Literature DB >> 30297411

Dopaminergic basis for signaling belief updates, but not surprise, and the link to paranoia.

Matthew M Nour1,2,3,4, Tarik Dahoun2,3,5, Philipp Schwartenbeck4,6,7,8,9, Rick A Adams10,11, Thomas H B FitzGerald4,6,12, Christopher Coello13, Matthew B Wall13, Raymond J Dolan4,6, Oliver D Howes1,2,3.   

Abstract

Distinguishing between meaningful and meaningless sensory information is fundamental to forming accurate representations of the world. Dopamine is thought to play a central role in processing the meaningful information content of observations, which motivates an agent to update their beliefs about the environment. However, direct evidence for dopamine's role in human belief updating is lacking. We addressed this question in healthy volunteers who performed a model-based fMRI task designed to separate the neural processing of meaningful and meaningless sensory information. We modeled participant behavior using a normative Bayesian observer model and used the magnitude of the model-derived belief update following an observation to quantify its meaningful information content. We also acquired PET imaging measures of dopamine function in the same subjects. We show that the magnitude of belief updates about task structure (meaningful information), but not pure sensory surprise (meaningless information), are encoded in midbrain and ventral striatum activity. Using PET we show that the neural encoding of meaningful information is negatively related to dopamine-2/3 receptor availability in the midbrain and dexamphetamine-induced dopamine release capacity in the striatum. Trial-by-trial analysis of task performance indicated that subclinical paranoid ideation is negatively related to behavioral sensitivity to observations carrying meaningful information about the task structure. The findings provide direct evidence implicating dopamine in model-based belief updating in humans and have implications for understating the pathophysiology of psychotic disorders where dopamine function is disrupted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian surprise; Kullback–Leibler divergence; aberrant salience; information-theoretic surprise; schizophrenia

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30297411      PMCID: PMC6205436          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1809298115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  82 in total

1.  D(3) receptor ligands modulate extracellular dopamine clearance in the nucleus accumbens.

Authors:  A Zapata; T S Shippenberg
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.372

Review 2.  New insights into the mechanism of action of amphetamines.

Authors:  Annette E Fleckenstein; Trent J Volz; Evan L Riddle; James W Gibb; Glen R Hanson
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.820

Review 3.  A neural substrate of prediction and reward.

Authors:  W Schultz; P Dayan; P R Montague
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-03-14       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Dual effects of D-amphetamine on dopamine neurons mediated by dopamine and nondopamine receptors.

Authors:  W X Shi; C L Pun; X X Zhang; M D Jones; B S Bunney
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Endogenous DA-mediated feedback inhibition of DA neurons: involvement of both D(1)- and D(2)-like receptors.

Authors:  W X Shi; C L Pun; P L Smith; B S Bunney
Journal:  Synapse       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.562

6.  Ventral striatal prediction error signaling is associated with dopamine synthesis capacity and fluid intelligence.

Authors:  Florian Schlagenhauf; Michael A Rapp; Quentin J M Huys; Anne Beck; Torsten Wüstenberg; Lorenz Deserno; Hans-Georg Buchholz; Jan Kalbitzer; Ralph Buchert; Michael Bauer; Thorsten Kienast; Paul Cumming; Michail Plotkin; Yoshitaka Kumakura; Anthony A Grace; Raymond J Dolan; Andreas Heinz
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Beyond Reward Prediction Errors: Human Striatum Updates Rule Values During Learning.

Authors:  Ian Ballard; Eric M Miller; Steven T Piantadosi; Noah D Goodman; Samuel M McClure
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Identity prediction errors in the human midbrain update reward-identity expectations in the orbitofrontal cortex.

Authors:  James D Howard; Thorsten Kahnt
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  The computational anatomy of psychosis.

Authors:  Rick A Adams; Klaas Enno Stephan; Harriet R Brown; Christopher D Frith; Karl J Friston
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 4.157

10.  Adaptive Prediction Error Coding in the Human Midbrain and Striatum Facilitates Behavioral Adaptation and Learning Efficiency.

Authors:  Kelly M J Diederen; Tom Spencer; Martin D Vestergaard; Paul C Fletcher; Wolfram Schultz
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  23 in total

1.  Pupil-Linked Arousal Responds to Unconscious Surprisal.

Authors:  Andrea Alamia; Rufin VanRullen; Emanuele Pasqualotto; André Mouraux; Alexandre Zenon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Computational mechanisms of curiosity and goal-directed exploration.

Authors:  Philipp Schwartenbeck; Johannes Passecker; Tobias U Hauser; Thomas Hb FitzGerald; Martin Kronbichler; Karl J Friston
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Accelerated atrophy in dopaminergic targets and medial temporo-parietal regions precedes the onset of delusions in patients with Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Riccardo Manca; Jose Manuel Valera-Bermejo; Annalena Venneri
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 5.270

Review 4.  Do psychedelics change beliefs?

Authors:  H T McGovern; P Leptourgos; B T Hutchinson; P R Corlett
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  A polygenic score indexing a DRD2-related co-expression network is associated with striatal dopamine function.

Authors:  Enrico D'Ambrosio; Giulio Pergola; Antonio F Pardiñas; Tarik Dahoun; Mattia Veronese; Leonardo Sportelli; Paolo Taurisano; Kira Griffiths; Sameer Jauhar; Maria Rogdaki; Michael A P Bloomfield; Sean Froudist-Walsh; Ilaria Bonoldi; James T R Walters; Giuseppe Blasi; Alessandro Bertolino; Oliver D Howes
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-23       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Dopamine and glutamate in schizophrenia: biology, symptoms and treatment.

Authors:  Robert A McCutcheon; John H Krystal; Oliver D Howes
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 49.548

Review 7.  An integrative framework for perceptual disturbances in psychosis.

Authors:  Guillermo Horga; Anissa Abi-Dargham
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 8.  A salience misattribution model for addictive-like behaviors.

Authors:  Shivam Kalhan; A David Redish; Robert Hester; Marta I Garrido
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2021-02-28       Impact factor: 9.052

Review 9.  Adaptive learning is structure learning in time.

Authors:  Linda Q Yu; Robert C Wilson; Matthew R Nassar
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 9.052

10.  Variability in Action Selection Relates to Striatal Dopamine 2/3 Receptor Availability in Humans: A PET Neuroimaging Study Using Reinforcement Learning and Active Inference Models.

Authors:  Rick A Adams; Michael Moutoussis; Matthew M Nour; Tarik Dahoun; Declan Lewis; Benjamin Illingworth; Mattia Veronese; Christoph Mathys; Lieke de Boer; Marc Guitart-Masip; Karl J Friston; Oliver D Howes; Jonathan P Roiser
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.