Literature DB >> 30293461

Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel iso-flavones derivatives as H3R antagonists.

Jian Xin1, Min Hu2, Qian Liu2, Tian Tai Zhang2, Dong Mei Wang2, Song Wu2.   

Abstract

Histamine H3 receptor (H3R), a kind of G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR), is expressed mainly in the central nervous system (CNS) and plays a vital role in homoeostatic control. This study describes the design and synthesis of a series of novel H3R antagonists based on the iso-flavone scaffold. The results of the bioactivity evaluation show that four compounds (1c, 2c, 2h, and 2o) possess significant H3R inhibitory activities. Molecular docking indicates that a salt bridge, π-π T-shape interactions, and hydrophobic interaction all contribute to the interaction between compound 2h and H3R.

Entities:  

Keywords:  H3R antagonist; iso-flavone; molecular docking

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30293461      PMCID: PMC6179058          DOI: 10.1080/14756366.2018.1509212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem        ISSN: 1475-6366            Impact factor:   5.051


Introduction

Histamine, a distinctly important neurotransmitter, exerts as a modulator in the brain and dominates several homoeostatic functions such as thermoregulation, fluid balance, and energy metabolism. Apart from that, histamine is also involved in numerous processes, for instance, circadian rhythms, the sleep–wake cycle, attention, memory, learning, and neuroendocrine regulation. According to recent studies, the biosynthesis and release of histamine in central nervous system (CNS) are modulated by four different G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) subtypes, namely histamine H1 receptor (H1R), histamine H2 receptor (H2R), histamine H3 receptor (H3R), histamine H4 receptor (H4R). Unlike H1R and H2R, H3R shows higher homology to H4R and is highly expressed in brain, such as basal ganglia and globus pallidus, which could couple with G i/oα protein and then activate mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathways. Subsequently, the phospholipase A2 (PLA2) is induced to recruit Ca2+ from intracellular stores, reduces cAMP formation, and enhances phosphorylation. Moreover, H3R is recognised as an auto- and hetero-receptor on non-histaminergic neurons controlling the release of many other important neurotransmitters,, such as acetylcholine, norepinephrine, dopamine, and serotonin. A clinical study revealed that neurotransmitters could trigger the postsynaptic signalling pathways bound to cognition which supported the hypothesis that H3R is a drug target for cognitive disorders,,,, especially for Alzheimer Disease (AD), schizophrenia and epilepsy. Because of the unique functions of H3R, a wide variety of selective H3R antagonists have been developed and some of them have shown promising effects,,. Flavone and iso-flavone, which are regarded as privileged structures, exhibit variety of pharmacological activities, such as anti-cancer, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and also are used in neurodegenerative disorders, for example, Alzheimer’s disease. Our previous study had confirmed the iso-flavone and flavone compounds possessed moderate inhibitory activity against H3R. Particularly, the optimization at the 8-position of the flavones and 7-position of iso-flavone provided satisfactory bioactivity (compound A, B, and C, Figure 1), which enlightened us to modify 8-position of iso-flavone to enhance the H3R inhibitory effect. In addition, we also want to modify the 6-position of isoflavones to see whether compounds with better antagonistic activity can be obtained. In this current work, two series of novel iso-flavone derivatives were designed and synthesised based on our previous study. After screening the H3R inhibitory activities at a fixed concentration, compounds that possessed good H3R inhibitory activity were further tested to determine the IC50 values. In addition, molecular docking studies were performed to investigate the interaction between H3R and the most potent antagonist.
Figure 1.

The structures of previously reported H3R antagonists and two novel series of compounds.

The structures of previously reported H3R antagonists and two novel series of compounds.

Materials and methods

Chemistry

Unless otherwise indicated, all solvents and organic reagents were obtained from commercially available sources and were used without further purification. The reaction process was monitored using thin layer chromatography (TLC) with silica gel plates (thickness = 0.20 mm, GF254) under UV light. Column chromatography was performed using a ZCX-II (200–300 mesh), to purify the final products. All final products were found to have purities ≥95% analysed by HPLC. Melting points were determined using a YRT-3 apparatus (Tian Jin Optical Instrument Factory, Tianjin, China) and were presented as uncorrected values. 1H NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian Mercury-300 MHz instrument, whereas 13 C NMR was recorded at 400 MHz on a Varian Mercury using DMSO-d6 as a solvent and tetramethylsilane (TMS) as an internal standard (1H NMR and 13 C NMR were recorded in different time). Mass spectra were obtained using a Waters Acquity UPLC-SQD mass spectrometer (Waters, Milford, MA). High-resolution mass spectra (HRMS) were recorded on an Agilent Technologies LC/MSD TOF spectrometer (Agilent Technologies Co. Ltd., Santa Clara, CA). The synthetic route of novel compounds is depicted in Scheme 1. All title compounds were synthesised through Mannich reactions using iso-flavone, 37% formalin, and aliphatic amines as starting materials. Compounds 1a–1g, 2a–2i, and 2j–2t were synthesised from genistein, daidzein, and formononetin, respectively. The use of DMF-methanol as a solvent for formononetin and daidzein never resulted in the formation of 6-substituted products, but only 8-position substituted products were obtained.
Scheme 1.

Synthesis of compounds 1a–1g, 2a–2t. Reagents and conditions: (i) 37% formalin, aliphatic amines, 25°C, 24 h.

Synthesis of compounds 1a–1g, 2a–2t. Reagents and conditions: (i) 37% formalin, aliphatic amines, 25°C, 24 h.

