BACKGROUND: Although the proportion of triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) diagnosed among older women is low, the number of TNBC cases is substantial because of the high incidence of breast cancer after the age of 65 years. The molecular features of TNBC in this age group have not been well described. METHODS: This study examined a population-based cohort of women with stage I to III TNBC diagnosed between the ages of 25 and 91 years with the PAM50 gene expression subtyping assay. The concordance between the TNBC classification by immunohistochemistry and the gene expression classification by PAM50, the expression of individual genes, and 5-year recurrence and breast cancer mortality in older women (≥65 years old) and younger women (<50 years old) was assessed. RESULTS: The molecular subtype distribution in TNBC was significantly different according to the age at diagnosis. TNBC was more likely to be classified as basal-like in women younger than 50 years (sensitivity, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-0.97) than women 65 years old or older (sensitivity, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.87); 35% of clinical TNBC cases in the latter group were the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-enriched subtype by molecular classification. Older women with TNBC also had significantly higher expression of ERBB2 and lower expression of all 10 proliferation-associated genes tested (P < .01). The risk of breast cancer death within 5 years was significantly higher in women with TNBC in comparison with women with hormone receptor-positive cancers in all age groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed differences in molecular subtypes among clinical TNBC cases based on patient age. A potentially targetable HER2-enriched group raises the possible need for intrinsic subtyping in older women with TNBC.
BACKGROUND: Although the proportion of triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) diagnosed among older women is low, the number of TNBC cases is substantial because of the high incidence of breast cancer after the age of 65 years. The molecular features of TNBC in this age group have not been well described. METHODS: This study examined a population-based cohort of women with stage I to III TNBC diagnosed between the ages of 25 and 91 years with the PAM50 gene expression subtyping assay. The concordance between the TNBC classification by immunohistochemistry and the gene expression classification by PAM50, the expression of individual genes, and 5-year recurrence and breast cancer mortality in older women (≥65 years old) and younger women (<50 years old) was assessed. RESULTS: The molecular subtype distribution in TNBC was significantly different according to the age at diagnosis. TNBC was more likely to be classified as basal-like in women younger than 50 years (sensitivity, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-0.97) than women 65 years old or older (sensitivity, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.87); 35% of clinical TNBC cases in the latter group were the humanepidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-enriched subtype by molecular classification. Older women with TNBC also had significantly higher expression of ERBB2 and lower expression of all 10 proliferation-associated genes tested (P < .01). The risk of breast cancer death within 5 years was significantly higher in women with TNBC in comparison with women with hormone receptor-positive cancers in all age groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed differences in molecular subtypes among clinical TNBC cases based on patient age. A potentially targetable HER2-enriched group raises the possible need for intrinsic subtyping in older women with TNBC.
Authors: Brian D Lehmann; Joshua A Bauer; Xi Chen; Melinda E Sanders; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Yu Shyr; Jennifer A Pietenpol Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Maggie C U Cheang; Miguel Martin; Torsten O Nielsen; Aleix Prat; David Voduc; Alvaro Rodriguez-Lescure; Amparo Ruiz; Stephen Chia; Lois Shepherd; Manuel Ruiz-Borrego; Lourdes Calvo; Emilio Alba; Eva Carrasco; Rosalia Caballero; Dongsheng Tu; Kathleen I Pritchard; Mark N Levine; Vivien H Bramwell; Joel Parker; Philip S Bernard; Matthew J Ellis; Charles M Perou; Angelo Di Leo; Lisa A Carey Journal: Oncologist Date: 2015-04-23
Authors: L Gerratana; D Basile; G Buono; S De Placido; M Giuliano; S Minichillo; A Coinu; F Martorana; I De Santo; L Del Mastro; M De Laurentiis; F Puglisi; G Arpino Journal: Cancer Treat Rev Date: 2018-06-11 Impact factor: 12.111
Authors: Arti Hurria; Laura A Levit; William Dale; Supriya G Mohile; Hyman B Muss; Louis Fehrenbacher; Allison Magnuson; Stuart M Lichtman; Suanna S Bruinooge; Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis; William P Tew; Michael A Postow; Harvey J Cohen Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-07-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Tiffany A Traina; Kathy Miller; Denise A Yardley; Janice Eakle; Lee S Schwartzberg; Joyce O'Shaughnessy; William Gradishar; Peter Schmid; Eric Winer; Catherine Kelly; Rita Nanda; Ayca Gucalp; Ahmad Awada; Laura Garcia-Estevez; Maureen E Trudeau; Joyce Steinberg; Hirdesh Uppal; Iulia Cristina Tudor; Amy Peterson; Javier Cortes Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2018-01-26 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Marilyn L Kwan; Christine B Ambrosone; Marion M Lee; Janice Barlow; Sarah E Krathwohl; Isaac Joshua Ergas; Christine H Ashley; Julie R Bittner; Jeanne Darbinian; Keren Stronach; Bette J Caan; Warren Davis; Susan E Kutner; Charles P Quesenberry; Carol P Somkin; Barbara Sternfeld; John K Wiencke; Shichun Zheng; Lawrence H Kushi Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2008-05-14 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Joel S Parker; Michael Mullins; Maggie C U Cheang; Samuel Leung; David Voduc; Tammi Vickery; Sherri Davies; Christiane Fauron; Xiaping He; Zhiyuan Hu; John F Quackenbush; Inge J Stijleman; Juan Palazzo; J S Marron; Andrew B Nobel; Elaine Mardis; Torsten O Nielsen; Matthew J Ellis; Charles M Perou; Philip S Bernard Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-02-09 Impact factor: 44.544