Literature DB >> 30300751

Automatic segmentation of the spinal cord and intramedullary multiple sclerosis lesions with convolutional neural networks.

Charley Gros1, Benjamin De Leener1, Atef Badji2, Josefina Maranzano3, Dominique Eden1, Sara M Dupont4, Jason Talbott5, Ren Zhuoquiong6, Yaou Liu7, Tobias Granberg8, Russell Ouellette8, Yasuhiko Tachibana9, Masaaki Hori10, Kouhei Kamiya10, Lydia Chougar11, Leszek Stawiarz12, Jan Hillert12, Elise Bannier13, Anne Kerbrat14, Gilles Edan14, Pierre Labauge15, Virginie Callot16, Jean Pelletier17, Bertrand Audoin17, Henitsoa Rasoanandrianina16, Jean-Christophe Brisset18, Paola Valsasina19, Maria A Rocca19, Massimo Filippi19, Rohit Bakshi20, Shahamat Tauhid20, Ferran Prados21, Marios Yiannakas22, Hugh Kearney22, Olga Ciccarelli22, Seth Smith23, Constantina Andrada Treaba24, Caterina Mainero24, Jennifer Lefeuvre25, Daniel S Reich25, Govind Nair25, Vincent Auclair26, Donald G McLaren26, Allan R Martin27, Michael G Fehlings27, Shahabeddin Vahdat28, Ali Khatibi29, Julien Doyon29, Timothy Shepherd30, Erik Charlson30, Sridar Narayanan3, Julien Cohen-Adad31.   

Abstract

The spinal cord is frequently affected by atrophy and/or lesions in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. Segmentation of the spinal cord and lesions from MRI data provides measures of damage, which are key criteria for the diagnosis, prognosis, and longitudinal monitoring in MS. Automating this operation eliminates inter-rater variability and increases the efficiency of large-throughput analysis pipelines. Robust and reliable segmentation across multi-site spinal cord data is challenging because of the large variability related to acquisition parameters and image artifacts. In particular, a precise delineation of lesions is hindered by a broad heterogeneity of lesion contrast, size, location, and shape. The goal of this study was to develop a fully-automatic framework - robust to variability in both image parameters and clinical condition - for segmentation of the spinal cord and intramedullary MS lesions from conventional MRI data of MS and non-MS cases. Scans of 1042 subjects (459 healthy controls, 471 MS patients, and 112 with other spinal pathologies) were included in this multi-site study (n = 30). Data spanned three contrasts (T1-, T2-, and T2∗-weighted) for a total of 1943 vol and featured large heterogeneity in terms of resolution, orientation, coverage, and clinical conditions. The proposed cord and lesion automatic segmentation approach is based on a sequence of two Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). To deal with the very small proportion of spinal cord and/or lesion voxels compared to the rest of the volume, a first CNN with 2D dilated convolutions detects the spinal cord centerline, followed by a second CNN with 3D convolutions that segments the spinal cord and/or lesions. CNNs were trained independently with the Dice loss. When compared against manual segmentation, our CNN-based approach showed a median Dice of 95% vs. 88% for PropSeg (p ≤ 0.05), a state-of-the-art spinal cord segmentation method. Regarding lesion segmentation on MS data, our framework provided a Dice of 60%, a relative volume difference of -15%, and a lesion-wise detection sensitivity and precision of 83% and 77%, respectively. In this study, we introduce a robust method to segment the spinal cord and intramedullary MS lesions on a variety of MRI contrasts. The proposed framework is open-source and readily available in the Spinal Cord Toolbox.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Convolutional neural networks; MRI; Multiple sclerosis; Segmentation; Spinal cord

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30300751      PMCID: PMC6759925          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  33 in total

1.  Convolutional Neural Network-Based Automated Segmentation of the Spinal Cord and Contusion Injury: Deep Learning Biomarker Correlates of Motor Impairment in Acute Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  D B McCoy; S M Dupont; C Gros; J Cohen-Adad; R J Huie; A Ferguson; X Duong-Fernandez; L H Thomas; V Singh; J Narvid; L Pascual; N Kyritsis; M S Beattie; J C Bresnahan; S Dhall; W Whetstone; J F Talbott
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Spatial distribution of multiple sclerosis lesions in the cervical spinal cord.

