Literature DB >> 30303929

Evaluation of Prepectoral Implant Placement and Complete Coverage with TiLoop Bra Mesh for Breast Reconstruction: A Prospective Study on Long-Term and Patient-Reported BREAST-Q Outcomes.

Donato Casella1, Giuseppe Di Taranto1, Marco Marcasciano1, Silvia Sordi1, Ashutosh Kothari1, Tibor Kovacs1, Federico Lo Torto1, Emanuele Cigna1, Claudio Calabrese1, Diego Ribuffo1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast reconstruction is rapidly evolving, because of the changing face of cancer surgery and the growing acceptance of acellular dermal matrices and synthetic meshes. Although some early reports showed encouraging results after prepectoral breast reconstruction, there is a paucity of data on long-term outcomes.
METHODS: Between January of 2012 and March of 2015, 179 patients undergoing mastectomy were enrolled at the authors' institution. Patients underwent mastectomy and immediate prepectoral breast reconstruction with the definitive implant entirely wrapped in a titanium-coated polypropylene mesh (TiLoop). The BREAST-Q questionnaire was administered before surgery and after 2 years. Capsular contracture was evaluated using the Baker scale. Oncologic, surgical, and aesthetic outcomes and changes in BREAST-Q score were analyzed over time.
RESULTS: Average follow-up was 38.5 months. A total of 250 mastectomies were performed. The locoregional recurrence rate was 2.1 percent. Complications requiring reoperation were recorded in six patients (2.4 percent) and implant removal was necessary in three cases (1.2 percent), followed by reconstruction with submuscular expanders. Grade IV capsular contracture was detected in five breasts (2 percent), whereas 212 breasts were evaluated as grade I (84.8 percent), 28 breasts as grade II (11.2 percent), and five breasts as grade III (2 percent). Patients reported significant high rates in the BREAST-Q overall Satisfaction with Outcome (73.8), overall Satisfaction with Breasts (72.5), Psychosocial Well-being (77.7), and Sexual Well-being (57.9), scoring a significant increase in these domains from the preoperative period to the postoperative period (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The authors report encouraging results of a prepectoral direct-to-implant reconstruction technique using a synthetic mesh, supporting the evaluation of the muscle-sparing subcutaneous approach as a valid alternative to traditional submuscular reconstruction. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30303929     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  7 in total

Review 1.  Direct-to-Implant Subcutaneous Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Complications and Patient's Quality of Life.

Authors:  José Silva; Francisco Carvalho; Marisa Marques
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 2.708

2.  Extended Latissimus Dorsi Kite Flap (ELD-K Flap): Revisiting an Old Place for a Total Autologous Breast Reconstruction in Patients with Medium to Large Breasts.

Authors:  Donato Casella; Jacopo Nanni; Federico Lo Torto; Leonardo Barellini; Ugo Redi; Juste Kaciulyte; Dario Cassetti; Diego Ribuffo; Marco Marcasciano
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 2.326

3.  Pre-pectoral one-stage breast reconstruction with anterior biological acellular dermal matrix coverage.

Authors:  Ayesha Khan; Marios-Konstantinos Tasoulis; Victoria Teoh; Aleksandra Tanska; Ruth Edmonds; Gerald Gui
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-03

4.  Acellular bovine pericardium matrix in immediate breast reconstruction compared with conventional implant-based breast reconstruction.

Authors:  S Wang; S He; X Zhang; J Sun; Q Huang; J Liu; C Han; Z Yin; B Ding; J Yin
Journal:  JPRAS Open       Date:  2021-03-27

5.  Titanium-coated polypropylene mesh as innovative bioactive material in conservatives mastectomies and pre-pectoral breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Pietro Gentile; Marco Bernini; Lorenzo Orzalesi; Silvia Sordi; Icro Meattini; Francesca Lessi; Ashutosh Kothari; Claudio Calabrese
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2021-05-19

6.  Dual-Plane Retro-pectoral Versus Pre-pectoral DTI Breast Reconstruction: An Italian Multicenter Experience.

Authors:  Diego Ribuffo; Giorgio Berna; Roy De Vita; Giovanni Di Benedetto; Emanuele Cigna; Manfredi Greco; Luigi Valdatta; Maria Giuseppina Onesti; Federico Lo Torto; Marco Marcasciano; Ugo Redi; Vittorio Quercia; Juste Kaciulyte; Mario Cherubino; Luigi Losco; Francesco Luca Rocco Mori; Alessandro Scalise
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 2.326

Review 7.  The Journey of Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction through Time.

Authors:  Sharat Chopra; Zaid Al-Ishaq; Raghavan Vidya
Journal:  World J Plast Surg       Date:  2021-05
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.