General procedure for the synthesis of compounds 1a–1g

Genistein (0.50 g, 1.85 mmol), 37% formalin (0.30 g, 3.70 mmol), aliphatic amines (0.225 g, 2.780 mmol), and methanol (30 ml) were added into a three-necked flask (100 ml) and stirred at 25 °C for 24 h. After reactions completed monitored by TLC (DCM:MeOH = 10:1), the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by column chromatography using a mixture of dichloromethane and methanol (30:1) as the eluent to give the target compounds in yields ranging from 41% to 91%. The similar procedure was followed for the synthesis of compounds 2a–2t. Title compounds were characterised as follows:

5,7-dihydroxy-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-8-(pyrrolidin-1-ylmethyl)-4H-chromen-4-one (1a)

White solid, yield: 24%; mp 218–220 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.15 (s, 1H), 7.35 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 6.80 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 6.10 (s, 1H), 3.96 (s, 2H), 2.83 (m, 4H), 1.83 (m, 4H). 13 C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 179.9, 170.4, 161.6, 159.5, 157.8, 153.5, 130.7, 123.8, 122.2, 115.5, 104.7, 102.2, 94.7, 53.3, 50.0, 23.6. HR-MS (ESI) Calcd for C20H19NO5 [M + H]+, 354.1341, found: 354.1368.

8-((4-benzylpiperazin-1-yl)methyl)-5,7-dihydroxy-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4H-chromen-4-one (1b)

White solid, yield: 24%; mp 191–193 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.33 (s, 1H), 7.35–7.28 (m, 7H), 6.81 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 6.17 (s, 1H), 3.81 (s, 2H), 3.46 (s, 2H), 2.56 (m, 4H), 2.40 (m, 4H). 13 C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 180.9, 165.5, 161.1, 157.9, 155.6, 154.2, 138.5, 130.7, 129.4, 128.7, 127.5, 122.7, 121.7, 115.6, 104.7, 100.1, 99.5, 62.3, 52.8, 52.5, 51.7. HR-MS (ESI) Calcd for C27H26N2O5 [M + H]+, 459.1920, found: 459.1939.

5,7-dihydroxy-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-8-((3-methylpiperidin-1-yl)methyl)-4H-chromen-4-one (1c)

White solid, yield: 18%; mp 209–211°C; 1H NMR (300MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.29 (s, 1H), 7.36 (d, J=8.7Hz, 2H), 6.81 (d, J=8.4Hz, 2H), 6.10 (s, 1H), 3.84 (s, 2H), 2.89 (brs, 2H), 2.15 (t, J=10.8Hz, 1H), 1.89 (t, J=10.8Hz, 1H), 1.65–1.48 (m, 4H), 0.94 (m, 1H), 0.82 (d, J=6.6Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (100MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 180.4, 168.0, 163.5, 157.9, 157.4, 154.1, 130.7, 122.5, 121.9, 115.6, 104.0, 103.5, 94.5, 60.0, 53.1, 52.7, 32.0, 30.9, 24.9, 19.6. HR-MS (ESI): Calcd for C22H23NO5 [M+H]+, 382.1654, found: 382.1682.

6-(((3R,5S)-3,5-dimethylmorpholino)methyl)-5,7-dihydroxy-3–(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4H-chromen-4-one (1d)

White solid, yield: 20%; mp >250°C; 1H NMR (300MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 13.02 (s, 1H), 8.36 (s, 1H), 7.37 (d, J=8.4Hz, 2H), 6.81 (d, J=8.4Hz, 2H), 6.22 (s, 1H), 3.73 (s, 2H), 3.54 (t, J=9Hz, 2H), 2.81(d, J=12Hz, 2H), 1.78 (t, J=10.8Hz, 2H), 1.04 (d, J=6.3Hz, 6H). 13C NMR (100MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 181.0, 177.9, 176.8, 164.5, 157.9, 155.8, 154.3, 130.7, 121.7, 115.6, 104.9, 100.5, 99.4, 71.5, 58.6, 51.2, 19.4. HR-MS (ESI) Calcd for C22H23NO6 [M+H]+, 39.1604, found: 398.1633.

5,7-dihydroxy-8-((4-(hydroxymethyl)piperidin-1-yl)methyl)-3–(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4H-chromen-4-one (1e)

White solid, yield: 19%; mp 223–225°C; 1H NMR (300MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.29 (s, 1H), 7.36 (d, J=8.4Hz, 2H), 6.81 (d, J=8.7Hz, 2H), 6.09 (s, 1H), 3.86 (s, 2H), 3.57 (brs, 2H), 2.84 (t, J=6.6Hz, 2H), 2.38 (t, J=10.2Hz, 2H), 1.68 (d, J=12.9Hz, 2H), 1.12 (brs, 1H), 1.23–1.11 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (100MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 180.6, 167.4, 161.4, 157.9, 155.4, 153.8, 130.7, 122.6, 121.8, 115.6, 104.1, 99.9, 99.2, 65.9, 52.7, 52.6, 38.1, 28.6. HR-MS (ESI) Calcd for C22H23NO6 [M+H]+:398.1604, found: 398.1584.

5,7-dihydroxy-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-6-(morpholinomethyl)-4H-chromen-4-one (1f).

White solid, yield: 16%; mp 210–212°C; 1H NMR (300MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 13.03 (s, 1H), 8.36 (s, 1H), 7.38 (d, J=8.4Hz, 2H), 6.82 (d, J=8.4Hz, 2H), 6.24 (s, 1H), 3.74 (s, 2H), 3.58 (m, 4H), 2.49 (m, 4H). 13C NMR (100MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 180.9, 164.6, 161.4, 157.9, 154.4, 143.3, 130.7, 122.7, 121.7, 115.6, 104.9, 100.7, 99.3, 66.6, 53.14, 51.4. HR-MS (ESI) Calcd for C20H19NO6 [M+H]+, 370.1291, found: 370.1320.