Authors:  Dominique Eden; Charley Gros; Atef Badji; Sara M Dupont; Benjamin De Leener; Josefina Maranzano; Ren Zhuoquiong; Yaou Liu; Tobias Granberg; Russell Ouellette; Leszek Stawiarz; Jan Hillert; Jason Talbott; Elise Bannier; Anne Kerbrat; Gilles Edan; Pierre Labauge; Virginie Callot; Jean Pelletier; Bertrand Audoin; Henitsoa Rasoanandrianina; Jean-Christophe Brisset; Paola Valsasina; Maria A Rocca; Massimo Filippi; Rohit Bakshi; Shahamat Tauhid; Ferran Prados; Marios Yiannakas; Hugh Kearney; Olga Ciccarelli; Seth A Smith; Constantina Andrada Treaba; Caterina Mainero; Jennifer Lefeuvre; Daniel S Reich; Govind Nair; Timothy M Shepherd; Erik Charlson; Yasuhiko Tachibana; Masaaki Hori; Kouhei Kamiya; Lydia Chougar; Sridar Narayanan; Julien Cohen-Adad
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  Intersubject Variability and Normalization Strategies for Spinal Cord Total Cross-Sectional and Gray Matter Areas.

Authors:  Nico Papinutto; Carlo Asteggiano; Antje Bischof; Tristan J Gundel; Eduardo Caverzasi; William A Stern; Stefano Bastianello; Stephen L Hauser; Roland G Henry
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 2.486

4.  Development of new outcome measures for adult SMA type III and IV: a multimodal longitudinal study.

Authors:  Giorgia Querin; Timothée Lenglet; Rabab Debs; Tanya Stojkovic; Anthony Behin; François Salachas; Nadine Le Forestier; Maria Del Mar Amador; Gaëlle Bruneteau; Pascal Laforêt; Sophie Blancho; Véronique Marchand-Pauvert; Peter Bede; Jean-Yves Hogrel; Pierre-François Pradat
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Multiple sclerosis lesions in motor tracts from brain to cervical cord: spatial distribution and correlation with disability.

Authors:  Anne Kerbrat; Charley Gros; Atef Badji; Elise Bannier; Francesca Galassi; Benoit Combès; Raphaël Chouteau; Pierre Labauge; Xavier Ayrignac; Clarisse Carra-Dalliere; Josefina Maranzano; Tobias Granberg; Russell Ouellette; Leszek Stawiarz; Jan Hillert; Jason Talbott; Yasuhiko Tachibana; Masaaki Hori; Kouhei Kamiya; Lydia Chougar; Jennifer Lefeuvre; Daniel S Reich; Govind Nair; Paola Valsasina; Maria A Rocca; Massimo Filippi; Renxin Chu; Rohit Bakshi; Virginie Callot; Jean Pelletier; Bertrand Audoin; Adil Maarouf; Nicolas Collongues; Jérôme De Seze; Gilles Edan; Julien Cohen-Adad
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 13.501

6.  Open-source pipeline for multi-class segmentation of the spinal cord with deep learning.

Authors:  François Paugam; Jennifer Lefeuvre; Christian S Perone; Charley Gros; Daniel S Reich; Pascal Sati; Julien Cohen-Adad
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 2.546

7.  Are Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologies Crucial to Our Understanding of Spinal Conditions?

Authors:  Rebecca J Crawford; Maryse Fortin; Kenneth A Weber; Andrew Smith; James M Elliott
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 4.751

8.  Considerations for Mean Upper Cervical Cord Area Implementation in a Longitudinal MRI Setting: Methods, Interrater Reliability, and MRI Quality Control.

Authors:  C Chien; V Juenger; M Scheel; A U Brandt; F Paul
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Sensitivity of the Inhomogeneous Magnetization Transfer Imaging Technique to Spinal Cord Damage in Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  H Rasoanandrianina; S Demortière; A Trabelsi; J P Ranjeva; O Girard; G Duhamel; M Guye; J Pelletier; B Audoin; V Callot
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Lateral Corticospinal Tract and Dorsal Column Damage: Predictive Relationships With Motor and Sensory Scores at Discharge From Acute Rehabilitation After Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Andrew C Smith; Denise R O'Dell; Stephanie R Albin; Jeffrey C Berliner; David Dungan; Eli Robinson; James M Elliott; Julio Carballido-Gamio; Jennifer Stevens-Lapsley; Kenneth A Weber
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-08-08       Impact factor: 3.966

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.