| Literature DB >> 30300419 |
Marina Andjelkovic1, Predrag Minic2,3, Misa Vreca1, Maja Stojiljkovic1, Anita Skakic1, Aleksandar Sovtic2, Milan Rodic2, Vesna Skodric-Trifunovic3,4, Nina Maric5, Jelena Visekruna2, Vesna Spasovski1, Sonja Pavlovic1.
Abstract
Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) is a rare inherited autosomal recessive or X-linked disorder that mainly affects lungs. Dysfunction of respiratory cilia causes symptoms such as chronic rhinosinusitis, coughing, rhinitis, conductive hearing loss and recurrent lung infections with bronchiectasis. It is now well known that pathogenic genetic changes lead to ciliary dysfunction. Here we report usage of clinical-exome based NGS approach in order to reveal underlying genetic causes in cohort of 21 patient with diagnosis of PCD. By detecting 18 (12 novel) potentially pathogenic genetic variants, we established the genetic cause of 11 (9 unrelated) patients. Genetic variants were detected in six PCD disease-causing genes, as well as in SPAG16 and SPAG17 genes, that were not detected in PCD patients so far, but were related to some symptoms of PCD. The most frequently mutated gene in our cohort was DNAH5 (27.77%). Identified variants were in homozygous, compound heterozygous and trans-heterozygous state. For detailed characterization of one novel homozygous genetic variant in DNAI1 gene (c. 947_948insG, p. Thr318TyrfsTer11), RT-qPCR and Western Blot analysis were performed. Molecular diagnostic approach applied in this study enables analysis of 29 PCD disease-causing and related genes. It resulted in mutation detection rate of 50% and enabled discovery of twelve novel mutations and pointed two possible novel PCD candidate genes.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30300419 PMCID: PMC6177184 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205422
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
A list of analyzed PCD-related genes.
| PCD causative genes | Protein localization/function | Variants detected in our study | The incidence of variants in our study |
|---|---|---|---|
| N-DRC | - | 0% | |
| N-DRC | + | 11.11% | |
| Cytoplasmatic, ODA assembling | - | 0% | |
| Cytoplasmatic, DA assembling | - | 0% | |
| Cytoplasmatic, DA assembling | - | 0% | |
| Cytoplasmatic, DA assembling | - | 0% | |
| ODA | + | 16.66% | |
| ODA | - | 0% | |
| ODA | + | 16.66% | |
| ODA | - | 0% | |
| ODA | + | 27.77% | |
| ODA | - | 0% | |
| ODA | + | 5.55% | |
| Cytoplasmatic, DA assembling | - | 0% | |
| CP | - | 0% | |
| Cytoplasmatic, DA assembling | + | 5.55% | |
| ODA | + | 0% | |
| Cytoplasmatic | - | 0% | |
| Cytoplasmatic | - | 0% | |
| RS | - | 0% | |
| RS | - | 0% | |
| Regulate microtubule dynamics | - | 0% | |
| Associates with microtubule-based structures | - | 0% | |
| Role in ciliogenesis and cilium morphology | - | 0% | |
| Microtubule motor activity | - | 0% | |
| Centrosome | - | 0% | |
| Role in motile ciliogenesis | + | 11.11% | |
| Proper function of the axoneme | + | 5.55% | |
| Component of axonemal dynein and cytoplasmic dynein 1 | - | 0% | |
CP, central pair; DA, dynein arms; ENaC, amiloride-sensitive epithelial sodium channel; N-DRC, nexin-dynein regulatory complex; ODA, outer dynein arm; RS, radial spoke.