5,7-dihydroxy-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-8-((4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)methyl)-4H-chromen-4-one (1g)

White solid, yield: 19%; mp 231–233°C; 1H NMR (300MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.34 (s, 1H), 7.37 (d, J=8.4Hz, 2H), 6.82 (d, J=8.7Hz, 2H), 6.18(s, 1H), 3.80(s, 2H), 3.55(m, 4H), 2.35 (m, 4H), 2.07(s, 3H). 13C NMR (100MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 180.7, 166.4, 161.5, 158.0, 155.6, 154.2, 130.7, 122.7, 121.7, 115.6, 104.7, 100.1, 99.6, 54.9, 52.4, 51.7, 46.0. HR-MS (ESI) Calcd for C21H22N2O5 [M+H]+, 383.1607, found: 383.1609.

7-hydroxy-8-((4-(2-hydroxyethyl)piperazin-1-yl)methyl)-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4H-chromen-4-one (2a)

White solid, yield: 20%; mp 230–232°C; 1H NMR (300MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.30 (s, 1H), 7.91 (d, J=8.7Hz, 1H), 7.37(d, J=8.7Hz, 2H), 6.88 (d, J=9.0Hz, 1H), 6.77 (d, J=8.4Hz, 2H), 3.95 (s, 2H), 3.49 (t, J=6.3Hz, 2H), 2.57–2.48 (m, 8H), 2.38 (t, J=6.3Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (100MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 175.3, 163.4, 157.7, 155.5, 153.0, 130.6, 126.3, 123.8, 123.0, 116.9, 115.5, 115.5, 108.7, 60.5, 59.0, 53.4, 52.7, 52.4. HR-MS (ESI) Calcd for C22H24N2O5 [M+H]+, 397.1763, found: 397.1767.

7-hydroxy-8-((4-(hydroxymethyl)piperidin-1-yl)methyl)-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4H-chromen-4-one (2b)

White solid, yield: 24%; mp 244–246°C; 1H NMR (300MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.28 (s, 1H), 7.89 (d, J=8.7Hz, 1H), 7.37 (d, J=8.4Hz, 2H), 6.84–6.77 (m, 3H), 3.98 (s, 2H), 3.26 (d, J=6.3Hz, 2H), 2.95 (d, J=11.1Hz, 2H), 2.21 (t, J=11.1Hz, 2H), 1.73 (d, J=13.2Hz, 2H), 1.43 (brs, 1H), 1.19 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (100MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 175.3, 164.2, 157.7, 155.5, 152.9, 130.6, 126.1, 123.8, 123.0, 116.6, 115.7, 115.5, 108.4, 66.00, 53.3, 52.9, 38.2, 28.9. HR-MS (ESI) Calcd for C22H23NO5 [M+H]+, 382.1654, found: 382.1648.

7-hydroxy-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-8-((4-methylpiperidin-1-yl)methyl)-4H-chromen-4-one (2c)

White solid, yield: 14%; mp 250–252°C; 1H NMR (300MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.28 (s, 1H), 7.89 (d, J=8.7Hz, 1H), 7.37 (d, J=8.7Hz, 2H), 6.84–6.77 (m, 3H), 3.97 (s, 2H), 2.95 (d, J=11.1Hz, 2H), 2.22 (t, J=11.4Hz, 2H), 1.68 (d, J=13.2Hz, 2H), 1.42 (brs, 1H), 1.17 (m, 2H), 0.91 (d, J=6.6Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (100MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 175.3, 164.2, 157.7, 155.5, 152.9, 130.6, 126.1, 123.8, 123.0, 116.6, 115.7, 115.5, 108.5, 53.1, 34.1, 30.2, 22.0. HR-MS (ESI): Calcd for C22H23NO4 [M+H]+, 366.1705, found: 366.1749.

8-(((3R,5S)-3,5-dimethylmorpholino)methyl)-7-hydroxy-3–(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4H-chromen-4-one (2d)

White solid, yield: 27%; mp 230–232°C; 1H NMR (300MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.32 (s, 1H), 7.92 (d, J=9Hz, 1H), 7.38 (d, J=9Hz, 2H), 6.93 (d, J=9Hz, 1H), 6.80 (d, J=8.4Hz, 2H), 3.88 (s, 2H), 3.56 (t, J=8.4Hz, 2H), 2.83 (d, J=10.8Hz, 2H), 1.90 (t, J=11.1Hz, 2H), 1.05 (d, J=6.3Hz, 6H). 13C NMR (100MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 175.4, 162.8, 157.8, 155.8, 153.1, 130.6, 126.4, 123.8, 123.00, 117.1, 115.5, 115.4, 109.1, 71.5, 58.7, 51.8, 19.4. HR-MS (ESI) Calcd for C22H23NO5 [M+H]+, 382.1654, found: 382.1664.

7-hydroxy-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-8-((3-hydroxypiperidin-1-yl)methyl)-4H-chromen-4-one (2e)

White solid, yield: 15%; mp 226–228°C; 1H NMR (300MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.28 (s, 1H), 7.89 (d, J=9Hz, 1H), 7.37 (d, J=8.4Hz, 2H), 6.84–6.77 (m, 3H), 3.96 (s, 2H), 2.87 (d, J=7.2Hz, 2H), 2.13 (t, J=11.1Hz, 1H), 1.87 (t, J=10.8Hz, 1H), 1.69–1.42 (m, 4H), 0.90 (m, 1H), 0.84 (d, J=6.3Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (100MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 175.3, 164.2, 157.6, 155.4, 152.9, 130.6, 126.2, 123.8, 123.0, 116.6, 115.7, 115.5, 108.3, 60.6, 53.4, 53.2, 32.3, 31.2, 25.2, 19.7. HR-MS (ESI) Calcd for C22H23NO4 [M+H]+, 366.1705, found: 366.1716.

