Literature DB >> 30301464

Profile of cardiac lipid metabolism in STZ-induced diabetic mice.

Wenjie Li1, Min Yao1, Ruonan Wang1, Yun Shi1, Lianguo Hou1, Ziyuan Hou2, Kaoqi Lian1, Nan Zhang1, Yaqi Wang1, Weiwei Li1, Wei Wang1, Lingling Jiang3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lipotoxicity contributes to diabetic myocardial disease. In this study, we investigated the lipid species contributing to lipotoxicity and the relationship with peroxisomal β-oxidation in the heart of diabetic mice.
METHODS: Male C57BL/6 mice were randomly divided into a Diabetic group (intraperitoneal injection of STZ) and a Control group (saline). Cardiac function indexes [ejection fraction (EF%) and fractional shortening (FS%)] were evaluated by echocardiography. Morphological changes in the myocardial tissues and mitochondria were assessed by electron microscopy following hematoxylin and eosin staining. Blood myocardial injury indexes and lipids were measured using an automatic biochemical analyzer. Cardiac ATP levels were analyzed using a commercially available kit. mRNA levels of glucose transporter 4 (GLUT4), fatty acid binding protein 3 (FABP3), palmitoyl transferase 1α (CPT-1α), acyl-CoA oxidase 1 (AOX1), D-bifunctional protein (DBP), 3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase A (THLA), uncoupling protein (UCP) 2 and UCP3 were investigated by quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction. FABP3 protein expression was analyzed by Western blotting. Non-targeted metabolomics by LC-MS/MS was applied to evaluate profile of lipid metabolism in heart.
RESULTS: Compared with controls, EF% and FS% were significantly reduced in diabetic mice. Furthermore, blood myocardial injury indexes and lipids, as well as myocardial mitochondrial cristae fusion were significantly increased. In the diabetic heart, GLUT4 expression was decreased, while expression of FABP3, CPT-1α, AOX1, DBP, THLA, UCP2 and UCP3 was increased, and ATP levels were reduced. In total, 113 lipids exhibited significant differential expression (FC > 2, P < 0.05) between the two groups, with sphingolipid metabolism identified as the top-ranking affected canonical pathway. In the diabetic heart, long-chain hydroxyl-acylcarnitines (8/8) and acylcarnitines (6/11), triglycerides (2/5), and diacyglycerol (3/7) were upregulated, while very long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) (5/6) including eicosapentaenoate, docosahexaenoate, phosphocholine (11/19), lysophosphocholine (5/9), phosphoethanolamine (7/11), lysophosphoethanolamine (7/10), phosphatidylglycerol (6/8), phosphoserine (6/8), phosphatidylinositol (2/2), phosphatidic acid (1/1), lysophosphatidic acid (1/1) and sphingomyelin (6/6) were downregulated.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the increase in toxic lipid species and decreased in PUFAs undergoing peroxisomal β-oxidation, combined with the reduction in phospholipids cause mitochondrial injury and subsequent uncoupling of phosphorylation and ATP deficiency; thereby leading to diabetic heart dysfunction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diabetic myocardial disease; Lipid metabolomics; Lipotoxicity; Non-targeted metabolomics

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30301464      PMCID: PMC6178266          DOI: 10.1186/s12944-018-0872-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lipids Health Dis        ISSN: 1476-511X            Impact factor:   3.876


Background

Diabetic cardiomyopathy is the primary cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with diabetes [1-4], and is being increasingly recognized as a metabolic disease caused predominantly by lipotoxicity [5]. Under normal physiological conditions, approximately 70% of the ATP generated in the heart occurs through oxidation of fatty acids (FAs). Following entry of FAs into the cell via FA transporters located on the cell membrane, a CoA group is added, and the long-chain fatty acyl-CoA is converted to an acyl-carnitine. The resulting long-chain fatty acyl-carnitine then crosses the inner mitochondrial membrane, where FA oxidation occurs in the mitochondrial matrix [6]. In the heart from animals or humans with diabetes mellitus, there is a shift from glucose utilization to almost complete reliance on FAs as the energy source [6]. Therefore, the myocardium absorbs large amounts of FAs via CD36 molecules, which are integral membrane proteins that function as FA translocases. These FAs are then transferred into the mitochondria by cardiac fatty acid binding protein (FABP)3, which is upregulated in the diabetic heart of rat [7]. The expression of mitochondrial FA oxidation enzymes, such as carnitine palmitoyl transferase 1α (CPT-1α), is increased [8, 9]. However, some FAs [10], fatty acid acylcarnitine [11], triglycerides (TG) [12], and diacylglycerol (DG) [13] are increased, leading to impairment of mitochondrial structure and function, as well as cardiac function. In addition to the mitochondria, peroxisomes are also subcellular organelles involved in FA degradation. Long and medium chain-length FAs are well known as substrates for both mitochondrial and peroxisomal β-oxidation, although very long-chain FAs and mono- or polyunsaturated FAs (PUFAs) undergo β-oxidation only via the peroxisomal pathway to generate shorter chain acyl-CoA molecules for further β-oxidization to produce ATP via the mitochondrial pathway. However, identity of species related to the FAs undergoing peroxisomal β-oxidation among these accumulated lipid metabolites remains to be fully clarified. Due to methodological issues, previous studies have not revealed the identity of lipids that play a role in lipotoxicity, although Han et al. [14] observed alterations of myocardial cardiolipin in diabetic heart of mice with a shotgun lipidomics study. This method involves ionization of lipid components by the ion source without chromatographic separation [15-17]; however, the ionization of low abundance and hard ionized lipid components was obviously inhibited, resulting in the inability of the related lipids to be detected [18]. Therefore, in the present study, a non-targeted metabolomics approach was used to investigate the potential of lipid metabolites to contribute to lipotoxicity and their relationship with peroxisomal FA oxidation in the diabetic heart.