Clinical and genetic characteristics of analysed patients in population of Serbia.
| Patients | |
|---|---|
| 21 (100.00%) | |
| Males | 11 (52.40%) |
| Females | 10 (47.60%) |
| Bronchiectasis | 17 (80.95%) |
| Chronic sinusitis | 19 (90.47%) |
| Neonatal respiratory distress | 17 (80.95%) |
| Recurrent pneumonia | 9 (42.86%) |
| 10 (47.60%) | |
| 11 (52.40%) | |
| 0 | |
| 4 (19.05%) | |
| Normally ciliary beat pattern | 1/4 (25.00%) |
| Pathological ciliary beat pattern | 3/4 (75.00%) |
| Non-motile | 17 (80.95%) |
| Mutations detected in PCD causative and candidate genes | 9 (50%) |
| Homozygous mutations in | 0 |
Spectrum of detected genetic variants in Serbian patients with PCD.
| GENE | dbSNP ID | Genomic coordinates | Genetic variants | Allele freq Eur (%) | ACMG classification | DANN | SIFT/Provean | Patient ID | Reference from HGMD/ClinVar | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nucleotide change | Amino acid change | |||||||||
| rs397515393 | chr17-78013765 | c. 248delC | p.Ala83ValfsTer84 | 0 | Pathogenic (PVS1, PS3) | NA | Not applicable | P5 | [ | |
| rs747233125 | chr17-78060006 | c. 2440C>T | p.Arg814Ter | 0 | Pathogenic (PVS1, PM2, PM4, PP2) | 0.9899 | Damaging | P13, P14 | [ | |
| - | chr9-34500765 | c. 947_948insG | p.Thr318TyrfsTer11 | unknown | NA | NA | Not applicable | P9, P10 | novel | |
| rs867262419 | chr9-34512140 | c.1345_1349delCTTAA | p.Asn450LeufsTer6 | 0 | NA | NA | Not applicable | P21 | novel | |
| - | chr9-34514506 | c.1684G>A | p.Asp562Asn | 0 | Uncertain Significance (PM2, PP3) | 0.9993 | Damaging | P21 | novel | |
| - | chr5-13864748 | c. 4356-2A>G | - | 0 | Pathogenic (PVS1, PM2, PP3) | 0.9949 | Not applicable | P4 | novel | |
| - | chr5-13809281 | c.7624T>C | p.Trp2542Arg | 0 | Uncertain Significance (PM2, PP3) | 0.9919 | Damaging | P4 | novel | |
| rs137949961 | chr5-13777417 | c.8999G>A | p.Arg3000Gln | 0.26 | Uncertain Significance (PP3) | 0.9989 | Damaging | P6 | ClinVar | |
| rs140782270 | chr5-13914743 | c.1206T>A | p.Asn402Lys | 0.13 | Uncertain Significance (PM2, PP3) | 0.9979 | Damaging | P20 | ClinVar 188080 | |
| - | chr 5–13718980 | c.8012A>G | p.Gln2701Arg | 0 | NA | NA | Damaging | P20 | novel | |
| rs751754576 | chr14-74154044 | c.347A>T | p.Lys116IIe | 0 | Uncertain Significance (PM2, PP3) | 0.9926 | Damaging | P1 | novel | |
| rs535885451 | chr14-74154047 | c.350T>G | p.Leu117Trp | 0 | Uncertain Significance (PM1, PM2, PP3) | NA | Damaging | P1 | novel | |
| - | chr14-74156171 | c.485G>A | p.Trp162Ter | 0 | Uncertain Significance (PM2, PM4, PP3) | 0.9946 | Damaging | P1 | novel | |
| rs200906172 | chr8-133673857 | c.27T>G | p.Ile9Met | 0 | Uncertain Significance (PM2, BS4) | 0.9907 | Damaging | P2 | ClinVar | |
| - | chr7- 21788220 | c.8533C>G | p. Arg2845Gly | 0.13 | Likely benign | 0.9813 | Damaging | P3 | ClinVar 359658 | |
| rs61752199 | chr2-214354811 | c.1067G>A | p.Ser356Asn | 2 | Uncertain Significance (PM1, BS1) | 0.9964 | Damaging | P8 | novel | |
| - | chr2-214174834 | c. 331G>A | p.Asp111Asn | 0 | Uncertain Significance (PP3) | 0.9993 | Damaging | P11 | novel | |
| rs17185492 | chr1-118644524 | c. 473A>T | p.Glu158Val | 17 | Benign (PP2, BS1, BA1,) | 0.9927 | Damaging | P8, P11 | novel | |
All identified genetic variants were numbered based on cDNA reference sequences and as recommended by the Human Genome Variation Society (http://www.hgvs.org/mutnomen). RefSeq accession numbers for the sequences used in the analyses were as follows: NM_017950.3 (CCDC40), NM_012144.2 (DNAI1), NM_001369.2 (DNAH5), NM_031427.3 (DNAL1), NM_001277115.1 (DNAH11), NM_012472.3 (LRRC6), NM_024532.4 (SPAG16), and NM_206996.2 (SPAG17).