7-hydroxy-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-8-(pyrrolidin-1-ylmethyl)-4H-chromen-4-one (2f).

White solid, yield: 23%; mp 177–179°C; 1H NMR (300MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.27 (s, 1H), 7.88 (d, J=8.7Hz, 1H), 7.37 (d, J=8.4Hz, 2H), 6.84–6.77 (m, 3H), 4.08 (s, 2H), 2.67 (m, 4H), 1.77 (m, 4H). 13C NMR (100MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 175.3, 164.7, 157.7, 155.4, 152.8, 130.6, 126.2, 123.8, 123.1, 116.1, 115.9, 115.5, 109.1, 53.6, 50.0, 23.7. HR-MS (ESI) Calcd for C20H19NO4 [M+H]+, 338.1392, found: 338.1413.

(S)-7-hydroxy-8-((2-(hydroxymethyl)pyrrolidin-1-yl)methyl)-3–(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4H-chromen-4-one (2g)

White solid, yield: 35%; mp 205–207°C; 1H NMR (300MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.27 (s, 1H), 7.88 (d, J=8.7Hz, 1H), 7.37 (d, J=8.7Hz, 2H), 6.85–6.77 (m, 3H), 4.34–4.01 (s, 2H), 3.51 (brs, 2H), 2.92–2.83 (d, J=27.6Hz, 2H), 2.40 (d, J=8.1Hz, 1H), 1.89 (m, 1H), 1.67 (m, 3H). 13C NMR (100MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 175.3, 172.8, 157.8, 155.2, 152.6, 138.2, 130.6, 126.1, 123.8, 123.0, 120.0, 115.5, 109.6, 65.6, 62.8, 54.6, 49.5, 27.6, 23.1. HR-MS (ESI) Calcd for C21H21NO5 [M+H]+, 368.1498, found: 368.1482.

7-hydroxy-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-8-((2-methylpiperidin-1-yl)methyl)-4H-chromen-4-one (2h)

White solid, yield: 12%; mp 228–230°C; 1H NMR (300MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.28 (s, 1H),7.89 (d, J=8.7Hz, 1H), 7.37 (d, J=8.4Hz, 2H), 6.79–6.77 (m, 3H), 4.32–4.27 (d, J=15, 1H), 3.9–3.85 (d, J=15Hz, 1H), 2.83 (d, J=12Hz, 1H), 2.66 (brs, 1H), 2.30 (t, J=9.3Hz, 1H), 1.62–1.35 (m, 6H), 1.15 (d, J=6.3Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (100MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 175.3, 164.6, 157.7, 155.2, 152.9, 130.6, 125.9, 123.8, 123.1, 116.4, 115.9, 115.4, 108.7, 57.8, 56.3, 50.4, 36.3, 33.8, 25.6, 22.5. HR-MS (ESI) Calcd for C22H23NO4 [M+H]+, 366.1705, found: 366.1731.

7-hydroxy-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-8-((4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)methyl)-4H-chromen-4-one (2i)

White solid, yield: 18%; mp 215–217°C; 1H NMR (300MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.28 (s, 1H), 7.90 (d, J=8.7Hz, 1H), 7.37 (d, J=8.7Hz, 2H), 6.88–6.77 (m, 3H), 3.93(s, 2H), 2.56 (m, 4H), 2.34 (m, 4H), 2.15 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (100MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 175.4, 163.3, 157.7, 155.6, 153.1, 137.2, 130.6, 126.3, 123.9, 123.0, 116.9, 115.5, 108.9, 55.0, 52.6, 52.3, 46.1. HR-MS (ESI) Calcd for C21H22N2O4 [M+H]+, 367.1658, found: 367.1646.

7-hydroxy-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)-8-((4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)methyl)-4H-chromen-4-one (2j)

White solid, yield: 23%; mp 202–204°C; 1H NMR (300MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.36 (s,1H), 7.92 (d, J=8.7Hz, 1H), 7.50 (d, J=9Hz, 2H), 6.99 (d, J=8.7Hz, 2H), 6.87 (d, J=9Hz, 1H), 3.95 (s, 2H), 3.77 (s, 3H), 2.57 (m, 4H), 2.36 (m, 4H), 2.16 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (100MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 175.3, 163.2, 159.5, 155.6, 153.4, 130.6, 126.3, 124.7, 123.5, 116.9, 115.5, 114.1, 109.0, 55.7, 55.0, 52.6, 52.3, 46.1. HR-MS (ESI) Calcd for C22H24N2O4 [M+H]+, 381.1814, found: 381.1814.

7-hydroxy-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)-8-(morpholinomethyl)-4H-chromen-4-one (2k).

White solid, yield: 28%; mp 235–237°C; 1H NMR (300MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.31 (s, 1H), 7.92 (d, J=8.7Hz, 1H), 7.38 (d, J=8.7Hz, 2H), 6.93 (d, J=9Hz, 1H), 6.77 (d, J=8.4Hz, 2H), 3.88 (s, 3H), 3.59 (m, 6H), 2.48 (m, 4H). 13C NMR (100MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 175.4, 162.6, 157.7, 155.9, 153.2, 130.6, 126.4, 123.8, 123.0, 117.1, 115.5, 115.3, 109.3, 66.6, 53.2, 52.0. HR-MS (ESI) Calcd for C20H19NO5 [M+H]+, 354.1341, found: 354.1315.

