Literature DB >> 30299121

A readability analysis of online mental health resources.

Dorothy D Skierkowski1, Paul Florin1, Lisa L Harlow1, Jason Machan2, Yinjiao Ye3.   

Abstract

Analyzing the reading grade level of online mental health information is an important first step in ensuring that information is largely accessible by the general public, so as not to perpetuate existing health disparities across socioeconomic groups. The present study systematically examined grade-level readability of mental health information related to various psychiatric diagnoses, obtained from 6 highly utilized mental health websites, using a generalized estimating equations approach. Results suggest that, in general, the readability of mental health information is largely well above the 6th-to-8th grade level recommended by several national health organizations, including the CDC and NIH (Kutner, Greenberg, Jin, & Paulsen, 2006; National Institutes of Health, 2001, 2017), with reading-grade-level estimates from the model ranging from 5.62 to 17.9. Further efforts are required to ensure that writers of online health information do not exacerbate existing health disparities by ignoring these guidelines. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30299121      PMCID: PMC6453751          DOI: 10.1037/amp0000324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Psychol        ISSN: 0003-066X


  25 in total

1.  Designing websites for persons with cognitive deficits: Design and usability of a psychoeducational intervention for persons with severe mental illness.

Authors:  Armando J Rotondi; Jennifer Sinkule; Gretchen L Haas; Michael B Spring; Christine M Litschge; Christina E Newhill; Rohan Ganguli; Carol M Anderson
Journal:  Psychol Serv       Date:  2007-08

Review 2.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.

Authors:  P E Shrout; J L Fleiss
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 3.  Readability of patient education materials: implications for clinical practice.

Authors:  J Albright; C de Guzman; P Acebo; D Paiva; M Faulkner; J Swanson
Journal:  Appl Nurs Res       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.257

4.  Partial Tonsillectomy.

Authors:  Kevin Wong; Jessica R Levi
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 1.547

Review 5.  Health literacy interventions and outcomes: an updated systematic review.

Authors:  Nancy D Berkman; Stacey L Sheridan; Katrina E Donahue; David J Halpern; Anthony Viera; Karen Crotty; Audrey Holland; Michelle Brasure; Kathleen N Lohr; Elizabeth Harden; Elizabeth Tant; Ina Wallace; Meera Viswanathan
Journal:  Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep)       Date:  2011-03

Review 6.  Understanding online health information: Evaluation, tools, and strategies.

Authors:  Elisabeth Beaunoyer; Marianne Arsenault; Anna M Lomanowska; Matthieu J Guitton
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2016-08-26

7.  Readability analysis of online health information about overactive bladder.

Authors:  Kevin Koo; Kevin Shee; Ronald L Yap
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2016-10-29       Impact factor: 2.696

8.  Readability of online health information: implications for health literacy.

Authors:  Nicholas McInnes; Bo J A Haglund
Journal:  Inform Health Soc Care       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 2.439

9.  Reading deficits in schizophrenia and individuals at high clinical risk: relationship to sensory function, course of illness, and psychosocial outcome.

Authors:  Nadine Revheim; Cheryl M Corcoran; Elisa Dias; Esther Hellmann; Antigona Martinez; Pamela D Butler; Jonathan M Lehrfeld; Joanna DiCostanzo; Jennifer Albert; Daniel C Javitt
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 18.112

10.  Readability Assessment of Online Patient Education Material on Congestive Heart Failure.

Authors:  Akhil Kher; Sandra Johnson; Robert Griffith
Journal:  Adv Prev Med       Date:  2017-06-01
View more
  3 in total

1.  "I wouldn't even know what to do," Adolescent and Parent Perspectives on Identifying, Understanding, and Seeking Help for Adolescent Depression.

Authors:  Heather Stuckey; Elizabeth A Hivner; Jennifer L Kraschnewski; Alissa M Molinari; Heather J Costigan; Deepa L Sekhar
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2021-04-28

2.  Assessment of the readability and quality of online patient education materials for the medical treatment of open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Lois Crabtree; Edward Lee
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03-28

3.  An evaluation of the quality of online perinatal depression information.

Authors:  Madison P Hardman; Kristin A Reynolds; Sarah K Petty; Teaghan A M Pryor; Shayna K Pierce; Matthew T Bernstein; Patricia Furer
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 3.007

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.