S K Kunutsor1,2, D Gillatt3, A W Blom1,2. 1. National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. 2. Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Musculoskeletal Research Unit, University of Bristol, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK. 3. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Osseointegration, an approach for direct skeletal attachment of a prosthesis to an amputated limb, may address many of the problems associated with socket prostheses. The safety of osseointegration remains uncertain. The aim of this study was to summarize evidence on functional and clinical outcomes, as well as adverse effects of osseointegration for patients with a limb amputation. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were searched to April 2018. Eligible studies were observational, case and qualitative studies, and RCTs conducted in patients with a limb amputation, who were managed with osseointegrated prostheses and had follow-up data. RESULTS: Twenty-two eligible articles comprising 13 unique studies were included. No RCT was identified. Apart from three case reports that comprised one to five patients, the sample size of studies ranged from 11 to 100 participants. All relevant studies reported improvement in functional outcomes (walking ability, prosthetic use and mobility), satisfaction and quality of life following osseointegration, compared with their preoperative status or when using a conventional socket prosthesis. Infection rates ranged from 1 (95 per cent c.i. 0 to 5) to 77 (59 to 88) per cent. The majority of infections were described as low-grade soft tissue or superficial infections related to the skin-implant interface, and were treated effectively with antibiotics. None of the studies reported additional amputation or death as a result of osseointegration. CONCLUSION: Osseointegration after limb amputation improves prosthetic use, comfort when sitting, walking ability, mobility, gait and quality of life. However, it is associated with an increased risk of soft tissue infection.
BACKGROUND: Osseointegration, an approach for direct skeletal attachment of a prosthesis to an amputated limb, may address many of the problems associated with socket prostheses. The safety of osseointegration remains uncertain. The aim of this study was to summarize evidence on functional and clinical outcomes, as well as adverse effects of osseointegration for patients with a limb amputation. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were searched to April 2018. Eligible studies were observational, case and qualitative studies, and RCTs conducted in patients with a limb amputation, who were managed with osseointegrated prostheses and had follow-up data. RESULTS: Twenty-two eligible articles comprising 13 unique studies were included. No RCT was identified. Apart from three case reports that comprised one to five patients, the sample size of studies ranged from 11 to 100 participants. All relevant studies reported improvement in functional outcomes (walking ability, prosthetic use and mobility), satisfaction and quality of life following osseointegration, compared with their preoperative status or when using a conventional socket prosthesis. Infection rates ranged from 1 (95 per cent c.i. 0 to 5) to 77 (59 to 88) per cent. The majority of infections were described as low-grade soft tissue or superficial infections related to the skin-implant interface, and were treated effectively with antibiotics. None of the studies reported additional amputation or death as a result of osseointegration. CONCLUSION: Osseointegration after limb amputation improves prosthetic use, comfort when sitting, walking ability, mobility, gait and quality of life. However, it is associated with an increased risk of soft tissue infection.
Authors: Jason S Hoellwarth; Kevin Tetsworth; John Kendrew; Norbert Venantius Kang; Oscar van Waes; Qutaiba Al-Maawi; Claudia Roberts; Munjed Al Muderis Journal: Bone Joint J Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 5.082
Authors: Maxim Shevtsov; Dmitriy Gavrilov; Natalia Yudintceva; Elena Zemtsova; Andrei Arbenin; Vladimir Smirnov; Irina Voronkina; Polina Adamova; Miralda Blinova; Nataliya Mikhailova; Oleg Galibin; Michael Akkaoui; Mark Pitkin Journal: J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater Date: 2020-09-16 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Muhammad Adeel Akhtar; Jason Shih Hoellwarth; Shakib Al-Jawazneh; William Lu; Claudia Roberts; Munjed Al Muderis Journal: JB JS Open Access Date: 2021-06-23