Methods

Diabetes induction

Male C57BL/6 mice (aged 6–8 weeks, body weight approximately 20 g) were obtained from Beijing Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co. Ltd. (Certificate number 11400700128532). Mice were randomly divided into a Control group and Diabetic group (n = 6–8/ group). For the diabetic model, the mice were intraperitoneally injected with a single dose (150 mg/kg body weight) of streptozotocin (STZ) (Sigma s0130, USA). Mice in the Control group received an equivalent volume of saline via the same route. Mice were considered diabetic with fasting blood glucose ≥16.7 mmol/L in two consecutive analyses conducted one week after STZ administration. After a further 6 weeks, fasting blood glucose measurements were repeated and body weight and cardiac function were evaluated. The mice were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of 20% Urethane (0.12 g/100 g, Sigma u2500, USA). Blood was collected immediately and stored at 37 °C for 30 min. Serum was then isolated by centrifugation at 1500 rpm for 15 min, at 4 °C fooled by collection of the supernatant. The serum was used for measurement of the myocardial injury index, total free fatty acid (T-FFA) content and other physiological indicators. The heart was removed immediately for ATP detection. Samples of cardiac tissue were stored at − 80 °C for quantitative real-time PCR and Western blot analyses, fixed in formaldehyde for hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining, or fixed in glutaraldehyde for electron microscopy studies. All animal experiment protocols were performed in accordance with the guidelines established by the Ethics Review Committee for Animal Experimentation (Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China).

Echocardiographic assessment

Cardiac function was evaluated in the anesthetized mice (oxygen flow meters 0.5–1 L/min, Isoflurane flow meters 2–3%). Ultrasound examinations were carried out using a high resolution imaging system (Vevo 770, VisualSonics, Canada), equipped with a high-frequency ultrasound probe (RMV-707B, VisualSonics). The settings for temporal resolution in M-mode imaging in this system were as follows: pulse repetition frequency, 8 kHz; axial resolution, 55 μm; lateral resolution, 115 μm; focal length, 12.7 mm; depth of field, 2.2 mm. M-mode images were obtained for measurements of left ventricular (LV) wall thickness, LV end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), and LV end-systolic diameter (LVESD) (measures of LV dilation). Ejection fraction (EF) and fractional shortening (FS) were calculated as follows: EF% = LVEDV - LDESV/LVEDV × 100 and FS% = (LVEDD - LVESD/LVEDD) × 100 (measures of systolic function). To minimize variability of the data, cardiac function was assessed at a heart rate of 500–600 bpm.

Determination of myocardial injury indexes in blood

Total creatine kinase (T-CK, KU/L), creatine kinase isoenzyme-MB (CKMB, KU/L), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH, KU/L), α-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase (α-HBDH, KU/L), myoglobin (Myo, ng/L), high sensitivity C reactive protein (Hs-CRP, mg/L) and homocysteine (HCY, mmol/L) were quantified using an automatic biochemical analyzer (AU 640 Medical System, Olympus, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. Total free fatty acid (T-FFA, mmol/L) was assayed by colorimetry assay kits (NEFA, Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Total cholesterol (T-chol, mmol/L) and total triglycerides (T-TG, mmol/L) were quantified using an automatic biochemical analyzer (AU 640 Medical System, Olympus) according to the manufacturer’s protocols.

HE staining

To investigate pathological changes in tissue structure, formalin-fixed heart samples were imbedded in paraffin and sections (thickness 4 μm) were prepared. The myocardial morphology was evaluated following HE staining according to standard procedures. Images were captured with a PictureFrame computer software (LAS V4.3) under a microscope (DM6000; Leica, Germany).

Transmission electron microscopy

Glutaraldehyde-fixed cardiac tissue samples were washed in 0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), post-fixed with 1% osmium tetroxide for 1 h, dehydrated in acetone, and embedded in resin. Sections (thickness 60 nm) were prepared and stained with 1% uranyl acetate and 0.4% lead citrate. Mitochondrial structure was assessed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) using a JEOL JEM-1230 (JEOL, Japan).

ATP determination

ATP (mol/g protein) was measured in the cardiac tissue samples using ATP assay kits (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Quantitative real-time PCR analysis

Total RNA was extracted from the cardiac tissue using the Total RNA Kit (OMEGA, UK). The cDNA was synthesized using the M-MLV First Strand Kit (Invitrogen, USA) and qRT-PCR analysis was carried out using the SYBR Green Master Mix (Thermo, USA) with the ABI 7500 Fast system (Life Technologies, USA). Expression of the following genes was analyzed: glucose transporter GLUT4, fatty acid transporter FABP3, carnitine palmitoyl transferase 1α (CPT-1α, a key enzyme for mitochondrial fatty acid β-oxidation), and the peroxisomal fatty acid β-oxidation enzymes acyl-CoA oxidase 1(AOX1), D-bifunctional protein (DBP), 3-Ketoacyl-CoA thiolaseA (THLA) and uncoupling protein (UCP)2, and UCP3; 18S rRNA served as a reference gene. The following gene-specific primers were used: 18S rRNA-F: 5′ -CGCCGCTA GAGGTGAAATTC-3′ 18S rRNA-R: 5′-CCAGTCGGCATCGTTT ATGG-3′; CPT-1α-F: 5′-TACCTGCTTTGAAATGGGTGC-3′ CPT-1α-R: 5′-AAGTGCACATGAGAGGTTGGA-3′; FABP3-F: 5′-AGTCACTGGTGACGCTGGACG-3′ FABP3-R: 5′-AGGCAGCATGGTGCTGAGCTG-3′; GLUT4-F: 5′-GGGGTTATCAATGCCCCACA-3′ GLUT4-R: 5′-GAAGATGGCCACGGAGAGAG-3′; THLA-F: 5′-TTCTCCAGGACGTGAGGCTA-3′ THLA-R: 5′-GGCTCCTGGCTCAAGAACAT-3′; DBP-F: 5′-GAAAGGCGGAAAAGCAGTGG- 3′ DBP-R:5′-AATGTGTCCAGTGCCGTCTT-3′; AOX1-F: 5′-CAGAACGGAAGCTGGAGTGT-3′ AOX1-R: 5′-CCTGGCCGCCTATGTGTATT-3′; UCP2-F: 5′- CTCAGAAAGGTGCCTCCCGA-3′ UCP2-R:5′- ATCGCCTCCCCTGTTGATGTGGTCA-3′; UCP3-F: 5′- GCACTGCGGCCTGTTTTG -3′ UCP3-R: 5′- ACCCTCTGTGCGCACCATAGTCA-3′ The thermal cycling program was as follows: 10 s denaturation at 95 °C followed by 40 cycles of 5 s denaturation at 95 °C, 30 s annealing at 65 °C, and 20 s extension at 72 °C. The relative expression level of each gene was determined using the 2−ΔΔCt method.

