| Literature DB >> 30303998 |
Panita Limpawattana1, Daris Theerakulpisut2, Kosin Wirasorn3, Aumkhae Sookprasert3, Narong Khuntikeo4, Jarin Chindaprasirt3.
Abstract
Low skeletal muscle mass is frequently observed in cancer patients and is known to be a poor prognostic factor for survival outcomes. The purposes of our study were to determine the prevalence of sarcopenia and its relation to mortality in biliary tract cancer. Body composition measurements (skeletal muscle index, total fat mass, bone mineral content) were evaluated by using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in 75 biliary tract cancer patients before chemotherapy. Muscle strength was measured by handgrip strength and gait speed. Overall survival and its associated factors were determined. The mean appendicular muscle mass was 17.8±2.7 kg in men and 14.0±2.1 kg in women (p < 0.05). Sarcopenia was diagnosed in 46 patients (61.3%) and higher proportion of men was classified as sarcopenia than women (69.0% vs 35.3%, p < 0.05). Multivariable analysis adjusted for chemotherapy regimen and age revealed that high appendicular muscle mass independently predicted better survival outcomes (HR 0.40; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.88; p = 0.023). Sarcopenia is common in biliary tract cancer patients and low appendicular muscle mass was associated with poor survival outcome.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30303998 PMCID: PMC6179280 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204985
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Baseline clinical characteristics, values expressed as n (%).
| Characteristics | n = 75 |
|---|---|
| Age (years) | |
| Median (IQR) | 57 |
| Range | 43–77 |
| Male sex | 58 (77.3) |
| ECOG-PS | |
| 0 | 40 (53.3) |
| 1 | 35 (46.7) |
| Location of primary tumor | |
| Intrahepatic | 35 (47.9) |
| Extrahepatic | 38 (52.1) |
| TNM stage II/III/IV | 6/5/64 |
| Node-positive | 50 (66.7) |
| Metastasis | 45 (60) |
| Liver surgery | 26 (34.7) |
| Biliary drainage | 15 (20) |
| Chemotherapy regimen | |
| Fluorouracil-based | 60 (80) |
| Gemcitabine-based | 15 (20) |
Body composition and function, values given as median (IQR), unless state otherwise.
| Characteristic | Males (n = 58) | Females (n = 17) | Total (n = 75) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight (kg) | 57.5 (50.5, 61.8) | 54.7 (48, 62.4) | 56.7 (49.2, 62) |
| Height (cm) | 165 (160, 167) | 155 (155, 159) | 163 (158, 166) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 21.3 (18.9, 23.7) | 21.8 (19.1, 25.2) | 21.5 (19, 24) |
| Underweight (≤ 18.5 kg/m2), n (%) | 12 (20.7) | 2 (11.8) | 14 (18.7) |
| Normal (18.5–24.9 kg/m2), n (%) | 37 (63.8) | 10 (58.8) | 47 (62.7) |
| Overweight (25–29.9 kg/m2), n (%) | 7 (12.1) | 5 (29.4) | 12 (16.0) |
| Obesity (≥30.0 kg/m2), n (%) | 2 (3.5) | 0 | 2 (2.7) |
| Weight loss (kg) | 6.4 (2, 11.2) | 3.3 (1, 6.7) | 5 (2, 9.8) |
| Skeletal mass (kg), mean (SD) | |||
| Upper extremities | 4.8 (0.8) | 3.3 (0.5) | 4.5 (0.9) |
| Lower extremities | 13.0 (1.9) | 10.7 (1.7) | 12.5 (2.1) |
| Appendicular muscle mass | 17.8 (2.7) | 14.0 (2.1) | 16.9 (3.0) |
| ASMI (kg/m2), mean (SD) | 6.6 (0.9) | 5.8 (0.8) | 6.4 (1.0) |
| Bone mineral content (kg), mean (SD) | 2.6 (0.4) | 2.1 (0.4) | 2.4 (0.4) |
| Fat (kg), mean (SD) | 12.0 (6.9) | 16.8 (6.0) | 13.1 (7.0) |
| Handgrip strength (kg) | 17.9 (14.1, 24.2) | 15.6 (12.9, 18.5) | 17.2 (14, 21.2) |
| Gait speed (m/s) | 0.08 (0, 0.18) | 0.06 (0, 0.16) | 0.08 (0, 0.17) |
| Sarcopenia, n (%) | 40 (69) | 6 (35.3) | 46 (61.3) |
| Osteoporosis, n (%) | 10 (17.2) | 1 (5.9) | 11 (14.7) |
Abbreviation: BMI: body mass index, ASMI: Appendicular skeletal muscle index.
Fig 1Appendicular muscle mass in each subset was shown with a p-value of Wilcoxon rank-sum test.
The median was presented as the black line. The top and bottom of each box indicated the upper and lower quartiles of the samples and the bars represented the minimum and maximum values. M, metastasis; PD, progressive disease.
Fig 2Association between appendicular muscle mass and hemoglobin level (a) and handgrip strength (b).
The grey area indicates the 95% confidence interval.
Simple and multiple linear regression analysis using appendicular muscle mass as the dependent variable.
| Simple linear regression | Multiple linear regression | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coefficient | 95% CI | p-value | Coefficient | 95% CI | p-value | |
| Age (years) | -0.11 | -0.19, -0.04 | 0.004* | -0.10 | -0.16, -0.04 | 0.002* |
| Female | -3.71 | -5.11, -2.31 | <0.001* | -3.96 | -5.15. -2.76 | <0.001* |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 0.28 | 0.09, 0.47 | 0.005* | 0.23 | 0.09, 0.38 | 0.002* |
| Hb (g/dL) | 0.48 | 0.09, 0.87 | 0.016* | 0.17 | -0.12, 0.46 | 0.252 |
| Albumin (g/dL) | 0.75 | -0.54, 2.05 | 0.250 | - | ||
| Handgrip strength (kg) | 0.13 | 0.06, 0.20 | <0.001* | 0.05 | -0.01, 0.11 | 0.077 |
| Biliary drainage | -1.50 | -3.19, 0.19 | 0.081 | - | ||
Dependent variable, appendicular muscle mass; Adjusted R2 = 0.569; the level of significance at p < 0.05; CI, confidence interval; BMI, body mass index; Hb, hemoglobin
Fig 3Patients with appendicular muscle mass of ≥ 19.0 kg (quartile four, highest amount of muscle mass) had a significantly longer overall survival compared with those with low appendicular muscle (quartiles one to three); HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.22–0.95, p = 0.037.
Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models for overall survival.
| Univariable | Multivariable | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95% CI | p-value | HR | 95% CI | p-value | |
| Appendicular muscle | ||||||
| Quartile 1–3 | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
| Quartile 4 | 0.46 | 0.22, 0.95 | 0.037* | 0.40 | 0.18, 0.88 | 0.023 |
| NLR | 1.26 | 1.11, 1.42 | <0.001 | 1.17 | 1.01, 1.35 | 0.039 |
| Chemotherapy | ||||||
| Carboplatin-based | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
| Cisplatin-based | 0.50 | 0.28, 0.89 | 0.021 | 0.69 | 0.35, 1.36 | 0.280 |
| Age (years) | 0.99 | 0.96, 1.03 | 0.607 | 0.97 | 0.94, 1.01 | 0.185 |
HR, Hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; NLR, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio