, as evidenced by the presence of unfinished nursing care, may be the result of a limited surge capacity. Implications for research, policy, and practice were discussed. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Entities:
Keywords:
Burn care; Missed care; Nursing care quality; Tasks undone; Unfinished nursing care