7-hydroxy-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)-8-((4-methylpiperidin-1-yl)methyl)-4H-chromen-4-one (2l)

White solid, yield: 21%; mp 208–210°C; 1H NMR (300MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.33 (s, 1H), 7.90 (d, J=8.7Hz, 1H), 7.50 (d, J=9Hz, 2H), 6.95 (d, J=11.7Hz, 2H), 6.82 (d, J=9Hz, 1H), 3.98 (s, 2H), 3.77 (s, 3H), 2.96 (d, J=11.4Hz, 2H), 2.22 (t, J=10.8Hz, 2H), 1.68 (d, J=12.3Hz, 2H), 1.42 (brs, 1H), 1.17 (m, 2H), 0.91 (d, J=6.6Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (100MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 175.2, 164.3, 159.5, 155.5, 153.2, 130.6, 126.2, 124.7, 123.5, 116.6, 115.8, 114.1, 108.4, 55.7, 53.2, 53.1, 34.1, 30.2, 22.0. HR-MS (ESI) Calcd for C23H25NO4 [M+H]+, 380.1862, found: 380.1881.

7-hydroxy-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)-8-(pyrrolidin-1-ylmethyl)-4H-chromen-4-one (2m)

White solid, yield: 12%; mp 173–175°C; 1H NMR (300MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.32 (s, 1H),7.89 (d, J=8.7Hz, 1H), 7.50 (d, J=8.7Hz, 2H), 6.98 (d, J=8.7Hz, 2H),6.82 (d, J=8.7Hz, 1H), 4.09 (s, 2H), 3.77 (s, 3H), 2.68 (m, 4H), 1.77 (m, 4H). 13C NMR (100MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 175.2, 164.5, 159.5, 155.4, 153.1, 130.6, 126.2, 124.8, 123.4, 116.2, 115.9, 114.1, 109.3, 55.6, 53.6, 49.9, 23.7. HR-MS (ESI) Calcd for C21H21NO4 [M+H]+, 352.1549, found: 352.1568.

7-hydroxy-8-((4-hydroxypiperidin-1-yl)methyl)-3–(4-methoxyphenyl)-4H-chromen-4-one (2n)

White solid, yield: 21%; mp 205–207 °C; 1H NMR (300MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.33 (s, 1H), 7.90 (d, J=8.7Hz, 1H), 7.50 (d, J=8.7Hz, 2H), 6.98 (d, J=9Hz, 2H), 6.83 (d, J=9Hz, 1H), 3.96 (s, 2H), 3.77 (s, 3H), 3.56 (brs, 1H), 2.80 (t, J=7.2Hz, 2H), 2.35 (t, J=10.8Hz, 2H), 1.75 (d, J=12.9Hz, 2H), 1.45 (q, J=6.9Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (100MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 175.2, 164.1, 159.5, 155.4, 153.2, 131.5, 125.9, 124.3, 123.4, 116.5, 115.3, 113.9, 109.4, 55.6, 55.4, 52.9, 50.6, 34.4. HR-MS (ESI) Calcd for C22H23NO5 [M+H]+, 382.1654, found: 382.1669.

7-hydroxy-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)-8-((3-methylpiperidin-1-yl)methyl)-4H-chromen-4-one (2o)

White solid, yield: 21%; mp 165–167°C; 1H NMR (300MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.33 (s, 1H), 7.90 (d, J=9Hz, 1H), 7.50 (d, J=8.7Hz, 2H), 6.98 (d, J=9Hz, 2H), 6.82 (d, J=9Hz, 1H), 3.96 (s, 2H), 3.77 (s, 3H), 2.87 (d, J=7.5Hz, 2H), 2.17(t, J=11.7Hz, 1H), 1.83 (t, J=10.8Hz, 1H), 1.65–1.49 (m, 4H), 0.93 (m, 1H), 0.82 (d, J=6.6Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (100MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 175.2, 164.3, 159.5, 155.5, 153.2, 130.6, 126.2, 124.7, 123.5, 116.6, 115.7, 114.1, 108.4, 60.6, 55.7, 53.4, 53.2, 32.3, 31.2, 25.2, 19.7. HR-MS (ESI) Calcd for C23H25NO4 [M+H]+, 380.1862, found: 380.1897.

7-hydroxy-8-((3-hydroxypiperidin-1-yl)methyl)-3–(4-methoxyphenyl)-4H-chromen-4-one (2p)

White solid, yield: 25%; mp 188–190°C; 1H NMR (300MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.33 (s, 1H), 7.91 (d, J=9Hz, 1H), 7.50 (d, J=8.7Hz, 2H), 6.98 (d, J=9Hz, 2H), 6.84 (d, J=8.7Hz, 1H), 3.95 (s, 2H), 3.77 (s, 3H), 3.58 (brs, 1H), 2.85 (d, J=9.3Hz, 1H), 2.66 (d, J=11.1Hz, 1H), 2.27–2.13 (m, 2H), 1.71 (d, J=10.5Hz, 2H), 1.45 (m, 1H), 1.24 (m, 1H). 13C NMR (100MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 175.2, 164.0, 159.5, 155.5, 153.2, 130.6, 126.2, 124.7, 123.5, 116.7, 115.7, 114.1, 108.6, 65.8, 60.4, 55.6, 53.0, 52.9, 32.6, 22.7. HR-MS (ESI) Calcd for C22H23NO5 [M+H]+, 382.1654, found:382.1718.