Western blot analysis

The cardiac tissue was added to protein lysis buffer (50 mmol/L Tris-HCL pH 7.5, 150 mmol/L NaCL, 2 mmol/L EDTA, 1% TritonX-100, protease inhibitor) and homogenised on ice for 3–5 min. Total proteins were obtained by centrigugation of the homogenate at 12,000 rpm for 30 min at 4 °C. The proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE (15% gel, 200 V for approximately 40 min) and then transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (semi-dry transfer at 20 V for 30 min). FABP3 and β-actin proteins were probed overnight at 4 °C with a polyclonal antibody (FABP3 15KDa anti-rabbit,β-actin 43KDa anti-rabbit, Santa Cruz, 1:1000). After removal of the primary antibody, the blots were washed with PBS/Tween-20, followed by incubation with a peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary detection antibody (Santa Cruz, 1:5000) at room temperature for 1 h. After washing, the immunoreactive bands were Visualizer with an ECL detection system and quantified by scanning with a Fusion Image Dock Station (Fusion FX5, Vilber Lourmat, France).

LC-MS/MS analysis

Sample preparation

Cardiac tissue (100 mg) was placed in 1 mL pre-cooled (− 20 °C) 80% methanol, subjected to ultrasonic disruption and placed on ice for 20 min. The tissue was then centrifuged at 10,000×g for 10 min at 4 °C and 600 μL supernatant was freeze-dried and stored at − 80 °C. Before the experiment, the extracts were dissolved in 100 μL 80% methanol, and 5 μL was used for LC-MS/MS analysis using a LC system (Nexera X2 system, Shimadzu, JPN) consisting of a vacuum degasser, an autoinjector, and a triple quadruple mass spectrometer (MS/MS) (Triple TOF 5600+, AB Sciex, USA) equipped with analyst software MarkerView 1.2.1 for data acquisition and calibration. Metabolites were separated on an Agilent ZORBAX Eclipse Plus C18 column (2.1 × 100 mm, 3.5 μm) at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min. The mobile phase A comprised 0.1% formic acid/water and the mobile phase B comprised 0.1% formic acid/acetonitrile. The gradient of A was as follows: 98% (0–1 min), 98–10% (1–13 min), 10% (13–16 min), and 10–98% (16–16.1 min). The sample injection volume was 5 μL and the total run time was 16.1 min. The mass spectrometer equipped with an electrospray ionization source (ESI) at the resolution and in positive ion mode. The desolvation temperature was set to 500 °C and the source temperature was 120 °C. The desolvation and cone gas flow were set to 600 and 50 L/H, respectively. The positive ion mode was set to 3.0 kV. The sampling cone and extraction cone were set to 27 eV and 4 eV, respectively. The quadrupole analyzer ranged from 50 to 1500 m/z.

Statistical analysis

For the metabolomic analysis, LC-MS/MS data (metabolite peak intensity) were analyzed using MetaboAnalyst (v3.0) (http://www.metaboanalyst.ca/) feature of the statistical package R (v2.14.0). These data were scaled using the Pareto scaling feature and differences between the Control and Diabetic groups were analyzed using Student’s t-test. P < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. Multivariate analysis [principal component analysis (PCA) and partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA)] was performed using the MultiQuant software in MetaboAnalyst 3.0. PLS-DA was determined using the variable importance in projection (VIP) analysis. Compound identification was conducted using the METLIN and HMDB databases. Pathway analysis was performed by the Pathway Analysis features in MetaboAnalyst 3.0 (Impact > 0). All heat maps were generated using the heat map analysis feature in MetaboAnalyst v3.0. All other data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Differences between the Control and Diabetic groups were compared using Student’s t-test. P < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

Results

Cardiac function and lipid metabolism abnormity in diabetic mice

As shown in Table 1, a significant increase in fasting glucose levels[fold change (FC) 4.9] and a significant decrease in body weight (FC 0.8) was observed in the Diabetic group compared to those in the Control group mice. In the Diabetic group, this was accompanied by significant increases in blood lipids including T-FFA (FC 2.6), T-chol (FC 1.3), T-TG (FC 2.2) and blood indicators of myocardial function such as T-CK (FC 9), CKMB (FC 2.5), LDH (FC 1.5), α-HBDH (FC 1.8), Myo (FC 1.4), Hs-CRP (FC 2) and HCY (FC 1.3). There were also significant decreases in the EF% (FC 0.7) and FS% (FC 0.7) in the Diabetic group compared with those in the Control group. These results indicated abnormalities in lipid metabolism and cardiac function in diabetic mice.
Table 1