a According to VarSome (1000 Genome Project, ExaC)
b ACMG: American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.
c Deleterious annotation of genetic variants using neural networks (DANN). The value range is from 0 to 1, with 1 given to the variants predicted to be the most damaging.
d SIFT (sorts intolerant from tolerant) is an in silico prediction tool based on sequence homology derived from closely related sequences collected through PSI-BLAST. Provean (Protein Variation Effect Analyzer) is an in silico tool that predicts how nonsynonymous or in-frame indel variant will affect a protein's biological function.
e This variant does not have automated ACMG/AMP 2015 interpretation
Fig 1Confirmation by direct sequencing, expressional analysis and protein analysis of novel variant, c.947_948insG, found in DNAI1 gene.
(A) Pedigree structure of one PCD family with two affected sisters. (B) Sanger sequence confirmation of the 1 bp insertion (NM_012144.2: c.947_948insG) in exon 9 of DNAI1 gene. First two sequences designated as P9 and P10 originated from the affected patients and displayed homozygous insertion of G nucleotide. Second two sequences (Pf and Pm) belongs to their parents and displayed insertion of G nucleotide on the one allele, and the last sequence originated from healthy control. For direct sequencing reverse primer was used, and therefore the sequences are aligned from the reverse side. (C) Comparison of the RT-qPCR profile of control group (mean of healthy control samples represents 100% expression), affected siblings (P9 and P10) and their parents (Pm and Pf). Relative expression of the DNAI1 transcript was 30–45% lower in two affected patients and their parents compared to healthy controls. (D) Immunoblotting of proteins from two patients with novel genetic variant, their parents and healthy control with rabbit Anti-Dynein intermediate chain 1 antibody, which reacts with human DNAI1 protein. Using Western Blot method we detected full length protein in patients (lanes 3 and 4), but the amount was lower in comparison to parents (lanes 5 and 6) and positive control (lane 1). Lane 2 represents negative control. The blot shown is representative of three independent experiments.
Fig 2Three-dimensional molecular models of DNAI1 protein with close-up views of the regions harbouring novel frameshift genetic variant, and regions for PPIs.
(A) View of the wild type (top picture) and mutated (bottom picture) DNAI1 protein. Wild type DNAI1 protein consists of 699 amino acids (GenBank accession number: NP_036276.1). Mutated is shorter than wild type and consists of 327 amino acids. Proteins begin to differ after position 318 in polypeptide chains. White arrows point to the last amino acid in polypeptide chains (Thr 699 in wild type and Lys 327 in mutated protein). Labelled amino acids in close-up view of wild type protein are representing ligand binding sites. Close-up view of mutated protein is displaying the altered region and truncation of protein due to frameshift stop mutation. Insertion has led to changes in open reading frame and consequently incorporation of incorrect amino acids downstream of insertion and premature stop codon. Images were prepared using UCFS Chimera software (http://www.rbvi.ucsf.edu/chimera). (B) Amino acid sequence alignment with ClustalW2. Five sequences were aligned and results indicate to high evolutionary conservation of residues affected by p.Thr318TyrfsTer11 variant among the DNAI1 orthologs in all analyzed vertebrate species (mouse, monkey, frog, fish and human). The amino acid marked with a rectangle displayed absolute evolutionary conservation among analysed species.