8-((4-benzylpiperazin-1-yl)methyl)-7-hydroxy-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)-4H-chromen-4-one (2q)

White solid, yield: 27%; mp 220–222°C; 1H NMR (300MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.36 (s,1H), 7.92 (d, J=8.7Hz, 1H), 7.50 (d, J=8.7Hz, 2H), 7.29 (m, 5H), 6.98 (d, J=8.7Hz, 2H), 6.87 (d, J=8.7Hz, 1H), 3.96 (s, 2H), 3.77 (s, 3H), 3.47 (s, 2H), 2.59–2.49 (m, 8H). 13C NMR (100MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 175.3, 159.7, 159.5, 157.4, 155.7, 142.5, 138.5, 130.6, 129.4, 128.7, 127.3, 124.4, 123.3, 116.7, 115.5, 114.1, 108.6, 69.1, 62.4, 55.8, 52.9, 52.6. HR-MS (ESI) Calcd for C28H28N2O4 [M+H]+, 451.2127, found: 457.2113.

7-hydroxy-8-((4-(hydroxymethyl)piperidin-1-yl)methyl)-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)-4H-chromen-4-one (2r)

White solid, yield: 27%; mp 195–197°C; 1H NMR (300MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.33 (s, 1H), 7.90 (d, J=8.7Hz, 1H), 7.50 (d, J=8.7Hz, 2H), 6.98 (d, J=9Hz, 2H), 6.82 (d, J=9Hz, 1H), 3.98 (s, 2H), 3.77 (s, 3H), 3.27 (d, J=6Hz, 2H), 2.99 (d, J=11.1Hz, 2H), 2.25 (t, J=11.4Hz, 2H), 1.73 (d, J=12.9Hz, 2H), 1.23 (brs, 1H), 1.11 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (100MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 175.2, 164.3, 159.5, 155.5, 153.2, 130.6, 126.2, 124.7, 123.5, 116.5, 115.8, 114.1, 108.4, 66.00, 55.7, 53.3, 52.9, 38.2, 28.9. HR-MS (ESI) Calcd for C23H25NO5 [M+H]+, 396.1811, found: 396.1806.

7-hydroxy-8-((4-(2-hydroxyethyl)piperazin-1-yl)methyl)-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)-4H-chromen-4-one (2s)

White solid, yield: 27%; mp 196–198°C; 1H NMR (300MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.35 (s, 1H), 7.91 (d, J=8.7Hz, 1H), 7.50 (d, J=8.7Hz, 2H), 6.98 (d, J=9Hz, 2H), 6.89 (d, J=9Hz, 1H), 3.94 (s, 2H), 3.77 (s, 3H), 3.49 (t, J=6.3Hz, 3H), 2.57–2.40 (m, 8H), 2.36 (t, J=7.2Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (100MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 175.2, 163.4, 159.5, 155.6, 153.3, 130.6, 126.3, 124.7, 123.3, 116.9, 115.5, 114.1, 108.8, 60.5, 59.0, 55.7, 53.5, 52.7, 52.4. HR-MS (ESI) Calcd for C23H26N2O5 [M+H]+, 411.1920, found: 411.1904.

7-hydroxy-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)-8-((2-methylpiperidin-1-yl)methyl)-4H-chromen-4-one (2t)

White solid, yield: 17%; mp 141–143 °C; 1H NMR (300MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.32 (s, 1H), 7.87 (d, J=9.9Hz, 1H), 7.50 (d, J=9.9Hz, 2H), 6.98 (d, J=9Hz, 2H), 6.80 (d, J=9.9Hz, 1H), 4.31–4.26 (d, J=15Hz, 1H), 3.90–3.85 (d, J=15Hz, 1H), 3.77 (s, 3H), 2.83 (d, J=12.3Hz, 1H), 2.66 (brs, 1H), 2.33 (t, J=9.6Hz, 1H), 1.48–1.35 (m, 6H), 1.15 (d, J=6.3Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (100MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 175.1, 164.8, 159.5, 155.2, 153.1, 130.6, 125.9, 124.8, 123.5, 116.4, 115.9, 114.1, 108.6, 56.6, 55.6, 51.7, 50.4, 33.8, 26.9, 25.7, 22.6. HR-MS (ESI) Calcd for C23H25NO4 [M+H]+, 380.1862, found: 380.2130.

Bioassay studies

Cell lines and cell culture

The cell-based histamine receptor 3 (H3R) assay was carried out based on β-lactamase complementation technology. The H3-bla U2OS cells (Invitrogen, Invitrogen, Waltham, Massachusetts) stably expressed two fusion proteins, as well as a β-lactamase reporter gene under the control of a UAS response element. The first fusion protein was human H3R linked to a Gal4-VP16 transcription factor through the TEV protease site, and the other was the β-arrestin/TEV protease fusion protein. H3-bla U2OS cells were cultured in McCoy’s 5A Medium supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco, Shanghai, China) at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2. To each well in a 384-well plate was seeded exponentially growing cells in a density of 6.5×103 cells/mL in 32μL of media. The plate was incubated at 37°C, 18–24h, 5% CO2 for cell adherence.

Fluorescent H3R assay

Stock solutions of test compounds (10mM) were prepared in DMSO and then diluted 100 times in media. Cells were exposed to 4μL of test compounds and the control compound thioperamide (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri) for 30min and then stimulated with 4μL of methylhistamine at 400nM (Sigma-Aldrich) for 5h. Then, 8μL of LiveBLAzer-FRET B/G Substrate (CCF4-AM; Invitrogen) was added and incubation continued for 2h. Plates were subjected to the fluorescence reading with a Spectra Max M5 microplate reader (BioTek, Winooski, Vermont); equipped with 410nm excitation and 460nm and 530nm emission filters. The inhibition percentage was calculated based on the fluorescence according to the following equation: % inhibition = (ModelResponse ratio–CompoundResponse ratio)/ModelResponse ratio. And IC50 values were determined from log concentration − inhibition curves. At least three separate tests were carried out.

