| Literature DB >> 30301945 |
Karen Grace V Bondoc1,2,3, Christine Lembke4,5, Stefan N Lang6, Sebastian Germerodt6, Stefan Schuster6, Wim Vyverman7, Georg Pohnert8,9.
Abstract
Microorganisms encounter a diversity of chemical stimuli that trigger individual responses and influence population dynamics. However, microbial behavior under the influence of different incentives and microbial decision-making is poorly understood. Benthic marine diatoms that react to sexual attractants as well as to nutrient gradients face such multiple constraints. Here, we document and model behavioral complexity and context-sensitive responses of these motile unicellular algae to sex pheromones and the nutrient silicate. Throughout the life cycle of the model diatom Seminavis robusta nutrient-starved cells localize sources of silicate by combined chemokinetic and chemotactic motility. However, with an increasing need for sex to restore the initial cell size, a change in behavior favoring the attraction-pheromone-guided search for a mating partner takes place. When sex becomes inevitable to prevent cell death, safeguard mechanisms are abandoned, and cells prioritize the search for mating partners. Such selection processes help to explain biofilm organization and to understand species interactions in complex communities.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30301945 PMCID: PMC6331598 DOI: 10.1038/s41396-018-0299-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ISME J ISSN: 1751-7362 Impact factor: 10.302
Fig. 1Cell size dependent behavioral switch of S. robusta. The combined effects of sex induction and dSi starvation were determined on medium-sized (~ 40 µm) and small-sized (24–27 µm) S. robusta. All data points are presented as mean ± SEM of 3 movies except dSi-starved induced and not induced (n(movies) = 6) as cell responses showed variability between sets. The overlaid shaded area shows the linear mixed effects modeling (LME) with pair-wise Tukey’s honest significance difference (HSD) fit with 95% confidence intervals, detailed statistical analysis can be found in Table S3. A Medium-sized cells were only attracted to diproline when grown with dSi and upon induction (p < 0.001 compared with all treatments). dSi starvation and non-induction render the cells to be attracted to dSi beads (p < 0.01 compared with all treatments). B Non-starved, small-sized cells were attracted to diproline, even without induction and at the same intensity as induced cells (p = 1 compared to the non-starved and induced treatment). However, these self-inducing cells were not attracted to the pheromone when starved, and it was only through induction that starved cells regained attraction to diproline (p = 0.18). Only small cells that are both not induced and starved were attracted to dSi (p < 0.02 for all comparisons)
Fig. 2Choice experiments (dSi vs. diproline). Choice experiments were performed using self-inducing and dSi-starved small cells. A The left panel shows normalized cell counts from bins (depicted as white circles in the pictures right) having a size of 115 µm from the edge of the bead. Induced cells accumulated only on diproline beads over time (orange circles and upper panels p = 0.0259). On the other hand, the not induced cells showed preference only to dSi beads (blue circles, lower panels p = 0.0003). Data points are presented as mean ± SEM of 3 videos from independent treatments. Pheromone-loaded beads are placed right in the assays. The overlaid shaded area shows the LME model fit with 95% confidence intervals. Detailed statistical analysis can be found in Table S4. Scale bar = 100 µm. B The cell speed averaged over intervals of 1 min for 10 min were taken from automatically tracked cells in five independent movies (n(cells/movie) = 80–100). The track data was divided into three groups: the areas around the two beads and the area outside the beads. Induced cells showed a consistent higher mean speed when cells are under the influence of diproline gradients compared to dSi and outside the beads (LME with Tukey’s HSD, p < 0.001 for both). In contrast, non-induced cells that accumulated around dSi beads increase speed over time, whereas, diproline did not induce any change in speed (p < 0.001). Data points are presented as mean speed ± SEM of 5 videos from independent treatments. Detailed statistical analysis can be found in Table S5
Fig. 3Numerical modeling on diatom decision-making. The mathematical model investigates the optimal choice of cells between mitotic division and sex depending on nutrient resources and cell density. The panel above illustrates the development of a natural population or lab culture and the consequent consumption of resources. The subplots A–C represent the modelled choices of the cells at distinct conditions encountered during this process. Subplot D is an extra scenario wherein a dense population experiences a high influx of nutrients. Modeled subplots of other conditions can be found in Supplementary Figure S3. Vertical lines on subplots A–D represent cell size thresholds at which a switch between optimal modes of reproduction, i.e. mitotic divisions and sex occurs. The first threshold (transition red-to-yellow) appears if the optimization criterion is solely the expected growth rate (solid line). By adding a second optimization criterion, the estimated offspring size (dashed line), in linear combination with the estimated growth rate (dotted line) a second threshold was determined (transition yellow-to-green). Individuals of size classes within the red area should choose meiosis as the primary mode of reproduction, while individuals of size classes within the green area should always choose mitosis. The yellow area represents size classes of individuals that should choose mitosis according to the optimal expected number of offspring but may choose meiosis to additionally preserve mean cell size. The plots show that the optimal switching points significantly alter along typical population dynamics and resource availability. Note that the mean long-term growth rates given are a fitness proxy and not equivalent to growth rates in cultures