| Literature DB >> 30312149 |
Sophia David1,2,3, Massimo Mentasti2,4, Sandra Lai5, Lalita Vaghji2, Derren Ready2, Victoria J Chalker2, Julian Parkhill1.
Abstract
The diversity of Legionella pneumophila populations within single water systems is not well understood, particularly in those unassociated with cases of Legionnaires' disease. Here, we performed genomic analysis of 235 L. pneumophila isolates obtained from 28 water samples in 13 locations within a large occupational building. Despite regular treatment, the water system of this building is thought to have been colonized by L. pneumophila for at least 30 years without evidence of association with Legionnaires' disease cases. All isolates belonged to one of three sequence types (STs), ST27 (n=81), ST68 (n=122) and ST87 (n=32), all three of which have been recovered from Legionnaires' disease patients previously. Pairwise single nucleotide polymorphism differences amongst isolates of the same ST were low, ranging from 0 to 19 in ST27, from 0 to 30 in ST68 and from 0 to 7 in ST87, and no homologous recombination was observed in any lineage. However, there was evidence of horizontal transfer of a plasmid, which was found in all ST87 isolates and only one ST68 isolate. A single ST was found in 10/13 sampled locations, and isolates of each ST were also more similar to those from the same location compared with those from different locations, demonstrating spatial structuring of the population within the water system. These findings provide the first insights into the diversity and genomic evolution of a L. pneumophila population within a complex water system not associated with disease.Entities:
Keywords: Legionella pneumophila; Legionnaires' disease; genomic diversity; occupational building; water system; whole-genome sequencing
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30312149 PMCID: PMC6249432 DOI: 10.1099/mgen.0.000226
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Genom ISSN: 2057-5858
Fig. 1.Maximum-likelihood tree of 235 L. pneumophila isolates obtained from the occupational building, reconstructed after mapping sequence reads to the Corby reference genome. The columns show the sg, as inferred from the presence/absence of the wzm gene, and the ST. Bar, number of SNPs per variable site in the genome alignment.
Fig. 2.Maximum-likelihood trees of 85 ST27 (a), 124 ST68 (b) and 33 ST87 (c) isolates obtained from the occupational building and elsewhere, reconstructed after mapping sequence reads to ST-specific reference genomes and the removal of recombined regions from the alignments. The trees were rooted using isolates obtained from elsewhere as outgroups. The tips of the trees (circles) are coloured by the general sampling location and date, and the columns show the locations of isolation in the occupational building (if applicable). Bootstrap values, derived from 100 resamples, are shown for major nodes.
Fig. 3.Boxplots showing the estimated time since the MRCA across all root-to-tip distances for isolates belonging to the STs 27, 68 and 87 from the occupational building. Estimates are provided given two different evolutionary rates previously inferred.
Diversity of isolates in individual locations and water samples
The SNPs were calculated after removal of putative recombined regions (only one region in the ST68 lineage). na, Not applicable.
| 2A | 1 | ST27 (6) | 0 SNPs between all | ST27 : 0–1 (mean 0.3) |
| ST68 (8) | 0–9 (mean 5.2) | |||
| 2 | ST27 (5) | 0–1 (mean 0.6) | ||
| ST68 (10) | 0–8 (mean 3.6) | |||
| 2B | 3 | ST68 (4) | 1–9 (mean 4.8) | ST68 : 1–9 (mean 4.8) |
| 2C | 4 | ST68 (14) | 0–6 (mean 2.8) | ST68 : 0–10 (mean 4.5) |
| 5 | ST68 (4) | 0–5 (mean 3.2) | ||
| 6 | ST68 (15) | 0–10 (mean 3.4) | ||
| 7 | ST68 (2) | 4 | ||
| 8 | ST68 (1) | |||
| 2D | 9 | ST68 (10) | 0–7 (mean 2.6) | ST68 : 0–9 (mean 4.3) |
| 10 | ST68 (8) | 0 SNPs between all | ||
| 2E | 11 | ST68 (8) | 0–3 (mean 1.1) | ST68 : 0–9 (mean 3.8) |
| ST87 (5) | 0–1 (mean 0.6) | |||
| 12 | ST68 (7) | 0–1 (mean 0.3) | ||
| 2F | 13 | ST27 (4) | 0–4 (mean 2) | ST27 : 0–4 (mean 1.5) |
| ST87 (11) | 0–3 (mean 1.2) | |||
| 14 | ST27 (4) | 0–2 (mean 1) | ||
| ST87 (11) | 0–2 (mean 0.4) | |||
| 2G | 15 | ST27 (1) | ST27 : 0–13 (mean 4.2) | |
| 16 | ST27 (3) | 1–6 (mean 4) | ||
| 17 | ST27 (9) | 0–12 (mean 4.6) | ||
| 2H | 18 | ST27 (15) | 0 SNPs between all | ST27 : 0–3 (mean 0.4) |
| 19 | ST27 (2) | 3 | ||
| 20 | ST27 (7) | 0 SNPs between all | ||
| 2I | 21 | ST87 (5) | 0–1 (mean 0.4) | ST87 : 0–1 (mean 0.4) |
| 2J | 22 | ST27 (11) | 0 SNPs between all | ST27 : 0 SNPS between all |
| 23 | ST27 (1) | |||
| 3A | 24 | ST68 (6) | 0–2 (mean 0.7) | ST68: 0–3 (mean 0.9) |
| 25 | ST68 (15) | 0–3 (mean 1.0) | ||
| 3B | 26 | ST68 (6) | 0–2 (mean 0.7) | ST68: 0–2 (mean 0.4) |
| 27 | ST68 (4) | 0 SNPs between all | ||
| 4A | 28 | ST27 (13) | 0–6 (mean 2.4) | ST27 : 0–6 (mean 2.4) |
Fig. 4.Boxplots showing pairwise SNP differences between isolates from each of the STs 27, 68 and 87 that were sampled from the same and different locations in the occupational building. P values were calculated using the Mann–Whitney U-test.