| Literature DB >> 30300751 |
Charley Gros1, Benjamin De Leener1, Atef Badji2, Josefina Maranzano3, Dominique Eden1, Sara M Dupont4, Jason Talbott5, Ren Zhuoquiong6, Yaou Liu7, Tobias Granberg8, Russell Ouellette8, Yasuhiko Tachibana9, Masaaki Hori10, Kouhei Kamiya10, Lydia Chougar11, Leszek Stawiarz12, Jan Hillert12, Elise Bannier13, Anne Kerbrat14, Gilles Edan14, Pierre Labauge15, Virginie Callot16, Jean Pelletier17, Bertrand Audoin17, Henitsoa Rasoanandrianina16, Jean-Christophe Brisset18, Paola Valsasina19, Maria A Rocca19, Massimo Filippi19, Rohit Bakshi20, Shahamat Tauhid20, Ferran Prados21, Marios Yiannakas22, Hugh Kearney22, Olga Ciccarelli22, Seth Smith23, Constantina Andrada Treaba24, Caterina Mainero24, Jennifer Lefeuvre25, Daniel S Reich25, Govind Nair25, Vincent Auclair26, Donald G McLaren26, Allan R Martin27, Michael G Fehlings27, Shahabeddin Vahdat28, Ali Khatibi29, Julien Doyon29, Timothy Shepherd30, Erik Charlson30, Sridar Narayanan3, Julien Cohen-Adad31.
Abstract
The spinal cord is frequently affected by atrophy and/or lesions in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. Segmentation of the spinal cord and lesions from MRI data provides measures of damage, which are key criteria for the diagnosis, prognosis, and longitudinal monitoring in MS. Automating this operation eliminates inter-rater variability and increases the efficiency of large-throughput analysis pipelines. Robust and reliable segmentation across multi-site spinal cord data is challenging because of the large variability related to acquisition parameters and image artifacts. In particular, a precise delineation of lesions is hindered by a broad heterogeneity of lesion contrast, size, location, and shape. The goal of this study was to develop a fully-automatic framework - robust to variability in both image parameters and clinical condition - for segmentation of the spinal cord and intramedullary MS lesions from conventional MRI data of MS and non-MS cases. Scans of 1042 subjects (459 healthy controls, 471 MS patients, and 112 with other spinal pathologies) were included in this multi-site study (n = 30). Data spanned three contrasts (T1-, T2-, and T2∗-weighted) for a total of 1943 vol and featured large heterogeneity in terms of resolution, orientation, coverage, and clinical conditions. The proposed cord and lesion automatic segmentation approach is based on a sequence of two Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). To deal with the very small proportion of spinal cord and/or lesion voxels compared to the rest of the volume, a first CNN with 2D dilated convolutions detects the spinal cord centerline, followed by a second CNN with 3D convolutions that segments the spinal cord and/or lesions. CNNs were trained independently with the Dice loss. When compared against manual segmentation, our CNN-based approach showed a median Dice of 95% vs. 88% for PropSeg (p ≤ 0.05), a state-of-the-art spinal cord segmentation method. Regarding lesion segmentation on MS data, our framework provided a Dice of 60%, a relative volume difference of -15%, and a lesion-wise detection sensitivity and precision of 83% and 77%, respectively. In this study, we introduce a robust method to segment the spinal cord and intramedullary MS lesions on a variety of MRI contrasts. The proposed framework is open-source and readily available in the Spinal Cord Toolbox.Entities:
Keywords: Convolutional neural networks; MRI; Multiple sclerosis; Segmentation; Spinal cord
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30300751 PMCID: PMC6759925 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.081
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuroimage ISSN: 1053-8119 Impact factor: 6.556