Literature DB >> 22344813

Ventral striatal prediction error signaling is associated with dopamine synthesis capacity and fluid intelligence.

Florian Schlagenhauf1, Michael A Rapp, Quentin J M Huys, Anne Beck, Torsten Wüstenberg, Lorenz Deserno, Hans-Georg Buchholz, Jan Kalbitzer, Ralph Buchert, Michael Bauer, Thorsten Kienast, Paul Cumming, Michail Plotkin, Yoshitaka Kumakura, Anthony A Grace, Raymond J Dolan, Andreas Heinz.   

Abstract

Fluid intelligence represents the capacity for flexible problem solving and rapid behavioral adaptation. Rewards drive flexible behavioral adaptation, in part via a teaching signal expressed as reward prediction errors in the ventral striatum, which has been associated with phasic dopamine release in animal studies. We examined a sample of 28 healthy male adults using multimodal imaging and biological parametric mapping with (1) functional magnetic resonance imaging during a reversal learning task and (2) in a subsample of 17 subjects also with positron emission tomography using 6-[(18) F]fluoro-L-DOPA to assess dopamine synthesis capacity. Fluid intelligence was measured using a battery of nine standard neuropsychological tests. Ventral striatal BOLD correlates of reward prediction errors were positively correlated with fluid intelligence and, in the right ventral striatum, also inversely correlated with dopamine synthesis capacity (FDOPA K inapp). When exploring aspects of fluid intelligence, we observed that prediction error signaling correlates with complex attention and reasoning. These findings indicate that individual differences in the capacity for flexible problem solving relate to ventral striatal activation during reward-related learning, which in turn proved to be inversely associated with ventral striatal dopamine synthesis capacity.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22344813      PMCID: PMC3731774          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.22000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  68 in total

1.  Kinetics of the metabolism of four PET radioligands in living minipigs.

Authors:  N M Gillings; D Bender; L Falborg; K Marthi; O L Munk; P Cumming
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.408

2.  The relation of the trail making test to organic brain damage.

Authors:  R M REITAN
Journal:  J Consult Psychol       Date:  1955-10

3.  Unified segmentation.

Authors:  John Ashburner; Karl J Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Working memory capacity predicts dopamine synthesis capacity in the human striatum.

Authors:  Roshan Cools; Sasha E Gibbs; Asako Miyakawa; William Jagust; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Individual differences and the neural representations of reward expectation and reward prediction error.

Authors:  Michael X Cohen
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Relation between presynaptic and postsynaptic dopaminergic functions measured by positron emission tomography: implication of dopaminergic tone.

Authors:  Hiroshi Ito; Fumitoshi Kodaka; Hidehiko Takahashi; Harumasa Takano; Ryosuke Arakawa; Hitoshi Shimada; Tetsuya Suhara
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Striatal dopamine during sensorial stimulations: a [18F]FDOPA PET study in human and cats.

Authors:  Wadad Hassoun; Stephane Thobois; Nathalie Ginovart; Luis Garcia-Larrea; Marion Le Cavorsin; Stephane Guillouet; Frederic Bonnefoi; Nicolas Costes; Frank Lavenne; Jean Pierre Martin; Emmanuel Broussolle; Vincent Leviel
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Dopamine-dependent prediction errors underpin reward-seeking behaviour in humans.

Authors:  Mathias Pessiglione; Ben Seymour; Guillaume Flandin; Raymond J Dolan; Chris D Frith
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Human reinforcement learning subdivides structured action spaces by learning effector-specific values.

Authors:  Samuel J Gershman; Bijan Pesaran; Nathaniel D Daw
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Disentangling the roles of approach, activation and valence in instrumental and pavlovian responding.

Authors:  Quentin J M Huys; Roshan Cools; Martin Gölzer; Eva Friedel; Andreas Heinz; Raymond J Dolan; Peter Dayan
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  48 in total

1.  Striatal dopamine influences the default mode network to affect shifting between object features.

Authors:  Linh C Dang; Aneesh Donde; Cindee Madison; James P O'Neil; William J Jagust
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 2.  Reinforcement learning models and their neural correlates: An activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis.

Authors:  Henry W Chase; Poornima Kumar; Simon B Eickhoff; Alexandre Y Dombrovski
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Interactions between glutamate, dopamine, and the neuronal signature of response inhibition in the human striatum.

Authors:  Robert C Lorenz; Tobias Gleich; Ralph Buchert; Florian Schlagenhauf; Simone Kühn; Jürgen Gallinat
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Ventral striatal dopamine reflects behavioral and neural signatures of model-based control during sequential decision making.

Authors:  Lorenz Deserno; Quentin J M Huys; Rebecca Boehme; Ralph Buchert; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Anthony A Grace; Raymond J Dolan; Andreas Heinz; Florian Schlagenhauf
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Public mental health: a call to action.

Authors:  Andreas Heinz; Katrin Charlet; Michael A Rapp
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 49.548

Review 6.  Intelligence moderates reinforcement learning: a mini-review of the neural evidence.

Authors:  Chong Chen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Dose-dependent effects of estrogen on prediction error related neural activity in the nucleus accumbens of healthy young women.

Authors:  Janine Bayer; Tessa Rusch; Lei Zhang; Jan Gläscher; Tobias Sommer
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Corticostriatothalamic reward prediction error signals and executive control in late-life depression.

Authors:  A Y Dombrovski; K Szanto; L Clark; H J Aizenstein; H W Chase; C F Reynolds; G J Siegle
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 7.723

Review 9.  Neurobiological Models of Self-Disorders in Early Schizophrenia.

Authors:  A Mishara; I Bonoldi; P Allen; G Rutigliano; J Perez; P Fusar-Poli; P McGuire
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 10.  An Integrative Perspective on the Role of Dopamine in Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Tiago V Maia; Michael J Frank
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 13.382

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.