Literature DB >> 30294844

The community and ecosystem consequences of intraspecific diversity: a meta-analysis.

Allan Raffard1,2, Frédéric Santoul2, Julien Cucherousset3, Simon Blanchet1,3.   

Abstract

Understanding the relationships between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning has major implications. Biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationships are generally investigated at the interspecific level, although intraspecific diversity (i.e. within-species diversity) is increasingly perceived as an important ecological facet of biodiversity. Here, we provide a quantitative and integrative synthesis testing, across diverse plant and animal species, whether intraspecific diversity is a major driver of community dynamics and ecosystem functioning. We specifically tested (i) whether the number of genotypes/phenotypes (i.e. intraspecific richness) or the specific identity of genotypes/phenotypes (i.e. intraspecific variation) in populations modulate the structure of communities and the functioning of ecosystems, (ii) whether the ecological effects of intraspecific richness and variation are strong in magnitude, and (iii) whether these effects vary among taxonomic groups and ecological responses. We found a non-linear relationship between intraspecific richness and community and ecosystem dynamics that follows a saturating curve shape, as observed for biodiversity-function relationships measured at the interspecific level. Importantly, intraspecific richness modulated ecological dynamics with a magnitude that was equal to that previously reported for interspecific richness. Our results further confirm, based on a database containing more than 50 species, that intraspecific variation also has substantial effects on ecological dynamics. We demonstrated that the effects of intraspecific variation are twice as high as expected by chance, and that they might have been underestimated previously. Finally, we found that the ecological effects of intraspecific variation are not homogeneous and are actually stronger when intraspecific variation is manipulated in primary producers than in consumer species, and when they are measured at the ecosystem rather than at the community level. Overall, we demonstrated that the two facets of intraspecific diversity (richness and variation) can both strongly affect community and ecosystem dynamics, which reveals the pivotal role of within-species biodiversity for understanding ecological dynamics.
© 2018 Cambridge Philosophical Society.

Keywords:  biodiversity; community; eco-evolutionary dynamics; ecosystem functioning; genotype; meta-analysis; phenotype

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30294844     DOI: 10.1111/brv.12472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc        ISSN: 0006-3231


  27 in total

1.  Plant traits alone are poor predictors of ecosystem properties and long-term ecosystem functioning.

Authors:  Fons van der Plas; Thomas Schröder-Georgi; Alexandra Weigelt; Kathryn Barry; Sebastian Meyer; Adriana Alzate; Romain L Barnard; Nina Buchmann; Hans de Kroon; Anne Ebeling; Nico Eisenhauer; Christof Engels; Markus Fischer; Gerd Gleixner; Anke Hildebrandt; Eva Koller-France; Sophia Leimer; Alexandru Milcu; Liesje Mommer; Pascal A Niklaus; Yvonne Oelmann; Christiane Roscher; Christoph Scherber; Michael Scherer-Lorenzen; Stefan Scheu; Bernhard Schmid; Ernst-Detlef Schulze; Vicky Temperton; Teja Tscharntke; Winfried Voigt; Wolfgang Weisser; Wolfgang Wilcke; Christian Wirth
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 15.460

2.  Growing up aspen: ontogeny and trade-offs shape growth, defence and reproduction in a foundation species.

Authors:  Christopher T Cole; Clay J Morrow; Hilary L Barker; Kennedy F Rubert-Nason; Jennifer F L Riehl; Tobias G Köllner; Nathalie D Lackus; Richard L Lindroth
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  My niche: individual spatial niche specialization affects within- and between-species interactions.

Authors:  Annika Schirmer; Julia Hoffmann; Jana A Eccard; Melanie Dammhahn
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Assessing ex situ genetic and ecogeographic conservation in a threatened but widespread oak after range-wide collecting effort.

Authors:  Bethany A Zumwalde; Bailie Fredlock; Emily Beckman Bruns; Drew Duckett; Ross A McCauley; Emma Suzuki Spence; Sean Hoban
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 4.929

5.  Reading light: leaf spectra capture fine-scale diversity of closely related, hybridizing arctic shrubs.

Authors:  Lance Stasinski; Dawson M White; Peter R Nelson; Richard H Ree; José Eduardo Meireles
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 10.323

6.  Condition-dependent responses of fish to motorboats.

Authors:  H R Harding; T A C Gordon; K Wong; M I McCormick; S D Simpson; A N Radford
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  The impact of mistranslation on phenotypic variability and fitness.

Authors:  Laasya Samhita; Parth K Raval; Godwin Stephenson; Shashi Thutupalli; Deepa Agashe
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 4.171

8.  Growth-defense trade-offs shape population genetic composition in an iconic forest tree species.

Authors:  Olivia L Cope; Ken Keefover-Ring; Eric L Kruger; Richard L Lindroth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Phenotypic plasticity can reverse the relative extent of intra- and interspecific variability across a thermal gradient.

Authors:  Staffan Jacob; Delphine Legrand
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 5.530

10.  Strain-Level Diversity Impacts Cheese Rind Microbiome Assembly and Function.

Authors:  Brittany A Niccum; Erik K Kastman; Nicole Kfoury; Albert Robbat; Benjamin E Wolfe
Journal:  mSystems       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 6.496

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.