| Literature DB >> 30302580 |
Antony Bertrand-Grenier1,2,3,4, Fatemeh Zehtabi1,5, Sophie Lerouge1,5,6,7, Husain Alturkistani1,3,6,8, Claude Kauffmann1,3, Paule Bodson-Clermont1, Igor Salazkin1, Hélène Héon1, Guy Cloutier1,2,6,7, Gilles Soulez9,10,11,12,13.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To evaluate residual endoleak and thrombus organisation with shear wave imaging (SWI) after endoleak embolisation through an animal study.Entities:
Keywords: Elasticity imaging techniques; Endoleak; Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR); Iliac aneurysm; Shear wave elastography; Ultrasonography
Year: 2018 PMID: 30302580 PMCID: PMC6177487 DOI: 10.1186/s41747-018-0059-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Radiol Exp ISSN: 2509-9280
Fig. 1Images from an aneurysm with endoleak (green arrow), chitosan (white arrow), less-organised chitosan (yellow arrow) and organised thrombus (black arrow). a Macroscopic cut showing the different regions of interest. b CT scan showing the endoleak. c Endoleak on DUS. d Areas filled with chitosan were slightly hyperechoic and areas with endoleak were anechoic on B-mode ultrasound. e Endoleak and less organised chitosan were visualised on SW. f Colour scale and Q-Box values for SWI
Fig. 2Images from an aneurysm with endoleak (green arrow), chitosan (white arrow) and massive fresh thrombus (red arrow). a Macroscopic cut showing the different regions of interest. b The small endoleak is depicted on CT scan. c DUS showing the endoleak. d On B-mode ultrasound, the chitosan is seen as a hyperechoic area but endoleak area is not clearly depicted. e The regions of interest corresponding to chitosan, soft thrombus and endoleak are depicted on SWI. f Colour scale and Q-Box values for SWI
Mechanical properties of the regions of interest according to the time points
| Region of interest | 1 week | 1 month | 3 months | 6 months |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endoleak | 0.2 ± 0.3 ( | 0.0 ± 0.1 ( | 0.2 ± 0.2 ( | 0.1 ± 0.2 ( |
| Fresh thrombus | Not performed | Not performed | 9.2 ± 2.7 ( | 10.2 ± 5.3 ( |
| Organised thrombus | Not performed | Not performed | 55.4 ± 21.2 ( | 33.6 ± 13.7 ( |
| Total thrombus | 39.6 ± 21.3 ( | 52.4 ± 21.3 ( | 45.6 ± 22.2 ( | 28.8 ± 12.9 ( |
| Chitosan | 27.7 ± 6.8 ( | 46.1 ± 9.6 ( | 45.9 ± 20.7 ( | 33.5 ± 18.2 ( |
| Chitosan-STS | 36.2 ± 20.9 ( | 52.9 ± 38.2 ( | 49.1 ± 30.9 ( | 30.5 ± 7.7 ( |
Data are kPa expressed as mean ± standard deviation. n indicates the number of aneurysms
Tukey comparisons of the mechanical properties of the regions of interest at sacrifice at three or six months
| Comparison of elasticity values | kPa (mean ± standard deviation) | |
|---|---|---|
| Endoleak vs fresh thrombus | 0.2 ± 0.1 vs 9.5 ± 3.3 | < 0.001 |
| Endoleak vs organised thrombus | 0.2 ± 0.1 vs 48.1 ± 21.3 | < 0.001 |
| Endoleak vs agents | 0.2 ± 0.1 vs 44.9 ± 23.7 | < 0.001 |
| Fresh thrombus vs organised thrombus | 9.5 ± 3.3 vs 48.1 ± 21.3 | < 0.001 |
| Fresh thrombus vs agents | 9.5 ± 3.3 vs 44.9 ± 23.7 | < 0.001 |
| Organised thrombus vs agents | 48.1 ± 21.3 vs 44.9 ± 23.7 | 1.000 |
Note: all elasticity values were compared on animal sacrificed at three months (n = 5) or six months (n = 3). Values were log-transformed to better meet normality assumptions. Comparisons were significant overall in the ANOVA results (p < 0.001), there was no influence of the time at sacrifice (three or six months) on elasticity values (p = 0.275) and type of gel (Chi or Chi-STS; p = 0.713)
Fig. 3Evolution of aneurysm size as a function of endoleak and fresh thrombus areas at sacrifice. Pearson coefficient r = 0.646, p = 0.007