Animal characteristics of mice

Control (n = 8)Diabetic (n =  8)P value
Body weight, g25.16 ± 0.8816.30 ± 1.160.002
Ejection fraction,%57.65 ± 11.5242.00 ± 12.270.040
Fractional shortening,%38.30 ± 9.0027.95 ± 8.280.030
In blood
 Fasting glucose, mmol/L5.49 ± 0.4626.61 ± 1.140.002
 Total free fatty acid, mmol/L0.50 ± 0.191.32 ± 0.560.002
 Total cholesterol, mmol/L2.15 ± 0.402.81 ± 0.310.030
 Total triglyceride, mmol/L0.75 ± 0.211.64 ± 0.550.020
 Total creatine kinase, KU/L0.44 ± 0.150.83 ± 0.160.040
 Creatine kinase isoenzyme-MB, KU/L0.42 ± 0.111.04 ± 0.170.002
 Lactate dehydrogenase, KU/L0.65 ± 0.281.01 ± 0.250.040
 α-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase, KU/L0.31 ± 0.110.55 ± 0.130.002
 Myoglobin, ng/L6.86 ± 2.1223.67 ± 3.440.001
 High sensitivity C reactive protein, mg/L0.20 ± 0.060.40 ± 0.1400.010
 Homocysteine, mmol/L10.73 ± 1.7713.67 ± 2.420.040

Data are means ± SD. P vs. Control

Animal characteristics of mice Data are means ± SD. P vs. Control

Mitochondrial structure abnormalities and decreased ATP levels in cardiac tissue in diabetic mice

Although HE staining showed no pathological changes in the cardiac tissue in the Diabetic group compared with that in the Control group (Fig. 1a), TEM images showed more mitochondrial cristae fusion (Fig. 1b). Furthermore, the mRNA levels of UCP2 and UCP3 were increased (Fig. 2a) in the Diabetic group. In accordance with these findings, reduced levels of ATP (Fig. 1c) were detected in the cardiac tissue in the Diabetic group.
Fig. 1

Mitochondrial structure and ATP content in mouse cardiac tissue. a HE staining images of cardiac tissue. b TEM images of mitochondrial structure (5000×), box: 7× magnification of the original image. c ATP content (n = 6). Data represent the means ± SD (*P < 0.05 vs. Control)

Fig. 2

Expression of glucose utilization and fatty acid metabolism genes in cardiac tissue. a mRNA levels of GLUT4, CPT-1α, FABP3, AOX1, DBP, THLA, UCP2 and UCP3 (n = 6). b Western blot analysis of FABP3 and c its band intensity (n = 6).Data represent the means ± SD (*P < 0.05 or **P < 0.01 vs. Control)

Mitochondrial structure and ATP content in mouse cardiac tissue. a HE staining images of cardiac tissue. b TEM images of mitochondrial structure (5000×), box: 7× magnification of the original image. c ATP content (n = 6). Data represent the means ± SD (*P < 0.05 vs. Control) Expression of glucose utilization and fatty acid metabolism genes in cardiac tissue. a mRNA levels of GLUT4, CPT-1α, FABP3, AOX1, DBP, THLA, UCP2 and UCP3 (n = 6). b Western blot analysis of FABP3 and c its band intensity (n = 6).Data represent the means ± SD (*P < 0.05 or **P < 0.01 vs. Control)

Expression of genes involved in fatty acid-degradation were increased in the cardiac tissue of diabetic mice

As shown in Fig. 2, the mRNA expression of GLUT4 decreased, while expression of FABP3 increased at both the mRNA and protein levels increased in the cardiac tissue of diabetic mice. In addition, the mRNA expression of CPT-1α, AOX1, DBP and THLA also increased in the cardiac tissue of diabetic mice. These results indicated that glucose utilization was reduced and β-oxidation of FAs was increased both in the mitochondria and peroxisomes in the cardiac tissue of diabetic mice.

Changes in lipid metabolism in the cardiac tissue of diabetic mice

LC-MS/MS analysis revealed a total of 196 endogenous metabolites in the cardiac tissues of mice in the Control and Diabetic groups, of which 113 lipids exhibited significant differential expression (FC > 2, P < 0.05) (Fig. 3 and Table 2). PCA and PLS-DA analyses showed good separation between the data for the two groups (Fig. 4), indicating marked differences in the metabolic characteristics of the cardiac tissue in the two groups. Furthermore, these results confirmed that the data obtained in present study were representative and with good repeatability.
Fig. 3

Heat map of the most abundant t-test significant lipid metabolites in mouse cardiac tissue. Each cardiac tissue sample (6 control samples shown in red, 7 diabetic samples are shown in green) is represented by a single column, and each column represents a different metabolite: a fatty acid, hydroxyacyl-carnitine and fatty-acyl-carnitine. b DG and TG. c Lysophospholipids and d PE, PC, PG, PS, SM in one stool sample. Red indicates higher abundance, while green indicates lower abundance

