Literature DB >> 30300228

The Effects of Electrical Stimulation Parameters in Managing Spasticity After Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review.

Amira Hassan Bekhet1, Vanesa Bochkezanian, Ibtissam M Saab, Ashraf S Gorgey.   

Abstract

Controversial findings about the effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation and functional electrical stimulation in managing spasticity have been raised after spinal cord injury. A systematic review was conducted to identify the range of the stimulation parameters that may alleviate spasticity. Three independent reviewers searched Medline (PubMed), web of knowledge, Scopus, Cochrane Central, Virtual Health Library, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database until January 2018. Inclusion criteria were applications of neuromuscular electrical stimulation/functional electrical stimulation on the lower limb muscles, stimulation parameters (frequency, pulse duration, and amplitude of current), and measures of spasticity after spinal cord injury. The primary outcome was spasticity as measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale and the secondary outcome was spasticity assessed by other indirect measures. Twenty-three clinical and nonclinical trials were included with 389 subjects. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation/functional electrical stimulation provided reductions in spasticity by 45%-60% with decrease in electromyography activity and increase in range of motion after spinal cord injury. The identified stimulation parameters were frequency of 20-30 Hz, pulse duration of 300-350 μs, and amplitude of the current greater than 100 mA. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation/functional electrical stimulation provides an effective rehabilitation strategy in managing spasticity. However, a recommendation of the stimulation parameters cannot be accurately assumed because of high variability in the methodology, design, and heterogeneity of the included studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30300228     DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0894-9115            Impact factor:   2.159


  5 in total

1.  The effect of a high-quality nursing model employing low-frequency pulse electrical stimulation combined with early systemic functional exercises on the function of the affected limb in brachial plexus injury patients.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Huang; Zongyuan Jiang; Haoran Sun; Bangzhu Xie; Fang Lu; Wenlong Huang; Ting Wang; Haiyan Xiong
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 2.  A Comparison of FES and SCS for Neuroplastic Recovery After SCI: Historical Perspectives and Future Directions.

Authors:  Lynsey D Duffell; Nicholas de Neufvillle Donaldson
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 4.003

3.  A Flexible Pulse Generator Based on a Field Programmable Gate Array Architecture for Functional Electrical Stimulation.

Authors:  Jorge A Mercado-Gutierrez; Ricardo Dominguez; Ignacio Hernandez-Popo; Jimena Quinzaños-Fresnedo; Arturo Vera-Hernandez; Lorenzo Leija-Salas; Josefina Gutierrez-Martinez
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 4.  Functional electrical stimulation cycling exercise after spinal cord injury: a systematic review of health and fitness-related outcomes.

Authors:  Jan W van der Scheer; Victoria L Goosey-Tolfrey; Sydney E Valentino; Glen M Davis; Chester H Ho
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 4.262

5.  Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Reduces Leg Cramps in Patients With Lumbar Degenerative Disorders: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Jan-Frieder Harmsen; Anna Sistig; Alessandro Fasse; Michael Hackl; Kilian Wegmann; Michael Behringer
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2020-11-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.