Literature DB >> 30304409

Inbreeding depression in line 1 Hereford cattle population using pedigree and genomic information.

Pattarapol Sumreddee1, Sajjad Toghiani1, El Hamidi Hay2, Andrew Roberts2, Samuel E Agrrey3,4, Romdhane Rekaya1,4,5.   

Abstract

This study aimed at assessing inbreeding and its effect on growth and fertility traits using the longtime closed line 1 Hereford cattle population. Inbreeding was estimated based on pedigree (FPED) and genomic information. For the latter, three estimates were derived based on the diagonal elements of the genomic relationship matrix using estimated (FGRM) or fixed (FGRM0.5) minor allele frequencies or runs of homozygosity (ROH) (FROH). A pedigree containing 10,186 animals was used to calculate FPED. Genomic inbreeding was evaluated using 785 animals genotyped for 30,810 SNP. Traits analyzed were birth weight (BWT), weaning weight (WWT), yearling weight (YWT), ADG, and age at first calving (AFC). The number of ROH per animal ranged between 6 and 119 segments with an average of 83. The shortest and longest segments were 1.36 and 64.86 Mb long, respectively, reflecting both ancient and recent inbreeding occurring in the last 30 to 40 generations. The average inbreeding was 29.2%, 16.1%, 30.2%, and 22.9% for FPED, FGRM, FGRM0.5, and FROH, respectively. FROH provided the highest correlations with FPED (r = 0.66). Across paternal half-sib families, with minimal variation in FPED, there were substantial variations in their genomic inbreeding. Inbreeding depression analyses showed that a 1% increase in an animal's FPED resulted in a decrease of 1.20 kg, 2.03 kg, and 0.004 kg/d in WWT, YWT, and ADG, respectively. Maternal inbreeding showed significantly negative effects on progeny growth performance. AFC increased by 1.4 and 0.8 d for each 1% increase in FPED of the cow and her dam, respectively. Using genomic inbreeding, similar impact on growth traits was observed although the magnitude of the effect varied between methods. Across all genomic measures, WWT, YWT, and ADG decreased by 0.21 to 0.53 kg, 0.46 to 1.13 kg, and 0.002 to 0.006 kg/d for each 1% increase in genomic inbreeding, respectively. Four chromosomes (9, 12, 17, and 27) were identified to have a significant association between their homozygosity (FROH-CHR) and growth traits. Variability in genomic inbreeding could be useful when deciding between full and half-sib selection candidates. Despite the high level of inbreeding in this study, its negative impact on growth performance was not as severe as expected, which may be attributed to the purging of the deleterious alleles due to natural or artificial selection over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30304409      PMCID: PMC6313130          DOI: 10.1093/jas/sky385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  9 in total

1.  Estimates of Autozygosity Through Runs of Homozygosity in Farmed Coho Salmon.

Authors:  Grazyella M Yoshida; Pablo Cáceres; Rodrigo Marín-Nahuelpi; Ben F Koop; José M Yáñez
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 4.096

2.  Genetic Background and Inbreeding Depression in Romosinuano Cattle Breed in Mexico.

Authors:  Jorge Hidalgo; Alberto Cesarani; Andre Garcia; Pattarapol Sumreddee; Neon Larios; Enrico Mancin; José Guadalupe García; Rafael Núñez; Rodolfo Ramírez
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Freedom to Grow: Improving Sow Welfare also Benefits Piglets.

Authors:  Orla Kinane; Fidelma Butler; Keelin O'Driscoll
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Breeding Sustainable Beef Cows: Reducing Weight and Increasing Productivity.

Authors:  Warren M Snelling; R Mark Thallman; Matthew L Spangler; Larry A Kuehn
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 3.231

5.  Trends in genetic diversity and the effect of inbreeding in American Angus cattle under genomic selection.

Authors:  Emmanuel A Lozada-Soto; Christian Maltecca; Duc Lu; Stephen Miller; John B Cole; Francesco Tiezzi
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 4.297

6.  Population Structure and Genetic Diversity of Italian Beef Breeds as a Tool for Planning Conservation and Selection Strategies.

Authors:  Maria Chiara Fabbri; Marcos Paulo Gonçalves de Rezende; Christos Dadousis; Stefano Biffani; Riccardo Negrini; Paulo Luiz Souza Carneiro; Riccardo Bozzi
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Estimating dominance genetic variances for growth traits in American Angus males using genomic models.

Authors:  Carolina A Garcia-Baccino; Daniela A L Lourenco; Stephen Miller; Rodolfo J C Cantet; Zulma G Vitezica
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Comparison of Genetic Merit for Weight and Meat Traits between the Polled and Horned Cattle in Multiple Beef Breeds.

Authors:  Imtiaz A S Randhawa; Michael R McGowan; Laercio R Porto-Neto; Ben J Hayes; Russell E Lyons
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  Grid search approach to discriminate between old and recent inbreeding using phenotypic, pedigree and genomic information.

Authors:  Pattarapol Sumreddee; El Hamidi Hay; Sajjad Toghiani; Andrew Roberts; Samuel E Aggrey; Romdhane Rekaya
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 3.969

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.