Table 2

The Significantly different metabolites in heart of mice

ClassMetabolitesFC(Diabetic/Control)log2(FC)Vip Valuep Value
Hydroxyl-fatty-acyl-carnitine2-Hydroxymyristoylcarnitine(18:0)3.1821.669931.1330.0472
3-Hydroxy-cis-tetradecenoylcarnitine(14:1)10.2123.352191.1740.0308
3-Hydroxy-tetradecadiencarnitine(14:2)2.5521.351631.2300.0163
3-Hydroxyhexadecanoylcarnitine(16:0)11.6813.546091.2300.0323
3-Hydroxy-hexadecenoylcarnitine(16:1)2.5001.321931.1880.0433
3-Hydroxyhexadecadienoylcarnitine(16:2)2.7211.444141.1460.0450
3-Hydroxy-octadecenoylcarnitine(18:1)3.0771.621521.1390.0465
12-Hydroxy-octadecanoylcarnitine(18:0)3.2931.719401.0610.0467
Fatty-acyl-carnitineDecenoylcarnitine(10:1)0.033−4.936691.324< 0.0001
Dodecanoylcarnitine(12:0)0.202−2.306851.335< 0.0001
Tetradecanoylcarnitine(14:0)0.481−1.055891.076< 0.0001
Docosa-pentaenoyl carnitine(22:5)0.455− 1.134881.2470.0079
L-Palmitoylcarnitine(16:0)2.4211.275601.0620.0107
trans-Hexadec-enoyl carnitine(16:1)2.1321.092211.1120.0224
Hexadecadienoylcarnitine(16:2)2.5941.375181.3490.0630
Stearoylcarnitine(18:0)2.4041.265441.0500.0130
Linoelaidyl carnitine(18:2)2.0531.037731.0160.0182
Gamma-linolenyl carnitine(18:3)2.2021.138811.1230.0189
Arachidyl carnitine(20:0)0.429−1.222191.0950.0200
Fatty acidEicosenoic acid(20:1)0.459−1.124991.347< 0.0001
Eicosapentaenoic acid(20:5)0.479−1.062121.143< 0.0001
Docosadienoate(22:2)0.089−3.488771.343< 0.0001
Docosahexaenoate(22:6)0.067−3.907851.322< 0.0001
Tetracosahexaenoic acid(24:6)0.215−2.214751.384< 0.0001
Docosapentaenoic acid(22:5)2.0841.059361.2750.0079
Triglyceride (TG)TG 14:1/18:4/14:10.365−1.454181.1520.0284
TG 18:3/18:4/18:30.263−1.926381.1890.0024
TG 20:4/24:1/20:40.350−1.514501.0460.0033
TG 14:1/20:5/14:16.7632.757661.295< 0.0001
TG 16:1/18:0/16:13.4481.785761.0650.0268
Diacylglycerol (DG)DG 20:0/24:1/0:00.411−1.284511.335< 0.0001
DG 22:0/0:0/22:60.109−3.203981.0890.0078
DG 24:1/22:0/0:00.454−1.138811.0490.0006
DG 24:1/24:0/0:00.354−1.496211.2060.0005
DG 14:0/20:5/0:02.5381.343691.372< 0.0001
DG 14:1/22:6/0:04.7152.237261.393< 0.0001
DG 18:4/18:4/0:04.0792.028221.395< 0.0001
phospholipid
 Phosphatidylcholine (PC)PC 14:0/16:10.135−2.894141.0260.0150
PC 14:0/18:20.228−2.130271.0300.0094
PC 14:0/22:50.409−1.289241.0910.0340
PC 14:1/22:60.103−3.277691.1920.0014
PC P-16:0/18:30.305−1.713261.0500.0121
PC P-16:0/20:30.392−1.352761.3330.0003
PC P-18:1/18:30.353−1.501311.0750.0236
PC 18:3/P-16:00.411−1.281551.0430.0199
PC 20:5/P-18:10.410−1.285701.0560.0258
PC 20:5/18:30.110−3.184121.7120.0240
PC 20:5/14:00.428−1.223421.2430.0147
PC 14:1/20:52.0751.053111.303< 0.0001
PC 16:0/22:52.3161.211641.1630.0023
PC 18:2/22:66.3912.676041.0860.0056
PC 22:4/16:02.1781.123001.301< 0.0001
PC 22:4/24:12.0181.012931.288< 0.0001
PC 22:5/16:02.3581.237561.2070.0011
PC 22:6/18:12.0651.046141.2110.0012
PC 22:6/18:25.2122.381841.1610.0019
 Lysophosphatidylcholine (LysoPC)LysoPC 16:10.203−2.302171.254< 0.0001
LysoPC 20:20.072−3.792861.282< 0.0001
LysoPC 22:10.130−2.948231.2010.0012
LysoPC 22:20.122−3.040021.2130.0010
LysoPC 22:60.128−2.965321.2080.0011
LysoPC 14:12.0161.011501.0050.0243
LysoPC 18:02.1451.100981.0230.0108
LysoPC P-18:12.1111.077931.0300.0101
LysoPC 20:32.2541.172491.0920.0055
 Phosphoethanolamine (PE)PE 14:0/14:00.028−5.167921.276< 0.0001
PE P-16:0e/0:00.167−2.584481.1840.0016
PE O-16:0/18:10.091−3.462051.1140.0091
PE P-18:0/18:30.338−1.563651.1710.0232
PE 18:4/18:40.122−3.029981.2130.0010
PE 22:0/14:00.259−1.949351.440< 0.0001
PE 22:6/18:00.303−1.720721.312< 0.0001
PE 14:0/18:38.3003.053111.423< 0.0001
PE 16:1/20:15.4692.451281.352< 0.0001
PE P-18:1/20:43.8541.946361.287< 0.0001
PE 22:6/20:02.0351.025031.282< 0.0001
 Lysophosphatidylethanolamine (LysoPE)LysoPE 14:00.465−1.104341.1580.0022
LysoPE 18:10.315−1.665851.268< 0.0001
LysoPE 20:10.150−2.733141.2320.0007
LysoPE 22:10.209−2.260931.258< 0.0001
LysoPE 22:20.190−2.398901.2370.0006
LysoPE 22:60.122−3.033861.2130.0010
LysoPE 24:60.116−3.111031.2480.0005
LysoPE 22:02.0261.018631.0210.0326
LysoPE 22:42.3391.225891.2140.0008
LysoPE 24:13.5181.814761.1800.0048
 phosphatidic acid (PA)PA 20:4e/2:00.127−2.979111.1750.0019
 Lysophosphatidic acid (LysoPA)LysoPA 18:10.202−2.309181.2030.0011
 Phosphatidylglycerol (PG)PG 12:0/18:40.165−2.598371.2350.0006
PGP 16:0/16:00.109−3.191411.1850.0210
PG 18:1/16:10.168−2.576281.297< 0.0001
PG 18:1/18:10.109−3.203831.2110.0010
PG 18:1/20:40.110−3.187131.2070.0011
PG 18:3/22:50.106−3.240311.289< 0.0001
PG 16:0/18:36.0182.589281.353< 0.0001
PG 18:1/18:32.5251.336281.0780.0058
 Phosphatidylserine (PS)PS 12:0/18:20.163−2.619651.260< 0.0001
PS 14:1/20:40.117−3.092381.1890.0014
PS 18:0/18:10.478−1.066261.334< 0.0001
PS 18:0/22:50.394−1.344261.1370.0055
PS 18:1/18:10.412−1.279771.6110.0279
PS 20:4/16:10.274−1.866321.293< 0.0001
PS 18:0/18:05.0652.340561.257< 0.0001
PS 20:3/18:05.5232.465451.2300.0007
 Phosphatidylinositol (PI)PI 18:0/16:00.457−1.128291.0640.0211
PI 22:0/0:00.130−2.945051.2030.0012
PI 16:0/16:02.1801.124331.2110.0010
PI 16:0/16:12.4231.276791.1760.0020
 Sphingomyelin (SM)SM d18:0/16:00.100−3.320341.1210.0127
SM d18:0/16:10.303−1.720721.0580.0358
SM d18:0/18:10.126−2.988411.2080.0010
SM d18:0/22:00.329−1.605491.0550.0236
SM d18:0/22:30.227−2.141761.342< 0.0001
SM d18:0/26:10.099−3.339141.2020.0012

