Literature DB >> 30304745

Factors Influencing Sustained Engagement with ECG Self-Monitoring: Perspectives from Patients and Health Care Providers.

Meghan Reading1, Dawon Baik2, Melissa Beauchemin2, Kathleen T Hickey2, Jacqueline A Merrill2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patient-generated health data (PGHD) collected digitally with mobile health (mHealth) technology has garnered recent excitement for its potential to improve precision management of chronic conditions such as atrial fibrillation (AF), a common cardiac arrhythmia. However, sustained engagement is a major barrier to collection of PGHD. Little is known about barriers to sustained engagement or strategies to intervene upon engagement through application design.
OBJECTIVE: This article investigates individual patient differences in sustained engagement among individuals with a history of AF who are self-monitoring using mHealth technology.
METHODS: This qualitative study involved patients, health care providers, and research coordinators previously involved in a randomized, controlled trial involving electrocardiogram (ECG) self-monitoring of AF. Patients were adults with a history of AF randomized to the intervention arm of this trial who self-monitored using ECG mHealth technology for 6 months. Semistructured interviews and focus groups were conducted separately with health care providers and research coordinators, engaged patients, and unengaged patients. A validated model of sustained engagement, an adapted unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT), guided data collection, and analysis through directed content analysis.
RESULTS: We interviewed 13 patients (7 engaged, 6 unengaged), 6 providers, and 2 research coordinators. In addition to finding differences between engaged and unengaged patients within each predictor in the adapted UTAUT model (perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, facilitating conditions), four additional factors were identified as being related to sustained engagement in this population. These are: (1) internal motivation to manage health, (2) relationship with health care provider, (3) supportive environments, and (4) feedback and guidance.
CONCLUSION: Although it required some modification, the adapted UTAUT model was useful in understanding of the parameters of sustained engagement. The findings of this study provide initial requirement specifications for the design of applications that engage patients in this unique population of adults with AF. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30304745      PMCID: PMC6179719          DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1672138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Clin Inform        ISSN: 1869-0327            Impact factor:   2.342


  50 in total

1.  Patient-generated health data foundation for personalized collaborative care.

Authors:  Susan Hull
Journal:  Comput Inform Nurs       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 2.  Present and Future Trends in Consumer Health Informatics and Patient-Generated Health Data.

Authors:  A M Lai; P-Y S Hsueh; Y K Choi; R R Austin
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2017-09-11

3.  Data-Driven Healthcare: Challenges and Opportunities for Interactive Visualization.

Authors:  David Gotz; David Borland
Journal:  IEEE Comput Graph Appl       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.088

4.  Personalized support for chronic conditions. A novel approach for enhancing self-management and improving lifestyle.

Authors:  Irene Lasorsa; Pierluigi D Antrassi; Miloš Ajčević; Kira Stellato; Andrea Di Lenarda; Sara Marceglia; Agostino Accardo
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 2.342

5.  Diagnostic utility of a novel leadless arrhythmia monitoring device.

Authors:  Mintu P Turakhia; Donald D Hoang; Peter Zimetbaum; Jared D Miller; Victor F Froelicher; Uday N Kumar; Xiangyan Xu; Felix Yang; Paul A Heidenreich
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2013-05-11       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Community-Based ECG Monitoring System for Patients with Cardiovascular Diseases.

Authors:  Bor-Shyh Lin; Alice M Wong; Kevin C Tseng
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 7.  Incorporating Patient-Reported Outcomes Into Health Care To Engage Patients And Enhance Care.

Authors:  Danielle C Lavallee; Kate E Chenok; Rebecca M Love; Carolyn Petersen; Erin Holve; Courtney D Segal; Patricia D Franklin
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  "You Get Reminded You're a Sick Person": Personal Data Tracking and Patients With Multiple Chronic Conditions.

Authors:  Jessica S Ancker; Holly O Witteman; Baria Hafeez; Thierry Provencher; Mary Van de Graaf; Esther Wei
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Sustained Use of Patient Portal Features and Improvements in Diabetes Physiological Measures.

Authors:  Stephanie L Shimada; Jeroan J Allison; Amy K Rosen; Hua Feng; Thomas K Houston
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Baseline Motivation Type as a Predictor of Dropout in a Healthy Eating Text Messaging Program.

Authors:  Kisha Coa; Heather Patrick
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 4.773

View more
  9 in total

1.  Early Adopters of Patient-Generated Health Data Upload in an Electronic Patient Portal.

Authors:  Jessica S Ancker; Elizabeth Mauer; Robin B Kalish; Joshua R Vest; J Travis Gossey
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 2.342

2.  Updating HIPAA for the electronic medical record era.

Authors:  S Trent Rosenbloom; Jeffery R L Smith; Rita Bowen; Janelle Burns; Lauren Riplinger; Thomas H Payne
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Use of patient-generated health data for shared decision-making in the clinical environment: ready for prime time.

Authors:  Carolyn Petersen
Journal:  Mhealth       Date:  2021-07-20

Review 4.  Sensor technology for nursing research.

Authors:  Nancy S Redeker
Journal:  Nurs Outlook       Date:  2020-06-21       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Differential influences of social support on app use for diabetes self-management - a mixed methods approach.

Authors:  Nicola Brew-Sam; Arul Chib; Constanze Rossmann
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 2.796

6.  Comparing the Acceptance of Mobile Hypertension Apps for Disease Management Among Patients Versus Clinical Use Among Physicians: Cross-sectional Survey.

Authors:  Bernhard Breil; Christel Salewski; Jennifer Apolinário-Hagen
Journal:  JMIR Cardio       Date:  2022-01-06

7.  Phenotypes of engagement with mobile health technology for heart rhythm monitoring.

Authors:  Jihui Lee; Meghan Reading Turchioe; Ruth Masterson Creber; Angelo Biviano; Kathleen Hickey; Suzanne Bakken
Journal:  JAMIA Open       Date:  2021-06-12

Review 8.  Returning Cardiac Rhythm Data to Patients: Opportunities and Challenges.

Authors:  Ruth Masterson Creber; Meghan Reading Turchioe
Journal:  Card Electrophysiol Clin       Date:  2021-07-02

9.  Cardiac symptom burden and arrhythmia recurrence drives digital health use: results from the iHEART randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ruth M Masterson Creber; Meghan Reading Turchioe; Angelo Biviano; Billy Caceres; Hasan Garan; Isaac Goldenthal; Theresa Koleck; Shazia Mitha; Kathleen Hickey; Suzanne Bakken
Journal:  Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 3.908

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.