Literature DB >> 30312255

PARS PLANA VITRECTOMY FOR THE TREATMENT OF TRACTIONAL AND DEGENERATIVE LAMELLAR MACULAR HOLES: Functional and Anatomical Results.

Marta S Figueroa1, Andrea Govetto2,3, David H Steel4,5, J Sebag6, Gianni Virgili7, Jean Pierre Hubschman2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Functional and anatomical outcomes of vitrectomy with membrane peeling were compared in tractional lamellar macular holes (LMH)/macular pseudoholes (MPH) versus degenerative LMH.
METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study enrolled patients with a minimum follow-up of 6 months. The association of spectral domain optical coherence tomography parameters with preoperative and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity was analyzed.
RESULTS: Seventy-seven (74.8%) tractional LMH/MPH and 26 (25.2%) degenerative LMH were included. Preoperative best-corrected visual acuity was better in tractional LMH/MPH (0.39 ± 0.2 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution, 20/50 Snellen equivalent) than degenerative LMH (0.56 ± 0.2 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution, 20/66 Snellen equivalent; P < 0.001). Premacular membranes were found in all tractional LMH/MPH, whereas LMH-associated epiretinal proliferation (LHEP) was present in all degenerative LMH. Primary anatomical success was achieved in 97/103 eyes (94.2%), with foveal restoration occurring earlier in degenerative LMH (1.6 ± 2.3 vs. 3.3 ± 3.6 months; P = 0.025). Best-corrected visual acuity improved in both tractional LMH/MPH and degenerative LMH (P < 0.001 and P = 0.012, respectively) but was better in tractional LMH/MPH (P = 0.001).
CONCLUSION: The presence of premacular membranes and absence of LMH-associated epiretinal proliferation in all tractional LMH/MPH further distinguishes this from degenerative LMH. Best-corrected visual acuity improved in both subgroups but more so in tractional LMH/MPH. Complete anatomical restoration of foveal microanatomy was rare in degenerative LMH, reflecting significant morphological and pathophysiological differences between the two lesions.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30312255     DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Retina        ISSN: 0275-004X            Impact factor:   4.256


  12 in total

1.  Results of lamellar macular hole-associated epiretinal proliferation embedding technique for the treatment of degenerative lamellar macular hole.

Authors:  Kosuke Takahashi; Yuki Morizane; Shuhei Kimura; Yusuke Shiode; Shinichiro Doi; Toshio Okanouchi; Ippei Takasu; Yasushi Inoue; Fumio Shiraga
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 2.  Surgical interventions for lamellar macular holes.

Authors:  Declan C Murphy; Jon Rees; David Hw Steel
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-11-08

3.  Outcomes from the Retrospective Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study on Lamellar Macular Hole Surgery.

Authors:  Hanna Haave; Beáta Éva Petrovski; Zofia Anna Nawrocka; Goran Petrovski; Michał Zając; Xhevat Lumi; Wassiliki Melekidou; Lyubomyr Lytvynchuk; Andrii Ruban; Ljubo Znaor; Jerzy Nawrocki
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06-08

4.  Improving morphological outcome in lamellar macular hole surgery by using highly concentrated autologous platelet-rich plasma.

Authors:  Felix Hagenau; Nikolaus Luft; Matthias Nobl; Denise Vogt; Julian E Klaas; Benedikt Schworm; Jakob Siedlecki; Thomas C Kreutzer; Siegfried G Priglinger
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Embedding and sparing of lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation in the treatment of lamellar macular holes.

Authors:  Tso-Ting Lai; Yi-Ting Hsieh; Young Lee; Chung-May Yang
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 4.456

Review 6.  [Biomarkers in full-thickness and lamellar defects of the macula].

Authors:  M Maier; R Schumann; J Friedrich; J Klaas; C Haritoglou
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 1.174

7.  Lamellar Macular Holes: The Role of Microperimetry in Functional Assessment.

Authors:  Simone Donati; Paola Della Valle; Elias Premi; Marco Mazzola; Laura Lo Presti; Claudio Azzolini
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-04-14       Impact factor: 1.909

8.  Surgery outcomes of lamellar macular eyes with or without lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hanyue Xu; Ling Qin; Yifan Zhang; Yinan Xiao; Ming Zhang
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 2.209

9.  Visual outcomes and prognostic factors of vitrectomy for lamellar macular holes and epiretinal membrane foveoschisis.

Authors:  Takashi Omoto; Yuichi Asahina; Han Peng Zhou; Ryosuke Fujino; Muneyuki Takao; Ryo Obata; Tatsuya Inoue; Ryo Asaoka; Maiko Maruyama-Inoue; Yasuo Yanagi; Kazuaki Kadonosono
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Morphological Changes in Lamellar Macular Holes According to SD-OCT Examination over a Long Observation Period.

Authors:  Magdalena Kal; Izabela Chojnowska-Ćwiąkała; Mateusz Winiarczyk; Monika Jasielska; Jerzy Mackiewicz
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.