FC fold change, VIP value variable importance in the projection; p Value, from Student t test and vs. diabetic group; Metabolites, lipids displaying significant changes between control and diabetic heart (P < 0.05 and VIP > 1)

Fig. 4

PCA (a) and PLS-DA (b) plots of the metabolome of mouse cardiac tissue. The control (red) and diabetic (green) cardiac tissue samples were used to determine discrimination between the Control and Diabetic heart samples

Heat map of the most abundant t-test significant lipid metabolites in mouse cardiac tissue. Each cardiac tissue sample (6 control samples shown in red, 7 diabetic samples are shown in green) is represented by a single column, and each column represents a different metabolite: a fatty acid, hydroxyacyl-carnitine and fatty-acyl-carnitine. b DG and TG. c Lysophospholipids and d PE, PC, PG, PS, SM in one stool sample. Red indicates higher abundance, while green indicates lower abundance The Significantly different metabolites in heart of mice FC fold change, VIP value variable importance in the projection; p Value, from Student t test and vs. diabetic group; Metabolites, lipids displaying significant changes between control and diabetic heart (P < 0.05 and VIP > 1) PCA (a) and PLS-DA (b) plots of the metabolome of mouse cardiac tissue. The control (red) and diabetic (green) cardiac tissue samples were used to determine discrimination between the Control and Diabetic heart samples Among the 113 differentially expressed lipids detected in the cardiac tissue of diabetic mice, the lipids were FFAs, acyl-carnitines, hydroxyl-acyl-carnitines, TGs, DGs, phosphocholine (PC), phosphoethanolamine (PE), phosphatidylglycerol (PG), phosphoserine (PS), phosphatidylinositol (PI), phosphatidic acid (PA) lysoglycerophospholipids (LysoPC, LysoPE and LysoPA) and sphinomyelin (SM). Compared with the Control group, all six differentially expressed FFAs were unsaturated very long-chain fatty acids (C20–C24) and all were significantly downregulated in the cardiac tissue of diabetic mice, with the exception of C22:2 FFA, which was upregulated. Eight differentially expressed hydroxyl-acyl-carnitines were identified, all of which were long-chain (C14–C18) and all were upregulated in the cardiac tissue of diabetic mice. Eleven differentially expressed acyl-carnitines were identified (4 downregulated and 6 upregulated), all of which were long-chain (C10C20), with the exception of docosapentaenoyl carnitine (C22). Of the downregulated acyl-carnitines in the Diabetic group, the levels of two (C10:1 and C12:0) were a thirtieth and a fifth of the levels detected in the Control group, indicating increased mitochondrial β-oxidation of medium chain FAs in the diabetic heart. Five differentially expressed TGs were identified in the cardiac tissue of diabetic mice, of which two TGs (with more long chain FA) were upregulated (FC 6.7 and 3.6) and three (more polyunsaturated FA) were downregulated. Seven differentially expressed DGs were identified (3 upregulated and 4 downregulated) in the cardiac tissue of diabetic mice. Among the four downregulated DGs, levels of the DG (22:0/0:0/22.6) were one tenth of the levels detected in the Control group, indicating increased peroxisomal β-oxidation in the diabetic heart. Compared with the Control group, nineteen differentially expressed PCs (11 downregulated and 8 upregulated) and nine differentially expressed lysoPCs (5 downregulated and 4 upregulated) were identified in the cardiac tissue of diabetic mice. In addition, 11 differentially expressed PEs (7 downregulated and 4 upregulated) and 10 differentially expressed lysoPEs (7 downregulated and 3 upregulated) were identified in the cardiac tissue of diabetic mice. Eight differentially expressed PGs (6 downregulated and 2 upregulated) were identified in the cardiac tissue of diabetic mice. Eight differentially expressed PSs (6 downregulated and 2 upregulated) were identified in the cardiac tissue of diabetic mice. Four differentially expressed PIs (2 downregulated and 2 upregulated) were identified in the cardiac tissue of diabetic mice. One PA and one lysoPA as well as six SMs were downregulated in the cardiac tissue of diabetic mice compared with the levels detected in the Control group.