Molecular docking

We chose the most active compounds for molecular docking studies to predict how molecules and proteins work. A homology modelling of H3R was built as our previous report. The 3D structure of compound 2h was built using DS MODELER (Discovery Studio 2016, BIOVIA Inc, San Diego, CA) and evaluated the model according to the PDF Total Energy and the Profile-3D procedure. Flexible Docking was used for the docking procedure. The 3D model of H3R with the lowest PDF Total Energy was chosen for docking. Water and the cognate ligand (doxepin) were removed from the model, and hydrogen atoms were added to amino acid residues. The binding mode was shown by DS visualizer.

Results and discussion

Structure–activity relationship

The compounds were initially evaluated for inhibition rate on H3R at a fixed concentration of 10μM (Tables 1 and 2). Of the 27 compounds evaluated, four compounds (1c, 2c, 2h, 2o)performed satisfactory inhibitory effect (Figure 2). According to reports in the literature, H3R inhibitory activities were increased by the introduction of pyrrolidine and piperidine to the iso-flavone scaffold. Thus, we introduced various pyrrolidine, piperidine, piperazine and morpholine moieties onto 6- or 8-position of iso-flavone. The results for series 1 are shown in Table 1. The advantage of piperidine groups outweighed pyrrolidine moieties. As for substituted piperazine and morpholine moieties, the subsequent data did not give satisfactory results. Then, we modified daidzein and formononetin with substituted piperidine and pyrrolidine fragments. It should be noted that further steric modification on piperidine was detrimental for the inhibitory activities. For example, 4-hydroxymethyl, 3-hydroxy piperidine (compound 2b, 2e) attached to the structure of daidzein led the inhibitory activity to decrease. However, the 2-methyl piperidine group (compound 2h) showed very strong inhibition. Interestingly, for formononetin, 3-methyl piperidine (compound 2o) and pyrrolidine (compound 2m) fragments showed unexpected inhibitory effect. Structurally, substituted piperidine (such as methyl- and hydroxyl-) or pyrrolidine groups could improve bioactivity but bulky substitutions may hinder binding H3 pockets, namely, binding affinity would loss. Comparing different iso-flavone structures, even though 4′-hydroxy or 4′-methoxy benzene ring in 4-position of iso-flavone scaffold showed significant fluctuation in bioactivity level according to the data shown in Table 2, in most cases, daidzein derivatives have advantages over formononetin as H3R antagonists, for example, compound 2c vs 2l; 2h vs 2t.
Table 1.

Structures and activities of compounds 1a–1g.


CompoundR1R2Inhibit rate (%) at 10 μMIC50 (μM)
1aH–7.61 
1bH–10.31 
1cH38.1417.83 ± 0.06
1dH–61.00 
1eH–7.54 
1fH–19.15 
1gH–43.72 
Thioperamide  72.341.03 ± 0.01

Bold values indicates that the compound has a high inhibit rate (%) at 10 µM and is able to posses an IC50.

Table 2.

Structures and activities of compounds 2a–2t.


CompoundR3R4Inhibit rate (%) at 10 μMIC50 (μM)Compd.R3R4Inhibit rate (%) at 10 μMIC50 (μM)
2aOH–1.85 2kOCH3–23.17 
2bOH–32.59 2lOCH3–1.51 
2cOH39.5914.24 ± 0.082mOCH314.56 
2dOH–57.52 2nOCH31.72 
2eOH–0.82 2oOCH366.774.71 ± 0.01
2fOH18.72 2pOCH3–9.49 
2gOH–8.12 2qOCH3–9.56 
2hOH81.833.84 ± 0.042rOCH3–55.09 
2iOH–20.42 2sOCH3–42.75 
2jOCH3–9.69 2tOCH32.53 

Bold values indicates that the compound has a high inhibit rate (%) at 10 μM and is able to posses an IC50.

Figure 2.

The IC50 of the four compounds (1c, 2c, 2h, and 2o) showed good H3R inhibitory activity.

The IC50 of the four compounds (1c, 2c, 2h, and 2o) showed good H3R inhibitory activity. Structures and activities of compounds 1a–1g. Bold values indicates that the compound has a high inhibit rate (%) at 10 µM and is able to posses an IC50. Structures and activities of compounds 2a–2t. Bold values indicates that the compound has a high inhibit rate (%) at 10 μM and is able to posses an IC50.

Binding modes of compound 2h

The results showed that compound 2h bound with H3R through multiple sites (Figure 3). The protonated amine of the pyridine group interacted with Glu206 through a salt bridge. The Tyr-115 and Phe-198 bound to the aromatic ring structural on one side of compound 2h by π–π T-shape interactions. In addition to this, compound 2h also formed hydrophobic interaction, π–sigma and π–alkyl interaction with the protein.
Figure 3.

(a) The predicted binding mode of compound 2h with H3R; (b) the binding pocket of H3R by the surface representation; (c) 2D schematic diagram of potential interactions between compound 2h and H3R.

(a) The predicted binding mode of compound 2h with H3R; (b) the binding pocket of H3R by the surface representation; (c) 2D schematic diagram of potential interactions between compound 2h and H3R.

