Literature DB >> 30304981

Physical confinement alters sarcoma cell cycle progression and division.

Rebecca A Moriarty1, Kimberly M Stroka1,2,3,4.   

Abstract

Tumor cells experience physical confinement on one or multiple axes, both in the primary tumor and at multiple stages during metastasis. Recent work has shown that confinement in a 3D spheroid alters nucleus geometry and delays cell division, and that vertical confinement impairs mitotic spindle rounding, resulting in abnormal division events. Meanwhile, the effects of bi-axial confinement on cell cycle progression has received little attention. Given the critical role of nuclear shape and mechanics in cell division, we hypothesized that bi-axial physical confinement of the cell body and nucleus would alter cell cycle progression. We used sarcoma cells stably expressing the fluorescence ubiquitination cell cycle indicator (FUCCI), along with fibronectin-coated microchannel devices, and explored the impact of bi-axial physical confinement on cell cycle progression. Our results demonstrate that bi-axial physical confinement reduces the frequency of cell division, which we found to be attributed to an arrest in the S/G2/M phase of the cell cycle, and increases the frequency of abnormal division events. Cell and nuclear morphology were both altered in confinement, with the most confining channels preventing cells from undergoing the normal increase in size from G1 to S/G2/M during cell cycle progression. Finally, our results suggest that confinement induces a mechanical memory to the cells, given our observation of lasting effects on cell division and morphology, even after cells exited confinement. Together, our results provide new insights into the possible impact of mechanical forces on primary and secondary tumor formation and growth.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mechanobiology; cell migration; cell shape; microchannels; nucleus

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30304981      PMCID: PMC6237433          DOI: 10.1080/15384101.2018.1533776

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Cycle        ISSN: 1551-4005            Impact factor:   4.534


  47 in total

1.  Biased migration of confined neutrophil-like cells in asymmetric hydraulic environments.

Authors:  Harrison V Prentice-Mott; Chi-Han Chang; L Mahadevan; Timothy J Mitchison; Daniel Irimia; Jagesh V Shah
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  External forces control mitotic spindle positioning.

Authors:  Jenny Fink; Nicolas Carpi; Timo Betz; Angelique Bétard; Meriem Chebah; Ammar Azioune; Michel Bornens; Cecile Sykes; Luc Fetler; Damien Cuvelier; Matthieu Piel
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 3.  Exploring the function of cell shape and size during mitosis.

Authors:  Clotilde Cadart; Ewa Zlotek-Zlotkiewicz; Maël Le Berre; Matthieu Piel; Helen K Matthews
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 12.270

Review 4.  The physics of cancer: the role of physical interactions and mechanical forces in metastasis.

Authors:  Denis Wirtz; Konstantinos Konstantopoulos; Peter C Searson
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 5.  Cancer cell motility: lessons from migration in confined spaces.

Authors:  Colin D Paul; Panagiotis Mistriotis; Konstantinos Konstantopoulos
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 60.716

6.  Generation of compartmentalized pressure by a nuclear piston governs cell motility in a 3D matrix.

Authors:  Ryan J Petrie; Hyun Koo; Kenneth M Yamada
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Physical confinement alters tumor cell adhesion and migration phenotypes.

Authors:  Eric M Balzer; Ziqiu Tong; Colin D Paul; Wei-Chien Hung; Kimberly M Stroka; Amanda E Boggs; Stuart S Martin; Konstantinos Konstantopoulos
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Increased asymmetric and multi-daughter cell division in mechanically confined microenvironments.

Authors:  Henry Tat Kwong Tse; Westbrook McConnell Weaver; Dino Di Carlo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Chemotaxis of cell populations through confined spaces at single-cell resolution.

Authors:  Ziqiu Tong; Eric M Balzer; Matthew R Dallas; Wei-Chien Hung; Kathleen J Stebe; Konstantinos Konstantopoulos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Contact guidance is cell cycle-dependent.

Authors:  Kamyar Esmaeili Pourfarhangi; Edgar Cardenas De La Hoz; Andrew R Cohen; Bojana Gligorijevic
Journal:  APL Bioeng       Date:  2018-05-30
View more
  10 in total

1.  Integration of Mesenchymal Stem Cells into a Novel Micropillar Confinement Assay.

Authors:  Mary T Doolin; Kimberly M Stroka
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 3.056

2.  Physical confinement induces malignant transformation in mammary epithelial cells.

Authors:  Yen-Chun Lu; Tinyi Chu; Matthew S Hall; Dah-Jiun Fu; Quanming Shi; Alan Chiu; Duo An; Long-Hai Wang; Yehudah Pardo; Teresa Southard; Charles G Danko; Jan Liphardt; Alexander Yu Nikitin; Mingming Wu; Claudia Fischbach; Scott Coonrod; Minglin Ma
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  Confined migration induces heterochromatin formation and alters chromatin accessibility.

Authors:  Chieh-Ren Hsia; Jawuanna McAllister; Ovais Hasan; Julius Judd; Seoyeon Lee; Richa Agrawal; Chao-Yuan Chang; Paul Soloway; Jan Lammerding
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-08-17

Review 4.  Mechanical regulation of cell-cycle progression and division.

Authors:  Vivek K Gupta; Ovijit Chaudhuri
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 21.167

5.  Nuclear Deformation Causes DNA Damage by Increasing Replication Stress.

Authors:  Pragya Shah; Chad M Hobson; Svea Cheng; Marshall J Colville; Matthew J Paszek; Richard Superfine; Jan Lammerding
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Nuclear Deformation in Response to Mechanical Confinement is Cell Type Dependent.

Authors:  Mary T Doolin; Thea S Ornstein; Kimberly M Stroka
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 6.600

7.  Compression enhances invasive phenotype and matrix degradation of breast Cancer cells via Piezo1 activation.

Authors:  Mingzhi Luo; Grace Cai; Kenneth K Y Ho; Kang Wen; Zhaowen Tong; Linhong Deng; Allen P Liu
Journal:  BMC Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2022-01-03

Review 8.  Microfluidic Lab-on-a-Chip for Studies of Cell Migration under Spatial Confinement.

Authors:  Federico Sala; Carlotta Ficorella; Roberto Osellame; Josef A Käs; Rebeca Martínez Vázquez
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-05

Review 9.  Tissue engineered platforms for studying primary and metastatic neoplasm behavior in bone.

Authors:  Victoria L Thai; Katherine H Griffin; Steven W Thorpe; R Lor Randall; J Kent Leach
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 10.  Embracing Mechanobiology in Next Generation Organ-On-A-Chip Models of Bone Metastasis.

Authors:  Ellen E Slay; Fiona C Meldrum; Virginia Pensabene; Mahetab H Amer
Journal:  Front Med Technol       Date:  2021-09-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.