Pathway analysis in heart of diabetic mice

With the impact value threshold set at > 0, the result of the pathway analysis suggested that the key metabolites were involved in seven metabolic pathways (Table 3). Sphingolipid metabolism was the top-ranking impacted canonical pathway.
Table 3

Pathway analysis of key metabolites

PathwayTotalHitsRaw pImpact
Sphingolipid metabolism2140.099570.27820
Glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism1810.804230.09677
Pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis1510.742700.06122
Glycosylphosphatidylinositol(GPI)-anchor biosynthesis1420.342740.04390
Glycerolipid metabolism1810.804230.01920
Fatty acid elongation in mitochondria2710.914090.00370
Fatty acid metabolism3920.864110.00034

Total, total number of compounds in the pathway. Hits, the number of compounds that match with our experimental data. Raw p, original p value calculated from the enrichment analysis. Impact, pathway impact value calculated from pathway topology analysis

Pathway analysis of key metabolites Total, total number of compounds in the pathway. Hits, the number of compounds that match with our experimental data. Raw p, original p value calculated from the enrichment analysis. Impact, pathway impact value calculated from pathway topology analysis

Discussion

Hyperglycemia, hypertriglyceridemia, abnormalities of lipid metabolism and cardiac function injury are the main features of diabetic cardiomyopathy [19-21]. In STZ-induced diabetic animal models, elevated blood glucose and lipid levels are associated with cardiac contractile function deterioration and increased myocardial injury indexes in blood [19, 22]. In accordance with these reports, in the present study, cardiac EF% and FS% were reduced along with increased blood glucose and lipid levels in detected in STZ-induced diabetic mice. Insulin deficiency causes decreased GLUT4 expression and subsequent reduction in glucose delivery and increased FA intake by cardiomyocytes as an energy source [23, 24]. These FAs in myocardial cells are then transported by the upregulated cardiac FABP3 [25] to the mitochondria for β-oxidation to generate ATP [26]. The enzymes involved in β-oxidation are highly regulated at the transcriptional level, and their expression is often associated with upregulation of fatty acid β-oxidation [27]. Furthermore, CPT-1α, which is the rate limiting enzyme in the process of mitochondrial β-oxidation, is transcriptionally upregulated in the diabetic heart to elevate the rate of mitochondrial β-oxidation for degradation of these FAs [28]. In accordance with these reports, in the present study, we also observed downregulation of GLUT4 expression in the cardiac tissue of diabetic mice, while FABP3 and CPT-1α expression was upregulated, indicating reduced glucose utilization and increased mitochondrial β-oxidation for degradation of these FAs, the majority of which were long-chain FA. However, although FA is dramatically increased [29], the substantial FFA uptake often exceeds the oxidative capacity of the mitochondria [27]. This leads to FA elevation and subsequent TG synthesis in the diabetic heart, causing cellular lipotoxicity and the initiation of cardiac dysfunction [30]. In the present study, despite no obvious increase in FFAs, differential expression of all eight long-chain hydroxyacylcarnitine and six long-chain acylcarnitines was detected. In addition, two TGs and three DGs were obviously upregulated in the diabetic heart. These cytotoxic lipids cause mitochondrial injury resulting in decreased ATP production and increased generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS); thereby, resulting in cardiac dysfunction in diabetic mice [11, 31]. Moreover, under these conditions lipotoxicity also causes increased expression of UCP2 and UCP3, which contributes to decline in ATP content in the diabetic heart by uncoupling oxidative phosphorylation [32, 33]. In addition to mitochondrial β-oxidation, here, peroxisomal FA β-oxidation was also found to be elevated in the diabetic heart. The majority of FAs that undergo oxidation in cardiac tissue are mono- or polyunsaturated and not saturated [34]. The decrease in PUFA observed in STZ-induced insulin deficiency is caused by a reduction in the delta 6-desaturase activity required to convert long-chain fatty acids to PUFAs [35]. Furthermore, peroxisomal β-oxidation is negatively correlated with the PUFA content in diabetic heart [9]. In accordance with our previous study, our present results show enhanced peroxisomal β-oxidation activity accompanied by deficiencies of the very long chain mono- or polyunsaturated FAs, especially EPA (C20:5n–3) and DHA (C22:6n–3), in the heart of diabetic mice. Furthermore, peroxisomal FA β-oxidation elevation promotes the production of toxic ROS. Therefore, the increased peroxisomal β-oxidation exacerbates the mitochondrial injury and impaired heart function in diabetic mice by producing ROS and reducing the important PUFAs, especially EPA and DHA [8, 36]. It has been shown previously that lipotoxicity induces the breakdown of phospholipids in rat cardiomyocytes and ultimately leads to cell death [37]. Under the conditions of lipotoxicity described here, more than half of all the differentially expressed phospholipid species detected in this study were found to be downregulated in the cardiac tissue of diabetic mice, with the exception of all the SM species and half of the PI species. Phospholipids are important biomembrane components and signaling molecules [38, 39]. A reduction in phospholipids results in mitochondrial abnormalities [40-42] and cardiac dysfunction [43, 44]; therefore, the downregulation in phospholipids in the diabetic heart could also contribute to mitochondrial cristate fusion, reduced ATP production and cardiac dysfunction. Moreover, the sphingolipid metabolic pathway was constructed in the diabetic heart.

