Literature DB >> 33842244

Pre-pectoral one-stage breast reconstruction with anterior biological acellular dermal matrix coverage.

Ayesha Khan1, Marios-Konstantinos Tasoulis1, Victoria Teoh1, Aleksandra Tanska1, Ruth Edmonds1, Gerald Gui1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pre-pectoral implant breast reconstruction (IBR) is gaining popularity. Several techniques using different types of meshes and methods of placement have been described, but no method is currently considered standard. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of pre-pectoral IBR using acellular dermal matrix (ADM) for anterior implant cover.
METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent pre-pectoral IBR between November 2016 to August 2018. Data on demographics, adjuvant therapies and operative technique was collected. Postoperative complications, length of hospital stay and secondary cosmetic procedures were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using descriptive statistics, non-parametric tests and logistic regression.
RESULTS: One hundred and eleven pre-pectoral IBR were performed in 65 patients. Median age was 41 [interquartile range (IQR), 35-51.5] years, and BMI 22 (IQR, 20.4-24.4) kg/m2. Therapeutic mastectomy was performed in 33 procedures with nipples preservation in 78 cases. The median mastectomy weight and implant volume was 360 (IQR, 220-533) gr, and 445 (IQR, 400-475) cc respectively. At a median follow-up of 18 (IQR, 12-22.5) months, 37 mastectomies had at least 1 complication, but only 12 required surgery. The implant loss rate was 4.5% (5 cases). Lipofilling as secondary procedure was performed in 10.8% of cases. Factors associated with post-operative complications on univariate analysis were nipple preservation (P=0.028), BMI (P=0.01) and implant volume (P=0.027) but these did not remain significant on multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Pre-pectoral IBR using ADM for anterior implant cover is associated with low complication and reconstructive failure rate. Patient selection and meticulous surgical technique are important for successful outcome. 2021 Gland Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast reconstruction; acellular dermal matrix (ADM); implant; implant loss; pre-pectoral

Year:  2021        PMID: 33842244      PMCID: PMC8033052          DOI: 10.21037/gs-20-652

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gland Surg        ISSN: 2227-684X


  21 in total

1.  Comparison of prepectoral and subpectoral breast reconstruction after mastectomies: A systematic review and meta analysis.

Authors:  Lun Li; Yonghui Su; Bingqiu Xiu; Xiaoyan Huang; Weiru Chi; Jianjing Hou; Yingying Zhang; Jinhui Tian; Jia Wang; Jiong Wu
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 4.424

2.  A systematic review of complications in prepectoral breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Ryan D Wagner; Tara L Braun; Huirong Zhu; Sebastian Winocour
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2019-04-21       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Impact of Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy in Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Catherine J Sinnott; Sarah M Persing; Mary Pronovost; Christine Hodyl; Daniel McConnell; Anke Ott Young
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Effect of Body Mass Index on Outcomes after Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Allen Gabriel; Steven Sigalove; Noemi M Sigalove; Toni L Storm-Dickerson; Nicole Pope; Jami Rice; G Patrick Maxwell
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with porcine acellular dermal matrix: a new technique for direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy.

Authors:  Roland Reitsamer; Florentia Peintinger
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Safety Outcome Endpoints and Delineation of Risk Factors.

Authors:  Kassandra P Nealon; Rachel E Weitzman; Nikhil Sobti; Michele Gadd; Michelle Specht; Rachel B Jimenez; Richard Ehrlichman; Heather R Faulkner; William G Austen; Eric C Liao
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Multicentre study of prepectoral breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix.

Authors:  M Chandarana; S Harries
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2019-12-19

8.  Prepectoral breast reconstruction with complete implant coverage using double-crossed acellular dermal matrixs.

Authors:  Joon Seok Lee; Jong Seong Kim; Jong Ho Lee; Jeong Woo Lee; Jeeyeon Lee; Ho Yong Park; Jung Dug Yang
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-12

9.  Early complications and implant loss in implant-based breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix (Tecnoss Protexa®): a comparative study.

Authors:  S Potter; A Chambers; S Govindajulu; A Sahu; R Warr; S Cawthorn
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 4.424

10.  Trends in Immediate Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Daniel R Leff; Alex Bottle; Erik Mayer; Darren K Patten; Christopher Rao; Paul Aylin; Dimitri J Hadjiminas; Thanos Athanasiou; Ara Darzi; Gerald Gui
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-09-04
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Direct-to-Implant Subcutaneous Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Complications and Patient's Quality of Life.

Authors:  José Silva; Francisco Carvalho; Marisa Marques
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 2.708

2.  Prepectoral breast reconstruction with complete anterior implant coverage using a single, large, square-shaped acellular dermal matrix.

Authors:  Hyun Ki Hong; Yun Hyun Kim; Joon Seok Lee; Jeeyeon Lee; Ho Yong Park; Jung Dug Yang
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 2.030

3.  Effect of acellular dermal matrix thickness and surface area on direct-to-implant breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Tae Hyun Kong; Kyu-Jin Chung; Taegon Kim; Jun-Ho Lee
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2022-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.