Conclusions

In this work, two series of iso-flavone derivatives were synthesised and evaluated for their H3R inhibitory activity. Ultimately, we identified compound 1c, 2c, 2h, 2o which possessed favourable H3R inhibitory activity. The structure–activity relationship (SAR) study identified the piperazine group in the 8-position of iso-flavone was essential for the H3R inhibitory activity (compound 2h). Molecular docking showed 2′-methyl piperidine substituent of 2h formed a salt bridge and hydrophobic interactions with the protein. In this paper, we creatively modified the iso-flavone derivatives and determined this scaffold possessing the potential H3R inhibitory activity. Moreover, these results also provided clues for the development of novel H3R antagonists.
  25 in total

Review 1.  Histamine H3 receptor as a drug discovery target.

Authors:  Michael Berlin; Christopher W Boyce; Manuel de Lera Ruiz
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 7.446

2.  Discovery and characterization of 6-{4-[3-(R)-2-methylpyrrolidin-1-yl)propoxy]phenyl}-2H-pyridazin-3-one (CEP-26401, irdabisant): a potent, selective histamine H3 receptor inverse agonist.

Authors:  Robert L Hudkins; Rita Raddatz; Ming Tao; Joanne R Mathiasen; Lisa D Aimone; Nadine C Becknell; Catherine P Prouty; Lars J S Knutsen; Mehran Yazdanian; Gilbert Moachon; Mark A Ator; John P Mallamo; Michael J Marino; Edward R Bacon; Michael Williams
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  Discovery of two clinical histamine H(3) receptor antagonists: trans-N-ethyl-3-fluoro-3-[3-fluoro-4-(pyrrolidinylmethyl)phenyl]cyclobutanecarboxamide (PF-03654746) and trans-3-fluoro-3-[3-fluoro-4-(pyrrolidin-1-ylmethyl)phenyl]-N-(2-methylpropyl)cyclobutanecarboxamide (PF-03654764).

Authors:  Travis T Wager; Betty A Pettersen; Anne W Schmidt; Douglas K Spracklin; Scot Mente; Todd W Butler; Harry Howard; Daniel J Lettiere; David M Rubitski; Diane F Wong; Frank M Nedza; Frederick R Nelson; Hans Rollema; Jeffrey W Raggon; Jiri Aubrecht; Jody K Freeman; John M Marcek; Julie Cianfrogna; Karen W Cook; Larry C James; Linda A Chatman; Philip A Iredale; Michael J Banker; Michael L Homiski; Jennifer B Munzner; Rama Y Chandrasekaran
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  Design, synthesis, biological evaluation, and molecular docking of novel flavones as H3 R inhibitors.

Authors:  Gang Wen; Qian Liu; Huabin Hu; Dongmei Wang; Song Wu
Journal:  Chem Biol Drug Des       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 2.817

5.  Dibasic biphenyl H3 receptor antagonists: Steric tolerance for a lipophilic side chain.

Authors:  Fabrizio Bordi; Silvia Rivara; Elisa Dallaturca; Caterina Carmi; Daniele Pala; Alessio Lodola; Federica Vacondio; Lisa Flammini; Simona Bertoni; Vigilio Ballabeni; Elisabetta Barocelli; Marco Mor
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 6.514

6.  Histamine H3 Inverse Agonist BF 2649 or Antagonist with Partial H4 Agonist Activity Clobenpropit Reduces Amyloid Beta Peptide-Induced Brain Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Ranjana Patnaik; Aruna Sharma; Stephen D Skaper; Dafin F Muresanu; José Vicente Lafuente; Rudy J Castellani; Ala Nozari; Hari S Sharma
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 5.590

7.  Non-imidazole histamine H3 receptor ligands incorporating antiepileptic moieties.

Authors:  Bassem Sadek; Johannes Stephan Schwed; Dhanasekaran Subramanian; Lilia Weizel; Miriam Walter; Abdu Adem; Holger Stark
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 6.514

8.  5-hydroxyindole-2-carboxylic acid amides: novel histamine-3 receptor inverse agonists for the treatment of obesity.

Authors:  Pascale David Pierson; Alec Fettes; Christian Freichel; Silvia Gatti-McArthur; Cornelia Hertel; Jörg Huwyler; Peter Mohr; Toshito Nakagawa; Matthias Nettekoven; Jean-Marc Plancher; Susanne Raab; Hans Richter; Olivier Roche; Rosa María Rodríguez Sarmiento; Monique Schmitt; Franz Schuler; Tadakatsu Takahashi; Sven Taylor; Christoph Ullmer; Ruby Wiegand
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 7.446

9.  Donepezil, an acetylcholine esterase inhibitor, and ABT-239, a histamine H3 receptor antagonist/inverse agonist, require the integrity of brain histamine system to exert biochemical and procognitive effects in the mouse.

Authors:  Gustavo Provensi; Alessia Costa; M Beatrice Passani; Patrizio Blandina
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 5.250

10.  Discovery of novel isoflavone derivatives as AChE/BuChE dual-targeted inhibitors: synthesis, biological evaluation and molecular modelling.

Authors:  Bo Feng; Xinpeng Li; Jie Xia; Song Wu
Journal:  J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 5.051

View more
  2 in total

1.  Flavonoids enhance rod opsin stability, folding, and self-association by directly binding to ligand-free opsin and modulating its conformation.

Authors:  Joseph T Ortega; Tanu Parmar; Beata Jastrzebska
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Substituted Purines as High-Affinity Histamine H3 Receptor Ligands.

Authors:  Christian Espinosa-Bustos; Luisa Leitzbach; Tito Añazco; María J Silva; Andrea Del Campo; Alejandro Castro-Alvarez; Holger Stark; Cristian O Salas
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.