Literature DB >> 30295539

A randomized prospective study comparing mobile-bearing against fixed-bearing PFC Sigma cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasties with ten-year minimum follow-up.

A J Powell1, E Crua2, B C Chong3, R Gordon1, A McAuslan1, R P Pitto1, M G Clatworthy1.   

Abstract

AIMS: This study compares the PFC total knee arthroplasty (TKA) system in a prospective randomized control trial (RCT) of the mobile-bearing rotating-platform (RP) TKA against the fixed-bearing (FB) TKA. This is the largest RCT with the longest follow-up where cruciate-retaining PFC total knee arthroplasties are compared in a non-bilateral TKA study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 167 patients (190 knees with 23 bilateral cases), were recruited prospectively and randomly assigned, with 91 knees receiving the RP and 99 knees receiving FB. The mean age was 65.5 years (48 to 82), the mean body mass index (BMI) was 29.7 kg/m2 (20 to 52) and 73 patients were female. The Knee Society Score (KSS), Knee Society Functional Score (KSFS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), and 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey Physical and Mental Component Scores (SF-12 PCS, SF-12 MCS) were gathered and recorded preoperatively, at five-years' follow-up, and at ten years' follow-up. Additionally, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS) were collected at five- and ten-year follow-ups. The prevalence of radiolucent lines (RL) on radiographs and implant survival were recorded at five- and ten-year follow-ups.
RESULTS: At the ten-year follow-up, the RP group (n = 39) had a statistically significant superior score in the OKS (p = 0.001), WOMAC (p = 0.023), SF-12 PCS (p = 0.019), KOOS Activities of Daily Living (ADL) (p = 0.010), and KOOS Sport and Recreation (Sport/Rec) (p = 0.006) compared with the FB group (n = 46). The OKS, SF-12 PCS, and KOOS Sport/Rec at ten years had mean scores above the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) threshold. There was no significant difference in prevalence of radiolucency between groups at five-years' follow-up (p = 0.449), nor at ten-years' follow-up (p = 0.08). Implant survival rate at 14 years postoperative was 95.2 (95% CI 90.7 to 99.8) and 94.7 (95% CI 86.8 to 100.0) for the RP and FB TKAs, respectively.
CONCLUSION: At ten-year follow-up, the mobile-bearing knee joint arthroplasty had statistically and clinically relevant superior OKS, SF-12 PCS, and KOOS (Sport/Rec) than the fixed-bearing platform. No difference was seen in prevalence of radiolucent lines. There was a greater than 94% implant survival rate for both cohorts at 14 years. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:1336-44.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30295539     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B10.BJJ-2017-1450.R1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  7 in total

1.  Total knee arthroplasty using modified measured resection: a five-year retrospective review of midterm outcomes.

Authors:  Tran T Dung; Vo S Q Nang; Dinh N Son; Hoang G Du; Nguyen H Long; Le M Son; Duong D Toan; Do V Minh; Nguyen H Phuong; Ma N Thanh
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 3.318

2.  Fragility Index as a Measure of Randomized Clinical Trial Quality in Adult Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Carl L Herndon; Kyle L McCormick; Anastasia Gazgalis; Elise C Bixby; Matthew M Levitsky; Alexander L Neuwirth
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-10-11

3.  The Impact of Total Knee Replacement with a Customized Cruciate-Retaining Implant Design on Patient-Reported and Functional Outcomes.

Authors:  Andre F Steinert; Lennart Schröder; Lukas Sefrin; Björn Janßen; Jörg Arnholdt; Maximilian Rudert
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-01-31

4.  Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis: still a very valuable tool in the orthopaedic research armamentarium.

Authors:  Andreas Fontalis; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 4.410

Review 5.  No difference between mobile and fixed bearing in primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Filippo Migliorini; Nicola Maffulli; Francesco Cuozzo; Marco Pilone; Karen Elsner; Jörg Eschweiler
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 4.114

6.  Does mobile-bearing have better flexion and axial rotation than fixed-bearing in total knee arthroplasty? A randomised controlled study based on gait.

Authors:  Yi-Ming Zeng; Meng-Ning Yan; Hui-Wu Li; Jun Zhang; You Wang
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Mobile-bearing versus fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Ashraf T Hantouly; Abdulaziz F Ahmed; Osama Alzobi; Ammar Toubasi; Motasem Salameh; Aissam Elmhiregh; Shamsi Hameed; Ghalib O Ahmed; Abtin Alvand; Mohammed Al Ateeq Al Dosari
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-05-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.