Conclusion

Our lipidomics study revealed distinct differences in lipid metabolism and endogenous metabolites were identified in the cardiac tissue of STZ-induced diabetic mice compared with control mice. Eight long-chain hydroxyl- and six acyl-carnitines as well as two TGs and three DGs were shown to be upregulated in the cardiac tissue of diabetic mice. In contrast, PUFAs, such as EPA, and DHA, and many phospholipids, especially MS, were downregulated with the increase in peroxisomal β-oxidation in the diabetic heart. Thus, our data suggest that the increase in toxic lipid species and decreased PUFAs, combined with the reduction in phospholipids cause mitochondrial injury and subsequent uncoupling of phosphorylation and ATP deficiency; thereby leading to diabetic heart dysfunction.
  43 in total

Review 1.  Risk of all-cause mortality and vascular events in women versus men with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rachel R Huxley; Sanne A E Peters; Gita D Mishra; Mark Woodward
Journal:  Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 32.069

2.  Protection of cardiac membrane phospholipid against oxidative injury by calcium antagonists.

Authors:  D R Janero; B Burghardt; R Lopez
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  1988-11-01       Impact factor: 5.858

Review 3.  Lipotoxicity in type 2 diabetic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Tineke van de Weijer; Vera B Schrauwen-Hinderling; Patrick Schrauwen
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 10.787

4.  Phospholipid homeostasis regulates lipid metabolism and cardiac function through SREBP signaling in Drosophila.

Authors:  Hui-Ying Lim; Weidong Wang; Robert J Wessells; Karen Ocorr; Rolf Bodmer
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  Global analysis of the yeast lipidome by quantitative shotgun mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Christer S Ejsing; Julio L Sampaio; Vineeth Surendranath; Eva Duchoslav; Kim Ekroos; Robin W Klemm; Kai Simons; Andrej Shevchenko
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Mitochondrial remodeling in mice with cardiomyocyte-specific lipid overload.

Authors:  Aly Elezaby; Aaron L Sverdlov; Vivian H Tu; Kanupriya Soni; Ivan Luptak; Fuzhong Qin; Marc Liesa; Orian S Shirihai; Jamie Rimer; Jean E Schaffer; Wilson S Colucci; Edward J Miller
Journal:  J Mol Cell Cardiol       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 5.000

7.  Alterations in myocardial cardiolipin content and composition occur at the very earliest stages of diabetes: a shotgun lipidomics study.

Authors:  Xianlin Han; Jingyue Yang; Kui Yang; Zhongdan Zhao; Dana R Abendschein; Richard W Gross
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2007-05-08       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 8.  Diabetes-induced abnormalities in the myocardium.

Authors:  A G Tahiliani; J H McNeill
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1986-03-17       Impact factor: 5.037

9.  The antioxidant edaravone prevents cardiac dysfunction by suppressing oxidative stress in type 1 diabetic rats and in high-glucose-induced injured H9c2 cardiomyoblasts.

Authors:  Lei Ji; Yingying Liu; Ying Zhang; Wenguang Chang; Junli Gong; Shengnan Wei; Xudong Li; Ling Qin
Journal:  Can J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 2.273

Review 10.  Diabetes: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment.

Authors:  David M Nathan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  6 in total

1.  Loss of Stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 leads to cardiac dysfunction and lipotoxicity.

Authors:  Bryon F Tuthill Ii; Christopher J Quaglia; Eileen O'Hara; Laura Palanker Musselman
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 3.308

2.  Multi-Omics Analysis of Diabetic Heart Disease in the db/db Model Reveals Potential Targets for Treatment by a Longevity-Associated Gene.

Authors:  Ashton Faulkner; Zexu Dang; Elisa Avolio; Anita C Thomas; Thomas Batstone; Gavin R Lloyd; Ralf Jm Weber; Lukáš Najdekr; Andris Jankevics; Warwick B Dunn; Gaia Spinetti; Carmine Vecchione; Annibale A Puca; Paolo Madeddu
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 6.600

3.  Protective Effects of Huangqi Shengmai Yin on Type 1 Diabetes-Induced Cardiomyopathy by Improving Myocardial Lipid Metabolism.

Authors:  Zhanhong Cao; Jianheng Pan; Xin Sui; Chunqiu Fang; Na Li; Xiaowei Huang; Xiaobo Qu; Dong Han
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 2.629

4.  Diabetes Mellitus Severity and a Switch From Using Lipoprotein Lipase to Adipose-Derived Fatty Acid Results in a Cardiac Metabolic Signature That Embraces Cell Death.

Authors:  Karanjit Puri; Nathaniel Lal; Rui Shang; Sanjoy Ghosh; Stephane Flibotte; Roger Dyer; Bahira Hussein; Brian Rodrigues
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 5.501

5.  Prediabetes Induced by Fructose-Enriched Diet Influences Cardiac Lipidome and Proteome and Leads to Deterioration of Cardiac Function prior to the Development of Excessive Oxidative Stress and Cell Damage.

Authors:  Gergő Szűcs; Andrea Sója; Mária Péter; Márta Sárközy; Bella Bruszel; Andrea Siska; Imre Földesi; Zoltán Szabó; Tamás Janáky; László Vígh; Gábor Balogh; Tamás Csont
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 6.543

6.  Serum Metabolomic Profiles Associated With Untreated Metabolic Syndrome Patients in the Chinese Population.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Li; Yongfa Wang; Yaodong Zhuang; Ping Zhang; Shujiao Chen; Tetsuya Asakawa; Bizhen Gao
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 4.689

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.