| Literature DB >> 30301473 |
Nicholas J Woudberg1, Amy E Mendham2,3, Arieh A Katz4, Julia H Goedecke2,3, Sandrine Lecour5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Obesity is associated with a change in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) function and subclass. Exercise training reduces cardiovascular risk in obese patients. We aimed to explore the effect of an exercise training stimulus on HDL functionality and subclass in obese women.Entities:
Keywords: Anti-inflammatory; Antioxidative; Cholesterol efflux; Exercise intervention; HDL structure; HDL subclass; Obesity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30301473 PMCID: PMC6178267 DOI: 10.1186/s12944-018-0879-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Changes in anthropometry, cardiorespiratory fitness and lipid profile in response to the 12-week intervention
| Control ( | Exercise ( | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-testing | Post-testing | Pre-testing | Post-testing | Group | Time | Interaction | |
| Age (yrs) | 24.5 ± 0.9 | 22.8 ± 0.7 | 0.157 | – | – | ||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 33.3 ± 0.8 | 33.7 ± 0.8 | 34.4 ± 0.6 | 34.0 ± 0.7 | 0.493 | 0.678 | 0.010 |
| Body weight (kg) | 88.0 ± 3.2 | 89.1 ± 3.2* | 84.1 ± 1.9 | 83.3 ± 2.2 | 0.187 | 0.681 | 0.007 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 103 ± 2 | 106 ± 2* | 104 ± 2 | 100 ± 2** | 0.406 | 0.548 | 0.001 |
| Hip circumference (cm) | 118 ± 2 | 119 ± 2 | 114 ± 1 | 113 ± 1* | 0.045 | 0.359 | 0.022 |
| WHR | 0.88 ± 0.01 | 0.89 ± 0.02 | 0.91 ± 0.01 | 0.89 ± 0.01 | 0.436 | 0.892 | 0.044 |
| Total-C (mmol/L) | 3.91 ± 0.35 | 3.65 ± 0.35 | 3.98 ± 0.18 | 4.27 ± 0.21 | 0.299 | 0.917 | 0.141 |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 1.94 ± 0.29 | 1.57 ± 1.43 | 2.80 ± 0.99 | 2.69 ± 1.34 | 0.169 | < 0.001 | 0.202 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 0.97 ± 0.06 | 0.97 ± 0.06 | 1.00 ± 0.05 | 1.05 ± 0.04 | 0.343 | 0.511 | 0.568 |
| VO2peak (ml/kg/min) | 23.7 ± 0.8 | 22.7 ± 0.9 | 25.2 ± 0.7 | 27.7 ± 0.7* | 0.002 | 0.202 | 0.003 |
Results represent means ± SEM and as medians ± IQR for LDL-C. Unadjusted p values testing for significance of the grouping variable (Control vs Exercise), time (intervention duration) and the interaction (Group*Time). For Fischer post-hoc testing following interaction effect: * p < 0.05 ** p < 0.005 pre vs post-testing. BMI Body mass index, WHR Waist/hip ratio, Total-C Total-cholesterol, LDL-C Low-density lipoprotein, HDL-C High-density lipoprotein and VO2peak, Peak oxygen consumption
Fig. 1Distribution of HDL subclasses in participant sera in response to the intervention. Participant sera was analysed using the Lipoprint® system and analysed using Lipoware software. Representative scan results of control (a, d and g) and exercise (b, e and h) sera pre and post testing. Representative scan results (a, b, d, e, g and h). Changes in the percentages of large ©, intermediate (f) and small (i) HDL subclasses. VLDL,Very low density lipoprotein. Results are means ± SEM .** p < 0.005 significance for interaction
Fig. 2Changes in reverse cholesterol efflux capacity and anti-inflammatory function in response to the intervention. [3H-Cholesterol] was effluxed from RAW264.7 cells for 4 h prior to scintillation counting. Cholesterol efflux capacity represents the mean radiolabel present in culture media relative to that of an untreated control (a). HUVEC cells were treated with 10 μg/ml participant HDL prior to 20 ng/ml tumour necrosis factor (TNF) treatment for 8 h. Results are calculated relative to a no-HDL treatment control (b). Cell lysates were harvested and stored in RNAprotect reagent prior to RNA extraction, followed by cDNA synthesis and quantitative real time PCR. Results as percentage changes relative to a baseline. Results are means ± SEM. VCAM, Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule
Fig. 3Changes in paraoxonase activity and protein expression in response to the intervention. Paraxonase activity of diluted sera was measured at A405 over a 20 min time interval using the paraoxon-ethyl substrate. One unit of activity is defined as 1 nmol of substrate disintegrated per minute (a). Participant sera (b and d) and isolated HDL (c and e) were run on reducing 12.5% SDS-PAGE gels and transferred to nitrocellulose membrane. Ponceau S staining was used to confirm equal loading. Blots were probed with mouse anti-PON-1 antibody. Results are representative of randomized experiments (b) and (c). Results are presented as percentage changes in densitometry relative to a baseline in sera (d) and HDL (e). Results are means ± SEM.* p < 0.05 significance for interaction. PON, Paraoxonase
Fig. 4Changes in PAF-AH activity and protein expression in response to the intervention. PAF-AH activity of diluted sera was measured at A412 over a 20 min time interval using the PAF Acetylhydrolase Assay Kit. One unit of activity is defined as 1 μmol of substrate disintegrated per minute (a). Participant sera (b and d) and isolated HDL (c and e) were run on reducing 12.5% SDS-PAGE gels and transferred to nitrocellulose membrane. Ponceau S staining was used to confirm equal loading. Blots were probed with rabbit anti-PAF-AH antibody. Results are representative of randomized experiments (b) and (c). Results are presented as percentage changes in densitometry relative to a baseline in sera (d) and HDL (e).** p < 0.005 significance for interaction. PAF-AH, Platelet activating factor acetylhydrolase
Fig. 5Associations between HDL subclass, function and changes in body composition in response to the 12-week intervention. Baseline HDL anti-inflammatory function is plotted against baseline large HDL subclass distribution (a). Changes in WHR (b) are plotted against changes in large HDL subclass percentage. Changes in HDL function (PON activity (c)) are plotted against changes in small HDL subclass percentages. Values represent Pearson correlation coefficients. AU, Arbitrary units; WHR, Waist/hip ratio and PON, Paraoxonase