Literature DB >> 30309448

Real-World Analysis of Dispensed International Units of Coagulation Factor VIII and Resultant Expenditures for Hemophilia A Patients: A Comparison Between Standard Half-Life and Extended Half-Life Products.

Amit Chhabra, Patrick F Fogarty, Bartholomew J Tortella, Dean Spurden, José Alvir, Margaret McDonald, Jennifer Hodge, Andreas M Pleil.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify international units (IUs) dispensed and consequent expenditures for standard half-life (SHL) versus extended half-life (EHL) recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) replacement products in hemophilia A patients in a real-world setting.
DESIGN: Two U.S. claims databases were analyzed.
METHODOLOGY: Number of IUs dispensed and quarterly expenditures for rFVIII products were collected from the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart and Truven Health MarketScan Databases. Truven claims were also analyzed for factor IUs dispensed and expenditures for patients with data for ≥3 months before and after switching to an EHL product.
RESULTS: The Optum and Truven databases, respectively, included 276 (SHL, n=243; EHL, n=33) and 500 (SHL, n=409; EHL, n=91) hemophilia A patients. Median quarterly factor IUs dispensed in Optum were 10% higher with EHL versus SHL products over nine quarters, and 45% higher with EHL versus SHL products in Truven over 10 quarters. Median quarterly expenditures in the EHL cohort were 51% (individual quarterly medians range, 1%-101%) higher than in the SHL cohort in Optum and 122% higher (individual quarterly medians range, 1%-189%) in Truven. Twenty-nine Truven patients switched to an EHL product; median factor IUs dispensed varied quarterly. The lowest SHL and highest EHL values occurred in the quarter immediately before switching and the first quarter post-switch, respectively. Overall median quarterly expenditures were higher post-switch; this was consistent over seven quarters.
CONCLUSION: We found higher expenditures over two years for hemophilia A patients using EHL versus SHL products. Switching to an EHL rFVIII product was associated with variable factor IUs dispensed and consistently higher expenditures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hemophilia A; blood coagulation factor VIII; cost analysis; drug prescriptions; drug switching

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30309448

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Manag Care        ISSN: 1062-3388


  4 in total

1.  Optimizing language for effective communication of gene therapy concepts with hemophilia patients: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Daniel P Hart; Brian R Branchford; Sarah Hendry; Robert Ledniczky; Robert F Sidonio; Claude Négrier; Michelle Kim; Michelle Rice; Matthew Minshall; Claire Arcé; Steve Prince; Maria Kelleher; Sharon Lee
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 4.123

2.  Italian experience with rVIII-single chain: a survey of patients with haemophilia A and their physicians.

Authors:  Alessandra Borchiellini; Giancarlo Castaman; Giulio Feola; Antonietta Ferretti; Paola Giordano; Matteo Luciani; Giuseppe Malcangi; Maurizio Margaglione; Angelo Claudio Molinari; Berardino Pollio; Angiola Rocino; Cristina Santoro; Michele Schiavulli; Ezio Zanon
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2021-11-13       Impact factor: 5.221

3.  Bleeding outcomes and factor utilization after switching to an extended half-life product for prophylaxis in haemophilia A in Austria.

Authors:  Cihan Ay; Clemens Feistritzer; Joachim Rettl; Gerhard Schuster; Anna Vavrovsky; Leonard Perschy; Ingrid Pabinger
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Assessing prophylactic use and clinical outcomes in hemophilia A patients treated with rVIII-SingleChain and other common rFVIII products in Germany.

Authors:  Martin Olivieri; Patrick Sommerer; Geraldine Maro; Songkai Yan
Journal:  Eur J Haematol       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 2.997

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.