Literature DB >> 30312911

Communicating quantitative evidence of policy effectiveness and support for the policy: Three experimental studies.

J P Reynolds1, M Pilling1, T M Marteau2.   

Abstract

Increasing the prices of products that harm health is an effective intervention for changing behaviour to improve health but public support for such interventions is generally low. The current paper investigates whether communicating evidence of a policy's effectiveness at tackling the focal problem could increase support. Across three studies we develop an infographic for communicating quantitative evidence of the effectiveness of a hypothetical tax to tackle childhood obesity. We investigate first, whether communicating evidence of effectiveness increases (a) perceived effectiveness (Studies 1,2,3) and (b) support for the policy, and second, whether any increase in perceived effectiveness mediates an increase in support (Studies 1 & 3). In all three studies (combined N = 9654) communicating evidence of effectiveness for the intervention increased perceived effectiveness. In Study 1, communicating evidence did not change support for the policy. Variations of the infographic were developed in Study 2 with one emerging as clearer and easier to comprehend. This infographic was therefore used in Study 3 in which it increased support for the tax from 45% to 49%, an effect that was mediated by perceived effectiveness. The effect sizes were small but probably meaningful at a population level. The results of these three studies suggest the potential for presenting quantitative evidence of intervention effectiveness to increase public support. Much uncertainty remains about the most effective ways of presenting this evidence, whether similar effects are achieved by presenting unquantified evidence and whether larger effects might be achieved by presenting information other than effectiveness.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attitudes; Belief change; Communication; Policy; Public health; Updating beliefs

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30312911     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.09.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  9 in total

1.  Public attitudes to, and perceived impacts of 20mph (32km/h) speed limits in Edinburgh: an exploratory study using the Speed Limits Perceptions Survey (SLiPS).

Authors: 
Journal:  Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav       Date:  2021-12-04

2.  Public acceptability of public health policy to improve population health: A population-based survey.

Authors:  Catherine A Sharp; Mark A Bellis; Karen Hughes; Kat Ford; Lisa C G Di Lemma
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Are Australians ready for warning labels, marketing bans and sugary drink taxes? Two cross-sectional surveys measuring support for policy responses to sugar-sweetened beverages.

Authors:  Caroline L Miller; Joanne Dono; Melanie A Wakefield; Simone Pettigrew; John Coveney; David Roder; Sarah J Durkin; Gary Wittert; Jane Martin; Kerry A Ettridge
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Impact of health warning labels on snack selection: An online experimental study.

Authors:  Natasha Clarke; Emily Pechey; Eleni Mantzari; Anna K M Blackwell; Katie De-Loyde; Richard W Morris; Marcus R Munafò; Theresa M Marteau; Gareth J Hollands
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 3.868

5.  Message framing to inform cancer prevention pricing interventions in the UK and USA: a factorial experiment, 2019.

Authors:  Joseph G L Lee; Julie V Cristello; Christina H Buckton; Rachel N Carey; Elisa M Trucco; Paulina M Schenk; Theresa Ikegwuonu; Shona Hilton; Shelley D Golden; David I Conway
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 3.006

6.  Public support for policies to improve population and planetary health: A population-based online experiment assessing impact of communicating evidence of multiple versus single benefits.

Authors:  Eleni Mantzari; James P Reynolds; Susan A Jebb; Gareth J Hollands; Mark A Pilling; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Communicating Evidence about the Causes of Obesity and Support for Obesity Policies: Two Population-Based Survey Experiments.

Authors:  James P Reynolds; Milica Vasiljevic; Mark Pilling; Marissa G Hall; Kurt M Ribisl; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Impact of health warning labels on selection and consumption of food and alcohol products: systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Natasha Clarke; Emily Pechey; Daina Kosīte; Laura M König; Eleni Mantzari; Anna K M Blackwell; Theresa M Marteau; Gareth J Hollands
Journal:  Health Psychol Rev       Date:  2020-07-02

9.  Communicating evidence about the environment's role in obesity and support for government policies to tackle obesity: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  James P Reynolds; Milica Vasiljevic; Mark Pilling; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  Health Psychol Rev       Date:  2020-10-02
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.