Literature DB >> 30295720

A survey of ontology learning techniques and applications.

Muhammad Nabeel Asim1, Muhammad Wasim1, Muhammad Usman Ghani Khan2, Waqar Mahmood1, Hafiza Mahnoor Abbasi1.   

Abstract

Ontologies have gained a lot of popularity and recognition in the semantic web because of their extensive use in Internet-based applications. Ontologies are often considered a fine source of semantics and interoperability in all artificially smart systems. Exponential increase in unstructured data on the web has made automated acquisition of ontology from unstructured text a most prominent research area. Several methodologies exploiting numerous techniques of various fields (machine learning, text mining, knowledge representation and reasoning, information retrieval and natural language processing) are being proposed to bring some level of automation in the process of ontology acquisition from unstructured text. This paper describes the process of ontology learning and further classification of ontology learning techniques into three classes (linguistics, statistical and logical) and discusses many algorithms under each category. This paper also explores ontology evaluation techniques by highlighting their pros and cons. Moreover, it describes the scope and use of ontology learning in several industries. Finally, the paper discusses challenges of ontology learning along with their corresponding future directions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30295720      PMCID: PMC6173224          DOI: 10.1093/database/bay101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Database (Oxford)        ISSN: 1758-0463            Impact factor:   3.451


  3 in total

1.  Systematized nomenclature of medicine clinical terms (SNOMED CT) to represent computed tomography procedures.

Authors:  Thuppahi Sisira De Silva; Don MacDonald; Grace Paterson; Khokan C Sikdar; Bonnie Cochrane
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 5.428

2.  Enabling the European Patient Summary through triplespaces.

Authors:  Reto Krummenacher; Elena Simperl; Dario Cerizza; Emanuele Della Valle; Lyndon J B Nixon; Doug Foxvog
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2009-04-05       Impact factor: 5.428

3.  The Human Phenotype Ontology project: linking molecular biology and disease through phenotype data.

Authors:  Sebastian Köhler; Sandra C Doelken; Christopher J Mungall; Sebastian Bauer; Helen V Firth; Isabelle Bailleul-Forestier; Graeme C M Black; Danielle L Brown; Michael Brudno; Jennifer Campbell; David R FitzPatrick; Janan T Eppig; Andrew P Jackson; Kathleen Freson; Marta Girdea; Ingo Helbig; Jane A Hurst; Johanna Jähn; Laird G Jackson; Anne M Kelly; David H Ledbetter; Sahar Mansour; Christa L Martin; Celia Moss; Andrew Mumford; Willem H Ouwehand; Soo-Mi Park; Erin Rooney Riggs; Richard H Scott; Sanjay Sisodiya; Steven Van Vooren; Ronald J Wapner; Andrew O M Wilkie; Caroline F Wright; Anneke T Vulto-van Silfhout; Nicole de Leeuw; Bert B A de Vries; Nicole L Washingthon; Cynthia L Smith; Monte Westerfield; Paul Schofield; Barbara J Ruef; Georgios V Gkoutos; Melissa Haendel; Damian Smedley; Suzanna E Lewis; Peter N Robinson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 16.971

  3 in total
  2 in total

1.  Why imaging data alone is not enough: AI-based integration of imaging, omics, and clinical data.

Authors:  Andreas Holzinger; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Igor Jurisica
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-06-15       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Semantic characterization of adverse outcome pathways.

Authors:  Rong-Lin Wang
Journal:  Aquat Toxicol       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 4.964

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.